SchreiberWWII
SchreiberWWII
  • 12
  • 109 776
Intro to Macroeconomics
Macroeconomics definition, essential questions, goals, business cycle, and stages
Переглядів: 1 032

Відео

My Screencast
Переглядів 3549 років тому
Markets
Monetary Policy
Переглядів 5829 років тому
Overview of Federal Reserve, monetary policy, easy monetary policy, tight monetary policy
GDP Basics
Переглядів 5919 років тому
GDP componets, nominal and real
Demand
Переглядів 57010 років тому
Demand basics, definition, law of demand, movement along curve, and shifts
Microeconomics & Supply
Переглядів 72810 років тому
Introduce microeconomics, define supply, law of supply, graphs, and changes to graphs
Economic Theory Karl Marx
Переглядів 30 тис.10 років тому
Highlights Karl Marx economic theory and weaknesses of Capitalism
Economic Theory Adam Smith
Переглядів 73 тис.10 років тому
Introduces the basic economic theory of Adam Smith
The Basics Part III
Переглядів 79210 років тому
economic thinking and economic systems
The Basics Part II
Переглядів 76810 років тому
Introduce flow chart, 3 economic questions and factors of production
Economics The Basics Part I
Переглядів 88410 років тому
Economic dilemma, choices, utility, incentives, opportunity costs
Economics The Basics Part I
Переглядів 18710 років тому
Highlights economic concepts of economic dilemma, choices, and opprotunity costs

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @JimChicken
    @JimChicken 11 місяців тому

    I appreciate your separation of Marx’s critique of capitalism and communism in the beginning of the video. One might come about communism from the critique of capitalism but communism isn’t strictly the critique of capitalism. I do have to say you were very reductive in a lot of this video and although you are trying to teach the basics your explanations tend to lean away from the fact that these things Marx claims the capitalists do are very natural consequences of the capitalist mode of production.

  • @psikeyhackr6914
    @psikeyhackr6914 2 роки тому

    Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is in the public domain and can be downloaded from Project Gutenberg and searched. Smith used the word 'invisible' six times but only once as "invisible hand". It is really curious that we hear about 'invisible hand' so much. Smith used the word 'education' EIGHTY TIMES. We are not told that. Search for "and account" and you will find multiple instances of "read, write, and account", not "read, write and arithmetic". Double entry accounting was more than 300 years old when Smith wrote Wealth of Nations, but 50% of Brits were illiterate and public schools did not exist. The United States could have made accounting/finance mandatory in the schools since Sputnik. Wouldn't that have helped everyone best serve their own self interest? But we do not hear these people propagandizing us about the "invisible hand" advocating mandatory accounting because that makes their invisible rip-offs easier. Adam Smith never used the word 'depreciation'. He mentioned paper money being depreciated one time. Marx talked about 'depreciation' a number of times, sometimes regarding the depreciation of machines. Consumers did not buy automobiles and air conditioners and televisions before 1885. But it is OK! Our brilliant economists don't talk about the depreciation of under engineered consumer trash today either.

  • @royolstad8532
    @royolstad8532 3 роки тому

    Marx was born 30 years after Smith died, and rose in response to serfdom, (corrupt mionorchs), where the only two classes were aristocracy and serfs, basically. One thing that's not commonly remembered, today, and something that I think is important to know, is that Marx was a fan of Adam Smith. Smith offered a very balanced, reasoned and equitable alternative to serfdom. it's the only example of Marx's opinions I can back btw.

    • @yydd4954
      @yydd4954 Рік тому

      Marx was himself an idiot Or call it intellegent idiot or knowledgeable idiot But his theory is very static Smith understood entrepreneurship well and importance of capital too. A man from 18th century and it's a big deal. He understood consumer sovereignty Marx ignored consumers and kept his workers propaganda alive. His surplus value and Economic development theory is very static and ignores entrepreneurship and consumer sovereignty. Marx solution to problem was even more stupid with an collective approach that has led to many destruction

  • @orphanedbygenesis3065
    @orphanedbygenesis3065 3 роки тому

    LIBERAL ANTHEM This Polish prog-rock piece contains the line "Let chants exalt Adam Smith": ua-cam.com/video/YaA3BXdvDuE/v-deo.html.

  • @carlbigeasy
    @carlbigeasy 3 роки тому

    The only people who aren't actually workers are the unemployed or the benefit crew as I call them, I'm confused because most Marxists seem to always use them as the crux of the problem with capitalism, so he sets out his stall as workers Vs non workers and yet here we are in the 21st century with millions of non workers all created by capitalism?.

