Відео

You are welcome and thanks for the view.

You are welcome and more to come.

Thanks for the view. There are some tricks to help with the M60s that you will see in the upcoming video plays.

Thanks for the view. It still has the complexity with more details added. You will see some of this in the playthroughs.

@@campsawyerLooking forward to watching it, I got my @ss kick so many times playing this games 35+ years ago 😂

Thanks for the view. I have played a lot of them as well but now I am filming the playthroughs. Lot s of good detail.

Thanks for the view and apologies for the wrong canvas dimensions. This was due to a prior short video editing. The next one will be better.

Pardon my asking, but what screen recording software do you use? Looking forward to more videos!

Thanks for the video. I too am awaiting MBT to have some more older tank models included. It starts with the M60A3 TTS model. I would like to see older ones but that might not come until IDF and that might be a maybe.

I initially though of waiting and I believe I point out a location, but I could not wait and opened up at a longer range.

@@campsawyer it's not clear to me that the soviets could ever win, however, because the american force is vastly superior. cover gives the soviets about a 2-1 advantage, but the american force is 4x as big. thus, as soon as any soviet unit shoots, the americans can just obliterate it. then it's a question of who gets 5 hits first, advantage to americans. anyway, just an introductory scenario

@@victorfinberg8595 They can win with the Firefight II rules that I used and a little more luck. I did not play this way as I wanted to use typical setup that one might use. Think in more of a ambush attack and check the lines of attack.

You are correct. I should have pulled out my old thread.😀

Thanks for the view. For the Americans, they are using the M60A1's which had a slightly inferior gun for this time. M60A3's had the better gun that could get the kill over 1.5 km. I believe the T-62's are off with there stats compared to other data and MBT.

Thanks for the view. I agree nice little scenario and I am told its main function was to show the lethality of modern weapons.

Thanks for the view and the correction. I noticed this after all created and posted. Will make sure I get the VC's right on the next one.

Thanks for the view. There is not much difference with the game just some of the extras that the consumer version gets that are not need with the army version.

Smoke is available in later scenarios.

Thanks for the view. There is smoke for off board artillery and it one item that is missing with the tanks. We will see this in MBT.

Yes, MBT has a lot more as we will see.

Thanks for the view and comment. I am looking forward to this comparison as there is so many similarities with the games it should prove interesting.

Thanks for the view. I am glad you are seeing the same thing I am. The older SPI were not all encompassing as todays, but both have a value.

Thanks for the view. Glad you enjoyed it.

Thanks for the view. Yes more to come.

Thanks for the view.

Thanks for the view.

Hey Hexy, nothing special with this first one on Opp fire. It will be a choice between direct fire and opp fire for the Soviets. The US will be a little different as they can Overwatch and Short Halt.

I believe the rules are roughly the same and it was just a straight reprint.

@@campsawyer True. But not that lovely SPI color palette. 😢

You get the Gold Star. Revisiting and oldie.

Thanks for the view and I am glad it helped you.

thanks for the view. Probably need a Windows emulator to run it. You might want to ask the question on the Vassal forum, vassalengine.org/

Thank for the view. Good point, when I looked at the shot and th e PzIIIF penetration v armor, I noticed it did not have a good chance of penetrating. In hindsight I should have probably shot, hoping for a Track hit.

GBACW

Thanks for the comment. No advantage for the stream.

I'd probably stand. The chance for vp is tempting. Withdrawal fire could be bad here, those carbines will tear you up. If I'm going to get shot up by repeaters, I want to get my licks in.

@@michaelhaggett1016 Thanks for the comment. It is a tough decision.

Yes, 2'x4' tables, they allow me to configure them in any manner without the need for a large space.

Thanks, looking to get a few moderate size games going.

Thanks for the view. Great game quick play, fairly simple, plenty of action.

Thanks for the view. The game keep me going as each roll gave a new twist to the play. I really like Jim's designs as you mention and more Panzer coming my way as well. You are welcome.

Thanks for the view. Your question made me look back to check and I noticed something else, the variable end means that the turn is the last turn and ends after it is played. If the Germans hold the hill at the end they will have the 450 points. I will play this out in the near future.

Thanks for the view.

Thanks for the view and the comment. They were fun to build and add a flavor to the game.

Thanks for the view. In double checking the special rules I see it is Harpers brigade and the CSA artillery that cannot occupy breastworks. Thanks for that catch.

Thanks for the view. I agree with your statement, simple system to give a tactical view of the ACW naval actions. Final Clash will be out very soon.

Thanks for the view. Yes, this is the biggest scenario of the game. Most are single engagements with two ships or small groups (3-4-5 ships). But you will need at last a 4x2 table.

Tempting, tempting. It is a series commitment once you get in. After this I might be tempted to create some British-German 1940 matchups now that there is the early British armor in North Africa. Some sort of home made Arras battle would be interesting.

No I had not received a reply, thanks for the reminder.

Thank you for the view and I am happy you liked it.

I am puzzling over Rebel Fury. I like the concepts in the game for movement and simplified combat. But there is some specifics that needs some help.