Відео

Your spreadsheet demonstrates a lack of understanding of tax law and financial accounting. Both your company and the customer were never eligible to claim an R&D credit for the same $500,000. The changes to Section 174 were implemented to put an end to this form of income tax evasion (not avoidance) by one party or the other. Unfortunately, the changes to Section 174 were not thought through and this knee-jerk reactionism has stifled innovation. As it stands, any contract which either leaves the contractor company performing the R&D with either full or partial ownership of the resulting work or facing financial risk is the party that MUST amortize the expenses. The changes in tax law have left the door open to both parties being forced to amortize the R&D expenses in the case of shared ownership and/or financial risk. The projections for consistent growth are unrealistic because the business will not have the financial reserves needed to grow new business after paying taxes on FICTITIOUS PROFIT of $900,000. The result for small businesses which perform R&D is the possibility of bankruptcy due to owing taxes on "profits" that appear only on paper and having insufficient funds to pay the taxes due and no ability to borrow the money. Even if the R&D investment produces no useful output or the useful life of a product resulting from the R&D turns out to be only two years the full value must be amortized over the entire five year period. That this policy was enacted into law proves just how stupid the members of Congress who voted for it truly are.

This was an amendment to a tax cut bill. I wonder who got 174 squeezed in?

Wow! 10 minutes in man I am amazed how simply you are saying things that is so understandable.

SECTION 174 is anti constititoional because it goes against article 1 section8 clause 8 of the U.S. constition. : [The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. Inventors can't benefit from this clause because most of us wont be able to reach it due to Section 174.

this Sec 174 is like your own mother forcing you to pay rent for all 9 months that you were in her tummy developing and also you have to pay for food she gave you plus usage of the umbilical cord. then when you are born she increases the rent and charges you for depreciation on her life. this is outright crazy and morally destructive for inventors.

the tax writers knew exactly what they were doing in 2017 when they put this in place. They needed something to make make the TCJA look like wasn't going to create a huge deficit. To make that math work, they picked 174. It was never intended to go into place but failure by congress allowed it to go into effect.

This is insane! Just created my company in the US, now I'm considering starting up somewhere else.

Land of the free, am I right? Can you elaborate on who benefits from this and how?

'promosm'

Ah also, good video

I still have to finsh the video, but my biggest question is, are you wearing pajamas?

I am learning UX design. Your video is concise yet informative. Thanks for sharing

Very well explained , clear and concise , crisp

this has satisfied my curiosity for today, thank you :)

You can also use fun retrospective formats! We love www.teamretro.com/choose-your-retrospective-template

This intro about django multiligual web app is the most perfect one i've seen so far. Wonderful job!!

🅿🆁🅾🅼🅾🆂🅼

Wow, this is great and simply explained. Very easy to understand. Thanks🙏🏽

Such a helpful video.. Great video

great job🙂🙂

🙏🙏💕

Great talk, as a budding Django developer, I got a lot of value out of this, would love to see/hear more of Wesley Kendall :)

Thanks Rudy!

2 comments in 2 years? For such a good stuff. Such an empty world of internet.

Great talk, learnt a ton of things.

Thank you

Simple and clear. Thanks

Helpful, thank you :)

Honestly I didn't really feel like pytest made things easier or cleaner in the examples you have given, so I'm going to stick with the default django test system :)

Can't wait to be approached in Ruggles by virtual Jehovah's Witness

Can you help regarding this issue? stackoverflow.com/questions/65898776/how-to-get-postgress-username-in-pghistory-event-table-using-django-pghistory

Here is the link to save you some typing - github.com/wesleykendall/pytest-django-tutorial

Good talk! I wish questions were audible.

Good talk, but I would love to see how authentication and authorization could be implemented.

Escaldando na gringa em! hehe parabéns.

github.com/wesleykendall/pytest-django-tutorial

This was great! Thanks! 🙏

Channels sucks!!

Wow.....

that was usefull, thank you

I have been using PysTest for quite sometime now and I gotta say I love the flexibility it gives me while writing my test.

Believed in PyTest :)

Hi, thank you for your video and explanations, pretty clear. I am building a website for a non profit organization and I need to support English and Brazilian Portuguese, so I watched a lot of tutorials and read the Django docs a bunch and got through the whole process you talked about. Now the next challenge for me is be able to translate the data coming from the database, people will be adding data on weekly basis. I found this library "pypi.org/project/django-database-translation/" , but I'm a bit skeptical to use it. Do you have any advice there?

please help i can't deploy channels i am stuck for days

Amazing talk, clear and full of useful information! Thank you so much!

Amazing 😍 Thank you!

Thank Gil and Liam! It was a really interesting talk!

Thank you SO MUCH for that NGINX configuration part. I was scratching my head over that bit for ages.

Thank you!!

Also. If you'd like me to send you some of Grey's coffee syrup (which seems to be better than Autocrat), I can do that.