  • @carlbigeasy
    @carlbigeasy 3 роки тому

    My first thought it is, we're all workers aren't we?.. I mean we all work even billionaires

  • @Laissez_Faire
    @Laissez_Faire 3 роки тому

    Over productions create jobs. The problem the poor have is overspending

  • @jorgegonzalez-ruiz9886
    @jorgegonzalez-ruiz9886 4 роки тому

    Awesome intro to Karl Marx 👏

  • @dinnerwithfranklin2451
    @dinnerwithfranklin2451 4 роки тому

    Thank you for this. It seems like it would be a fair introduction to the outlines of Marx's work. Quite balanced and I thank you for that.

  • @clickprofileimage
    @clickprofileimage 4 роки тому

    Hey stranger! May God/the universe bless you abundantly and help make your plans successful. Speaking of plans, is your college coursework getting in the way? Are your professors/teachers bombarding you with huge amounts of homework? I can help. Just send me an email (maryjoykimmy@gmail.com).

  • @ABM321
    @ABM321 4 роки тому

    Thanks you for your help

  • @LIVINGWITHBIPOLARDISORDER
    @LIVINGWITHBIPOLARDISORDER 4 роки тому

    He was working as a Satan appointed and not a God appointed prophet under the guise of a philosopher. He was projecting into a future that was slipping out of his prediction thus the boom in middle class. Except a man is given wisdom of the future by God he has no clue what is to come, cell phones, internet, color television etc. I prophesy to you, that doctrine of the Jew which has haunted civilization and governments worldwide is about to be obliterated and burried by a chosen prophet. Matthew 12:42

  • @skillstolearn8594
    @skillstolearn8594 4 роки тому

    THIS IS GREAT VEDIO PLZ NOT TO STOP MAKING THE VEDIOSWHEN SEE YOUR SUBSCRIBERS ITS GIVES ALOT OF INFORMATION T0 OTHER GOD BLESS YOU

  • @hilda455
    @hilda455 4 роки тому

    you're amazing and i admire ur videos so much

  • @cornelius656
    @cornelius656 5 років тому

    This information is wrong. Smith never used the Invisible Hand metaphor to refer to the free market or competition.

    • @cocojumbo197
      @cocojumbo197 5 років тому

      I think people dont read Adam Smith so everyone misinterpret invisible hand😁 Then we have issue with monopolies? Who will stop merchants conspiring together, bribing government? Actually lobbying is allowed in usa. How division of labour/dumbing down of workforce for the sake of productivity..😏

    • @dinnerwithfranklin2451
      @dinnerwithfranklin2451 4 роки тому

      I'm pretty sure that Smith used the term 'invisible hand' once in Wealth of Nations. The fact that neoliberals have made it central to their interpretation of Smith's work says far more about modern capitalism than Smith's work.

  • @beatrizbenjamim2980
    @beatrizbenjamim2980 5 років тому

    "there are the ones you understand"

  • @TomTheGamer913
    @TomTheGamer913 6 років тому

    You said you were a teacher, you should know you can;t have "unlimited amounts of money."

  • @Mbruteblondi
    @Mbruteblondi 6 років тому

    THIS ISN'T EVEN MY FINAL FORM

  • @chelsearachel
    @chelsearachel 6 років тому

    good job!

  • @josephkiely1065
    @josephkiely1065 6 років тому

    All these views prob from CCH guys

  • @courtneyfaithbryant8045
    @courtneyfaithbryant8045 6 років тому

    Duh why would you not want to improve??? Of course you want more production and of course you want to thrive. No I don’t agree with reducing wages and upping prices, but I do agree with wanting to expand

  • @goniguntlaKalyani
    @goniguntlaKalyani 6 років тому

    thnq you

  • @tari-ebisuobo
    @tari-ebisuobo 6 років тому

    Thank you for the clear teaching

  • @sushilahlawat3706
    @sushilahlawat3706 6 років тому

    Very low volume

  • @samfuentes2343
    @samfuentes2343 6 років тому

    The overproduction/underconsumption problem isn’t relevant in today’s economy because the middle class has grown tremendously in past decades. If this wasn’t the case then it would be a problem (just like in the 1800s). If companies are “overproducing” then you either expand into new markets if there’s demand for your product. If there’s no demand for your product, then you halt production. There’s no such thing as overproduction because it clearly can’t go on forever.

