Відео

Thanks, George!

My Dad's side of the family is Irish! I'd never shit on them 😆

Kind of, but it's a bit more complicated than that. The Anglo-Saxons were a mix of different Germanic tribes, mainly from what is now Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands. So yeah, there’s definitely a Germanic influence in the English gene pool, but it’s just one part of the story.. Over time, the English population has been created by various groups like the Celts, Vikings, and Normans, so it’s not as simple as saying they’re part German. If you look at DNA haplogroups, a lot of English people belong to haplogroups like R1b, which is common across Western Europe, including Britain and Germany. There's also I1 and I2, which are more associated with Germanic and Scandinavian ancestry. So, while there are links, the English identity is a unique blend of many influences over thousands of years.

You know... I think that I agree.

@@CeltainianChronicals Oh, I'll actually watch the video. I thought it was going to be generic civic nationalist slop...

@samuelknight957 😆 I don't purposely align myself with any idiology, if I'm honest. As I've said in the pinned comment, I believe that every ethnic people and culture should be able to thrive in their own land.

@@CeltainianChronicals I'm an American. Our culture is pretty muddy lol.

@oaktreeholler Yeah, it's definitely different from Britain and the rest of Europe, but it's still fascinating nonetheless.

Almost! I'm from the Northwest of England.

I prefer "Anglo-Celtic" over "British". Anglo-Celtic is already an established ethnic identity in Australia and Canada, and the US to a lesser extent. British is our nationality, but our ethnicity is Anglo-Celtic.

Yes! Anglo-Celtic is the way forward 💪

completely agree with you. It’s frustrating to see the blatant bias and double standards when it comes to the rights of native people. When other countries prioritise their native populations, it’s seen as perfectly acceptable, but when the same idea is applied in Western nations, it's immediately labelled as controversial or even racist. Every people should have the right to preserve their culture and heritage without being judged unfairly. The hypocrisy in this one-way logic is undeniable.

Honestly, the people trying to make you feel guilty for being Anglo-Saxon are the ones with the real problem. Every people should be proud of who they are, and if they’re not, they should focus on contributing something meaningful to their own culture to take pride in. 🙏 💪

Colour isn't real anyways, it's just a spectrum that we arbitrarily define and compartmentalise (pretty much the most innate human trait). Borders aren't real, except non-human animals display consistent territorial behaviours, to the point where placing trackers on wolves leaves us with near perfect physical land boundaries. You are a slave. You are not human, but a replaceable economic unit.

Oh wait, did you mean nationality as opposed to ethnicity?

@@samuelknight957 yeah that’s why I said nationality, but I agree with your comment it’s all man made to make sense of the world

@@Do27gg Fair enough lol

I'm 100% European, but with my mother's central European blood, you're probably more English than I am. lol

Please can you rewrite your paragraph. I can't understand what you're trying to say.

We certainly are 💪 🙏

An Irish proverb, "The greater your destiny, the greater the price,"

@@CeltainianChronicals 'Anyone with gumption and a sharp mind will take the measure of two things: what's said and what's done' - S Heaney, Beowulf

"BanCommies_Fascists", yet you don't understand what the latter stood for. This was always going to happen, and it was the only sane reaction to a globalist Communist state. They lost, and that's why we're here now.

Correct. Diversity is White erasure, and it's no accident.

🎉 I'm Mercian. I say this now, because YT bans me from saying normal everyday words. It's ridiculous

You seem to assume I'm connecting to Norse mythology, but as an English person, Woden would be more relevant than Odin, who is primarily associated with Norse (Viking) culture. However, my heritage connects more strongly with Brythonic Celtic roots rather than Norse mythology, as genetic studies show a much larger Celtic influence in England than Viking ancestry. I prefer to celebrate the history of my Brythonic ancestors rather than adopt a romanticised version of Norse traditions.

I completely agree with you. Europeans are connected through our values, culture, and DNA, yet we still maintain our own unique identities. It’s pretty obvious when you think about it. The further apart people are geographically, the more culturally and genetically different they tend to be. You can see shared genetic markers across Europe that link populations from Ireland to Poland, yet regional differences remain, like the higher prevalence of Celtic ancestry in Western Europe and Slavic influences in the East. Culturally, we share similar traditions, such as seasonal festivals, folklore, and architectural styles, but each country and region adds its own twist, like the differences between Mediterranean cuisine and Nordic traditions. Of course, there are exceptions, like Australia, South Africa, and even America.

I disagree. Alcohol is a greater threat to democracy than women, because when the beer makes a man unable to think, it makes him unable to vote and act.

@@موسى_7 I'd argue that alcohol is embedded in European culture, but it does play a part. My biggest problem is with football. They would rather attack their own brothers because of a game of sport, than recognise that their nation is being overrun. Horrible times we live in.

I get where you're coming from, and I think it's important to recognise that throughout history, whenever large numbers of people have moved into another population's land, it’s never been a case of peaceful coexistence-one culture always ends up dominating or even replacing the other. Take the Bell Beaker people moving into Britain, for example. They replaced much of the original Neolithic population, both culturally and genetically. The Romans did the same when they arrived, imposing their laws, language, and way of life, which fundamentally changed the native British culture. More recently, we've seen similar patterns across the world-just look at what happened to the Native Americans or the Aboriginal Australians. Small numbers of immigrants, say 1% or less, can usually integrate without drastically changing the host culture. But when it happens in large numbers, those new populations inevitably start taking positions of power-controlling councils, shaping policies, and often disregarding or even replacing the traditions and values of the native people. History shows us time and time again that cultural balance doesn't last when mass migration occurs. It’s not about rejecting other cultures-far from it. I want all cultures to thrive, but history proves that it works best when people flourish separately in their own lands, as they have for thousands of years. There’s a reason things have always been that way; it's how humanity naturally developed, preserving unique traditions and identities without being forced to compete for cultural survival within the same space.

Well it certainly makes you part english. If a DNA test traces you back to england (if you take one) then you are certainly part english.

Even eastern Europe and the Balkans? Even Bosnia 🕌 and Albania 🕋?

@@موسى_7 Probably not Albania and the balkans

Gay

@@pauliewalnuts5803 your Nan lives in a box the dusty arl fart

Mhath Taing 😂😂😂

Thank you 👍