- 62
- 64 007
Evidence Synthesis Ireland
Ireland
Приєднався 27 бер 2019
Healthcare decisions should be based on a synthesis of the global body of evidence rather than relying on the convenient selection of one or more discrete studies. Evidence synthesis methods seek to establish the overall balance of information on a given topic, and are based on identifying, assessing and examining all the available evidence on a given topic to inform health care decisions.
Evidence Synthesis Ireland (ESI) which includes Cochrane Ireland, has a mission to make evidence syntheses more usable in every sense of the word - better designed, conducted and reported, more useable for decision makers and more usable within healthcare policy and clinical practice decision making across the island of Ireland and beyond.
We are building evidence synthesis knowledge, awareness and capacity among the public, healthcare institutions and policymakers, clinicians, and researchers on the island of Ireland.
Evidence Synthesis Ireland (ESI) which includes Cochrane Ireland, has a mission to make evidence syntheses more usable in every sense of the word - better designed, conducted and reported, more useable for decision makers and more usable within healthcare policy and clinical practice decision making across the island of Ireland and beyond.
We are building evidence synthesis knowledge, awareness and capacity among the public, healthcare institutions and policymakers, clinicians, and researchers on the island of Ireland.
Equity, diversity and inclusion in evidence synthesis: how the PRO EDI tool can help
PRO EDI is an initiative led by Trial Forge, Evidence Synthesis Ireland and the Campbell Collaboration to try and make it easier for those doing systematic reviews, especially ones including randomised trials, to explicitly consider equity, diversity and inclusion in their reviews. The initiative benefits from an international advisory group to help us make PRO EDI relevant to all reviews, wherever the reviewers may be based in the world, and whatever the topic of the review. In this webinar the development of the PRO EDI tool is described and the tool itself introduced.
About the speakers
Prof. Shaun Treweek is a health services researcher interested in efficient trial design, particularly around inclusive recruitment and retention & effective presentation of research evidence. He led the development of the NIHR INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework, a tool to help trialists design inclusive trials, PRO EDI, a tool to help systematic reviewers consider equity in their reviews, and PRECIS-2, a tool to match trial design decisions to what the users of the results need.
Clarinda Cerejo is a EUPATI-certified Patient Expert and a Stanford-certified Design Thinker. She serves as an India Ambassador for The Sumaira Foundation, a Board Member of the Global Patient Advocacy Coalition, and a Management Committee of the Rare Disease Research Network.
Ioanna Gkertso is a medical student entering her 4th year at King's College London. She recently completed an intercalated BSc degree in Primary Care and Basic Medical Science, graduating with first-class honors. Throughout her academic journey, Ioanna has shown a strong commitment to both her studies and community.
Hanne Bruhn is a Research Fellow in the Aberdeen Centre for Evaluation at University of Aberdeen, and a Senior Research Fellow at HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Ireland. She is also an HRB-TMRN Research Associate.
About the speakers
Prof. Shaun Treweek is a health services researcher interested in efficient trial design, particularly around inclusive recruitment and retention & effective presentation of research evidence. He led the development of the NIHR INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework, a tool to help trialists design inclusive trials, PRO EDI, a tool to help systematic reviewers consider equity in their reviews, and PRECIS-2, a tool to match trial design decisions to what the users of the results need.
Clarinda Cerejo is a EUPATI-certified Patient Expert and a Stanford-certified Design Thinker. She serves as an India Ambassador for The Sumaira Foundation, a Board Member of the Global Patient Advocacy Coalition, and a Management Committee of the Rare Disease Research Network.
Ioanna Gkertso is a medical student entering her 4th year at King's College London. She recently completed an intercalated BSc degree in Primary Care and Basic Medical Science, graduating with first-class honors. Throughout her academic journey, Ioanna has shown a strong commitment to both her studies and community.
Hanne Bruhn is a Research Fellow in the Aberdeen Centre for Evaluation at University of Aberdeen, and a Senior Research Fellow at HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Ireland. She is also an HRB-TMRN Research Associate.
Переглядів: 123
Відео
Lived experience in living guidelines: Recruiting for diversity
Переглядів 1452 місяці тому
In this webinar, Dr Annie Synnot and Alecia Staines describe how they designed, recruited and supported a consumer / lived experience engagement approach for the Living Evidence for Australian Pregnancy and Postnatal care (LEAPP) guidelines. Together they operationalized what ‘diversity’ meant for these guidelines, and selected a 16-member Consumer Panel with a diversity of pregnancy and postna...
