Відео

It is very interesting interview. Thank you for your work🎉

I love Matt's green cardigan...

such an interesting discussion about the future of cyber-security and how it important it will be in the near future

sehr eingeschränkte Sicht auf AI

Very digestible, inspiering and well scoped presentation🙌👌 I wish the process of actually scoping and selling this practice to clients was as digestible and to the point. You want to push the scope beyond comfort but rarely know where the painpoint exists and end up loosing the engagement. If we want to democratize it, how do we create the desire for it and ensure people use it for envisioning and creating positive outcomes and not controll undesired outcomes through fear mongering?. People seem better att understanding how to avoid future they don't want than how to work for a future they do want. 😵‍💫 seemingly associated with following the path of least resistance and reluctance to change. So if we democratize this through tecnology we need to embedd a way to frame the path of least resistant to motivation change or pacify resistance.

What statement are you trying to make with the pinstripe jacket? Ehhh, ehhh, dehhh, ehhh, uhhhh emmm; How annoying. Pompous foolery.

Why is Ashley furniture cheap junk? Does anyone kokw why almost everything is junk these days? Oh, that's right, financial restructuring and forced migration, bc to you we are all expendable.

Shouldn't you all be with your companion animals? Or, is it more important to run the world so we don't have the time we prefer for our companion animals?

Looks to me like you corporations want to BE the government.

A must watch for all planners and designers.

Nice scifi webinar but, I suggest some more concrete contents. For example: The US will continue to burn coal until 2035. China will continue to burn coal until 2050. India will continue to burn coal until 2060. Assuming these dates are respected, because if they continue to burn coal even beyond these dates... The ITER nuclear fusion power plant will not be operational (hopefully functional) until after 2055. Destroying the European mechanical industry of internal combustion engines will not save planet Earth: because the rest of the world will not give up internal combustion engines. Destroying 30% of the dams in Italy, as part of a trend of desertification in the Mediterranean area, will not save planet Earth. Putting an incendiary coat of polystyrene and tar on houses, in a context of desertification in the Mediterranean area, will not save planet Earth. Destroying all primary sector (cattle breeding and agriculture) in Europe, to insert Soros bioreactors for synthetic meat, fish, fruit, vegetables, it won't save planet Earth: because the Second World and the Third World will not stop on using agriculture and cattle breeding, for their food production necessity. Assuming that the "know how" of the ITER project will be shared without too many legal obstacles, it will take another +35 years before other fusion power plants (ITER clones) can spread out, all around the world. Let's do some basic math: 2055+35=2090 assuming there are no further construction delays for ITER clones power plant all around the world.. A very unlikely hypothesis, on assuming no construction delays in the future: just think of all future extreme weather events, which will multiply both in number and intensity. Probably those stuffs will have directly/indirectly impact on the construction works of fusion power plants, all around the world. De facto, it is reasonable to think it will be no nuclear fusion power plant on Earth as an energy source, before the beginning of the 22nd century. It is logical IMHO to assume that only from 1/Jan/2100 the ITER nuclear fusion power plants will be spread out, and they will be available in large numbers, all on Earth, for many countries! However for the early 22nd century it is highly probable that "all the geopolitical, climatic and ecosystem games" but also the problem of overpopulation on planet Earth, all it will have been resolved 50 years earlier (probably around 2050) with a probable WWIII in Siberia and the inevitable Punic Wars in the Mediterranean area. This valuation is not fully of details: it is ceteris paribus the unknown trends of the melting of methane hydrates in Siberia with positive feedback mechanisms. Have a nice day!

Nice webinar but, I suggest less talking and more contents. For example: The US will continue to burn coal until 2035. China will continue to burn coal until 2050. India will continue to burn coal until 2060. Assuming then that these dates are respected, because if they continue to burn coal even beyond these dates... The ITER nuclear fusion power plant will not be operational (hopefully functional) until after 2055. Destroying the European mechanical industry of internal combustion engines will not save planet Earth: because the rest of the world will not give up internal combustion engines. Destroying 30% of the dams in Italy, as part of a trend of desertification in the Mediterranean area, will not save planet Earth. Putting an incendiary coat of polystyrene and tar on houses, in a context of desertification in the Mediterranean area, will not save planet Earth. Will the destruction of the primary sector (cattle breeding and agriculture) in Europe, to insert Soros bioreactors for synthetic meat, fish, fruit, vegetables, it won't save planet Earth: because the Second World and the Third World will not stop on using agriculture and cattle breeding for their food production necessity. Assuming that the "know how" of the ITER project will be shared without too many legal obstacles, it will take another +35 years before other fusion power plants (ITER clones) can spread on planet Earth: Let's do some basic math: 2055+35=2090 assuming there are no further construction delays. A very unlikely hypothesis, on assuming no construction delays in the future: just think of all future extreme weather events, which will multiply both in number and intensity. Probably they will have directly/indirectly impact on the construction works of fusion power plants, all around the world. De facto, it is reasonable to think it will be no nuclear fusion power plant on Earth as an energy source, before the beginning of the 22nd century. It is logical IMHO to assume that only from 1/Jan/2100 will ITER nuclear fusion power plants will be spread and available all on Earth for many countries! However, for the early 22nd century it is highly probable that "all the geopolitical, climatic and ecosystem games" but also the problem of overpopulation on planet Earth, all it will have been resolved 50 years earlier (probably around 2050) with a probable WWIII in Siberia and the inevitable Punic Wars in the Mediterranean area. Ceteris paribus the unknown trends of the melting of methane hydrates in Siberia with positive feedback mechanisms. Have a nice day!

