Відео

Thank you 🙏

Well explained! cool video❤

can you drain it sideways or is it improper?

What are the pipetting chemistry?about the colour and coulourless solutions?

tsym i have my as chemistry practical exam the day after tmrw and i didnt even know majority of the things you said in thsi video. VERY INFORMATIVE THANK YOU

Thank you. I have my first lab for Gen Chem II in a couple hours. This helped a lot getting me prepared mentally and visually.

The bottom of the meniscus was was actually below the line.

this video is amazing

"In the UC Berkeley Star Trek club there was a girl: Jennifer. Pretty, nice and with a great passion for boys and freshmen. In 5 years no one has been "saved". Do you know what they called it? "FIRST CONTACT".

Bu videoyu benim için Türkçe'ye çevirebilir misiniz rica etsem

dump out the solution...unless you just confirmed it's awesome (+)-beer then CHUG CHUG CHUG

Thank you so much😊

I've had so much trouble adjusting the meniscus in the lab today that I've spent 30 mins researching how to properly pressure the top and drop the meniscus. Can anyone help with this please?

So helpful

This is supposed to be a veiled impersonation of Jerry Lewis?

Thanku sir

thankyou 😍

Thank you, very thorough

Boring & not good

Entendíble xdd

Thanks!

Well done! I'd like you to do one on the Dirac equation.

Thanks for the video! I'm approaching Schrodinger's equation with a pure math background, so a lot of the interpretations of these quantities are new to me. While watching the video, I have some concerns and questions. 1) Your description of orthogonal is incorrect. You described linear independence of vectors, whereas orthogonality is a condition on the inner product of an inner product space (inner product of orthogonal vectors is 0). 2) You assert that the norm of the Schrodinger Equation yields a "probability". My understanding is that this is a popular interpretation of the Schrodinger Equation, but not a fact. As I understand it, there is some philosophical debate behind how this equation should be interpreted. Some insisted that it is a true probability, unknowable. Einstein famously said, "God does not play dice," suggesting to me that the uncertainty embedded in the theory of quantum mechanics is not fundamentally uncertain, but rather external to the theory as it had been developed up to that point. Does anyone know more about the history of the probability interpretation and alternative interpretations posed when the equation was first introduced?

you're my hero.

I have my physical chemistry practical after three days and this experiment is there in the syllabus kinetics of inversion of cane sugar after observing this video now I remember again how to take the readings very clearly explained thank you again

very nice video helped me a lot thank you very much!!

what program are you using to record?

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. HANDS DOWN THE VERY BEST LEWIS STRUCTURE VIDEO IVE SEEN AND BOY HAVE I BEEN SEARCHING.

Still didn't get it.