Відео

I disagree, for me godot has one of the best UIs, when I tried unity or unreal, I didn't like it very much (I understand that not everyone has the same opinion)

I’m not sure what you mean by that you can download and import as many textures as you want.

No, I just blurred the left one a little bit for the showcase

Please read the pinned comment

It's default export refresh rate in software i edited this video in and I probably just forgot to switch it to 60 😅

I think it was in version 4.1

@@tomargamedev Thanks. That will be why I can't find the options in my 3.5 version! :)

Both can be used for that. But if I like to do that kind of game, I would use Godot but and there should be strong arguments to choose Unity. I found Godot to be easier to develop.

try them both and see for yourself.

I don't know, it's just the program I used to record it showed the keys I pressed, so when you move the camera in Godot, you use shift and W, S, A or D

@@tomargamedev woo, man thanks for this. You are hella fast in replying. I got your answer here faster than discord buddies 😅

Its how you pronounce Godot, take it up with the French.

Right... sure your game might not have the greatest graphics, but graphics kinda stopped being so important after Mass Effect 3 for me anyway, Godot will improve in time but I would rather have bigger and more dynamic gameplay over the worlds greatest graphics at this point.

I've also noticed a lot of great comments here and I'd like to apologize for being inactive on this channel both in terms of responding to comments and posting videos I haven't had the time and motivation to create something lately but I'll try to come up with something over time

@@tomargamedevGreat video. The only reason I clicked on this video was because I wanted to see an general look of the environment. It may be a click bait, but I knew from beginning that Godot doesn't support AAA games.

You can use antialiasing in Godot, can’t you

😂 Sorry, this wasn't the best example of graphics in godot

It only looks like Roblox because of the grid

man u havent seen much of godot then

@@hingedevoper69 it’s a fairly new engine. The only main projects in the fps space we’ve seen so far have been road to Vostok. I’m just saying for a fairly new engine, mini projects that look this good that keep popping up are just making godot have more and more of a good portfolio of games.

Almost every optimization happens in assets. Up to three LOD levels in mesh and make sure that every triangle is at least 10px size in screen and using texture compression is way to get things fast. And asset optimization does not mean bad graphics, idea is to keep things photoreal while still having technical standards to assets. Dynamic shadows are not issue. Stencil shadow for one light source + polygon shadows below objects are something like 25 year old thing. Xbox 360 era hardware we got proper shadow maps but and theory we got something like 5 light sources at time creating dynamic shadows but shadow atlas had to be small. Less dynamic lights means more details on shadows. In Godot using modern hardware dynamic shadows are not issue and you can do lighting without SDFGI.

@@gruntaxeman3740 I wasn't talking about stencil shadows. I was talking about the dynamic shadow resolution.

@@You-tube-two Well, stencil shadows are dynamic. Their issue is that they are actually expensive so in PS2/Xbox era you got only one dynamic shadow casting light. PS3 / Xbox 360 made possible to increase multiple shadow casting lights. Godot makes easy to optimize that. Basicly you just bake everything that is not dynamic. On outdoor scenes maybe put only sun casting shadows and cloud shadows can be added in shader.

There are no AAA games on mobile.

Exactly. You can drop a bunch of AAA-quality assets into a Godot scene and make it look great, but the hard part is making that run smoothly. Occlusion culling and auto-LOD will help, but Godot has no built-in asset streaming so you'll need to have everything in memory at all times, making traversing larger levels impossible without having to stop for a loadscreen often. This is of course a bottleneck in all game engines but if you can stream in textures and models of higher quality progressively, you can manage to render a large and detailed scene as your character travels through it without requiring 64 GB of RAM, 32 GB of VRAM (I making these numbers up). Asset streaming hopefully is coming to Godot 4 in 2024, so it's worth keeping an eye out. For now - you need to design your environments with a limited set of textures in geometry in mind to limit the memory requirements. In theory you could load in unique assets on a separate thread, but this will require a lot of work and you'd also need to have separate meshes and textures for multiple LOD levels of your assets to be able to maintain a reasonable memory use. And that's a lot of work, and a lot of storage needed to keep that, so depending on the size of the assets, you might need to run the game off of an SSD to even have this work. Anyway - AAA is overrated and the bane of the game development. AAA is where the worst monetization and user abuse come from. Go indie or go home! - unfa

I was thinking about doing a video on optimization

@@liblast Up to three LOD levels per mesh, keep all triangles at least 10px size in screen, limit texture size that there is 16 texels in direction (x,y) in detailed part for one vertex. That will do the trick. It is all about asset optimization and it is artists responsibility to create them to match requirements, those are vertex and texel density in different parts of scene. Game engine will render them blazingly fast if assets are properly done.

You pronounce roboh????

​@@RenderingUserhe pronounce "godoT" :DD

@@RenderingUser nice

I wasn't talking about AAA games, I was talking about AAA graphics and of course even that can't be taken 100% seriously in this video

@Tonypec1974 Let's do some calculations. For example, I made the same game with cool graphics on two engines. On Unreal Engine and on Godot. On Unreal I have to pay 5% of the gross cost of the game, on Godot I pay nothing. But, if on Unreal Engine I will make it in 3 years, on Godot engine it will take 5 years. So is that 5% worth the extra 2 years of work??? And why do I need an open source engine? To look for errors or write missing functionality? Because on Unreal Engine I get all the functionality I need for such a game.

@Tonypec1974 You cannot efficiently create triple A games with Godot.

@@w3ryfrate535 A triple A game by definition is just a game with a high budget. the graphics don't really matter.

@@xenoxia pretty sure it means games published from big names of the gaming industry like Activision, Rockstar, etc.

@w3ryfrate535 well known companies are associated with AAA games because they generally have a higher budget, but there is no limitation on how big your company has to be to create an AAA game.

Yeah, I think (very close to) photorealistic humans as well as large open worlds are two things that AAA games do these days that you simply cannot achieve in Godot.

the engine provides all the resources to achieve this, including low level pipeline manipulation. it just doesn't do it for you. @@jesperpersson9388 there already exists tokisan/terrain3d and some particle implementations that can achieve well optimized results.

@@jesperpersson9388 I don't see that there is any real obstacle that prevents that. Human is photorealistic as you model it and trick to creating large open is how you cull things out that are not visible in scene so they are not rendered or their code is not run.

There is nothing that prevents that in Godot, if you can make photorealistic human models you can put them in Godot.@@jesperpersson9388