Strengthening evidence synthesis methods through Studies Within a Review (SWAR)
Переглядів 1956 місяців тому
The purpose of the webinar was to provide an overview of Studies Within a Review (SWAR), highlighting their significance in improving systematic review methodologies. It aimed to educate participants on what SWARs are, share practical insights and real-world examples of their benefits, and introduce a new funding scheme to support research in this area. It covered the following areas: Introduct...
How living evidence is rapidly changing the guidelines landscape
Переглядів 1026 місяців тому
Clinical guidelines are invaluable tools in ensuring that patients receive the best available care, however there are many shortcomings associated with traditional guidelines, primarily their risk of becoming outdated as new evidence becomes available, and their inability to adapt to changes in policy and practice. Living guideline methods encompass a dynamic process of updating recommendations...
Integrating the findings of a QES with the findings of a systematic review of effectiveness
Переглядів 787 місяців тому
Integrating the findings of a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) with the findings of a review of intervention effects can offer many insights including potential reasons for variation in intervention outcomes. QES often generate theories and explanations for why and how interventions work from the perspectives of those delivering or using them; by integrating these theories with evidence on ...
Evidence as the start of the conversation @ NICE; from systematic reviews to policy recommendations
Переглядів 728 місяців тому
This webinar was divided into 3 parts: Part 1 - pragmatic reviewing for committee decision making - Evidence is the start of the conversation, • key differences between Cochrane systematic reviews and guideline evidence reviews • prioritising outcomes for decision making • not a stand-alone review - fits into a series of reviews and HE modelling Part 2 - Presenting evidence to a decision making...
The problems with systematic reviews: updates on a living systematic review
Переглядів 3559 місяців тому
This webinar presented an overview of the living systematic review of the problems with systematic reviews (www.systematicreviewlution.com) including its aim, methods and findings. Evidence syntheses are experiencing a boom in production in the academic literature. But despite the developments within guidelines and extensions to improve methodological and reporting quality, there is much eviden...
Cochrane Qualitative Methodological Limitations Tool (CAMELOT)
Переглядів 1610 місяців тому
In this webinar we introduced the Cochrane Qualitative Methodological limitations Tool (CAMELOT). We discussed how it was developed and went through a short example of how it can be applied. Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas, Dr.Philos, is a researcher at Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. She is co-founder of the GRADE-CERQual approach and the TRA...
Get Real! - Ten Reasons to Undertake a Realist Synthesis (Despite What You May Have Heard!)
Переглядів 41711 місяців тому
Realist synthesis occupies a misty research hinterland somewhere between systematic reviews and the much-maligned narrative review. Critics often focus on the “…and then the magic happens” approach that challenges the orthodoxy of systematic reviews. Can a realist synthesis be “systematic” without aspiring to be a systematic review? Where does realist review sit within a toolbox of review appro...
How to search PubMed effectively
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
This 40-minute online training session, hosted by Evidence Synthesis Ireland and presented by Julie Glanville, taught participants techniques for effectively searching PubMed. Julie explained how to find and use Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and demonstrated restricting searches to specific fields, truncation for searching word variations, phrase searching for multi-word concepts, the new pro...
Large Language Models for health and evidence synthesis: can we trust what they say?
Переглядів 386Рік тому
Following the launch of ChatGPT, interest in large language models (LLMs) has grown significantly. Large numbers of new tools, which take advantage of the human-like text generation capabilities of the new ‘generative’ generation of language models, have been released, and there is widespread expectation that ‘AI’ will soon start to undertake tasks that hitherto could only be undertaken by huma...
Evidence Synthesis Ireland - what can we do for you?
Переглядів 87Рік тому
Evidence Synthesis Ireland, which includes Cochrane Ireland, aims to build evidence synthesis knowledge, awareness and capacity among the public, health care institutions and policymakers, clinicians, and researchers on the island of Ireland. We do this through 1) Training & Education; 2) Support & Network; and 3) Research & Innovation. This webinar explored the training programs, webinars and ...
Evidence Aid: Summarising systematic reviews for decision-makers in the humanitarian sector
Переглядів 73Рік тому
The webinar started with an explanation of why and how Evidence Aid was established in 2004, and later became an independent charity in 2015. We discussed why it’s important to summarise systematic reviews in a way that makes them usable for decision-makers in the humanitarian sector, how those summaries are written and how they have evolved over time, and how partnering ensures the evidence we...