    • @scottkuhn4026
      @scottkuhn4026 6 років тому

      Sam Fuentes if there is no overproduction then capitalism comes to an end.

    • @smhsophie
      @smhsophie 3 роки тому

      This is a dumb argument. I hope you've learned in the 2 years since posting this.

    • @JimChicken
      @JimChicken 11 місяців тому

      Overproduction occurs naturally as the market fluctuates. Idk what you mean by “halt production” but have you never seen a grocery store throw out expired food? That is overproduction and if this happens on a large enough scale without prices accounting for it ( if they even can) than inflation occurs.

  • @iamsujan.r
    @iamsujan.r 7 років тому

    I wana re update this video in nepal by uploading through my channel and i want your permission Cuz its ur effort and i dont want to ruin your effort

    • @iamsujan.r
      @iamsujan.r 7 років тому

      And bro thank you for your video its too awesome

  • @blueyognog
    @blueyognog 7 років тому

    A lot of Marx's theory seems to hinge on the "Overproduction/under-consumption" mechanism, but this is cancelled out by capitalism because if there isn't a demand for the goods then the business owners will not want to make a loss by trying to supply it. Overproduction can be a small issue but it is more of an issue for the businesses than anybody else. This theory reeks of somebody who doesn't know how business works. Oh wait...

    • @RadicalShiba1917
      @RadicalShiba1917 7 років тому

      This comment reeks of someone who has never read Marx

    • @kayshavkhanna
      @kayshavkhanna 6 років тому

      Great Depression of 1929. I rest my case

    • @dinnerwithfranklin2451
      @dinnerwithfranklin2451 4 роки тому

      I hope that by now you have actually read some Marx or at least something.

    • @JimChicken
      @JimChicken 11 місяців тому

      This reeks of somebody that doesn’t know what inflation is

  • @ChildOfBodom0815
    @ChildOfBodom0815 7 років тому

    Thank you for your effort and great videos! Could you please link related videos to each other (i.e. the part I to this part) keep it up!

    • @shoaibmohammed3707
      @shoaibmohammed3707 6 років тому

      FelixW Part 1 of Adam Smith : ua-cam.com/video/pa1UmWv9_4g/v-deo.html

  • @ellenkumsal8128
    @ellenkumsal8128 7 років тому

    you made it so clear.. thank you

  • @sunalharbi
    @sunalharbi 8 років тому

    many thanks for this great video

  • @planeofimmanence2157
    @planeofimmanence2157 8 років тому

    Actually back in Marx's time period the wealthy were the the rich nobles/clergy men from feudal times, and the middle class were the Bourgeois private business owners.

  • @amelieloruz6765
    @amelieloruz6765 8 років тому

    thanks a lot

  • @CitizenSnips314
    @CitizenSnips314 8 років тому

    Awesome that you took time to do this. Thank you.

  • @sunshinekiara
    @sunshinekiara 9 років тому

    mkay..

    • @moseswatson3407
      @moseswatson3407 3 роки тому

      pro tip: you can watch series at instaflixxer. Been using them for watching a lot of movies these days.

    • @neiljamie3122
      @neiljamie3122 3 роки тому

      @Moses Watson Definitely, have been watching on instaflixxer for years myself :D

    • @aidenneil4509
      @aidenneil4509 3 роки тому

      @Moses Watson Yea, have been using InstaFlixxer for months myself :D

    • @juniorjason583
      @juniorjason583 3 роки тому

      @Moses Watson Definitely, have been using InstaFlixxer for since november myself :)

    • @victorxander6630
      @victorxander6630 3 роки тому

      @Moses Watson Definitely, I have been watching on instaflixxer for since november myself =)

  • @kennethchanSG
    @kennethchanSG 9 років тому

    Good channel . Informative . Well Done .

  • @kennethchanSG
    @kennethchanSG 9 років тому

    Evolution Economy A free open market that evolves thru time is the best working model. Martxism, Socialism or Communism didnt work they tried it and failed. Current world ecocnomy is gobalised its too complex and modern for Martx.

    • @dinnerwithfranklin2451
      @dinnerwithfranklin2451 4 роки тому

      Yet the underlying tension between employer and employee remains. I'm not sure it is too complex for a Marxist to explain if you are not a capitalist propagandist.

  • @ashrafhariff6008
    @ashrafhariff6008 9 років тому

    great video!