Відео

Very informative thanks for the comparison's

What's that machine / ipad do?

Keep going man!

Than ther is not much difference between the orginal and the Baofeng and Retevis Antennas? 🤔

I got the same swr meter. It says the minimum power to test swr is 3watts.

You need a metal pan like a pizza pan and stick the antenna magnet mount in the center with at least a inch of metal or more around the base. Then you can use it as if it was on the ground.

кобра и еачайн это шлема, а очки и шлема две разные штуки, и на еачайн летал и на км

кобра и еачайн это шлема, а очки и шлема две разные штуки, и на еачайн летал и на км

I have a Viavi TRI-LKG-ANT-DUAL-DUCK Rubber Duck Antenna for Seeker HL , (who would buy it?)

Never ever place your hand and fingers on the connectors, it will not provide accurate testing.

Great video. Would you say that the Nagoya is well suited for marine band. Are these swr readings consistent with the same models or do you think there a variation with the readings with different antennas of the same model.

Да говори уж по- русски, чоуштам

Где полёты? Где сравнение работы приёмников на разной дальности? Видео не о чем.

Good day, I'm planning to purchase either the Nagoya UT-72 or Nagoya UT-72G antenna. I'm primarily going to use frequencies between 451.000 to 455.000 most of the time, and occasionally frequencies between 144 to 145. I've heard that the Nagoya UT-72G might be a better choice since its frequency range extends from 155 to 462 compared to the Nagoya UT-72, which covers 144 to 430. However, I've noticed that the Nagoya UT-72G is more expensive in my area. Can you please provide guidance on which antenna would be the better option given my frequency usage and budget constraints? Your assistance is much appreciated. Thank you.

Tanks! :)😃

Great info and video, very informative. Thanks 73's WA2TWF

Thank you for your help. I couldn't figure out why I had good signal and can see the everyone on wjst-x but nothing on band activity. When I went through your video, I saw my date was wrong, all I had to do was sync now. Bam, all was all good. Thanks again for your help

You got the '1.01' reading quite often when testing - that brings me to the conclusion there's something weird in your test setup! From the comments i read that this is due to the usage of the SWR-meter you use, and i think so too. When you grab it thightly with your hand you will nearly always get such readings. For the fake Nagoyas i saw very different results when testing. I think the quality spreads from 1:1.5 to 1:6 or similar depending on what you actually got. They don't do manual matching/tuning. At the base of the real ones you will find little inductor coils and caps as matching network for low SWR.

Спасибо большое за видео! Теперь точно знаю что со своим выбором не ошибся. ;)

Лайк

Thanks 😊

Спасибо!!! Полезная информация 👍

Please start with the costs.

Friend, I am a newbie, I bought 2PACK BaoFeng UV-16 Max V2 10W High Power IP68 Waterproof Walkie Talkie Support Type-C Charger Long Range Radio Upgrade UV5R PRO but I can only talk up to 500 meters, I need at least 10km. I'm doing something wrong or it's not the right model (these are given for distances up to 50 km. which I don't need) What do you recommend, thank you thank you

Лондон из зэ кэпитал

Very nice review but only thing I am not sure about is, you said walksnail can do 120fps and HD-Zero 90fps. In fact, both googles OLEDs (HD-Zero and Walksnail) can only do 90fps max so ....

You seem to have had your UV-5R set on LOW when doing your transmission tests. That and sticking the antennas out the window of your car would work only for your stock antenna. Please put your radio on HIGH and place the entire antenna outside the car. The RETEVIS RHD-771 should give you significantly better results, which is something you may learn in range tests!

Why the values in 04:35 are totally different than earlier? It was Stock: 144/436 and later 144/454 ; Nagoya 1st 162/479 later 155/432 ... ???

Какое-то видео ниочем, главное в конце промокодов накидать, очередной любитель халявных товаров от китайцев для обзоров

For those who are not familiar with HDZero, they recently rolled out the 1080p*30fps mode.

great comparison video!

Which is better?

I have all those goggles too and what you said about the cobra x is spot on, very clear image I use them the most with hdzero VRX

A Very much appreciated video as I have been looking at these very two quads! 😎🤝👍

You need ground when removing antenna from the analyzer, and put cable on. And you can't compare antenna with and without antenna cable between analyzer and antenna.

Its nice to see someone actually know how to use that meter. I can’t tell you how many people don’t put their hand around it when taking a reading

I had about the same results

Good testing with VNA, but why are you testing distance in a metal car ?

Thank you so much for all your tests man.

I tried time sync stuff but it didn't help. I even tried to install a sync program,.same history., Didn't help either.. So I'm little bit desperate for this

I think I just bought about five of these fake antennas.....

Reteves 771has a tubular condenser inside, Nagoya does not have

Can you try this test with your hand off the meter

why didn't you test the range on the Retevis?

Useless comparison and tests! Mag mount antennas must be on a metal surface (car body) to test SWR and the 771G is a dedicated GMRS antenna and not intended for use on VHF except for receive! I have several of the "fake" Nagoya 771's and, when tested with a proper counterpoise on a properly calibrated NANO VNA SAA-2, they were all well within specs on both the amateur VHF (144 MHz) and UHF (430 MHz).

The "G" designator means that they are tuned for GMRS band (462-467MHZ)

Magnetic antennas have their ground attached to the magnet. They have to be tested on a metal surface.

Thank you very much for comparison test.