Відео

ja das stimmt. Wobei auf 1024x768 Maximum ist es echt noch ziemlich flüssig spielbar. Aber man muss bedenken das ich auch mit einem P4 und 2,6 GHZ System getestet habe. Wenn ich mit einem P4 1.7GHz teste, wird es auf 1024x768 Maximum sehr eng. 1000 MHZ mehr gibt schon einen Boost, insbesondere bei Spiele die 2003 und später rauskamen.

:/

what exactly do you mean i don't understand sry

@@retro4fun358 2:15 look how these guys move 5:37 look how the boat jitters

@@Wujek_Foliarz That's true...i've noticed it too, but i can do nothing... its the effect from the timedemo^^ But it doesn't impact the performance. When I recorded the demo everything was fine

maybe in the future. I know this game its very cool:)

I have changed nothing, i have installed Direct X9. This is due to the graphics card. Geforce 3 Ti does not support Direct X9 or Shader Model 2. Geforce 4 Ti 4200 has the same Problem... If you get a ATi RAdeon 9600 Pro than the Water looks fine (Direct X9 Card). In NFS Most Wanted you have the siliar situation like Half Life 2... if you set Visual Treatman High, you still don't have the full Effect because of the lack of Direct X9.... it looks better than without but its only the half Effect like it should be...

good idea, maybe i will in the future, because its so much work to record so many games for testing or benchmarking. Its really a big Projekt.

The first time i played Morrowind in 640x480 with 10-20 fps with my first Pentium 3 667 MHZ 128 MB SDR Ram and TNT 2 Pro PC^^

I have the GEforce 4 Ti 4200 64 MB. I hope the card will continue to run well until I have finished the videos and the benchmarks

Ich habe die Radeon X740 XL vor 4 Jahren mal gebraucht für ca. 13€ (inklusive Versand) gekauft. Die Karte performt nicht schlecht. Zwar nicht so gut wie eine 6600 Gt aber kann sich trotzdem sehen lassen. Eine X740 XL ist aber nichts anderes als eine X700 Pro mit sehr leicht höherem Speichertakt. Irgendwann werde ich auch Videos zur X700 Pro machen, das könnte dann für Sie interessant werden:)

Allready Done:)

I recorded it using a capture card that I connected to my newest and more powerful PC. I just connected the VGA port of the graphics card to the capture card and connected the capture card to the new PC via USB and recorded with the new PC

@@retro4fun358 Ah, that explains it. Nice results btw. I know nothing about the how to, so this is very informative.

i have recorded this video with my capture card . I have choosen the same resolution as the game. Only 1280x1024 is different and i have choosen 1280x960 but its almost the same . I could record this in 1080 p too but then i would only have 30 fps maximum and the vidoe would be stretched because the game has 4:3 aspect ratio

Its not exactly the same but GTA 3 wasn't really good optimized... I remember that my first PC Pentium 3 667 MHT, 128 MB SDR Ram and TNt 2 Pro couldn't handle this game well even in Low Resolution and details but it was playable. earlier 20 fps was playable^^ nowadays people want 120 FPS or even more.... GTA Vice City runs definetely better than GTA 3

Its not about the music its' about the FPS:) This isn't a music channel by the way I have only put the NFS Hot Pursuit 2 OST here.

@@retro4fun358 The music sucks

@@retro4fun358 music is fine. don't listen to all those screamers :v

compared to whatever Heat & Unbound offered in terms of soundtrack, it's an actual music to my ears

@ The music sucks

The game world is smaller and you can pick up fewer objects than in the first part. The physics also strange. But it's still a solid game, but unfortunately a step backwards compared to part 1.

The leaves of the trees looked really good, as did the water reflections. Unfortunately, the textures look very muddy and the characters don't look good either. But for such a huge open world game, the graphics were OK for the time. Unfortunately, the game is very buggy and has performance problems

yes its not the worst case scenario which I have tested. But the Pentium 4 already limits there... I guess if you have a Dual Core CPU, you will see higher FPS and much less Frame drops

For me its both in one hand its nostalgia becasue of the old games, and on the other hand I became interested in retro hardware because I want to know how the games run with old graphics cards. Since I can only find very few or no videos of many old graphics cards on the Internet and especially on UA-cam, I decided to make such videos myself. My project is big. This is just the beginning^^

Nice:) but i hope you have ordered the right X600 XT because most of this used cards haven't got the real X600 XT clock speed! SO be carfeul. Here are the specs of a real X600 XT www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-x600-xt.c24 Unfortunately this cards aren't cheap because they are rare. If you like the X600 series, I would definitely go for the XT version. This card is noticeably faster than a X600 Pro and can even compete with the Geforce 6600! I'm glad my benchmark videos helped you to buy a X600 XT:) I have spent 20€ with shipping for this card and i was really lucky:)

Definetely not a bad system:) 7600 Gt was a good mainstream card in 2006 and with a Core2Duo its perfect i would say:). But the Geforce 7600 Series had probles with textures... it was blurry and not so sharp as it should be

@retro4fun358 I only had problem with Clear Sky at launch which was a driver issue preventing the game from running, had to wait a bit, I did end up buying a new rig 😂 SoC was running fine from the start

yes haha it's not a well optimized game... but there were games which run more worse than this. Like Boiling Point Road to Hell or GTA San Andreas....

@@retro4fun358 I never liked GTA, I always prefered Mafia, mainly because of I am Czech and Mafia is just our beloved game, but I remember that GTA SA looked really ugly to me and it performed pretty poorly for how it looks, it was just weird port from PS2.

@@Pidalin yes bad Port for the PC in terms of performance. It looks not great but better than PS2 because of the higher Resolation. Everyone benefits from different games. Tastes are different

The 360 came in the end of 2005. Much earlier than PS3. The Sofware is like a Athlon 64 X2 5400+and a GPU that was close to Geforce 7800 GTX. Its of course better than AMD ATlon64 3700+ and a Radeon X600 XT

You were really amazed by Oblivion? That game was ugly already back in the day, especially when you were used to playing FarCry, Half Life 2 and such games that looked much better already few years before. HDR, Bloom and stuff like that was super ugly, but Stalker Shadow of Chernobyl still looks pretty even even now. I play a lot of old games, but I am always shocked how ugly Oblivion is when I try it now and it was ugly already in 2006, Fallout 3 and New Vegas on the same engine were also very ugly, but it was ok for that stylised dark humor visuals, Skyrim was also super ugly in 2011, but there is a massive jump in graphics in Fallout 4, that looks pretty good I would say still with the same engine. BTW, don't take me wrong, I really like Oblivion and I would prefer it over Skyrim, but that game was super ugly. Back to Stalker, even when original stalker can look slightly more outdated now, there was such a big jump in lighting and shadows in Clear Sky that it still looks really good even today.

@Pidalin the HDR in caves when you had a torch and the reflections on armor were amazing. The open world was also amazing, for me it was jaw dropping. Stalker had a lot of issues with my x1950pro indoors the lighting and shadows were amazing but as soon as I went out the fps would drop like crazy and had to drop the fully illuminated settings. Tried many fixes but nothing seemed to work, it was a driver issue maybe but also the game was a mess at launch 🤓. I had it on original disk and I was young, never checked for updates even months after release.