- 85
- 124 413
PF Jung Clips and Extras
United States
Приєднався 23 лис 2021
This is the clips channel for PF Jung.
The scientific case for why Religion is BASED
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
Переглядів: 1 091
Відео
Arguing with Destiny about the Right's control of new media
Переглядів 1,2 тис.21 день тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
What is the "Meme War" and why is it so important?
Переглядів 119Місяць тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
Discussing the Autist VS Schizo dichotomy with JJ McCullough
Переглядів 320Місяць тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
"This is Trump's America now!" | Arguing with JJ McCullough
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Місяць тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
Contraception leads to MORE abortions ?! | Arguing with Andrew Wilson
Переглядів 60Місяць тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
The Problem With Debating Destiny (ft. JJ McCullough)
Переглядів 2,5 тис.Місяць тому
PF Jung's main channel: www.youtube.com/@PFJung
Destiny reacts to my reaction to our conversation
Переглядів 22 тис.2 місяці тому
Already working on a reaction to this
Arguing with Destiny about his Unhinged Behavior
Переглядів 2105 місяців тому
Full Video - ua-cam.com/video/xSkEZU2kRI0/v-deo.html Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung Join the PF Jung subreddit! - www.reddit.com/r/PF_Jung/
Destiny realizes that pre-Daily Wire Jordan Peterson was actually based
Переглядів 7 тис.5 місяців тому
Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung
Debating a Viewer about Natalism and Nukes
Переглядів 375 місяців тому
Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung Join the PF Jung subreddit! - www.reddit.com/r/PF_Jung/
Why is Paul so Ironic? And why does he disavow "philosophy?"
Переглядів 325 місяців тому
Why is Paul so Ironic? And why does he disavow "philosophy?"
If Joe Rogan Was a League of Legends Champion
Переглядів 585 місяців тому
Original Video - ua-cam.com/video/1V-sJFaQDsQ/v-deo.html Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung Join the PF Jung subreddit! - www.reddit.com/r/PF_Jung/
If Joe Rogan was in League of Legends
Переглядів 2,1 тис.5 місяців тому
Original Video - ua-cam.com/video/1V-sJFaQDsQ/v-deo.html Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung Join the PF Jung subreddit! - www.reddit.com/r/PF_Jung/
Arguing with Viewers about Police and Immigration
Переглядів 1125 місяців тому
Original Video - ua-cam.com/video/xo1awjCIDbQ/v-deo.html Main Channel - www.youtube.com/@PFJung Join the PF Jung subreddit! - www.reddit.com/r/PF_Jung/
Geopolitical Analyst on how to Beat Trump
Переглядів 1586 місяців тому
Geopolitical Analyst on how to Beat Trump
Geopolitical Analyst Explains JD Vance's Advantage
Переглядів 986 місяців тому
Geopolitical Analyst Explains JD Vance's Advantage
Ranking Biden's Replacements w/ JJ McCullough
Переглядів 1,7 тис.6 місяців тому
Ranking Biden's Replacements w/ JJ McCullough
Convincing Paul of Biden's Energy Plan
Переглядів 426 місяців тому
Convincing Paul of Biden's Energy Plan
Jreg THROWS JJ McCullough Mid-Debate
Переглядів 14 тис.7 місяців тому
Jreg THROWS JJ McCullough Mid-Debate
Why Jordan Peterson Never Answers Questions
Переглядів 3517 місяців тому
Why Jordan Peterson Never Answers Questions
What the Hell Happened to Jordan Peterson?
Переглядів 1408 місяців тому
What the Hell Happened to Jordan Peterson?
The Difference between Judaism and Zionism
Переглядів 3428 місяців тому
The Difference between Judaism and Zionism
Paul Struggles to Understand the Theriosphere
Переглядів 5588 місяців тому
Paul Struggles to Understand the Theriosphere
Destiny reacts to his placement in the 2023 Enlightened Centrist Tier List
Переглядів 12 тис.Рік тому
Destiny reacts to his placement in the 2023 Enlightened Centrist Tier List
A Satanist's Crusade against the Church of Woke
Переглядів 347Рік тому
A Satanist's Crusade against the Church of Woke
How is culture dependent on religion if most art, especially nowadays, is not related to religion?
Christianity invented science after all.
this videoo gave me canser
Religions work as a framework for survival in very particular and specific sets of circumstances, Amazonian tirbes fast during the reproductive season of the native fish. Similarly, abrahamic tribes saw the value of big, stable families and herda as the dessert and nature were dangerous and they depended on storms to sustain crops, the herd and more children meant, more of then could survive unto aldulthood. However when you apply such framework to the entierty of the world (as cristinanity is just ancient abrahamic doctrine with the potential for reddemption) it doesn't work as well.