The topic of this Futures Seminar and the whitepaper is to the point and very important: In my (subjective) view I believe that today more than half of Foresight Scenarios are, while being inspiring and interesting, not leading directly into concrete activities. As the future will accelerate further - AI is definitely an accelerator - I believe sooner or later Foresight is the only way to keep up or ahead of developments in our complex and disruptive VUCA world. Business needs to not only to a SWOT to look at today, but also FORESIGHT to look at the future to create future prepared plans and strategies. My experience is: The best (or only?) way to make Foresight directly leading to infuse the future to strategies and plans is that the team in charge of the strategy and plan itself is part of the Foresight project.

The hand gestures are so distracting...

Thank you so much for sharing these conversations online.

Great content!

Why should a large computer implode into a black hole? 12:20

Great and thought-provoking talk delivered by a really likeable guy!

Curious to learn more about how you can future-proof your hybrid workplace? Find inspiration in our newly published e-book ( cifs.dk/p/hybrid-workplace-2033 ). Explore the insights and strategies that will help you navigate the evolving landscape of hybrid work.

I am watching your content from the United States. One day, I will sign up for a membership. Thank you for your content.

In what ways does AI affect ecological footprint is something I am trying to figure out because that seems like a huge difference in how resources are used, who can use it, who hoards and benefits from it, and if the way economy works itself even if treated as a closed system, how would it affect the unidirectional systems that contribute to ecological footprint.

You are doing great, keep it up!!! If you want to get more fans research Promo SM!

a lot to learn and this video made it easy

I enjoyed this and learning more

Well, this was depressingly lame. So many buzzwords, reactionary takes, and zero originality. What is it about NGOs that make them more obsessed with performing goodness than achieving anything in the real world? Such a lack of vision or imagination. I fear any organization that teams with the U.N. loses relevance.

I tried the method and it worked with me

Naima’s “the Future is in our mouths” also resonated on my end. We tend to underestimate the power of words when it comes to creating new mindsets. Nice seminar as usual. Thanks for sharing

It is always inspiring to learn about new perspectives and ways to change our mindsets regarding such critical issues as the ones covered in this session. Citing Nicolas, talking is a simple yet relevant exercise to perform within our communities. As a takeaway Naima's comment "the world is in our mouths" strongly resonated in me. Thank you!

CHEERS!!🆒

Thank You

May all Sentient beings be free from all suffering. Namaste🙏

Very interesting webinar!

Love it! Dying for working there :)

Great talk. One of the most valuable takeaways I can take from this great webinar is about the need for a new mindset rather than skills for the future. Thank you for sharing.

Thank you for sharing! Couldn't make it on Feb 3rd.

Is it going to be digital health or is it going to be digital fascism rationalized as public health?

To underline the current monopolistic colonization of future's imaginations was, together with naming the expert bias, by far one of the fairest things i've seen coming from organizations directly connected to the business system. Beautiful.

Thanks for sharing. I particularly loved the explanation on what Strategic Foresight is (starting at 10:18). I was looking for a visual way to introduce foresight concepts and this is extremely valuable (Kudos to Alex Fergnani for the concepts)

Did you decide to call your recent videos 'pockets of the future' after the successful thirteenth year youtube channel by the same name? ;)

I’m a MD from the US and things are not going well. :(

I listened to this, not sure that people will be happy to give up more privacy that we already have. The CBDC idea also consumes all data involved in profiling a person, and so many of the solutions are primarily involved in absorbing data from their users rather than providing solutions first. the central issue is how does a democracy survive a model that China pioneered, that we all were shocked about, and now seem to be inevitably following without the introspection necessary of a democratic setup. So in short, yeah we all love tech, but tech isnt there to save us and the authors of the tech have a lot of answering to do now. Fresh air reality, and coversations offer a lot of answers also.

Great presentation. Thanks!