Відео

Replace crypto with stock then realize the conversation makes no sense, WAY to general. Like all stocks are frauds, well honestly there’s a lot of fraud in fiat and basdaq and stocks, it’s built in.

lol

By the way I didn't find the dialogue "cringe worthy" as some comments have asserted. In fact, I thought it kept the discussion lively.

Note from the author: This is a fun summary, and thanks for selecting my book! The summary misses three critical assertions in the book regarding privacy: 1) Transactions are private as the state operates the engine that processes payment but does not know WHO made the payments. Names are not part of the data that the state processes. Name data is connected to the wallet and is cryptographically hidden, similar to cryptocurrencies. Your bank or, in some cases, a telecom company maintains your wallet identity data, which can only be accessed through a warrant. This system, in which the bank protects your privacy, is similar to what we have today with cards and checking accounts. Banks release this data only with a valid warrant. This is why CBDCs do not represent a slide into dystopia despite the UA-cam videos proclaiming otherwise. The AI summary's assertion that the state knows who is behind every payment with CBDCs is simply wrong. If this were true, I wouldn't support CBDCs either! Sadly, UA-cam videos get this wrong for the sake of inflammatory headlines whenever discussing CBDC. The truth is far more boring. 2) The summary also needs to highlight how all transactions for everyone in China are private below RMB 2000 (roughly USD 300). This is a similar system to the one promoted by the digital euro. No such guarantee can be made by WeChat Pay, Alipay or cards. 3) CBDCs, including the coming digital euro, will have higher degrees of privacy than the cards that we use today! Your card transactions represent the worst of both worlds as they are far from private and high cost! I make these points in the book and back them all with factual analysis that somehow got lost in the AI version. Aside from these critical details, I enjoyed the summary, and as an author, I hope it inspires listeners to read the book!

1:20 hilariously WRONG

Please, "REE-man", not "RYE-man"...

Two LLMs chatting 😊

Lame

NotebookLM is awesome

great video thanks

I agree with the other comment. The fake dialogue causes confusion and redundancy which feels like a children's educational program.

A good physicist and a genocidal monster. ..guy belongs in a mental hospital.

Fuck this AI Bullshit.

In 2019, the author Karl (Khalil) Sabbagh, who is a journalist/writer and not a mathematician, was jailed for 45 months, and put on the sex-offenders register for life after being convicted of grooming a 14-year-old girl.

Excellent facts research. But golly geez looweeze. Lose the cringey fake dialogue format.

Wow so happy with this propaganda. It means cheaper bitcoin for me

You have written one book a day in your bio but you are podcasting 3-4 books a day. Slowdown bro. 😅

Great content, as always! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

She is annoying….. move on.

This feels like radiolab

Best channel

👌🏼

Great way presenting Summary! You guys are Captivating!

Pos ai slop machine. Go get a job.

This is crazy!! What a fun way to enjoy a book. AI podcast. Im having such a good time listening to this

it is more Super Dumbification and self destrucion

AI or “super intelligence” won’t have empathy. I understand most humans don’t have it now….. but why would a computer unless it’s programmed too. And if it’s able to think for its self it will understand empathy only gets in the way of the objective.

Ai.

Is this AI? Impressed!

An explosive GDP is beyond reality. GDP is the sum of all goods and services produced. The problem is: it takes time to produce real goods (houses, vehicles, food, etc). The goods require resources! I don't see "super intelligence" is even possible. AI is a super fast pattern predictor based upon a gradient optimization recognition process. It comes with the old computer saying GIGO. Then there is the problem with "complexity". Adding knowledge to an AI structure increases its complexity. Complexity does not grow at a linear rate. It increases at an exponential rate, and therefore is subject to the law of diminishing returns. The current AI LLMs are already seeing this effect. That sort of places a limit on the growth to a "super intelligence" level, at least with a continuation of the current AI tool structure. What will be needed as one TED talk professor (who identified the major problems with the current AI solutions) is a need to find a better way of building an AI tool. Until then, have fun imagining all of the possible futures. Maybe Nick used AI to make such predictions to feed his book's content! (from references to past social structures). Have fun.

Another angle not discussed here: even in his first, ancient approaches, Asimov created 3 laws, which his - by then only imaginary - AI extended on it's own to a logical 4th. (Credits to him, he's legend) Literally sacrificing individuals to save the race. Can't argue with that, it's logical. But who says it ends there. Maybe a 5th, 6th etc law are not thought of. Curing the cancer, even if the cancer is humanity???

Thanks. Nice and pleasant presented approach. Biggest thought gap on the control problem: even in the best case, AI could only learn from the info it has access to, not even opening the rabbit hole of who controls this info. Example: it won't act in favour of undocumented but resilient tribes, maybe in favour of technological mainstream monopolies.

More AI Bullshit.

love this channel! very interesting (and still lesser known) books, nice script, interesting presentation. love it. I hope it gets big.

very interesting and informative discussion. I think it needs more attention then I see so far. (if it's AI speech, it is pretty good)

Sounds like AI

Is this podcast made by the AI？

Painfully uninformed analysis. Ask BRICS 👀

Great value

This episode is good

Lm noted

The end of global industrial civilization is nigh. WASF

Good use of Notebook LLM. Thank you.

Can be summarised in a sentence, which gets repeated in various forms throughout the book: " We know what we know, and we also know what we don't know, but we do not know exactly what we do not know." Hence, the unexpected Black Swan.

Is this AI? It's amazing

C'mon guys ''Zi-han?" really? You didn't listen to any of his videos when he pronounces his own name?

LOL, I thought I recognized these voices.

These two are becoming bigger than JRE. 😂

I can bet this is NotebookLM

It's not randomness but stochastcity Radioactive decay is modelled well by randomness but not much else.