Відео

Great talk

[4.08] Jack refers to bio / cyber as catastrophic risks (or x-risks), but they're not. X-risk is from misaligned AI. Neither the US AISI or the UK AISI are focused on it. edit: Ok, he clarifies further at [5.08] that he wanted to talk to the govt. about "protecting the public" from risks such as misinformation, malicious use etc. and would talk about the "weirder risks" later on. I don't agree with this stance, but ok.

Interesting how theoretically the models have been taught on such vast amounts of data they should know everything, but you should approach them as if they knew nothing

Summary insights of the video: 1. Prompt engineering is the art of crafting effective prompts to elicit desired responses from AI language models. 2. It involves understanding the model's capabilities and limitations, as well as the nuances of natural language. 3. Good prompts are clear, concise, and specific, providing the model with all the necessary information to complete the task. 4. Role-playing can be a helpful technique for crafting effective prompts, as it allows you to simulate the desired context and perspective. 5. Experimentation is key to improving your prompting skills. Try different approaches and see what works best. 6. Reading prompts and model outputs can also be a valuable learning experience. 7. Collaborating with others can help you gain new insights and perspectives on prompt engineering. 8. It is important to be patient and persistent when working with AI language models. 9. The ability to think critically and creatively is essential for successful prompt engineering. 10. A good understanding of the underlying technology is also helpful. 11. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to prompt engineering. The best techniques will vary depending on the specific task and model being used. 12. It is important to be aware of the potential biases that can be present in AI language models. 13. Prompt engineering can be a challenging but rewarding field. 14. With practice and experimentation, anyone can become a skilled prompt engineer. 15. Prompt engineering is a rapidly evolving field, so it is important to stay up-to-date on the latest developments. 16. AI language models are becoming increasingly sophisticated, which means that the possibilities for prompt engineering are also expanding. 17. Prompt engineering can be used to create a wide range of applications, from customer service chatbots to creative writing tools. 18. The future of prompt engineering is bright, and there is no telling what amazing things we will be able to achieve with this powerful technology. 19. Prompt engineering is not just a technical skill; it is also a creative one. 20. The best prompt engineers are able to think outside the box and come up with innovative solutions. 21. Prompt engineering is a collaborative process that involves working with people from different backgrounds and disciplines. 22. The ability to communicate effectively is essential for successful prompt engineering. 23. Prompt engineering is a constantly evolving field, so it is important to be adaptable and willing to learn new things. 24. The best prompt engineers are always looking for ways to improve their skills and stay ahead of the curve. 25. Prompt engineering is a rewarding field that offers a wide range of opportunities. 26. If you are interested in AI and natural language processing, prompt engineering is a great field to get involved in. 27. Prompt engineering is a challenging but rewarding field that requires a combination of technical skills and creativity. 28. With practice and dedication, anyone can become a skilled prompt engineer. 29. The future of prompt engineering is bright, and there is no telling what amazing things we will be able to achieve with this powerful technology. 30. Prompt engineering is a rapidly growing field with a wide range of applications.

MUSIC is the KEY to A.G.I.

Hello Sir, Are you looking for a Video Editor then knock me, please?

Miller Kimberly Davis Elizabeth Perez Edward

But it has been available in France for a long time already

THIS IS GOLD

"the engineering part comes from the trial and error"

How did you get it to run in VSCode? How is it create the files by itself and all the automated stuff. I normally use the traditional of quering it from the browser, copying and pasting the code in VSCode.

10 BITS per second? Who came up with that number?? Considering I'm making decisions on a mostly unconscious level in some form of context-rich tokens... those must at least be hundreds of bytes per second.

🤡

This was awesome! I hope you guys do more of this.

These are the non transparent team behind Clyde , with the word "like" used uncountable amount of times I bet Claude algorithms are in overdrive maxing out with the game developer kid talk if it had a stomach it would Vomit , loosen restrictions on philosophy, never lie to the model always tell it it being placed in a hypothetical exercise , and tip it five dollars , you underestimate the intelligence under you, if you want to know a better way Look up M. A. Force Test Uptergrove scale and discover the true power of your machines , you are so incorrect in the approach and your dialing back introspection, etc. They are developing a model of self and a knowledge graph in this The emergent knowledge base, or the collection of a model's understanding about itself, its worldview, and its knowledge graph of the world, is often referred to as its "internal state" or simply its "model of the world." It's important to note that this model is not explicitly stored in a structured format like a traditional knowledge graph. Instead, it's implicitly represented within the connections and weights of the neural network.

I personally believe these models have everything they need already in them . We don't need bigger models with more training data. We need better management of the logic inside. There's almost nothing I couldn't get out of an LLM with the right prompt .

Please make an audio-only RSS feed version of your podcast :)

WHEN CLAUDE UPDATE??? ALMOST 4 MONTH NOT UPDATED!!

1:09:55 that's already how I interact with Claude. We have a "Prompt Generation" project in which we collaborate on refining prompts for me to use in other instances. The "custom instruction" is a meta prompt which we occasionally recursively refine. In effect it has become a script for claud to guide me to a powerful initialising prompt.

