Відео

The tech works and is going to change. Like podcasts it will take the world by storm

How much was you paid for the crap flat out lies you are saying about this product

Be careful, Rossi is a scoundrel who could sell a fake cell phone to a Neapolitan!

i plan on buying this phone as it will be my second, an upgrade from the older blu g33 tracfone, but i plan to use it for gaming social media and texting, no big need for the gps so this is really helpful. Thanks! also the games arent to bad, the worst is probably one of the triple a titles, aka fortnite, but seeing the specs and how well my g33 worked, i think itll do fine. Thanks for this video it really helps out a lot!

I was wondering when I'd stumble upon a NotebookLM video on UA-cam, and here is my first one! It's not bad for this type of content, honestly.

The AI conversation on this video is disturbing

It went 2.7 times further while having more charge on the battery? I don't think so. If it had "gained charge" on the battery it would just keep going not stop 2.7 times after the standard car.

does it have 4g lte call and text feature?

The bass is the Worst on D60, even worse than D50 - fking Disgusting!

Con.

I'll take one 10W for $25; now all we need is 999,999 more curious investors

I bought one because my iphone 12 only has 4gb of ram and the screen is very small! I saw the p50 and got it for the extra ram and larger screen! and it had a decent resolution but i wasn’t aware of processor and that clock speed is important! And even my old iphone 12 has a 3ghz processor. The main issue for me is the processor is only 1.6 ghz. In 2024 its not enough to play more modern or graphic intense games! Might be good for a kid or just for browsing etc. so far the only thing i found it good for is watching youtube.

I have the P50s version, arrived 2 days ago from Temu, and i am extremely happy with it and all the accessories that come with it for that money. I love it 🤩

“Big claims need big proof”? The old Carl Sagan approach to deny evidence that challenges establishment scientists.

There's nothing so sad as a closed mind. I've been following this since 2012. It's real. Retired electrical engineer

Es wird die Welt verändern mit Garantie

Good ole Rossi, miracles since 1974. Still waiting for delivery.

Thanks for your in depth review. I do like the style of your review which was not too technical and most informative

This is Google Notebook LM for the dialog.

If we want to violate the conservation of energy, we need to adjust our system's level perspective to the cosmological level. The method that violates conservation of energy must involve a cosmological level process.   ua-cam.com/video/XZcJem9jZvc/v-deo.html  We need to involve dark energy and the vacuum.  In general relativity, the concept of "conservation of energy" is not directly applicable in the same way as in classical physics because energy is not generally conserved in curved spacetime; instead, the closest equivalent is referred to as the conservation of the stress-energy tensor which represents the distribution of energy, momentum, and stress within spacetime.  Key points about energy conservation in general relativity: No global energy conservation: Due to the curvature of spacetime, there is no globally defined "total energy" that remains constant across a system, meaning energy is not conserved in the same way as in Newtonian mechanics.  Stress-energy tensor: The conservation of energy is expressed through the stress-energy tensor, which is a mathematical object that describes the distribution of energy, momentum, and stress in spacetime.  Local conservation: While global energy conservation may not hold, the stress-energy tensor is locally conserved, meaning that in any infinitesimal region of spacetime, energy is conserved.  Vacuum decay is a process that has cosmological significance and impact.

I rekon why not team up with Elizabeth Holmes, she has a vast amount of experience in this field.

What a lot of BS.

Very curious indeed

An explanation of why energy is not conserved in the universe ua-cam.com/video/wd2Zkxc_HYc/v-deo.html

B&T are you a Audio Overview generated in Google's NotebookLM? I just found out about NotebookLM and the Audio Overview I created sounds exactly like you two. I can see how you could leverage this for your channel with all kinds of product overviews. But I wonder...

Dear youtube, please stop showing me this garbage. I gave it a thumbs down, hoping that your algorithm is paying attention.

