- 48
- 8 872
Book Club
Приєднався 24 чер 2017
Your online book discussion club. We talk about books from every genre as well as books turned into movies and shows. We read rank and review.
The Book of Lost Names : Loves, Losses, and Doing What You Can
I have the memory of a goldfish so I don't know why I did this Q&A without my notes on hand 😅 Hope it's a good discussion for you guys
Переглядів: 3
Відео
Reacting to Wizard of Oz after watching Wicked
Переглядів 93821 день тому
Reacting to Wizard of Oz after watching Wicked
Wicked Act II Reaction : Too Fast + Glinda Can Rot (Spoilers)
Переглядів 586Місяць тому
Wicked Act II Reaction : Too Fast Glinda Can Rot (Spoilers)
React Wicked Act 1 Broadway Show: Good as We Remembered?
Переглядів 225Місяць тому
React Wicked Act 1 Broadway Show: Good as We Remembered?
Book Review: The Other Man : Selfish Lies
Переглядів 10Місяць тому
Book Review: The Other Man : Selfish Lies
How My Neighbor Stole Christmas...We're DONE!
Переглядів 7Місяць тому
This is how we feel about the book, How My Neighbor Stole Christmas. #bookreview #bookclub #howmyneighborstolechristmas
Agatha All Along Episode 3 Reaction | This Show is a Riot!
Переглядів 41Місяць тому
We watch episode 3 of Agatha All Along. The witches start their tests on the witches' road. #agathallalong #reaction #reactionvideos
How My Neighbor Stole Christmas: Losing Interest in less than 10 Chapters
Переглядів 8Місяць тому
How My Neighbor Stole Christmas: Losing Interest in less than 10 Chapters
Agatha All Along Episode 2 Reaction | We Head Down the Witches' Road
Переглядів 502 місяці тому
We're watching and reacting to episode 2 of Agatha All Along. #agathallalong #reaction #shows
How My Neighbor Stole Christmas is a Fun Little Read!
Переглядів 72 місяці тому
We're reading How My Neighbor Stole Christmas for the month of Dec. Join our virtual book club and read along with us so that you can tune into our discussions each week! #howmyneighborstolechristmas #bookclub #booktube
Wicked Act II (Soundtrack): No Longer Forgettable
Переглядів 3,1 тис.2 місяці тому
We react to Act II of Wicked so that we can prepare for what we're going to get into with the next act on film. #wicked #soundtrack #reaction
Wicked is a Revelation! Discussion and Review!
Переглядів 2032 місяці тому
Welcome to Book Club. We watched Wicked for the 3rd time and realized some things. Join us for the discussion and review! #wicked #movie #bookclub
Haunting Adeline ch 41&42 Plus Post Mortem
Переглядів 112 місяці тому
Haunting Adeline ch 41&42 Plus Post Mortem
Don't Read Haunting Adeline!
Переглядів 42 місяці тому
We're on chapters 36-40 of Haunting Adeline. We're almost done! Thank God! #hauntingadeline #bookclub #blackbooktuber
Intro to Notetaking on the Boox Go 10.3
Переглядів 1602 місяці тому
Intro to Notetaking on the Boox Go 10.3
Deep Dive of The Color Purple: Book vs. Movie vs. Musical
Переглядів 372 місяці тому
Deep Dive of The Color Purple: Book vs. Movie vs. Musical
Cursed Girl | An Illustrated Fairytale
Переглядів 22 місяці тому
Cursed Girl | An Illustrated Fairytale
Haunting Adeline Ch 31-35 | No Romance in this Erotica
Переглядів 62 місяці тому
Haunting Adeline Ch 31-35 | No Romance in this Erotica
Haunting Adeline Chapters 26-30 | This Book Sucks!
Переглядів 192 місяці тому
Haunting Adeline Chapters 26-30 | This Book Sucks!
Haunting Adeline ch 21-25 | Bad to Boring
Переглядів 123 місяці тому
Haunting Adeline ch 21-25 | Bad to Boring
Haunting Adeline | When is it TOO Toxic?
Переглядів 43 місяці тому
Haunting Adeline | When is it TOO Toxic?
Were you guys stoned? You were laughing at nothing for much of the movie lol
I was wondering why they giggled at the dramatic scenes and got all quiet and serious during the comedy parts. I gave up after 10 minutes.