The reason th at you cannot derive an "ought from an is" is not cause its to complicated. Its cause you cannot deductively infer a value claim from truth claims alone.
I think he's trying to say that you can't take an axiom and derive a decision algorithm that's then morality from it for every possible (or most) situation. Like in tic tac toe you can write down every possible move and right counter move, but for chess it's too complicated so you can just hope to find useful strategies by trial and error. But these aren't derived sturdily by logic, they are merely heuristics that probably lead to a better outcome.
@@razum1448 I get that but its a wrong interpretation of the is-ought gap. Your subjective opinion or values of how things should is not part of the objective structure of our reality.
Putting lol footage under "bad software" 💯💯
Degeneracy.
Starting off with the assumption that all religions are human formed ideas assumes you can provide evidence that religion is completely formed by humans. You can't do this. Start somewhere else.
Where did they form then. Please tell me where they came from. And don't say a burning bush or an angel came down neither you or I can prove anything. We only feel what we believe and neither you or I know what a GOD is feeling or thinking. To think anyone knows that or to think YOU or a preist or pope knows is fucking funny. No nobody knows what an omnipotent being is thinking of doing or wants to do.
Is there reason to believe they're not human-formed ideas? I can say this about any type of idea or belief. Where should we be starting off then?
@@ethanmiller5487 where did it start then? Bc it was no bush or angel.
Starting off elsewhere assumes non humans formed religion which should not be a starting point unless you can prove it is a equally valid argument towards the opposite we as humans haven't proven any similar intelligence and religious beliefs in any other creatures
aww chud running this channel coping so hard rn
Saying someone else is coping without providing an argument why is the ultimate cope.
2:37 It is not a bad thing to discourage sodomy. It is also unhealthy even from an athiest view as it increases the likelihood of various worms and stds.
This video was beautiful and thought provoking. Christianity serves to make us healthy and loving under the lord's great warmth.
2:20 why religion then? Social cohesion and conduct repression are their collective benefits.
Destiny is such a weasel
He's willing to get into detail about everything, literally the opposite of a weasel
Destiny says the right controls the entire media narrative. I guess that's true if you completely ignore Russiagate, Kenosha, Convington, Trump makes fun of disabled people, Trump hates Mexicans, Trump thinks white supremes are very fine people, etc....
Deomacracy?
Destiny is such a idiot lol
5:12 You're contradicting yourself here. The whole idea of this line of reasoning is that religion is evolutionarily adaptive. It's an evolved phenomenon. Which means it in some way corresponds to facts. So, in this sort of analytical framework, you must conclude that these ethical axioms are - if not entirely explicable - at least theoretically reasonable.
Destiny is slowly becoming Ezra Klein, and Ezra Klein is slowing waking up.
It's several meme wars going on at any point in time.
I always had that in my mind, mushrooms brought me to Jesus, I saw all kinds of imagery and Jesus spoke too me, I never even knew anything about the bible before that and that day, god opened My eyesand changed my life forever
what
Nice video
JJ McCuckold out with another banger❤
Lets be fair, politics aside..Hegseth was deployed to both Iraq and Afghanastan and graduated from Princeton. Hes not a terrible choice for SecDef.
Neutrality doesn’t exist. The essence of politics is the friend-enemy distinction. Trump picking friends and removing enemies is just him playing politics. How this is a threat to America, I have no idea. Andrew Jackson, FDR, Abe Lincoln, etc all did this.
I came here because I respect JJ. I expected an articulate and thoughtful debate and boy was this not that. It was a right wing weirdo bouncing around these bizarre conspiracy theories, saying off the cuff antisemitic remarks and seemingly abelist conspiracy theories.
15:31 the irony of this dude (Paul, no idea who he is) saying "laws can be hinderances to actual justice", after they just said that if Merrick Garland had been faster, trump might never have been elected again is pretty mindblowing
JJ is the embodiment of a self hating conservative. He hates Trump because Trump is brash non traditional and actually uses unorthodox tactics to get what he wants. JJ is product of a conservative movement in Canada which has let treadu run the country in the ground. They has so much ammo to attack Trudeau on they had the multiple charity frauds he supported, the multiple instances of black and brown faces his divorce and that’s just the catchy headline stuff I could think of there’s also the flood of legalized immigration the housing crisis the energy crisis etc… y’all let this guy destroy the country and you have the Gaul to lecture American conservatives for supporting a guy who in all accounts was a good president who brought prosperity home and had maintained a pretty good relative global peace.
