Відео

Amen ❤❤❤❤❤

I love god

Amen

Amen😊😊

Amen

Creating enemies out of non believers. How quaint

I love you Jesus

STOKING THE PARANOIA MACHINE ON UA-cam GETS THE BABES, DUDE! YOU GO GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes indeed

I love you Jusus so so much hoy i want to go to heaven

Glory to God for the blessings of life Amen thanks Jesus Christ for your holy Spirit Amen thanks Jesus Christ for your father God 💕 me and my Lord Jesus Christ amen ❤❤😂❤🙏💘🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💘 if you don't have faith you have nothing faith in God you will be in your life Amen thanks Jesus Christ amen glory to God blessings Amen

All wrong. No such thing as a "Gentile bride." Starting a message by terms not found in the Bible taints the whole message, being it's born out of error.

First to say come lord come

The term "rapture" was created to suggest the opposite of what Christ directly states... that He comes after the tribulation... Matt 24:29-31. So if we are going to entertain an idea that suggests the opposite of Christ...(antichrist... 1 John 2:18,19) there should actually be Scripture that states the opposite of Christ. Let's take a look at the claim of "two comings" We are told that these "comings" have names of "rapture" and "second coming"... yet this terminology is not used in Scripture, and Paul directly calls the event "the resurrection of the dead"... 1 Cor 15:42-55.. see verse 42, and what happens to the dead is what he doesn't want us ignorant about in 1 Thess 4:13-18. So Scripture gives it a name... and you don't use it... WHY? So if Paul directly calls it one thing... why is it so important for the rapturist to CHANGE the name? The term "the resurrection of the dead" maintains the focus on the dead.. whereas the new term "rapture" redirect the focus to the living. As any good magician knows, the art of deception is redirection. Jesus, Peter and Paul all warn us of the deception concerning His return... Matt 24:3,4, 29-31, 2 Thess 2:1-3, 2 Peter 3:15-17. Why do you think Peter pinpoints Paul's teaching on this matter and not his own, or Christ's or John's? So what's really happening to the dead that Paul doesn't want us ignorant about? The dead are returning WITH Christ...1 Thess 4:14, Rev 19:11. They are currently in Heaven with Christ... absent from their terrestrial realm bodies (2 Cor 5:8,1 Cor 15:40,44, 50) and present with the Lord in their celestial/'glorified bodies.... 1 Cor 15:40,44, Phil 3:19.20. When they return with Christ, they are getting their terrestrial realm bodies returned to them "RESURRECTED FROM THE DEAD. They "rise first" out of the dust of the Earth... 1 Thess 4:15.16. They need these physical earth suits for the purpose of ruling and reigning with CHRIST for 1000 years in the terrestrial realm of Earth. Without these bodies they would be ghosts or disembodied spirits unable to accomplish the task in the physical realm. Paul directly states that these bodies do not go to heaven... 1 Cor 15:50... why do you think the rapturist starts their narrative with the next verse and ignores this one? They mystery that Paul revealed was how people are CHANGED at the event he directly called "the resurrection of the dead", nine verses prior. It's important for the rapturist to ignore the fact that the resurrection of the dead occurs... remaining ignorant to the fact that the dead just came from heaven to get their terrestrial realm bodies returned to them destroys the rapturist narrative. No Scripture ever suggests that the raptured go to heaven, but Zech 14:4,5 indicates that Jesus continues to the Mount of Olives "with all of His saints". The resurrection of the dead is not some NEW event that had never before been revealed prior to Paul. Job tells us "Man dies and does not rise again until the heavens are no more... JOb 14:12. Jesus then repeats Job and tells us that the heavens will be destroyed..., AND OF THAT DAY, no man knows the day or the hour... Matt 24:35-43, Mark 13:31,32. Why does the rapturist constantly lie to us and tell us that this passage state that no man knows the day or the hour of their conjured event that is supposed to occur 7 years prior to the heavens being destroyed? Peter then repeats Jesus and tells us that Jesus comes "like a thief in the night" when the heavens are destroyed with a great noise... 2 Peter 3:10. In order for there to be "two comings" the element of surprise of "like a thief" and "No man knows the day or the hour" would have to fall on the first coming. Yet this element of surprise is given to the timing in which the heavens will be destroyed. A rapture would create a 7 year countdown to when Christ is coming "Like a thief" when the heavens are destroyed. Jesus declares that He is still coming "like a thief"... Just prior to the 7th bowl judgement... REv 16:15 John tells us that those martyred for not taking the mark are resurrected at the FIRST resurrection... Rev 20;4-6. These passages destroy the idea of multiple returns. Every argument for a rapture is birthed out of deception... God Himself puts a strong delusion over those who do not love the truth... 2 Thes 2:10-12

In the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit *