Відео

Yup!

Ör Sethhhhhhhh

Haha! It'd certainly help get more science, that's for sure. Especially on Serpent. To help out in the early-game.

Haha, haven't figured out a schedule so far. I generally try more towards the evening. Around 8-9pm eastern.

Onychoprion27 Darn that's really difficult for me to watch. Don't worry, I love watching the videos back afterwards, though!

Sorry...! I could stream at a different time, if you wanted!

Wow! That's dedication! And yeah, I am. This mod is a lot of fun. Enough familiarity with the system, but a lot of differences so that it all feels new!

Thanks for putting so much work into it! :O It's really well-done!

Thank you! I can't believe I was late to the livestream you started 5 hours ago - I was still asleep! UA-cam said you were still live but I joined just after you'd finished - darn!

Gameslinx Haha, no worries. I have no delusions that I'm any interesting to watch. XD Plus. Not sure how able I'd be when the mod maker is watching. The pressure! D: x3

Gameslinx whenKopernicus for 1.9 comes out I will download before Kerbin, after Kerbin, and beyond home

Oh, thank you!

There is an option for station services (you might notice them when I open the communication dialogue), but they're not working at the moment. There's also no way to go back from that option, which breaks the communications system entirely; hence why I don't open it. Yes, eyeballing hohmann transfer orbits is pretty inefficient. Though since the Main Engine System is effectively reactionless (you will eventually run out of reactor fuel, but never propellant), wasting delta-V isn't an issue. I do hope that future updates will have a better way of setting up transfer orbits, however. I'm hoping for something like the TransX mod in Orbiter, or something as simple as Kerbal Space Program's interface. As for battery charging, batteries can be charged from the main bus no matter which system bus they're linked to. Linking each battery to only one bus limits how quickly they drain, though also as the busses handle different functions (Bus 1 is more basic system functions, while Bus 2 are operational things, like Nav, MTS, etc.), the batteries will drain at different rates. If you don't start your reactors quickly enough, while powering everything on the batteries, Bus 2 will drain them far more quickly than Bus 1. That's why I try to only boot up operational systems after the reactor's running. Connecting to external power doesn't help, either, since it only provides power for Bus 1, but doesn't supply power to charge the batteries. Thus, even when booting on external power, Bus 2 will continue draining your batteries until your reactor is on-line. One advantage to connecting both batteries to both busses is that they will drain in sequence, and can provide an easy method for determining just how much power you have left. Battery 1 will drain first, followed by 2. Though with frugal use of power, you can easily get your reactor on-line on a single battery, so it's not too big an issue.

Excellent reply. Yes, although the simplicity of turning knobs has a retro appeal and is sufficient for leveraging prograde/retrograde/normal/radial concepts to match target velocities, target attitudes or orbits, then I hope it wont come at the expense of the stuff you mention. Something akin to planning burns in Kerbal is needed.

Or even just a depiction of your orbit and your locked target's orbit would be helpful. Again, I am biased more toward MFD-style 2D displays than trying to incorporate a 3D Kerbal-style interface on the info screen, which would feel clunky and tacked-on in comparison to the rest of the interface, IMO. Being able to see the orbits and the positions of yourself and your target would at least facilitate making transfer maneuvers.

Absolutely. Even so, I will forever thank Kerbal for building my mental map so that I can have situational awareness from mere orbital data. And, if the mechjeb2 manuevers where available from the onboard computer, then that would go a very long way without compromising the 2D MFD experience. And, if the AP target knob had a setting for targeted (LOC locked) docking port and the feature knob had a setting for matching attitude (maybe a switch for "reverse Y"), then the currently available difficult mission would be pretty simple. Even though it still feels weird eyeballing the approach burn.

You're quite welcome! I'm glad you enjoyed the video, and I certainly hope you have fun with the game!

Thanks!

The description is the full text, yes. There are a few words that I had to guess at, though.

This text is both freighting and heart wrenching. May I ask, where it's from?

It's from Myst Online: Uru Live, which you can get here: www.mystonline.com/en/

Onychoprion27 You are telling me that it's from a gamer site ? A Kadish reference from a gamer site ?

It's *from* the game. The "Kadish" referenced in the note (or, rather, the author of the note) was Guildmaster Kadish of the Guild of Writers. He was kind of an eccentric, building massive contraptions to trick people into thinking he had special powers (such as time travel). As the D'ni Civilization came to an end, Kadish retreated to a vault and there perished, surrounded by his wealth. Hence the note.

+Atrus Official I know, right?!

Ok cya lol xD :3

Evander H. There's a mod for KSP, I believe, that makes the planets the size of ... well, planets.

Yes, Real Solar system- but I still believe that Orbiter is the better sim- But because of the building elements, KSP is more fun :P

much, much faster my old friend

eight years ago 💀💀

​@@elzzznahoriasNo,now 9 year ago

Thanks! ^^ I wasn't aware anyone still watched these videos. :P This was recorded in a time I'd only read orbital terms, and that's why I'm a bit shaky on ... everything. I'm better now, but still no aerospace engineer. I'm glad you like the videos!

Good question! I'll have to get Orbiter up and running again and see how that works.

there is another set at the pointy end.