There is a complication here called the vacuum catastrophe when trying to make sence of the vacuum energy power density that Rossi thinks that he is tapping into.  According to current understanding, the "correct" value for vacuum energy, relative to the vacuum catastrophe, is significantly smaller than the theoretical value predicted by quantum field theory, with a discrepancy of around 120 orders of magnitude, meaning the observed vacuum energy is vastly lower than what calculations suggest it should be; this huge disparity is what constitutes the "vacuum catastrophe.". This larger predicted value is predicted based on quantum electrodynamics, consistency with the principle of Lorentz covariance and with the magnitude of the Planck constant suggests a much larger value of 10^113 joules per cubic meter.  Key points about the vacuum catastrophe: Theoretical value:  Quantum field theory predicts a much larger vacuum energy density (which is an incorrect assumption) due to zero-point fluctuations, often calculated using the Planck energy scale.  Observed value: Measurements based on cosmological observations show a significantly lower vacuum energy density.  Magnitude of the discrepancy: This difference is considered one of the biggest unsolved problems in physics, with the theoretical value being many orders of magnitude higher than the measured value.  From looking at the way that the power is produced during the EVO life cycle, it looks like that power comes from the electromagnetic field which is how science has come up with the large 10^113 joules per cubic meter value for the power density of the vacuum.  Sabine states that the vacuum energy is not produced by virtual particles, rather it is an inherent property of spacetime as described by general relativity and the expansion rate of the universe.  Here is Sabine's take on the vacuum as follows:  ua-cam.com/video/bl_wGRfbc3w/v-deo.html

ua-cam.com/video/R4v5vCq1kmo/v-deo.htmlsi=RvdMTxMbD8YcYKvz

Regarding: In the case of vacuum decay, does the new vacuum state convert what was in the old vacuum state into energy as seems to be the case when matter is ingested by the EVO during transmutation? What is false vacuum decay False vacuum decay is a quantum field theory process where a metastable (false) vacuum state transforms into a true vacuum state. This process occurs when small localized bubbles of true vacuum form. Here are some details about false vacuum decay: What is a false vacuum? A false vacuum is a locally stable state that is not the most stable possible ground state. What happens during false vacuum decay? The energy released from the Higgs field crashing into a lower energy state pushes the space around it over the barrier, releasing more potential energy. This creates a sphere of the negative vacuum where the Higgs field is not present that grows over time How could false vacuum decay relate to the Big Bang? Some believe that vacuum decay played a central role in the creation of space, time, and matter in the Big Bang. Has false vacuum decay been observed? Yes, physicists have observed false vacuum decay in a ferromagnetic superfluid. The case where particles are absorbed into the EVO as follows In vacuum decay, the new vacuum state essentially converts the energy contained within the old vacuum state into its own form of energy, effectively causing a transformation where the energy is redistributed as the system transitions to a lower energy state; essentially, the difference in energy between the old "false" vacuum and the new "true" vacuum becomes available as energy that can be used to create new particles or manifest in other forms. Key points to remember: False vacuum: The idea of vacuum decay is based on the concept of a "false vacuum," which is a metastable state that, while seemingly stable, is not the lowest possible energy state. This is the state of our universe. True vacuum: This is the state of the negative vacuum inside the EVO. This vacuum state is lower than the false vacuum state. Bubble nucleation: When a "true" vacuum state appears within a false vacuum, it can expand like a bubble, converting the energy of the old vacuum into the new one as it spreads. This is the EVO. Potential consequences: If our universe is currently in a false vacuum state, a vacuum decay event could have drastic consequences, potentially causing the universe to radically change or even destroy all matter as we know it unless the nucleated bubble is unstable and decays. As an example, the underlying assumption is that some process in the very early universe stored energy in a false vacuum state. This energy is then released when the false vacuum state decays. So the decay of the false vacuum state does not create energy, it simply releases energy that was already stored as potential energy in the false vacuum state. A complete accounting of the energy in the universe would have included this potential energy. By analogy, a ball rolling down a hill does not create energy, it simply converts potential energy into kinetic energy - and this potential energy was previously stored in the state of the ball/hill by pushing the ball up the hill in the first place. The case where no particles are absorbed into the EVO upon decay of the true vacuum. In vacuum decay, when a false vacuum transitions to a true vacuum state, the energy difference between the two states is released as energy, essentially converting the "potential energy" stored in the false vacuum into other forms of energy, even though the false vacuum itself might not contain any matter particles; it's the energy density of the vacuum state that changes, not necessarily the presence of matter particles. Key points to remember: The case of no matter conversion: While the transition might appear like matter is converted to energy, in reality, it's the energy stored within the false vacuum state that is released as the system moves to a lower energy state (the true vacuum). Bubble nucleation: The process of vacuum decay is often described as "bubble nucleation," where a small region of space spontaneously transitions to the true vacuum state, and this bubble then expands outward. False vacuum decay is a temporary situation that occurs when a low vacuum state is created (EVO created). Energy from our spacetime is then transfered to the lower vacuum state (EVO). Upon decay of the EVO, energy is transferred back to the previously higher vacuum state (our universe).

