- 174
- 51 216
Stoner Chul
Приєднався 28 тра 2023
NPD, MBTI, Philosophy, etc
Instagram: philosophymemer
Tiktok: creamcheeseinmyforeskin
Snapchat: hsjdjl22
cash.app/$nihilisticguy
tellonym.me/stonerchul
Instagram: philosophymemer
Tiktok: creamcheeseinmyforeskin
Snapchat: hsjdjl22
cash.app/$nihilisticguy
tellonym.me/stonerchul
Narcissist talks about NPD and BPD comorbidity
#narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #narcissist #npd #clusterb #bpd #borderlinepersonalitydisorder #borderline
Переглядів: 230
Відео
Narcissist talks about shame
Переглядів 5614 годин тому
#narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb #npd #narcissist
Narcissist talks about object constancy and nihilism
Переглядів 3416 годин тому
#narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb #nihilism #narcissist #npd
Narcissist describes what being selfish is like
Переглядів 5114 днів тому
#narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #narcissist #npd #clusterb
Reconciling Quantum Mechanics And Determinism
Переглядів 4721 день тому
#determinism #quantummechanics #philosophy
Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? Atheist Responds
Переглядів 155Місяць тому
#atheism #nihilism
My experience as INTP narcissist
Переглядів 547Місяць тому
#mbti #intp #narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #narcissist #clusterb
Narcissist talks about stigma
Переглядів 53Місяць тому
#npd #narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb
Why Narcissists Hate People You Know
Переглядів 86Місяць тому
#npd #narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb
My take on evolutionary ethics
Переглядів 6482 місяці тому
#philosophy #moralphilosophy #atheist #atheism
Narcissist talks about mirroring
Переглядів 1142 місяці тому
#npd #narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb
Narcissist talks about difficulty treating NPD
Переглядів 1152 місяці тому
#npd #narcissisticpersonalitydisorder #clusterb
Exploring situated cognition (rationalism vs empiricism) (embodied cognition)
Переглядів 302 місяці тому
Exploring situated cognition (rationalism vs empiricism) (embodied cognition)
My take on Moral/Ethical Subjectivism
Переглядів 243 місяці тому
My take on Moral/Ethical Subjectivism
My take on Consequentialism vs Deontology
Переглядів 233 місяці тому
My take on Consequentialism vs Deontology
Narcissist talks about sensitivity to criticism
Переглядів 893 місяці тому
Narcissist talks about sensitivity to criticism
Narcissist talks about disappointment
Переглядів 994 місяці тому
Narcissist talks about disappointment
Narcissistic Personality Disorder vs Bipolar Disorder
Переглядів 2904 місяці тому
Narcissistic Personality Disorder vs Bipolar Disorder
Narcissist talks about people pleasers
Переглядів 994 місяці тому
Narcissist talks about people pleasers
1st: THANK YOU for sharing your highly intelligent, honest thoughts AND keeping the comments on. I don't think anyone truly realizes how much it takes to do that, and makes me want to rage preemtively for anyone endeavoring to take advantage of that. 2nd: I could really relate. I have asked my own therapist 3xs throuhout our session if I could also have NPD or ASPD, and he always reassured me that I did not. Despite agreeing or not, the key does truly seem to lie in the crises, where BPD would tend to show itself in ways that Narcissists can back out of. As you've said, if Narcs expressed your vulnerabilities more openly, you may as well have BPD. And if us Borderlines were able to maintain the mask, we may as well have NPD. What you tell yourself (about being god/ others are stupid) is verbatim the inner monologue I consciously work to adopt, but is abruptly chucked out of the window as if it has caught fire in times of intense loneliness and pain.
Thank you for your kind words and understanding 💖💖💖
Great video. I have one question: How are you feeling when you are mentioning your own "insecurity".Don't you feel that your image is being tarnished in some way?
I guess there's a few perspectives 1. Talking about my insecurity makes me feel "real". Being open about it is its own confidence ironically. There are definitely people that could never make these videos 2. Might as well be honest? I'm a very take it or leave it kind of person. Whether it be insecurity or narcissism, what you see is what you get 3. I find my content about NPD more unique from my first hand experiences
Just subbed.
Thanks! 😎
Me when I’m gay…
What a stupid, homophobic comment.
6:54 *lack of object constancy
I think NPD is so important to talk about because these experiences are actually present in so many people on a lower level and we ignore them because it's so uncomfortable, all the things someone with NPD can't possibly ignore. Not to say the narcissistic point of view is the "right" one but a very human one.
wait yeah you just said the same thing around 6.30 minutes in
Do you relate to being considered “dramatic and erratic”?
I think I can be? It's hard to say bc my emotions have always felt either all or nothing
Me when I’m gay
Me when I’m gay
It's cool that you're honest about it. You certainly explained it in a way I could understand. I think I knew a girl with NPD and she it sometimes seemed like she hated herself a little bit. I think if you hate yourself, you're certainly at risk of abusing other people because you'll devalue them as well, but I don't believe the platitude that you absolutely have to love yourself before you love someone else, though I do think it helps. It's the sanctity of life that people need to be able to see within themselves first that leads to their success in deriving gratification from relationships with other people.