I just gotta say the whole setup with the mirrow is clever AF!!!❤
The story of Oz comes from the 1900 L. Frank Baum novel, the Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and 13 sequels he wrote. It has been the starting point for so many variations and take-offs of the story (in particular this MGM movie and Wicked), but while they all share similar points, they vary all over the place in the overall story. Trying to reconcile them with each is impossible, unless you want a headache. The novel and all the variations on it, but the MGM movie, have Oz a real place. MGM felt audiences of the day could not accept this as real. Because it is her dream in this version, we have the whole Kansas sequence where we see the real people Dorothy will meet in Oz. On the other hand, there is no real backstory possible for the MGM characters as Ozians, although we might want to know how Miss Gulch or Prof. Marvel wound up where they were. Book Oz had FOUR witches - MGM combined the (unnamed) Good Witch of the North with Glinda, the Good Witch of the SOUTH. The William Denslow illustrations that were part of the original novel (and thus reflect Baum's ideas) do not show either witch like a bubbly ditzy pink-chiffon Billie Burke version. The north one is just a kindly grandmother in appearance. Glinda is a beautiful sophisticated woman with red hair. In the book, the two evil witches were not sisters, and so the idea that the ruby/silver slippers should have gone to the surviving witch (and thus that Dorothy somehow stole them) is not "canon." Baum wanted to write American fairy tales, so he avoided all the typical attributes of medieval witches. He even included have good ones, too. None of his witches could fly, neither by broomstick nor bubble. His wicked witch of the west was drawn like a stereotypical gypsy fortune teller. She carried an umbrella (for obvious reasons). She had only good eye, which was weirdly a "telescopic" eye, which enabled her to see Dorothy from miles away. She doesn't haunt Dorothy from Munchkinland on - we only hear from her a good partway through the book. Most of all, she wasn't green. But Margaret Hamilton's appearance and performance was so iconic, it overshadowed Baum's version for all future stories that feature Oz (except the Wiz). Animals in Oz do speak, even Toto eventually in the sequels, but they only do animal things. They don't teach nor nurse or whatever, and so the Wizard is not trying to talk away their rights (and thus in the books, no righteous cause for an Elphaba to champion). Book wizard is just a gentle humbug, not the evil plotter of Wicked nor the woman-chasing con man of Disney's Oz, the Great & Powerful. Baum's Oz was not notable for the really wacky characters he created, with his silly logic and charming puns. For many Oz fans (myself included), Disney's 1985 Return to Oz is the closest to the Baum idea (even though some consider it too dark and scary). This is one of the few adaptations of the sequels, not the main story, that is, the second and third, Marvelous Land of Oz and Ozma of Oz. (Would love to see your reaction to this movie.)
Just a suggestion - you had the movie playing at the same volume as when the two of you were talking. I found it impossible at times to hear your comments with this in the background - and what I could hear, you guys were making some REALLY insightful and funny remarks. Perhaps if you had the microphone on which you are recording much closer to you than to the movie? Might also be possible to pause the movie when you go to speak, but since I have never done a video like this, I have no idea how practical this would be.
I think the audio might vary depending on what you're watching it on, because on my phone I can hear them just fine, and I'm hearing impaired.
The characters from Wicked turn into the characters in the Wizard of Oz. Fyero becomes the Scarecrow. (Compare Scarecrow's and Fyero's dance moves, and the lyrics to Dancing through Life... Life is painless, when you're brainless. And Elphaba tells Fyero to, Get stuffed." Boq Woodsman becomes the Tinman, and of course the little rescued lion cub is the Cowardly Lion.
Ms. Gulch hits a dog over the back with a rake and is then surprised when it bites her. Real brain trust there. 🙄
Lmao. Oh, did she hit the dog? I missed that part.
It was in her garden chasing her cat so even if she did 🤷🏽♀️
ya'll are so fun!! Can't wait for part 2. If you wanna see a REALLY great No Good Deed check out Julia Murney
I think Beyonce and Solange might be in wicked part 2 as The Wicked Witch of the East and The Good Witch of the South
that would make no sense as the East witch is sister to the West witch (i.e. we've already met her). And the South witch apparently doesn't exist in the Wickedverse as GLINDA herself is the witch of the south in the Oz books.
Um, no. Part 2 is already done and edited.
…
The original book is a lot darker, and not a comedy. Fiyero is married (not to Glinda) and has 3 kids. He is not the Scarecrow, (Boq is not the Tin Woodsman either) and ends up being captured by the Wizard’s guard while being tortured to death. Elphaba then shows up at the his castle with her’s and Fiyero’s illegitimate son, Liir (who’s also main protagonist of the book’s sequel “Son of a Witch”). Even though the widow is angry she lets them stay with her. In doing so she and her children are arrested and never heard from again. Also everyone is bisexual and Glinda is in love with Elphaba, not Fiyero. The two of them participate in an animal orgy. And Glinda tries to tell Elphaba that she loves her, but Elphaba rejects her.
Kitties!
You should check out Brittney Johnson’s performance. She the first African-American actress to play Glinda in the Broadway. She does an amazing job of playing a spoiled rich blonde white girl.
White person here, so take my comment how you will, but I do think Glinda is definitely a villain lol The problem is that this story is constrained by the original wizard of oz story, so Elphaba has to "die" and disappear or they've destroyed the original story which would have pissed a lot of people off too. So it's always a bit of a tragedy, turning the idea of what's wicked on its head. I think different people find all different things to resonate with - especially because Cynthia Erivo is giving such a deep, subtle, heartbreaking, and more intimate performance that adds a lot more than what you can get from a stage show. Part 2 is definitely more challenging for them to pull off but after Part 1 I have faith 😅
Yes, agreed. I have faith in them as well!