Regarding: In the case of vacuum decay, does the new vacuum state convert what was in the old vacuum state into energy as seems to be the case when matter is ingested by the EVO during transmutation? What is false vacuum decay False vacuum decay is a quantum field theory process where a metastable (false) vacuum state transforms into a true vacuum state. This process occurs when small localized bubbles of true vacuum form. Here are some details about false vacuum decay: What is a false vacuum? A false vacuum is a locally stable state that is not the most stable possible ground state. What happens during false vacuum decay? The energy released from the Higgs field crashing into a lower energy state pushes the space around it over the barrier, releasing more potential energy. This creates a sphere of the negative vacuum where the Higgs field is not present that grows over time How could false vacuum decay relate to the Big Bang? Some believe that vacuum decay played a central role in the creation of space, time, and matter in the Big Bang. Has false vacuum decay been observed? Yes, physicists have observed false vacuum decay in a ferromagnetic superfluid. The case where particles are absorbed into the EVO as follows In vacuum decay, the new vacuum state essentially converts the energy contained within the old vacuum state into its own form of energy, effectively causing a transformation where the energy is redistributed as the system transitions to a lower energy state; essentially, the difference in energy between the old "false" vacuum and the new "true" vacuum becomes available as energy that can be used to create new particles or manifest in other forms. Key points to remember: False vacuum: The idea of vacuum decay is based on the concept of a "false vacuum," which is a metastable state that, while seemingly stable, is not the lowest possible energy state. This is the state of our universe. True vacuum: This is the state of the negative vacuum inside the EVO. This vacuum state is lower than the false vacuum state. Bubble nucleation: When a "true" vacuum state appears within a false vacuum, it can expand like a bubble, converting the energy of the old vacuum into the new one as it spreads. This is the EVO. Potential consequences: If our universe is currently in a false vacuum state, a vacuum decay event could have drastic consequences, potentially causing the universe to radically change or even destroy all matter as we know it unless the nucleated bubble is unstable and decays. As an example, the underlying assumption is that some process in the very early universe stored energy in a false vacuum state. This energy is then released when the false vacuum state decays. So the decay of the false vacuum state does not create energy, it simply releases energy that was already stored as potential energy in the false vacuum state. A complete accounting of the energy in the universe would have included this potential energy. By analogy, a ball rolling down a hill does not create energy, it simply converts potential energy into kinetic energy - and this potential energy was previously stored in the state of the ball/hill by pushing the ball up the hill in the first place. The case where no particles are absorbed into the EVO upon decay of the true vacuum. In vacuum decay, when a false vacuum transitions to a true vacuum state, the energy difference between the two states is released as energy, essentially converting the "potential energy" stored in the false vacuum into other forms of energy, even though the false vacuum itself might not contain any matter particles; it's the energy density of the vacuum state that changes, not necessarily the presence of matter particles. Key points to remember: The case of no matter conversion: While the transition might appear like matter is converted to energy, in reality, it's the energy stored within the false vacuum state that is released as the system moves to a lower energy state (the true vacuum). Bubble nucleation: The process of vacuum decay is often described as "bubble nucleation," where a small region of space spontaneously transitions to the true vacuum state, and this bubble then expands outward. False vacuum decay is a temporary situation that occurs when a low vacuum state is created (EVO created). Energy from our spacetime is then transfered to the lower vacuum state (EVO). Upon decay of the EVO, energy is transferred back to the previously higher vacuum state (our universe).

Hahhahah ..... Roll On Floor Laughing .... they said : "it went 2.7 times further then the other twizzy and at the same time gained energy" ... so why did it not go further ? -------> BECAUSE IT IS A FRAUD ! ! ! There is nothing like a free energy converter / mashine or whatever you call it ... stop being naive and believing anything just because two moderators present it like it was a true and real thing !