Thank you
Me when I’m gay
Me When I’m Gay
5:12 *incoherent
What are your thoughts on the argument from reason?
My answer before watching: I don't know, but I'm ok with not knowing. It may be impossible to know.
Think of it as a science question. We're not investigating the universe when we ask "why is there something rather than nothing", we are investigating existence itself. The universe exists. Okay, that's a verb, that's the universe doing something. Has it always been doing that? What is it about the universe that demands that it exist? Is there some law that describes the quality of existence? Is existence causal? Is it accidental? Is it probabalistic? Is it cyclical? Does it follow some other pattern that we haven't even discovered yet? Can existence change over time, or be effected by events? Does existence necessarily demand matter and space and time and energy, or does it have a more complicated relationship with those things? Can existence itself be described mathematically? What makes you think that nothing exists outside the universe? Does existence have a start, an end, both, or neither, or do the concepts of beginnings and endings not apply to it at all? Does existence necessarily imply a Creator? And if so, can we learn anything about that Creator by observing and studying existence? If existence is not dependent upon a Creator, what does that imply about the universe? What is the relationship between what is self-evident, what is obscure, and what is impossible? What is the precise relationship between existence and non-existence? Are the laws of mathematics built-in to existence, or does existence generate them in some way? Do mathematics precede the universe, or do they only exist within the universe? Could existence be alive or conscious in some way? Is it actually true that existence does nothing? How do you know? Does "mattering" matter to existence? Is there actually something rather than nothing, or is existence iself a meaningless word? How do you know? Are there any experiments we could run to investigate existence, rather than merely things that exist? What if there is some incredible equation that elegantly solves the problem, but you would never know because you never bothered to ask? All of these questions are variations on the "why is there something rather than nothing" question.
don't you equate teleology with causality. The question asks for a cause, not a purpose. You pull back to doubting structure and causality later but we do expect causes and structure in science and reasoning about the world is fundamentally causal can I ask you a simpler question, to which the answer is not monotheism but it makes you think about what is material and what "immaterial" Why fundamental particles/fields move?
One can be a nihilist about causality just as well as about purpose. The laws of physics merely describe how one event follows another, but they're generally time-reversible so it's not obvious that events cause each other in the sense we're used to. We can use causality as a concept, extrapolating from the human experience of intentional action to the world of particles and fields, but it doesn't reveal anything deeper about the meaning of the universe.
If you really believe nothing matters, you won't be making this video, because it doesn't matter.
room temp iq take^ Say I don't understand without saying I don't understand.
Lazy braindead takes delivered like a “gotcha” are pretty much the bottom of the barrel. Atheism doesn’t argue that nothing matters, and anyone with even partial understanding would know this. And regardless, you don’t really need to believe things matter to make a video, so the logic is broken in the first place.
Everyday we do things that don't matter. We step out of the bed with one foot rather than the other. We eat this or that. We can try to stay still, until the prospect of suffering comes along, then we try to avoid it. This habit of making ourselves busy is inescapable. Check out The Myth of Sisyphus by Camus.
Me when I’m gay
I have vivid dreams almost every single night. Often the dreams are more fulfilling than real life.
how does asking the 'why is there something rather than nothing' presuppose teleology? i dont think they are necessarily saying there has to be an explanation, but that at least the intuitional seeming to most people is that this fact (that there is something) cries out for an explanation are you attacking the actual arguments or just the people that make the arguments? i could flip your argument: you are so stuck in with the new atheist tradition that you have to use this mental gymnastics of saying to ask for an explanation of the universe is silly. why should my argument be favoured over yours? again, are you attacking the arguments they make or the people that make them? why is your theory about people's religious beliefs correct? sounds quite disrespectful to call all religious believers 'weak' just because they have a different metaphysics to you if the problem of criterion asks for a foundation of knowledge (im not sure it does), why should we assume this is the case for the why is there something rather than nothing question. are there not non-foundational groundings (sensu lato) for metaphysics, i.e., some form of coherentism, infinitism, etc.? you say you argue it is mental gymnastics, but when will you actually provide an argument (assuming you intended to provide this sort of argument in this video)? you're talking about a completely different question to the one in the title are you just equating on what the universe means? if the god debate was so simple that some guy on youtube debunks theism in a few sentences, do you think there would still be people arguing about whether god exists (and im not talking about your uncle using pascal's wager, but actual top-level philosophers)? what has mereological nihilism got to do with this video? i feel like you have watched a few of alex oconnor's videos and are not just using buzzwords to make your rambling seem intelligible.
It very much seemed like this was made fresh off a few Alex O'conner vids - but it felt less honest/genuine that most of Alex's videos seem. Like this guy was just asserting his position rather than describing why he finds it compelling.
It might be impossible for a part to understand the whole, so as beings of matter and energy within a universe of matter and energy we'll always have unanswered questions. Perhaps either of these premises is incorrect. If there's something else besides matter and energy it might help us understand more, but how do we access it if our actions only affect the physical world? Relying on our intuitions is not obviously a way to truth.
