Відео

Very useful webinar indeed.

In a 2013, Heriot Watt pre-sessional, students had to stand in front of their posters and answer questions about them. I seem to remember their oral responses were part of their assessment.

"Promosm" 👍

Thank you professor

Kindly suggest some more specific areas in ressesrch. I am from Pakistan and how can i do this research in pakistani context ?

I want to make research proposal for phd on this topic. Kindly your assistance is required

It is amazing topic Madam

Very much enjoyed the Hitchhiker's Guide reference early on. 😊

A very interesting talk. The idea that designing assessment tasks around the limitations of generative AI is 'risky' in the short term and 'not viable' in either medium- or long-term was surprising for me. When I went to the source (Lodge, Howard & Broadbent 2023), though, I understood the reasoning and this suddenly made me realise that many of the approaches being taken by HEIs and individuals working in them to navigate this issue are likely doomed to irrelevance or obsolescence in the (very) near future.

Is it just me or does the video jump a lot?

Thank you for this thoughtful and reflective account.

Excellent analysis, thank you. I wonder if you could pause a bit longer when showing the quotes on screen? I didn't find there was enough time to read them.

Brilliant opening!

Very interesting presentation - thanks!

I liked the mention of "Reflective assignments" or at least demand reflection on all assignments.

Make students face a tribunal of fellow students to practise defending their “thesis” and make this part of the assessment and a way to practise for any final assessment by teacher tribunals. Oral or viva exams are harder to cheat on.

Interesting talk, thanks for sharing it online. We weren't able to go to all of them. Your presentation boosts not only language learning but also job opportunities for students. At the same time it gives us EAP teachers a framework to consider how to deal with AI.

Good to see such thoughtful and nuanced analysis of Gen AI from students. I hope institutions will create opportunities to hear students' voices in discussions around AI policy

Great video - an interesting study!

Most of your suggestions are quite generic and not very helpful. How can AI provide targeted and differentiated feedback - the one you show on your screen is mostly remedial grammar correction)? How can it help us make a lesson plan when we need to account for individual specificities within our group when planning? The resulting plan will be generic and we would have to modify so hardly a time saver. The only meaningful suggestions I saw are on how to mitigate against the misuse of AI - point 6). Lastly, how can it write assessment rubrics when there has to be constructive alightment in our courses? Are you going to feed all your course material and work into it so it can produce a meaningful assessment rubric? These are my first reactions upon watching this. Sorry if I sound a bit too negative - I am an AI sceptic.

Thank you for this interesting presentation

I'm working on secondary research where I'm comparing articles and after reading your article on emi movement in China and Japan, I'm here to thank you for your great docs that really open my eyes and excite my mind. I would say that you are such a great scholar.Your words ,the way you analyze the data, the stats you mentioned and the way you summed up the whole study at the end is absolutely amazing and I think your research is filled with incredibly amazing information......I am glad to discover your being

I really enjoyed this presentation. What I particularly like is the Sustainable Development Goals Summit. I'm going to try this activity with my classes this term. Thanks for all the great ideas!

I really enjoyed watching this video, please make more. You could get more fans with "Promosm"!!

Wonderful talk!

Hi there - Although I've known of your work on ARC for some time, I'm delighted to have watched through your webinar here detailing your research and its results. Well done!

Reference Christensen, G., Freese, J., & Miguel, E. (2019). Transparent and reproducible social science research: How to do open science. University of California Press. Christensen, G., Wang, Z., Levy Paluck, E., Swanson, N., Birke, D., Miguel, E., & Littman, R. (2020). Open science practices are on the rise: The State of Social Science (3S) Survey. Working Paper Series No. WPS-106. Center for Effective Global Action, University of California, Berkeley. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210. Ding, A., & Bruce, I. (2017). The English for academic purposes practitioner. Palgrave Macmillan. Gerrits, R. G., Jansen, T., Mulyanto, J., van den Berg, M. J., Klazinga, N. S., & Kringos, D. S. (2019). Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications. BMJ open, 9(5), e027903. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124. Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ware, J.J., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature human behaviour, 1(1), 1-9. Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. Nosek, B. [@BrianNosek]. (2019, November 29). In my 2002-2012 research methods courses, we did an exercise of describing what makes a "good scientist". One year's list [Tweet]. twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/1200179964869562369?s=20# Rozycki, W., & Johnson, N. H. (2013). Non-canonical grammar in Best Paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 32(3), 157-169.

References Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism, (5th ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Chang, J., Kim, W. & Lee, H. (2017). A language support program for English-medium instruction courses: Its development and evaluation in an EFL setting. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5): pp. 510-528. Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1): pp. 3-17. Galloway, N., Curle, S., Jablonkai, R. R., Mittelmeier, J., Sahan, K., & Veitch, A. (2020). English in higher education-English medium. Part 1: literature review. British Council. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Kim, E.G., Kweon, S.O., & Kim, J. (2017). Korean engineering students’ perceptions of English-medium instruction (EMI) and L1 use in EMI classes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(2): pp. 130-145. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2016.1177061 Lewis, G., Jones, B., Baker. C. (2012). “Translanguaging: origins and development from school to street and beyond.” Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7): pp. 641-654. Mazak, C.M. & Herbas-Donoso, C. (2014). Translanguaging practices and language ideologies in Puerto Rican university science education. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 11(1): pp. 27-49. DOI: 10.1080/15427587.2014.871622 Wang, W. & Curdt-Christiansen, X.L. (2019). Translanguaging in a Chinese-English bilingual education programme: a university-classroom ethnography. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(3): pp. 322-337. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2018.1526254 Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysg uwchradd ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education] (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Wales, Bangor, UK.