Rossi states that his system derives its energy from zero point energy What Rossi is saying in his theory paper is that he is extracting energy out of these virtual particles to the tune of many kilowatts per hour. In theory, it is possible to calculate the energy involved in the production of virtual particles within a limited volume of space using the principles of quantum field theory, although the calculations can be quite complex and often involve advanced mathematical techniques like renormalization to handle infinities that arise from summing over all possible virtual particle interactions within a given volume; this is often referred to as "vacuum energy density" in the context of quantum field theory. Key points to remember about virtual particles and energy calculations: Quantum fluctuations: Virtual particles arise from quantum fluctuations in the underlying quantum fields, meaning they can momentarily appear and disappear in pairs due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Limited lifetime: These particles exist for a very short time, and their energy is not precisely defined due to the uncertainty principle, which allows them to violate energy conservation temporarily. Feynman diagrams: To calculate the energy associated with virtual particles, physicists use Feynman diagrams, which represent the interactions between particles as visual diagrams and allow for the calculation of probabilities and amplitudes of these interactions. Challenges in calculating virtual particle energy: Infinite sums: Directly summing over all possible virtual particle interactions in a given volume can lead to mathematically infinite results. Renormalization: To address this issue, physicists use a technique called renormalization, where only the relevant "observable" differences in energy are considered, effectively "subtracting out" the infinite parts. Example application: Casimir effect: One observable phenomenon related to virtual particle energy is the Casimir effect, where the fluctuations of virtual particles between two closely spaced plates can result in a measurable attractive force. This effect can be calculated using quantum field theory and provides experimental evidence for the concept of vacuum energy associated with virtual particles. The vacuum energy density of space, according to recent measurements, is approximately 5.96 x 10^-27 kilograms per cubic meter which translates to roughly 5.36 x 10^-10 Joules per cubic meter. Explanation: Units: "Vacuum energy density" is measured in units of energy per unit volume, like Joules per cubic meter (J/m^3). Current understanding: Based on observations, the vacuum energy density is believed to be a significant component of the universe's energy density, contributing to the accelerating expansion of space. To produce a constant rate of energy production of 3 kilowatts, you would need 3,000 joules of energy per second. Explanation: 1 kilowatt is equal to 1,000 watts. 1 watt is equal to 1 joule per second. Therefore, 3 kilowatts is equal to 3,000 watts, which translates to 3,000 joules per second. Key point: While "joules" measure energy, "watts" measure the rate at which energy is transferred, meaning "joules per second" represents the power level. The amount of space carrying energy from the vacuum required to supply a constant rate of power production from vacuum energy at its source is 3,000 joules/5.36 x 10^-10 Joules per cubic meter or (3) (10^13)/ 5.36 Or approximately (10^13) cubic meters of space would be removed of virtual particles per second to supply 3 kilowatts of power. What happens if the NGU is configured to generate megawatts of power? If science made this calculation, what is the implication of this calculation with regards to the claim that the NGU extracts it energy from vacuum zero point energy? ---------------------------------------------------------------- When 1 gram of matter is completely converted into energy, it generates approximately 9 x 10^13 Joules of energy. Explanation: This is calculated using the famous Einstein equation E=mc^2, where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. Mass (m): 1 gram = 0.001 kilograms Speed of light (c): 3 x 10^8 meters per second Calculation: E = (0.001 kg) * (3 x 10^8 m/s)^2 = 9 x 10^13 Joules Key point: This is a massive amount of energy, which is why nuclear reactions that convert a small amount of mass into energy can release such tremendous power. Since Rossi does not report any loss of mass or any other signs of nuclear activity and since mass is just an excitation of quantum fields (particles) present in spacetime that is moderated by the Higgs field as the source of mass, then If spacetime comprised of all quantum fields is converted to energy, we should get the same amount of energy from space time annihilation as if that space time held mass. The Sen's conjecture in string theory?

When they get the Nobel prize I will check it out 😂

I am concerned that the NGU might well be seen as a "Perpetual Motion Devices", more so because the status as an understandable and comprehensible green energy system is worth a 30% tax credit on both the cost of the hardware and installation of the NGU system will not be authorized by science.  The LENR reaction expresses itself in two separate and distinct areas: energy production and transmutation. Energy production might be explained in terms of current science theories, but the scientific explanation of transmutation involves science that has not been considered. Discussing these speculative transmutation conjectures is certain to generate incredulity in current science. It is best to stay away from transmutation in any discussion of its science.

What does Rossi mean when he says that reversing entropy is the process that produces energy in his system. What is entropy. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy Entropy is a scientific concept that is most commonly associated with a state of disorder, randomness, or uncertainty. Entropy of an isolated system left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease with time. As a result, isolated systems evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, where the entropy is highest. When the BEC grows, the bosonic electrons are formed into a coherent aggregation when all the particles in the BEC are identical, a situation which has far less entropy than non aggregated electrons and photons. I think that Rossi considers this BEC formation process as a reduction of entropy. Rossi states in his theory "In this highly ordered, low entropy, hypothetical structure the Coulomb repulsion is balanced by the magnetic force FL in agreement with (6). In section 2.3 we will propose a Lagrangian for N interacting charged particles that suggests the possible existence of these coherent states." Rossi et al does not understand how a BEC is formed. The BEC equation for Bose Einstein Condensation is named "generalised Gross-Pitaevskii equation". There is no need to reinvent the wheel. See Pitaevskii_equation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross%E2%80%93Pitaevskii_equation Rossi has two types of information in this theory paper. The first type come from experimental observation. This type includes Bose-Einstein Condensate,Casimir eect, charge clusters, collective eects, ElectrumValidum (EVO), geometric phase coherence, long range interactions, low entropy aggregates, pico-metric structures. Then in order to envelope his theory in an explanation of how energy comes from Zero Point Energy (ZPE) he introduces other types of concepts to support the ZPE thesis that include Aharonov-Bohm eect, Anomalous Heat Eect, Darwin Lagrangian, electron model, , Electron Energy Distribution Function (EEDF), relativistic interaction Lagrangian, vector potential, Zitterbewegung electron model. In order to support his ZPE theory of energy production Rossi invents concepts and proofs that are not supported by the standard model and accepted by science in general. Rossi uses the same old time warn ZPE power generation mythology that is used by almost all overunity power generation theories that have come into common use over the years. The power production of the Reaction comes from the natural grouth of the EVO and its eventual distruction due to instability. There is a proper vacuum based power generation process that has come into fashion in science in the last 10 years which supports how the EVO grows over time and eventual terminates. That process is vacuum decay.