JJ is the embodiment of a self hating conservative. He hates Trump because Trump is brash non traditional and actually uses unorthodox tactics to get what he wants. JJ is product of a conservative movement in Canada which has let treadu run the country in the ground. They has so much ammo to attack Trudeau on they had the multiple charity frauds he supported, the multiple instances of black and brown faces his divorce and that’s just the catchy headline stuff I could think of there’s also the flood of legalized immigration the housing crisis the energy crisis etc… y’all let this guy destroy the country and you have the Gaul to lecture American conservatives for supporting a guy who in all accounts was a good president who brought prosperity home and had maintained a pretty good relative global peace.
JJ McCullough is always making amazing and powerfully worded arguments. The things happening rn in the name of Trumpism should be very concerning for anyone who cares about the health America and democracy.
I like Trump I think homie needs to relax I like him I hope he don't keep this hater stuff up
Not relevant to the conversation, but it’s the first time I’ve ever heard a Canadian actually say “aboot” instead of “aboat”
@1:30 The Left purged the Right from the military during the pandemic in 2020. The Left is scared of having done to them what they did to the Right. As far as I'm concerned Pete Hegseth is interested in removing Leftist politicization that doesn't aid the goal of the US military. Paying for transition drugs, passing women that can't pass the fitness requirements (multiple of my vet friends witnessed officers pass women that couldn't do the requisite pull ups, push ups, etc) does not help it become a better fighting outfit.
We need to see Manar Reports & PF Jung debate. Those 2 haven't met yet
I need a dose of autism in my life rn. Suffering from abstract bs :(
I feel dread when i see TDS comments here. And i'm fucking gay. As in, bisexual.
Congressional republicans argued "you cant indict a sitting president, you have to wait until he's out of office to prosecute for any laws he's breaking" and then when he's out of office and a bunch of lawsuits hit all at once they all surprised pikachu face and claim to be the victims. It is raw nonsense that Trump was unfairly targeted and has any moral right to retribution.
The media covered up Biden's scandals. This much is obvious with the most presidential pardons in US history including his son that had the HIGHLY specific 11 year time frame that also included future crimes. When New York politicians literally run on a platform to indict a political opponent it's blatantly political.
They litterally extended the law to specifically target him in multiple cases like the property value case where even the alledged victims of the offense said they agreed with the valuation and didn’t want to seek any sort of damages from Trump. Biden just pardoned his son for 11 years of crimes.
Schizos are based. Something not working out for you in the real world? Just reshape reality until it does.
I was literally rewatching the Peterson-Dawkins debate and said out loud "Literally autism vs schizophrenia" and I see this
I said this in one of jj's other videos that his view on politics today comes from an old playbook where the general idea is the federal govs job is to maintain a strong economy and keep the country safe and the rest is just kinda bs that the fed shouldn't really be involved in. I think what jj seems to not understand and this could be due to the environment from which he comes, which he may not see is as an elitist position but actually is that the average person is suffering due to the ideology capture, battles and in more cases then it aught to be straight up corruption that are happening in DC and I'm kinda shocked he doesn't see this seeing as he's canadian and is seeing it first hand here in Canada on the more extreme end.
maybe our country shouldn't be run like a corporation... the goal is happy and healthy citizens not profit
During the conversation about politicians putting their friends in positions of power I find it really off putting how you just kind of brushed off JJs argument by saying Biden has probably done the same thing. Why do you feel so comfortable making statements like that when you haven’t actually looked into it? You present yourself as centrist but every time someone from the left tries to make a compelling point to you, you just deflect it with both sides are the same nonsense. When someone presents an argument to you, you are supposed to engage with it. It’s not good faith to just dismiss it while admitting you have an assumption about the other side based on nothing but feels.
So you think dismissing it means he is not capable of providing an in depth response? Maybe the real problem is that it's a losing game because what you are asking is to trust either/or party and not be critical. This is not dismissal, it's being critical of whatever/whoever. do you understand the current zeitgeist? TDS is a very real thing and it goes both ways sadly. People that are ideologically captured CAN have concerns about Trump but it's so beaten over the head that anytime even a speculation occurs about leftist people in power leftists tend to go "this is not important, because Trump is literally going to thanos snap everyone". And the other people (right wingers) have to address the concerns but because half of the arguments against Trump basically come down to existential paranoia (feels/vibes) they start living out this world that doesn't exist too by starting to insert their beliefs in Trump's mouth like "yes he will take away your rights cope harder". So what this zeitgeist problem does is create polarization. This is centrism 101. And Paul doesn't "deflect". You literally have evidence of Biden and his son doing something fishy and your autistic ahh be like "but where is the evidence?"(forgive me for clownery, i have to present casually because i don't believe that you will like my response but i have to try) The thing about this is really simple to understand: Do you trust people in power? The elites? Is the onus on Paul for proving something that can't be proved for certain? He is a layman just as you. This sentiment of yours is a case of Destiny syndrome. It's when you decide that because the other person doesn't have the evidence or didn't do research and also is not an expert on something, that it means that they are not good faith even though the gall to ask someone to have "The Evidence" at hand is hypocritical when the person asking for it has the same layman understanding of the situation. Here's a question, what do you consider evidence? The fourchan or maybe twitter? What the officials say? The problematic thing with asking for evidence is that it's such a nebulous concept that it could be true for you from one source and completely bogus from the other. Are you aware that there were cases of people on kiwifаrms, fourchan and other websites where people helped find real criminals, discord groups where actual military top secret info on technicalities of literal tanks and fighter jets were leaked. My point is you can never be certain about anything. I hope you don't feel antagonized.