I always interpret it that while Glinda is singing, “no one mourns the wicked”, she is actually singing about herself in the guilt. She feels guilty believing that she’s caused the death of Elphapa and Fyero, as well as the death of Nessa, and also for what happens to Boq.
I totally disagree with the assessment that people aren't seeing themselves in Elphaba - this is totally her story, and the whole point is to explore how someone painted as a villain really wasn't. It's definitely meant to be cathartic for anyone who feels "other." Glinda doesn't get what she wants in the end and is definitely not presented as a hero although she improves a bit.
Well, Glinda got what she THOUGHT she wanted. But she didn't get satisfaction from it. We get that. It's still hard to watch Elphaba's ending though.
@ yeah it's definitely bittersweet (but this was all adapted from a villain character so it would be hard to happy ending it completely.) At least she gets to leave Oz with the person she loves, and Ginda is left alone.
Elphaba is already in the castle (Kiamo Ko) by For Good. That’s where she’s kidnapped Dorothy. Winkie Country/The Vinkus and Munchkinland are all regions in Oz, along with Gillikin Country and Quadling Country and the Emerald City
See...Tell my sister that! I knew they weren't going to Fiyero's castle at the end!
Y’all talked over one of the most emotional parts 😭 24:58
I'm sorry. 🥲
Fiyero remembers Elphaba after his transformation it is implied Boq has memory issues but it is unclear. Also Eden is the best stage Elphaba
Sorry, why are yall cheering for someone to save Elgin? He gotta go, weak link😂
😂 It's more about not wanting Boyd to do something he might regret later. I love how he always steps in to try to save people of the town, and I don't want him to become someone different. I was fine w/ Sara scooping his eye out. 😂
I had the same need to relisten to act 2, saw you were doing it so dropped in for a listen and wow, literally felt like it was an Act 2 slumber party relisten by those of us who wanted to experience it through a now new lens of the Cynthia/Ariana performances. thank you for the shared new 'feels' - teared up with you. And given the depth of story now obviously missing in the Act 2 songs, can see where they'll fit. here's to more listen-ins, thanks!!
I'm tearing up with you both.
i did this exact thing and i realized Thank Goodness, ALAYM, and No Good Deed are actually in my top 3 this whole time 😭 im too impatient
1 year is too long. I'm counting the days. 😭
I love No Good Deed❤
if u have no intent on liking this show then dont watch or react to it instead of talking through the whole thing
We're just giving our genuine reactions. We'll like some parts and not like others. We're not gonna fake anything. And if you don't want to hear people "talk through a show" don't watch reaction videos.
Going on the topic of the water; its i guess meant to be a vague rumor to mix with wizard of oz? It never made any sense why there was no explanation in the musical. The Wicked novel at least explains.
Going on the topic of the water its either a vague rumor or meant to mix with wizard of oz? Yeah it never made why there was no explanation. The Wicked novel at least explains.
in the book wicked, she is terrified of water, and washing with oils and not water. And Chicago came out way before Wicked.
"I hear her soul is so unclean, pure water will melt her" isn't any weirder than, "I hear she has an extra eye that always remains awake, I hear that she can shed her skin as easily as a snake" in the real world plenty of weird rumors get made up that seemingly have no basis in reality, or we can never find their true origin anyway.
@@wwozanewmusicalwhy is she terrified of water in the book? and which book, the original 1900 L Frank Baum books or the 1995 Gregory Maguire books?
@@oh.sorry.dont.mind.meeeeeNeither book actually explains why water may/may not harm her. The Gregory Maguire novel just plays with the concept a little more.
i did this the other day, i can't wait for part two!!!
I know! I don't know how I'm going to wait a whole year!
I’d run from that creepy yellow man
I’d be more scare Sarah than monsters 👹
You had me at squizzy
Putting up a mirror to show the screen is actually so smart 😭
What if the MIY was the reason for young Victor's massacre to happen? The Boy in White shared knowledge to Christopher... Knowledge comes with a cost = man in yellow What if the BIW sharing knowledge to Christopher ended up summoning him ? As we seen Victor's flashback, BIW was telling Christopher the story inside the church in town, Tabitha/Jade & Jim were in the forest, thats why the MIY appeared there, but with Christopher in the church , maybe the man in yellow showed up in town, and the massacre happened
Ooh! That's a good theory!
I'm really upset season 4 wont be out till 2026 but I feel like season 4 would be a huge season in comparison to season 1-3. Will finna definitely start seeing more story telling of the past, ect.
your daughters amazing!
Lmao. The little digital inserts are funny.
I've been enjoying reading this book!