Відео

thanks for connecting lots of dots and making it a holistic explanation

how 23:36?

The equation seems general; what are the assumptions needed for the full expansion to converge?

Do you know of the Dyson-Schwinger equation?

Just a minor nitpick, it can get confusing if the integration variable and the integration limit use the same symbol (like "x"). I get that it works for the simplicity of writing. Love the video though.

Thanks it helped me a lot❤

wonderful explanation ! Where can i find the proof of hilbert transform for periodic function being and integral of co-tangent ?

Sir when you were able to understand all this during you academic journey... i was unaware of probability calculus till now, I am already close to finishing up my bachelors ?

“einstein derived lorentz” wait what???😮😮😮

Can I do it without complex analysis?

Some questions: 1. At 8:21, shouldn't there be a factor of 1/2? since the inner product is expanded into the sum of 2 terms 2. At 9:01, can the operator δ be treated as a constant with respect to the basis |ψ>? (since it escapes the bra-ket) 3. At 11:11, it seems like the LHS of the two equations stay the same but the RHS of the second equation got exponentiated? and I might be mistaken here, but shouldn't an integration remove all of the "δ" in the equation, including |ψ+δψ>?

I have sometimes wondered if you can write every law of physics (thermodynamics, fluid dynamics...) with differential forms.

Hey! Thank you so much for making this video. What I attempted was, I used MoC to solve for tau's PDE, and (while I don't 100% understand it yet), but realized that tau must be a function of C, and then I had a(C) just like in the paper. But then he says a = phi(v), and I'm "in general" lost about what's happening here. Secondly, I got stuck when I tried to substitute x' = x - vt back into xi, and (where gamma = lorentz factor), got a * 1/gamma^2 * (x - vt) and I got confused about what to do with the extra gamma. Then saw your video and you absorbed it into a(v), and here too I'm clueless. Can you please help /explain this? This is the only part in the derivation I'm not 100% clear on (perhaps my total lack of theoretical exploration in real analysis is the problem here), I barely managed to learn the characteristics method from youtube. Thank you so much :)

sir please recommended a book where i find this topic related examples

Holy crap. I understood your thumbnail! My flavor preferences are chocolate, vanilla, peppermint, asparagus, charm and pistachio. Up has a strange aftertaste but strange just tastes like marshmallows.

Thanks for the video. Can you please let us know a practical example how to use Reynolds transport theorem ?

Elegant

Thanks for this video!!!

Tricky equations 😅 but you did the job well

Wonder if the parameter nu in the constitutive relation can be linked to the conservation of mass

Ah so the equation including W is for bending?

🎉🎉 👏👏 🥇🏅

This equation needs alot of data 😅

Could you please explain to me why physicists before Einstein could not have arrived at the final formula?

Is it used for prediction model ?

nagyon jó

Not following you. Where is the paper I see in the cover photo so I can just read it?

can u pls do a full review of the exam paper im in supirioe terza

Interesting problem

Bit tricky for me to understand but good explanation 🎉

How can we find length of a curve

Exuse me, I have one question. This is not really related to the topic of the video. Do you know how to plot magnetic field lines in the Schwarzschild metric in wolfram mathematica? Or do you know where i can read about this? You're my last hope :( i want to learn. Thank you in advance

🎉🎉 🏅🏅

Interesting problem

Thank you i'm watching all your videos.

The nitty grity is the most beautiful, yet doesn't appear so.

🎉🎉 🏅🏅

You are a genius, I mean it seriously, and thank you so much for your work. Really amazing and so cool to explain the Einstein theories!!!

very useful video, there's a lot of false information out there about this, falsely stating that kinetic energy in QM can be negative.

Ciao, fai anche ripetizioni? dove posso contattarti? Grazie

🎉🎉 🥇🥇🏆🏅 good content

Great proof. Please do more videos.

Really nice! The explanation is so clear and easy to understand.

I submit that what causes the two plates to come closer is Quantum space; specifically the gravity created by that space. Matter and quantum space repel each other. Around the earth the quantum space density is great and lessons by distance from the earth. The plates are pressed together by this dense quantum space. To prove my theory take the Casimir experiment to the ISS and do it where the quantum space, the pressure of it, gravity, is less. If I am correct the plates should not come together as readily since the pressure of the quantum space, gravity, is much less. Prove me wrong

Interesting problem 🎉🎉

how do you generalise to evaluate zeta(4) with integrate_0^1 1/(1-xyzw) dx dy dz dw --> Pi^4/90?

Interesting problem

I love your accent ❤❤❤

I like this proof. A smart little trick at the beginning and just raw dogging till the end. Euler would be proud.