Відео

Wrong C stands for?

Wie habt ihr die Partikel auf der Leinwand animiert?

@ Join Dr. Jacob Hudis as he explores the fascinating "Quantum Spring," ua-cam.com/video/bcrey5jHGzA/v-deo.htmlsi=ZZ0WhY6cXhdsz_yZ an innovative experiment conducted by Lee Guthrie. This unique spring, crafted from thin elastic steel, exhibits dramatic wave-like transitions between energy states under compression, mimicking quantum leaps seen in atomic systems. Dr. Hudis highlights Guthrie's exceptional work in designing and analyzing this spring, which demonstrates unusual load-deflection behaviors, including triangular and sawtooth patterns. These behaviors provide a striking macroscopic analogy to quantum mechanics, illustrating concepts like energy quantization and standing waves. With visuals, applets, and clear explanations, this video bridges mechanical physics and quantum mechanics, showcasing Guthrie’s groundbreaking experiment and the deeper scientific insights it reveals.

Was legitimiert dazu, davon auszugehen, dass sich die Intensitäts-Änderungen eines Photonenstrahls ( ist gleich das Auf und Ab der darstellenden grafischen Kurve ) in (mehrere) Ebenen zerlegen lassen? Also was haben die gemessenen Schwankungen mit Ebenen zu tun? Sind lanzettförmige, hintereinander gereihte, flache Photonen die Ursache? Oder haben wir es mit spindelförmigen Photonen zu tun, die amöben-artige, aber nicht spiralige Querschnitte aufweisen ( mit amöben-artig meine ich querschnitte, die sich gegebenenfalls aus mehreren symmetrisch-strahlenförmigen, zueinander verdrehten Achsen ergeben, bzw. aus der Kombination zueinander verdrehter, flacher, lanzettförmiger Photonen )?

Sorry, aber intuitiv sieht es so aus, als würde der erste Filter nur horizontal polarisiertes Licht durchlassen. Die Wellen-Ebene das durchgehenden Lichts wird aber vertikal dargestellt...??

I don't believe there is anything quantum about that. It can be explained with classical physics. But as long as you'll cling to the planetary model of the atom, with tiny electron "moons", you will always come up with fantasy physics and mathematical reification.

Beautifully explained, I wanna work with you and contribute to this beautiful work from Mongolia <3

nice bro

This is what i’m looking for. I’m curios how can you visualize this amazing design?

I think in single photon interference, there is no one photon at a time on screen, it's the limitation of photon detector that it can detect only one photon at a time even if there are thousands of photons at a time, it's similar to touch screen wherein only one or few touch spots can be detected at a time even if there are more touch inputs at a time.

quantum dimension ?

What does it mean to "bend the vibration, to form a semicircle"??

Here you showed phasor rotating in clockwise but bro phasor is anticlockwise rotating vector

This is one of the coolest visualizations I've ever seen. I wish I could have had this video when I was learning the periodic table in High School! Great stuff 👌

I don't know how the complex curve look like can you please make video on this

It's just amazing

The video is very interesting! Something I don't understand: I have USDT in my OKX wallet and I have the recovery phrase. [pride]-[pole]-[obtain]-[together]-[second]-[when]-[future]-[mask]-[review]-[nature]-[potato]-[bulb]: How should I convert them into Bitcoin?

wtf, was? sind auf dem letzten feld denn jetzt genug quanten um ein reiskorn zu bilden?

Was this script written by AI? The math seems off

great job ! Thanks

Inverting sphere vibes

what are the dimensions of the inhomogeneous magnetic field generator

sau geil

Jetzt noch der 3.

Hall Christopher Miller Linda Harris Michelle

Check out the video by Dr. Jorge S. Diaz titled "This experiment confirmed quantum physics" for more history about the Stern-Gerlach Experiment. ua-cam.com/video/BDAzFIJu9_E/v-deo.html

Great video! How does this apply to the spherical harmonics in atomic orbitals?

