Відео

Your comment just shows how subjective perception can be. Lots of people, including myself, find er flat and void, you find her lively and radiant.

The body may be built for modern stuff but not classical ballet. Classical ballet begins with classical body proportions, and ends with classical poses. If you don't know how classical proportions look, walk into a museum and look at paintings and statues from classical periods, those periods are called classical for a reason.

In these times she is the right proportion for classical ballet it develops like everything else

@@tomcooper3286 Nope. It's the "right" proportions only for certain AD's enamoured of beanpoles with protruding rib cages, which you would know had you looked at other classical ballet companies, who select dancers with classical body proportions. No, such unclassical proportions can't be "developed" , there aren't magic pills to make limbs grow at the expense of other parts of the body. It's genetics.

Then honestly classical ballet isn't for you. Don't try harder.

@@arepo You don’t get to tell anybody an art form isn’t for them lol. 2 years and I haven’t gone anywhere lol

@@joshcrittendon9416 I get, and I do. But if you want to waste your time further, you may continue to try to go nowhere.

@@arepo Girl, you aren’t the gatekeeper of classical ballet. Please go drink some water and touch some grass.

​@@joshcrittendon9416 Boy, you aren't either. This is a public forum, everybody is allowed to comment, just in case it has escaped your notice. You are not on your private turf here. Take it easy with that grass, it must have messed up your perception...

Зависть

A lot of... generalities? Her style is already as contrived as it gets, and it is already a freak show, or do you believe Coralli, Perrot, or Petipa have put the hyperextensions in the choreography? Nope, it's not classical. You obviously don't know what classical is. You can't even spell Struchkova's name properly. The best diagonal since hers? What, have you seen all? Must be thousands on youtube.

@@arepo Very few foreigners are able to spell Slavic names which is not a tragedy and not the end of the world. Many may not be technical in their expressions when they describe ballet. However, all appreciate it. If you choose to hate a ballerina, at least have boundaries which are not to be crossed. And most certainly do not insinuate online that other people are stupid.

@@lila2986 You confuse knowledge of the proper Romantic style & criticism with hate, but why should I wonder? You also confuse irony and plain common sense with hate. Perhaps you, as did Christopher, have seen all diagonals since Struchkova's used to to hers in the 1950's and after comparing them in your mind, have come to the happy conclusion Skorik's is best, whatever "best" means to you? (hint: ranking using superlatives is tabloid language) That's a lot of diagonals, don't you think so? Computers are nothing next to your mind...

Your reply is very much appreciated. Let's hope she's pappier now and love ballet much better.

Valeria Martynyuk.When Tereshkina and Martynyuk danced this, BI became pure perfection.

Yes, she is!

I can be wrong but she looks so unhappy 😞

She's probably not unhappy.She loves the art.

She always looks so sad and tired. Lifeless, emotionless dancing. This was not the life she chose for herself i guess.

I feel that she improved a whole lot technically, and became a whole lot more confident. However, she's still 1. Extremely emotionless, or rather one dimensional in her dancing - it's as if they tell her, 'so you're going to dance Odette, so put on a sad face and do your steps', or 'so this is Aurora, so just smile to the audience and do the steps'. She puts absolutely nothing personal, or deep in her interpretations, which makes her boring to watch IMO. 2. A bit stiff. Kirov ballerinas used to be known for their gliding through the stage ability, you know, Sizova-Mezentseva-Makarova-Makhalina-Lopatkina-Zakharova-Somova-Tereshkina... I'm not saying Skorik is still as robotic as she was in 2013, but our minds are constantly working through comparisons, and i can't help but think people are paying the same to see her... And to see Tereshkina or Novikova. Because the quality of movement is not the same. And she has the lines... But i'm still hoping to see her using them to create beautiful movement, not only beautiful static images... That would be the difference between a soloist in a small German company, and a Mariinsky prima ballerina.

She'll get better and better,amazing!!!

+Calvin Wong Really???? Hm... I thought she wouldn't go further

+Matthew Brehm But there's still that lifeless and really creepy smile that's giving me the heebie-jeebies. I think she's trying to show Giselle here, but she looks more like a psychopathic girl. I'm not trying to insult her, but she could try to build more emotion.

+silver_cupcake Therefore, I think she could have gotten more training as a corps dancer. She was promoted too quickly to build technique and emotion.

+Matthew Brehm A good principal dancer is very expressive and shows emotion to fit the character they are dancing as. Oksana tries to show emotion, but it's very poor and doesn't fit the character. It's always that same smile when playing any role with that sweet girl look. She's trying to look innocent and convince Albrecht.

I guess it might stay this way. We have our own disagreements. I'm not really saying that I'm right though.

I like her in all the roles.👍💕

I agree. people talk so much about her lack of emotion but as a soloist myself I see how very expressive she is with her arms and her epaulment. it may not be in the face but she used her outstanding abilities to convey an even deeper artistry than just facial expression. I love oksana!!!

No. She has good feet and extensions, but she is nowhere near the artistic level of Zakharova.

And ballet is not about feet and extensions. It is about telling a story, and making the audience feel something. Not just moving your feet

Oksana Will be legendary one day!

I would say she is even better than Zakharova. Skorik's artistry is breathtaking.

If she keeps her love for the art and works hard, she can be better.

staslurik Nice joke, lol :)

Stas Lurik They're one of the highest level companies for sure.

+natalie vaganovafan she fits in nothing alas

She fits in more and more roles these days.

+pediatrapaola please shut up

Kim Drescher are you a fan of her ? good enjoy her awful dancing and respect opinions of others ,

+pediatrapaola fan or not ... I don't have to respect your constant onslaught of diatribe ... You bore me, go away.