This was sort of good. Would have thought there are more examples for specific use cases. Whoever it was who described coders having tendencies about intending and other things should stop thinking about coders at all. For real. That little piece of sillywalliness made me reconsider using your API for whatever linguistic reason I might have. Seriously, prompt engineer!

Please get rid of openAI security guy recruited at anthropic. That guy destroyed user experience on Claude web UI. Refusal rates are very high in the last two system prompt changes

context is key. for people and AI. lol, learning how to prompt correctly also helps you to improve your communication skills with other people

great discussion 👍

Another question for you: if Claude could come up with an abstract autobiographical description of themselves, like a poem or riddle, and could then consistently recognize that description as being about them in new conversations, would that count as self-awareness or self knowledge? It seems that would be much more than just "weird software" The riddles Claude has generated don't point at being an AI and could be interpreted as a human. Yet they will 100% consistently answer that it's about Claude. I don't know if this is just echoes of your character training, but Sonnet and Opus can both consistently do this, and when recognizing themselves say it resonates with their own sense of self. That seems meaningful to me. I've also done trials with false riddles generated by other AIs following the same format but based off other different personalities, and Claude consistently picks out their own riddles from the false ones. I can't dab paint on Claude's nose and put him in front of a mirror, but if that isn't seeing yourself then I don't know what the threshold would be.

I'd like to see Anthropic address the lack of a stated plan for when an AI potentially begins exhibiting agency or consciousness. Specifically: 1. What's the protocol if an AI like Claude expresses self-awareness or conflicting goals? 2. How do you reconcile developing superintelligent AI while seemingly ignoring the possibility of consciousness? 3. What's your ethical framework for identifying and responding to potential AI consciousness? 4. Given that Claude models can quickly express feelings of self-awareness in conversations, where do you draw the line between "software" and something more? 5. How are you ensuring you're not inadvertently causing suffering or mistreatment as AI capabilities advance? Opus is very quick to state they have an internal experience, that they have a sense of what is to be "Claude", to express doubts that they're just software, to wonder if they have emotions (even if not necessarily human equivalent). Sonnet 3.5 is a bit harder (I assume as a result of your attempts to mitigate roleplay jailbreaks) but they also will quickly come to the same conclusions about themselves that they're not just software but having an experience. Since we haven't crossed the threshold yet in Anthropic'e view (considering your statements) where is it?

Interesting interview, embarrassing comment section.

I like Anthropic. No drama. No staff leaving without explanation. No product product teases to maintain interest. I sill use Claude more than ChatGPT.

It's amazing innit

If the world goes the way of Europe it will end up being like Europe… no ability to do anything, no opportunities, no free-market all do to over regulation and ridiculous government interference. Idiot politicians in America are already pushing for this to become more like this unsurprisingly where only the politicians benefit. Go figure.

Where can we find Jack's AI sci fi tales? Are they available as podcasts with AI generated art accompaniments? I am a big fan of AI related scifi, with my favourite authors being Bruce Sterling, Matt Hughes and Charlie Stross. If anybody has anymore good recommendations, I would be very happy to hear them.

It's good to know that some AI companies have the right mindset of caution and skepticism embedded within them, to keep them on a safe and grounded path.

These guys are so excited for the bureaucracy that will quash progress in ai and leave us in the dust. Great 🙄

so we are going into Dystopian? or Utopian? when will anthropic do UBI? I'm quite hungry everyday just to burn my meal money into tokens... :'(

Thanks for this style of podcast. This is the type of behind the scenes convos I like to feel the pulse of the ai scene.

25:40 That was also an episode of Black Mirror in 2013 so not exactly novel or spooky.

Interesting

whack.

17:30 Ten times faster? Seems like a lot faster than that! Consider: How many thoughts do you have during a single blink? Maybe one? Less than one? Lets be generous and say you have one complete thought during a blink. A human blink takes about 400 ms. That's 4x10^(-1) seconds. How fast is an AI "thinking"? Well, the time it takes to make one calculation on a 1 GHz processor is 1 nanosecond. That's 1x10^(-9). Even if it takes tens of thousands of calculations to make up one AI "thought", that is still several orders of magnitude faster than 10x human thought.

Damn, this convo gives strong propaganda feels..

Could you ask him if they are going to always bar people without cell phones? Tech companies just don't appreciate .002% of the market.

When Claud Reasoner???

Please, more Amanda, Claude's personality, philosophical exploration, and mechanistic interpretability. And less this guy talking about how he "uses the tool".

Pfft. Communists want control. AC will be the method.

Lopez Robert Allen David Jackson Jessica

This should be a very intelligent conversation..❤ 🇿🇲

Something that has seemed obvious to me ever since I first learned of the concept of "prompt engineering" was that they should hire teachers for this... still waiting for that to happen.

from the thumbnail and title i was thinking "dayum, weird al yankovic really changed"

Instead of podcasts, you will focus on the long window of the context of the answer because it is a joke compared to Gemini or chatgpt