This would be great point, but Biden did do the same thing, as has every president that I can remember, so it’s a pretty fair assumption and also happens to be true…
JJ never said he was a centrist. He has publicly said he was a conservative. He's just also Canadian.
@@Spengleman2 I feel like people should stop saying things unless they know for sure that what they’re saying is true. That’s really the bottom line of my statement. Also if you actually engage with the conversation, JJ is not arguing that it’s completely wrong. He’s more arguing that Trump is doing so in an egregious manner. His methodology for selecting members of his administration has more to do with personal loyalty than it does with an individuals ability to do a job correctly. That being said, I’m sure loyalty is a factor that every president would consider when picking members of their administration, however with Trumps past behavior in mind his idea of loyalty doesn’t allow for any push back against him. That creates a problem where these people are more likely to be fiercely loyal to him instead of being loyal to the principles of American Democracy
@@ZacharyBittner JJ is a liberal. Conservatism in Canada is very different than it is in the US. If you watch his content and listen to his appearances on podcasts it’s pretty clear that his perspective on American politics aligns more closely with center left mainstream democrats.
End of democracy? Kamala never won a primary election. The Department of Justice has been trying to arrest Trump. JJ’s argument is completely backwards.
Also, to conservatives, being "political" just means being gay and allowed to have a job, for example
That's absolutely not true. It also means being a racial minority or a woman and having a job
there are knuckledraggers out there but most conservatives have moved on to people who are gender non-conforming or whatever. There are certainly completely valid discussions about T's and Q's but making it political issue # is just bananas for less than 1% of people.
So, what gives me "hope" is the utter idiocy that the Right has embraced. After years of Willful ignorance, the fruits of their labors have become ripe. Pulling the rug out from under 175 million women by curtailing reproductive rights, threatening 20 million immigrants with expulsion and making 200 million people worry that they'll lose their Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. They've achieved pissing off everyone. Now Trumps voters are realizing they've been boxed in. And experiencing the biggest buyer's remorse in political history. The new administration will be so bad, inept and clumsy that nothing will get done. And everyone that is working against the administration, needs to work hard to make them make mistakes and try to cover up. And Federal,State and Local Government needs to make them jump through hoops and delay any attempt to get their way...
It’s a horrible thing. We are not ruled by a king. Wake up. So sad.
Trump is your king. Bow.
America has always been run by corporations. JJ is just mad the corporations that don't celebrate pride month are in power instead of the ones that pretend they're for the people.
You have to be pretty clueless to not realize Obama started the politicization of every department JJ is scared of the Trump admin trying to address...
Its more Musks America than anything else
Idk why you would buy into an obvious media play by the democrats. Like how could musk really control trump? It’s not like Trump needs reelection money. Trump already has unimpeachable control over the Republican Party and a threat of just his endorsement in a primary is dangerous to any republican. Elon does have influence obviously because he supported the guy very heavily but I would argue Elon properly has the same amount of sway on Trump as baron does lol
Idk why you would buy into an obvious media play by the democrats. Like how could musk really control trump? It’s not like Trump needs reelection money. Trump already has unimpeachable control over the Republican Party and a threat of just his endorsement in a primary is dangerous to any republican. Elon does have influence obviously because he supported the guy very heavily but I would argue Elon properly has the same amount of sway on Trump as baron does lol
You almost got him but didn't push when you said that sex is a bonding experience so even by "divine design" people are encouraged to do it regardless of consequences. People are not logical machines, when two people like each other too much they most likely don't care what it could mean to them. And to add to that, he's also discouraging the christian norm of loving your SO because if you are in that framework it's the tradbro delusion all over again. Andrew thinks love as it should be by his prudish logic is when you have apathy and indifference towards your SO, like they are an object and not a person. He claims to be against redpillers but he does the same thing they do, just in the religious prude way. And love is more important than casual relationships in this argument because casual relationships are also will not be affected by external factors like contraception because people like that also do not care and it's not anyone's bussiness in either commited or casual relationships because people choose to do it.