Відео

I like how you point out that each side of a person's political sensibilities are not void of the other aspects that make up an opposing perspective. Hardly anybody is 100% party lines or doctrine. Just like no two religious people in the same place of worship will have the same views. We are all a blend of everything it's just to what percentage that is. I personally have always been "in the middle" of many subjects. Trying to balance the objective and subjective.

Sub 42 baby!

If you always think you're in the right, you'll never see when you're wrong.

Well done I appreciate your approach

Quality content ❤ subbed😊

A lot conservative care and fairness ethics or expressed through Christianity, and a lot of Liberal Sanctity and Authority ethics are expressed in their relationship to Academia --- or have utilitarianism or science-aligned rationalizations. New age religion and pseudo-religious devotion to popular culture and the arts should be taken into account as well. “He who does not work, shall not eat.” “Believe science.”

Can you see how the politics and other things are used to undermine the morality? I mean to completely manipulate the outcome undermining the morality principles in a pursuit of power and status. No left and right dynamics just the good and the bad. The bad winning by a mile, especially where it matters if it concerns the power and the status.

Awesome video - looks great and very informative! Thanks!

Politics? … I’ll rather just play Minecraft as, after all, I’ll probably make more progress there. 🙃

This was a thoughtful and well-structured video, and I agree with much of what was presented, especially the role of moral intuitions and psychology in shaping political beliefs. I've long believed that genetics and innate traits play a major role in determining political orientation, creating a spectrum where roughly 30% lean strongly left, 30% strongly right, and 40% fall somewhere in between. However, I think the video glosses over a critical limitation: the personality traits that align with authoritarianism-often found in the right-make genuine dialogue and collaboration nearly impossible. When one side prioritizes plurality and open discourse while the other clings to blind obedience to authority and sanctity of tradition, meaningful debate becomes unattainable. The right's frequent bad-faith arguments further exacerbate this divide, undermining the very premise of constructive conversation. Additionally, the use of Kamala Harris at 14:09 to represent "the left" felt misleading. Both major political parties in the US are right-leaning, neoliberal entities. While Democrats may wear the veneer of social democracy, they ultimately serve the same capitalist interests as Republicans. A more appropriate representation of the left would have been an anarchist leader or a grassroots commune, as they align more closely with the values of care, fairness, and egalitarianism highlighted in the video. That said, I appreciate the call for humility, compassion, and a willingness to learn from opposing perspectives. Those are vital values, even if the practical challenges of engaging with the right make achieving them difficult.

Some of the coolest ideas I’ve ever heard explained in a video. 👍👍👍

I have a mental illness where I assume that others will automatically change their minds when I present them the correct information.

Another great video

Move over School of Life.

This is amazing. I hope more people see this. Thank you man!

I am glad someone is discussing values in conjunction with politics. I also really appreceate how you discuss the different frameworks without bias, it's very refreshing!

Great video. But we all know the agenda for territorial ambition thru expansion and new world order is too onerous, too extreme and could precipitate a war and further lead to outcast or worst an holocaust. And this is where an independent intelligence agency comes into the picture with an oath to preserve peace and protect life. You may not have heard of them but they are from all parts of the world. I have came across with one of them before and believe it or not they exist and my hopes are on them more than any others.

Nice

Yes

I wish more people understood the difference between a million and a billion.

Awesome work, man!

Poroshenko and Merkel have both stated that there was no intention of honoring the Minsk accords. That they were a ploy to buy time for the Ukraine to rearm and get ready for war. Also the Ukrainians have been shelling the Donbass break away regions for eight years prior to the Russian invasion resulting in up to 14,000 deaths, mostly civilians, in these regions. How can you reconcile these factors with our " liberal values and regard for human rights and internation law"?

Excellent video, very well made and succinctly put.