Відео

So glad you enjoyed it! We're working on more videos this month - let us know if there is a topic you'd recommend us covering next!

Thanks so much! We definitely take security seriously and are always recommending upgraded protocols. Let us know if there are any other topics we should cover next.

Thanks so much for the feedback! We also love the whiteboard and find it to be such a helpful learning tool. We're working on more videos this month!

Thanks, we appreciate that!

Yes, using a sub query. Watch from here (ua-cam.com/video/bxz3zdrD2dI/v-deo.html) and if that doesn't help, let me know and I can try to explain more.

I'm sorry that you found this to be misleading. This video never stated that Account and Contact had a master detail relationship. The ERD on the whiteboard was only being used as a basic relationship diagram at the beginning of the video for the sake of discussing object relationships in general with 2 objects that most people are familiar with. Sticking to trailhead alone does not always provide people with different learning styles a deep understanding of how things work as it can be very prescriptive. Many people who are 8x certified don't know how to face or troubleshoot real-world problems that don't look like what they learned in "the books". We always attempt to teach people the mechanics beyond face value so they can think more deeply about problems and solutions. If it's not for you, that's fine.

You are very welcome!!

Hi Black Phillip. The reason for that is because Sharing Rules can never reduce sharing, they can only add sharing beyond what a user already has. Because the profile already grants edit access, the sharing rule can't restrict it down to read-only if they already have access to these records based on sharing defaults. So, you also need to look at your Sharing defaults for Opportunity - is it public or private? The question you have to ask is: "what can these users already do before I created this sharing rule?". If the answer is that they can already edit these opportunities, then the sharing rule can't take that away. If they can't already edit these opportunities, then the sharing rule should be extending the "Read-only" access as you describe. But, I have a hunch that you are expecting the sharing rule to perform a conditional restriction and not a conditional extension. The bottom line is that your baseline from profiles, permissions and sharing defaults should always result to the strictest behavior, and then sharing can be extended beyond that behavior using sharing rules. I hope this helps.

@@leedssource I understand it now. If you had edit access at the profile level but no sharing rule it would go by the OWD for records you don't own and go by the profile for records you do own unless you select view all or modify all which would affect access to all records. Also OWD and Sharing rules can't have access greater than your Profile level of access. So if the OWD for opportunities is read only, a sharing rule can open that up to read/edit for the records governed by OWD (i.e. records you don't own) as long as you have edit access for the object at the profile level.

Exactly right.

Sure thing!

Unfortunately, to make this an actively available picklist value, you would have to use the metadata API, so it would not be possible from a flow. Any value added to the picklist using the flow would only become an inactive value (as long as its not a restricted picklist).

Best explanation I've seen on here of the model

Hi Tito. It really depends on your permissions. The permission you really need to see this is "access to setup" (top right gear icon in Lightning), but this is not generally an area that non-admins would have access to. Your field permissions are determined by your profile plus all of your permission sets - it can get bit heavy if you're looking for a consolidated list outside of just browsing your page layouts. We have actually have an app that does what you are looking for but it is geared towards admins. What is your position in your business and what kind of controls do you have over the environment? We can definitely chat further if you need additional assistance.

Thanks Dimitry! I should have another video out in a few days.

@@leedssource Awesome! I'm studying to the Admin exam and your explanations are the best I've seen so far. Thank you again.

Thanks, Lucas! We are in the process of making new videos - look out in the next few months and let us know if there is a topic you'd like us to discuss next!

@@leedssource Validation Rules, Formulas, Flow/Process Builder, the list goes on haha

Thank you! We plan to make many more videos coming up. Feel free to send us any recommended topics!

@@leedssource route to admin certification and app builder cerification from scratch . And how to build an app from scratch till deployment sir .

Thanks for the feedback. We're staring up vid production again now so I'll have to consider these topics. They are pretty deep, so I'll have to think about how to best break it up.

Any part in particular that I can help clarify?

@@leedssource Also, confusing for me. Account (parent) Project (child). Got that. But when or why or how did Account become child and Projects become parent?

@@babybooddha888 Can you specify which part you are referring to? The Account is always the parent and the project is always the child. There's no point where they were reversed. If you can tell me which part you're talking about, maybe I can understand why it looks that way and can help clarify.

@@leedssource "We also allowed to have the Account to have a child relationship back and that's called Project(s)"is where I got confused. I don't understand why you wrote in smaller lettering Account and Projects here. I do have comprehension issues so maybe its more of a me problem and I have to take it really slowly. I have something else I'd like to ask you about and thats about Hierarchal relationships. I don't know what is meant by User Object. I know you can create management chains between users but is management in reference to your clients management chains or sf management chains?

@@leedssource Also, I'm wondering if I could have your email address to shoot you questions that I have. I can't access the community of Trailblazer for some reason and it would be nice to have someone who is not just a youtube video. I assume you're a busy guy, but if it's not a huge hassle, it would be so helpful! I totally understand if you can't. Thanks.

Thank you, Chandan! We're working on some more videos now - please let us know if there are any topics you're interested in.

Great to hear! We are in the process of making new videos - look out in the next few months and let us know if there is a topic you'd like us to discuss next!

Thanks, Nishant! Let us know if you have any requests for our next topic!

Thanks, Darren! We're working on more right now. Any requests for topics to cover?