References Baffy, M. (2018). Constructed dialogue as a resource for promoting students’ socialization to written academic discourse in an EAP class. Linguistics and Education, 46, 33-42. Benesch, S. (2008). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2015). Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52-72. Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Heath, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. Language & Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press. Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: how far should we go now?. English for specific purposes, 21(4), 385-395. Ivanic, R., & Lea, M. (2006). New contexts, new challenges: the teaching of writing in UK higher education. In L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed.), Teaching Academic Writing in UK higher Education: Universities into the 21st Century (pp.6-16). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. Riazi, A. M., Ghanbar, H., & Fazel, I. (2020). The contexts, theoretical and methodological orientation of EAP research: Evidence from empirical articles published in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100925. Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.

References Alhassan, A. (2019). Investigating business EFL postgraduate student writing in a UK university: a qualitative study. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1699741. Bruce, I. (2011) Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. Basingstoke: Palgrave Chandrasegaran, A. (2008) NNS students' arguments in English: Observations in formal and informal contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing 17(4): 237-254 Clippinger, D. (2016). Planning and organizing business reports: written, oral, and research-based (First edition.). Business Expert Press. Hyland, K. (1999) Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles. In: Candlin, C. N. and Hyland, K. (eds.) Writing: Texts, processes and practices, p. 99-121. Harlow, Essex: Longman Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, vol. 7, 2: pp. 173-192 Hyland, K. (2006) English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. Jiang, K. (2015) Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20:90-102 Morris, J., and Zwart, J. (2020). Business Writing Style Guide. Oregon State University. Nathan, P. (2013). Academic writing in the Business school: The genre of the business case report. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12:57-68 Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: university tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 99-117). London: BAAL/Equinox. Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497. Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111-135.

References Gaunt A. and Stott A. (2019) Transform Teaching and Learning Through Talk: The Oracy Imperative. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. The-Oracy-Framework-1-1.pdf (voice21.org) Heron, M. (2019) Making the case for oracy skills in higher education: practices and opportunities, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(2), 2019. ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss2/9 lachopoulos, D., Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. Int Rev Educ 65, 605-632. Kiddle, T. (2020) Teaching Asynchronously (webinar 27/3/20) www.eaquals.org/eaquals-events/event/thom-kiddle-teaching-asynchronously/resources/ Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J. et al. (2020) College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. J. Comput. Educ. 7, 79-103 (2020). doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8 Walsh, S (2018) Developing classroom interactional competence across disciplines. Keynote speech, BALEAP PIM: Speaking, 9th June 2018. White, C. (2009) Towards a learner-based theory of distance language learning: The concept of the learner-context interface. In P. Hubbard (Ed.) Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Volume IV: Present Trends and Future Directions in CALL. London: Routledge. Pp. 97-112.

References Carroll, J. (2015). Tools for Teaching in an Educationally Mobile World. London, New York: Routledge. Dafouz, E., Haines, K. & Pagèze, J. (2019). ‘Supporting educational developers in the era of internationalised higher education: insights from a European project.’ International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. EQUiiP (2016). Available at: www.equiip.eu. ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/projects/eplus-project-details/#project/2016-1-NL01-KA203-022921 Galloway, N. (2020). English in higher education - English medium. Part 1: Literature review. London: British Council. Jenkins, J. (2014). English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: the Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Oxon: Routledge. Jenkins, J. and Wingate, U. (2015). ‘Staff and Students’ Perceptions of English Language Policies in ‘International’ Universities: A Case Study from the UK. Available at: www.researchgate.net/ publication/272353591_Staff_and_Students'_Perceptions_ of_English_Language_Policies_and_Practices_in_'International'_Universities_A_Case_Study_from_the_UK. Accessed 25/09/2020 Lauridsen, K. M. & Lillemose, M. K. (Eds) (2015). Opportunities and challenges in the multilingual and multicultural learning space. Final document of the IntlUni Erasmus Academic Network project 2012-15. Aarhus: IntlUni. Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the Curriculum. London, New York: Routledge. Lowe, R.J. and Kiczkowiak, M (2016). ‘Native-speakerism and the complexity of personal experience: A duoethnographic study.’ Cogent Education (2016), 3: 1-16. Schweisfurth, M. and Gu, Q (2009). ‘Exploring the experiences of international students in UK higher education: possibilities and limits of interculturality in university life.’ Intercultural Education, 20:5, 463-473.

Thank you for this inspiring talk and for sharing this presentation. I'm a researcher from Iraq and very interested in EAP as a new field of interest not being researched here. I've just started working on it since I teach English for non EFL students. I would like to be part of any further works in this regards. Would you please share the reference list of the works cited in the presentation?

interesting

Very interesting questions indeed, Jane!

Very interesting and informative. Thank you

Good one! it's worth my 4 minutes (:

Oh! Wow! What a thought provoking talk on EAP; thank you for sharing the video