@@Elisha_the_bald_headed_prophet i dont think it is necessarily an intuition in a sort of metaphysical sense, but a more general one, not exactly sure what you are saying though
I'm not convinced. Did you diagnose yourself? There is room for only one god, and you ain't it.
Ok if you are so satisfied with yourself and everyone else is too stupid for you then do me a favor and stay as far away as possible from other people. It’s best for you and for them
Are you filipino?
You guys have ptsd and anxiety disorder BUT also it’s related to Austism. I’ve dated 3 intp’s so I know
you're saying every INTP has 3 mental disorders?
Hey, thank you. Really hope you will find yourself. You're giving yourself your own key to get out of it, without realizing it: you can't have a sense of self when you don't care about others. It is like saying I cannot open this golden door because I don't care about the key. The key is the state of your heart. You need to get to a place where you would want to love others. It feels really good to do that. It brings warmth and joy to the soul. Look at it that way: the good you do to others, you're doing it to you too. This is only to help: if sadism is into the equation, then fall on your knees and cry out to Jesus in repentance for deliverance and salvation, because it is a demonic addiction. And beware, God resists to the prideful ones. Again, all is about the state of your heart and what you desire. If you want to get out of it, start by the 10 Commandments without any manipulation. Walk straight in them. This teaches a harden heart how to start in the path of true love. You don't need to feel some good emotions about that. It is a firm decision you take consciously. Then move on to Jesus' commands that will refine your being to the most profound way. He rebuilds broken souls on rocks. Jesus blesses you and may He comes into your life to bring you to life.
Me when I’m gay
I know at least two intp guys narcissists lol
Loved that, quite eloquently put thoughts. You may like "The Conspiracy Against The Human Race" by Ligotti.
Thanks for sharing. Do you think there's a link between personality type and metaethical stance?
i went the nihilist route and it wrecked my life. i logically came to the conclusion of reincarnation. also, if you want meaning to your life, marry an enfj, they will change your life. as im married to one, it blows my mind that she will sit and listen to my ramblings and be interested!
_Five_ is defined as one plus one plus one plus one us one. The _five_ is in that repeating the operation five times (or one being added five times). Admittedly, putting this into words is circular. Wittgenstein would say there's nothing we can add with words to make sense of it logically. But we understand it intuitively. BTW the operation itself is what you would call 'empirical'. (Mathematician and a nominalist here.)
Me when I’m gay
How do we tell if something is true? Not by an universal criterion, as Godel s incompleteness shows.
From the perspective of someone who has resonated quite strongly with many of your past thoughts and messages: There are a LOT of philosophical labels being thrown around here. I often repel those, finding them limiting and restrictive per my personal take on any one issue. Challenge: redo this vid (and some of the other newer ones), but without using a single philosophical label or term. Yes, that would be nearly impossible. But we’re INTP, aren’t we?
W Stoner Chul for paying attention to his community and engaging with it.
Me when I’m gay
6:45 *not safe
i think: working inside a particular language game involving fact-stating, true propositions are those that don’t encounter overwhelming opposition, and/or receives enough assent
Me when I’m gay
Stoner Chul, I've been following you for a while (I believe I have NPD too, or maybe OCD, I'm still trying to figure it out) and appreciate the videos you've posted. One thing I've always been curious about is your decision to reveal who you are given the stigma surrounding NPD. Is there a reason for it? Or does it not bother you too much in your current life circumstances? Personally, I was mortified when I was confronted with the possibility of having NPD and have largely isolated myself since, giving up on most friendships. Now, part of me wants to get a formal diagnosis and be simply candid with it so at least I won't live in fear of being exposed - I am who I am, and if others like to try be friends, sure, but at least they know the risks beforehand.
I would also be confused if I just leave out half of the arguements on both sides lmao
Atmluv1 is weird. You’re contributing to the furtherance of research and understanding into people who suffer with NPD, which is exactly what society needs right now. As a psychologist, I find immense value in these videos of yours. Thank you.
user-kp6ud7ht4z is weird. Imagine being a psychologist ? Pick a field with some dignity.
Unironically think that you pinpointing a lack of object constancy is a solid observation and I think that explains your hateful attitude. It also explains your inkling that positive sentiments are always fickle in some way. There’s a lot of anguish underlying these rants. It seems like your mind could be a very stimulating place to be in, but also potentially exhausting and tiring. I understand why you annoy people but there’s a sympathetic way of seeing these videos, which is something like wow, this guy is at bottom confused and wary.
Me when I’m gay
Know Jesus, Know Peace No Jesus, No Peace ❤
Me when I’m gay
4:44 Yes, absolutely - you do NOT have to always do small talk when you meet somebody! Fellow INTP here. Recently there was this new guy at work, we hadn’t exchanged a word yet. One day I walked slowly, unassuming towards him. When up close I dramatically locked my gaze with his and stated “ENFP?….. or maybe ENTP?!” We hit it off instantly and haven’t wasted a second on small talk yet.