If this thing is for real they're definitely coming for that guy's head . He better have a Is super back up plan or he's not going to last for a very long .

Suspicious Inconsistency [01:05 in video]: The battery of the car with the "Ecat" actually gained charge during the race, but it went only 2.7 times farther than the car without the "Ecat". So the "Ecat" car had more energy at the end of the race then at the beginning. So, WHY did the "Ecat" car stop at all? That is literally a "perpetual motion machine". Why didn't they just keep driving the "Ecat" car around the track repeatedly, without stopping, for thousands of miles, until its tires were warn down to the rims? If the "Ecat" car was actually gaining energy as it drove, then it should have been able to drive forever. Stopping the "Ecat" after it went only 2.7 times farther doesn't prove anything; it could have had a hidden extra battery.

Someone needs to do a review on blu G64 phone.

2.7 miles, THEN stops. Now do it at night. Overcast. Cold. Etc. Doesn't change basic physics.

I am asking the engineer who developed the EV drone if he might be interested in configuring a drone power supply that can show long duration hovering far beyond what any battery could provide. Do you think that such a demo would advance the credibility of the ECAT.

I am interested in the LENR reaction to get a preview of what science would be like in one hundred or two years from now. Yes, I like for science fiction to become real. Rossi seemed to be the first best hope of getting science interested in the LENR reaction because it is important to know how one heat his home and what makes his car go. And there is a lot of money involved in the things that the LENR reaction can do, and making money is an excellent motivator. It is not only what Rossi tech can do but all the other applications of the reaction that will be enabled over time. Like the laser and the transistor, these inventions started small but over the years they created applications that were unimaginable then. These inventions make the world real to what science fiction predicted would happen only a few years ago. Now that Rossi has taken the first small step for mankind to make the reaction real to people, let us hope that the next steps will follow... industrialization, commercial product development, and ubiquitous use in everyday life. These next steps will turn the reaction loose on the world. Like the old science fiction mantra someday made real: they strode like gods across the stars.

AI rubbish video

Like to see the thumbs down count on this drivel

Lol. The Temu ads add the magic you need.

I don't know why people don't have respect for Rabbits and their holes. People should just stop going down them, It's like worms and opening the can!.

So it keeps charging yet it only did 2 more laps? You might as well just add a solar panel for the same result.

More B.S.???

*The Feds have a Jail cell waiting for these guys. Total Scam!*

This is utter bullshit. It would break the laws of thermodynamics and last I heard, no one has yet. This is one step beyond the legendary perpetual motion machine.

I want to show you what the core of Rossi's reactor might look like. The first video shows an experiment that was intended to replicate the SAFIRE system that was called VEGA. The Video shows in slow motion at 36 seconds in the bosenova of the EVOs produced by the reaction in slow motion. Run the video at .25 speed to see more details of the bosenova explosions. The popping sounds that you hear come from an AM radio tuned between stations to pick up the radio waves that are being produced by the bosenova explosions. ua-cam.com/video/0VuO7iYzyT8/v-deo.html The second video comes from Rossi's demo of his first micro computer that he called "QUARKX" or "QX". You see on the scope the signals that were produced which includes both the pumping RF signal and interspersed voltage spikes produced by the exploding EVOs. You first see on the scope and the reactor the initiating fast rising spark, then a 3 second pumping signal with the interspersed EVO bosenova voltage spikes. The power cycle is 8.3 seconds long but a lot of the cycle is not pumped so that the reactor could run at 20% of maximum power. ua-cam.com/video/wS7ge56CNhw/v-deo.html