Відео

Good video but you completely forgot to include anything about debugging which was supposed to be the point of the video

you can use cloudflare for SSL also ?

Great explanation. No fluff. No boilerplate cluttering the examples.

Great content. Keep 'em coming please!

I already have nginx server on my ubuntu 22.04 running for several project, I want to try nginx unit for my newest project, if I install this nginx unit, would it break my nginx and all related website?

I remember yhe good old times when it was considered bloated if the executable exceeded a few megabytes in size :) oh how the turntables have been turning ;D

There is no revolution or magic here to be found! It is not worth to study how this works internally, reading documentation for hours etc. Use docker and apache,nginx. Keep it as simple as possible.

Franken php to bundle backend, and deno (hopefully bun too) to bundle and deploy frontend. Maybe someone can come up with installer script for windows, shipping products is going to be smooth as f in future.

Hi. I'm trying to run the frankphp in a different port. Is it possible to specify a port different from default (80) on run it? Thanks

Awesome, neat and easily put across! Can you make a video auto ssl for external domains, something what Shopify does?

Thanks for the great tutorial. I just setup Laravel with Tenancy package, but I get a different behavior on Herd; the tenant app loads the landlord home page. Maybe this is as a result of the folder structure on Laravel 11. Edit: This doesnt happen in laravel10. My guess is because the folder structure is exactly as on the documentation of the tenancy Package and I followed all steps as supposed :) Thanks once more for the great video.

Why that door moved from right side to left side 😆😆

How would the Laravel task scheduler be setup ? Will it leverage the existing binary or will you need to install PHP on the host machine and setup a cronjob?

docker run --rm -v $PWD:/app -p 443:443 dunglas/frankenphp php artisan sapi ERROR Command "sapi" is not defined. How come you did not get this error ?

Excellent!!!

Required reviewers are only available for public repositories.

Is it best than swoole ?

the wink about 6mins in got a chuckle out of me

Crazy. I was just about to use Nginx Unit with PHP inside one container and now I see this.

Nice explanation

What about logging and other stuff when you build the binary ?

This is awesome!

Took me a day till i found this

Just awesome explaining.... You're rocks

finally even PHP can suffer from a complex zero downtime deployment - thanks to single binaries.

I think putting it architecturally side by side with nginx + fpm could provide clarity, thanks for sharing, cheers!

how does it compare with preloading, JIT...etc ?

how do u deal with pecl extensions? that are not listed in the bash file ?

i wanted to ship a mysql server as well , does it bundle that as well?

When I am looking at any web stuff I can't believe that it is a binary code. It is super slow and absolutely religious by it's nature. While it is for the most part just an implementation of a prefab concept with a declarative language + some language that is targeting simple projects (getting problematic later). And overall everything web purposed is very similar to a game engine scope. I would expect true revolution for web with something like web-engine with specific IDE and editor. Game engine is an example of how you have an environment that is ready for all sorts of typical stuff and solutions for them in one place. And you don't have to remake everything if you just want to replace a physical engine or rendering pipeline. In few words: to have an actual architecture and not just bunch of unrelated stuff glued together hoping for the best. But I am quite delusional about web as I don't like browser and websites in the first place.

Hello my name is Guilherme I'm from Brazil, I'm interested in your course, do your videos have subtitles? With subtitles in English I can understand almost anything, without subtitles is a bit harder...

I've recently implemented my CI pipeline within AWS itself.. I noticed you didn't even mention AWS as an option yet you mentioned 6 or 7 others.. you're making me doubt my choices now.. is AWS for CI not a good idea?

I'm currently having this problem and this video solves it. Thank you for the great video and great explanation!

C.I. it`s a art! 🤓

I like your style, however your artifact has compiled built code (with npm packages), that was created via a node version. You stated that you can go back and not have to worry about NPM. This is not totally true as you will still need to deploy that artifact into an environment which is able to run in (a different NPM or node version may still make it fail). Clearly there are ways around this - like using a docker build file, making sure that is tracked as well. But then this also means you know the code will run on that tagged image version (correct NPM and node versions) your artifact though speeds up the reverting to an old build and WORST.. a package going offline so you can't install it again. Again only a small point, I don't use artifacts enough at the moment and will be moving to this. Approval stage is also great, to often code goes out that shouldn't. However I do also employ protected branches, so merge requests must be completed with a reviewer. The advantage you have, is that your test / build stage has generated an artifact, that is then a lot faster to deploy. Keep up the great content.

Your last chapter reminded me of people, and perhaps me the most, spending hours upon winning two milliseconds in context of nginx vs caddy, when a relationship query is taking 500ms 🤣🤣

Is the deploy only after review only available in Enterprise GitHub or is the setting something I am missing in our organization account?

what is this value "$GITHUB_SHA"?

But I mean. Docker already is something you use to be able to deploy things in an easier way. If I have a dockerized application I can deploy it to any cloud environment like aws, azure etc with docker integration. I don't see the point

Chris: "Does anyone use Travis CI anymore?" Me: 🤣 Good stuff!

I'll argue that having 2 separate branches for 2 environments (e.g. develop -> staging, main -> prod) is infinitely better than the workflow you presented, even if you're the only developer.

👌 *Promo sm*

i not understand that the part when you can give others to run immediately. 1. does it can run on others developer local machine on windows when it is develop in ubuntu OS without having composer npm node all those sort thing? 2. how to run it on other machines?

This is coming at the right time 👌. Great job

Great stuff, keep it going! 💪

Check out the repository for the code! github.com/fideloper/deploy-me

How the process / the php app is kept alive or restart if chashes? Thanks

This looks insane… if you have any sort of app that is moderately complex we should test the $&@T out of it and see if it’s faster, concurrent requests and page loads on dinámica content etc etc… would love to see a deep dive on server deployment

how easy is this to use with ssl? manual and automatic systems like letsencrypt?