Bernier Shoals

Hab nix verstanden

Stern - Gerlach ? : Glaubt hier jeder gleich einen Bluff ? PORCA MISERA . Hier fehlt doch etwas entscheidendes. Fakt: a) wenn man 2x Ladungsplatten verwendet, kann man einen Elektronenstrahl ablenken nach obe oder unteren oder zur Seite. b) wenn polarisiertes Licht oder polarisierte Mikrowelle bekommt man nach dem Magneten eine Gleichverteilung allerdings man hat oben und unten an der Projektionsfläche vermutlich dann eine unterschiedliche Drehung der Polarisationsebene c) hat man noch einen Scutter für nach oben oder unten polarisiertes Licht so bekommt man an der Projektionsfläche 2 scharf getrennte Polarisationen. Zusammenfassung es ist nur ein Polarisationsexperiment Das andere ist böswilliger Bluff. Man kann natürlich Silberionen durch einen gesonderten Kondensator noch laden. Das ist aber wieder etwas anderes. Silberionen sind doch massenträge ? Man braucht shcon ein getaktetes kleines MRT oder ein echtes funktionierendes Drehspektrometer.

im trippin balls

Ein C-Not-Gate ist eigentlich eine einfache Sache, aber wie ihr das erklärt habt, ist das schwer verständlich

For those That prefer a mechanical analog you can look at harmonics of a guitar string and such. The video I present is another mechanical method of quantizing a system. It is one of two methods where structures can actually be produced. ua-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/v-deo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area. If my model applies, it may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent behavior of fields. Under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced via Euler’s contain column analysis. Containing the column must come in to play before over buckling, or the effect will not work. The sheet of elastic material “system” response in a quantized manor when force is applied in the perpendicular direction. Bonding at the points of highest probabilities and maximum duration( ie peeks and troughs) of the fields “sheet” produced a stable structure when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material.

There are no quantum computers, who the hell is this for?

I do not believe that a better visualization exists on this topic, and we are graced to have access to this free of charge. Thank you!

Do you have research for dynamical behaviour of the earth? Do see oval shapes in objects in space so ...they perhaps can be round/sphere on another time frame. (perhaps in thousand years). Do see a lot of static anal;yses of the earth and also mostly local. Do not see many global analyses of the earth and its shape for instance ....volume changes in relation to volcansim. Earthquakes and how they move along the earth and insde the earth.

Finally someone explained why orbitals looks like those weird shaped blobs!!❤

"atomstrahlofen" !!)) What does this word mean ?!))) Рассказывает на английском, а слова немецкие!)))

While spherical harmonics are the eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom to describe its state, which are the eigenfunctions for the other 117 chemical elements (helium, etc.)?

So the rydberg formula can be used only on hydrogen atom ? What about other atoms ?

Great explanation with great visualization, thanks

Wie bei mehrprotonigen Elemente, beim Helium usw.?

Wonderful video! 👍

I started thinking about this after watching a singer shatter a wine glass by singing at it using its resonant frequency. Putting more energy into it than it could handle. A bit like a photon escaping. Then I considered how the glass could flex, and how physical limitations would cause any oscillation that wasn't at a resonant frequency to be self canceling, since the ends of the oscillation wouldn't meet. Then I imagined the limitations in 3 dimensions and how with something as small as an atom, unaffected by the macro universe, there would be basically no damping, so this "wine glass" could ring virtually forever.

❤

Здравия всем. *Испытаем* «фонари для гравитационных квантов» *посмотрим* на Вселенную? *Попробуем* квантами гравитации (цифровым способом) измерим Вселенную? Соберём два учебных пособия «ГИБРИДНЫЙ гироскоп и лазерную фиксированную рулетку 1000000» школьникам, студентам, академикам. Вы сможете совершать научные открытия; по астрономии, астрофизике, космологии, высшей теоретической физике,... Обращаюсь к Вам с предложением на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 250000 (в дальномере 1000000) метров при этом, не превышает параметры 84/84/84 см., и вес - 24кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы и дальномеы, для учебно практического применения в школах и высших учебных заведений. Эйнштейна мечтал измерить скорость поезда, самолёта - через опыт Майкельсона Морли 1881/2024 г., и только тогда, опыт будет выполнен больше чем 70%. Это возможно выполнить с помощью оптоволоконного ГИБРИД гироскопа. Вот исходя из выполненного более 70% опыта Майкельсона, возможно доказать постулаты: Свет - это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов и доминантные гравитационные поля корректируют скорость света в вакууме. (Мы, не ищем эфир, мы увидим работу квантов гравитации) В итоге *увидите* теорию всего в простых ❤учебных устройствах❤.

It would sure be a lot better to actually describe the experiment. From your picture I'm guessing that two photons are generated from one source (closest to the viewer, black box) which then bounce off mirrors to Alice and Bob. So it's not surprising that they are anti correlated.

Are you Peruvian?

this is one of the most profound videos i've ever seen in years of watching quantum videos

Sehr gutes Video