Evidence Synthesis Ireland Fellow Ciara O'Meara shares her experience
Переглядів 60Рік тому
Ciara O’Meara is an Evidence Synthesis Ireland (ESI) and Cochrane Ireland Fellow, and a Lecturer in General Nursing at the School of Nursing & Midwifery at the University of Galway. She is working on a Cochrane Systematic Review, Occupational therapy in multiple sclerosis, with her mentor, Dr Sinead Hynes. Here, Ciara shares her experience of being a ESI Fellow, and being mentored on a Cochrane...
Strengthening the Evidence Base for Systematic Reviews: the Role of SWARs
Переглядів 208Рік тому
Studies within a review (SWARs) are a resource-efficient means of improving the methods and design of systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses.
Sharing space at the research table: PPI in an evidence synthesis priority setting partnership
Переглядів 68Рік тому
Sharing space at the research table: PPI in an evidence synthesis priority setting partnership
Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline
Переглядів 1,9 тис.Рік тому
Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline
How to extract, analyze and present data in scoping reviews
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
How to extract, analyze and present data in scoping reviews
The REPRISE project: an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
Переглядів 84Рік тому
The REPRISE project: an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
Are We There Yet? - If, Why, When and How to Update a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis - Andrew Booth
Переглядів 124Рік тому
Are We There Yet? - If, Why, When and How to Update a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis - Andrew Booth
Data sources and searching for Adverse Effects
Переглядів 76Рік тому
Data sources and searching for Adverse Effects
Learn about Evidence Synthesis Ireland and our Study Within A Review Funding Scheme
Переглядів 109Рік тому
Learn about Evidence Synthesis Ireland and our Study Within A Review Funding Scheme
Advances in methods for overviews of reviews
Переглядів 89Рік тому
Advances in methods for overviews of reviews
Sampling primary studies for inclusion in a qualitative evidence synthesis
Переглядів 99Рік тому
Sampling primary studies for inclusion in a qualitative evidence synthesis
Trial Forge Evidence Packs and repackaging systematic reviews
Переглядів 332 роки тому
Trial Forge Evidence Packs and repackaging systematic reviews
Equity, diversity and inclusion in Cochrane and Campbell systematic reviews
Переглядів 1872 роки тому
Equity, diversity and inclusion in Cochrane and Campbell systematic reviews
Success of living systematic reviews for rapid evidence synthesis and surveillance - Rebecca Hodder
Переглядів 1522 роки тому
Success of living systematic reviews for rapid evidence synthesis and surveillance - Rebecca Hodder
An Introduction and Overview of Scoping Reviews - Assoc. Professor Zachary Munn
Переглядів 11 тис.2 роки тому
An Introduction and Overview of Scoping Reviews - Assoc. Professor Zachary Munn
Checklists for the reckless, tools for fools?
Переглядів 2422 роки тому
Checklists for the reckless, tools for fools?
Finding clarity in complexity: an introduction to the concept of network meta-analysis
Переглядів 3,4 тис.2 роки тому
Finding clarity in complexity: an introduction to the concept of network meta-analysis
"Thank you very much for your knowledge."
Beatifully made slides and nice audio! Very interesting to follow. This video is a good example on how to make training videos. Thank you for sharing, you did a great job!! *clap clap*
this is really helpful
Brilliant and most helpful. Thank you!
Thank you very much. This is helpful.
Can I ask about the preparation of the table before jumping to network meta-analysis?
CiNeMA
Thank you, insightful presentation
Amazing! Thank you! Love it!
It's my first time with rapid reviews.
Great job mom!
Fine
Thank you for posting this presentation!
*I’M SO IMPRESSED BY THE INVESTMENT THIS GREAT MAN EVERYONE TALKS ABOUT ON TELEGR’’AM! @BENNYHACK I JUST RECEIVED ANOTHER 6BTC INTO MY WALLET MY WIFE IS SO FILLED WITH JOY AS I CAN CARTER FOR MY FAMILY NEEDS..!!!!*
0:51 chat-adult18.online
Great video! We're doing similar work at Evsynthacademy.org and made an animation about the steps of a Systematic Review here- ua-cam.com/video/-FQSsnaAtOU/v-deo.html Would be fun to compare notes.