Відео

+

Hume did not say that you cannot get an ought from an is !! Peterson has not done his homework

That's why the rich and powerful always get away with everything, and normal people like us don't.

i did not expect the title to be literal 💀

Oh dear. Ok. We absolutely know who the author was. The 2nd century church fathers who knew John identified him and when he was on Patmos. There is zero evidence he took psychedlics. Revelation is easily understood if you know the OT and the genre and the hostorical context it was predicting (or retelling). It describes the roaring 60s. Of the 1st century. The persecutions of Nero. The calamities that befell the empire; war, pestilence, hunger, great fire of rome, multiple civil wars, martyrdom of christians and the jewish roman war in which jerusalem was DESTROYED along with the Israelite priesthood and temple. It then ends with the vision of the millenium which virtually all the theologians up until 1820 interpreted as the church age followed by the final judgment. Nero Ceasar in Hebrew even adds up to 666. Peterson, again, needs to stop making everything psychological

Peterson: Book of Revelation is a Psychedelic trip... Rogan: *hyperventilating* ..Tell me more

Plato being a loser lol dude would fold destiny HAHAHAHA

This was probably my favorite vid (the full one, but this was one of the best parts) I've seen in a while. I don't agree with Destiny probably about 40% of the time, but I've been pushing myself to listen to more "left leaning commentators," and Destiny is as far left as I can go. I need more Paul/Destiny comment. He's one of the good guys that just doesn't agree with me and also gets as heated as I do about "the other side" and I just have the privilege of not being recorded. My father-in-law told me that if I didn't vote for Kamala that he'd never speak with me again and I felt that Mr. Beralli nature when that was said (then again when he ignored me when I told him to have a good day). I agree with Destiny here, we are in a cultural spiral toward extremism and if you don't counterbalance then the extremists just win

Funny to see that destiniy got no idea why jp became popular or how good his points were

Destiny doesn’t seem to know that Female is something that applies to all species while woman only applies to Adult Female Humans Female is the reproductive function, something that even plants have, that’s it Destiny. The reproductive function(of which there is two) is something that can be identified, and yes Aliens would be able to see it too. And it doesn’t matter if you call it female or hembra or “pjaoahdisgsnmsz” , it refers to the same thing and that thing is what we’re referring to when we say woman, not anyone’s subjective sense of self.

Is Destiny retarded? Woman and Female don’t mean the same thing at all Female is a one of the two sexes which apply to EVERY single species except for Fungi. Woman is just the adult female of humans in the same way Mares are the adult female of horses

Is Destiny retarded? Woman and Female don’t mean the same thing at all Female is a one of the two sexes which apply to EVERY single species except for Fungi. Woman is just the adult female of humans in the same way Mares are the adult female of horses

Destiny needs to stop making the basic philosophical mistake of saying “I’m an atheist, I would say there is no God”. Atheism is a lack of belief, it doesn’t make any affirmative claims.

Hydronium "h3o" or heavy or distilled water, is water just heavier

Maybe Destiny should listen and try to understand what Peterson means, instead of constantly trying to "disprove" or "gotcha" him. Skipping through a video at 2x speed doesn't work for that though. You have to actively listen and try to understand where someone's coming from.

They induced a coma in dr. Peterson because of ailments related to acathisia brought on or worsened by benzodiazapene. The entire process as well as stress from his wife's ailments and as he has said his familly issues with depression. I listened to a lecture he did , in which he directly related the hierarchical keystoning of the relationship of "marriage" above the individual dispositions of the people involved in the union. He analogized that the careful maintenance of the marriage and exaltation of the union and baring of children, as a sacrifice and synthesis that is representative and nested in the concept of the light of God. I didn't explain aptly, but that lecture made me cry, that's how deeply it hit me

"Its actually much broader than H2O" No it isnt, Destiny makes things more complicated than anything needs to be on purpose to sound smart by just extrapolating words to their limit, We all know what Water is, Pure Water is water, Muddy Water is water, Sea Water is Water and carbonated Water is still water, just because it has something else mixed in dosnt mean we have to have a huge debate on the "Nature of Water," its just Word Play for the sake of Word play. "People knew what Genders were before they knew what Chromosomes were, so it must be more complicated" No its really simple, if you take a Naked Boy and a Naked Girl and stand them next to each other, even if the Girl had Short hair and like to lift heavy things and Wrestle you would still know it is a Girl, it isnt and never was more complicated.

seems like destiny is always playing catch up.

Cogito ergo sum. I think therefore I am. If you are thinking of a universal concept, it exists. You're welcome.

Destiny and PF Jung both misunderstand the fundamentalist claim about objective morality. Just because our interpretation of God's morality is imperfect does not mean our morality isn't objective. I could be wrong about what God wants us to do, but the category of my claim is still *objective.* It could just be categorically objective but wrong. It would be like me saying "everything in reality is made out of cheese" <- that's an objective statement, but it's a wrong one.

No its not a intellectual and nuanced topic its really easy, you're overthinking it to seem smart. Sex isnt a thing, its made up to open a discussion about how Masculine Women/Men Vs effeminate Women/Men portray themselves and it really isnt important, the only thing that matters is Gender, its the only thing that ever mattered, Humans just like every other Mammal on the Planet falls into 1 of 2 Categories 99% of the time at Birth, you're either Male with an XY Chromosome or you are Female with an XX Chromosome, Being Male allows you to "Impregnate" Being a Woman allows you to be Impregnated by Nature, its simple Biology full stop the end. You cant "Be" a Woman you cant "Be" a Man, you're Born that way due to a genetic 50-50 coin toss, so yes Destiny is Right, asking "What is a Woman" is a really dumb Question, because anyone who actually functions in Society knows, just like every other animal knows what the difference is. We know what a horse is, not because of some intense philosophical study but because we know Genetically what a Horse is and we know that that is what we call "Horse" its all Genetics, it always has been. Just like we know that Humans have 46 Chromosomes, however people with Downs syndrome have 47, are they still humans? Obviously, Variables exist. This is the dumbest topic to tear society apart over.

Misleading title. Destiny himself said he realized that "pre-Bill C-16" Peterson was smart, when Jung brought this up to him. It's like Jung is waiting for the smallest pretext to declare the reaction he wants from Destiny.

Ben plugs his wire into Jordan daily, that's what happened to him😮‍💨

it's interesting that Destiny said female is a synonym for woman. which is obviously true, but he just said that trans people are categorically not women as the definition of women is not performative

What is VERY important to realise is that JBP perverts his own thinking in his discussion of Foucault/ Post-structuralism. When it comes to Foucault, all of a sudden JBP cannot fathom how power can be exercised definitionally (non-violent, non-threatening) - instead JBP refuses to use Foucault's version of power (pouvoir-savoir, or disciplinary/normative power) and insists that power must always be the force of coercion. Which it isn't. Rendering his entire take on Foucault worthless as Foucauldian power is about the power (multiple) exercised that creates a 'norm of knowing' about a think, person or idea Then also in JBP's "The problem of perception" lecture he brilliantly gives credence to postmodern and poststructuralist critiques over categorisation, norm and perception.... but then S__Ts it down the toilet to pivot to a story of an opera and how looking at the stars made him cry so ... all that coherent critique stuff can just be ignored in favour of emotivist hype and the ridiculous claim that you can see "the infinite" when you look at the stars (you cannot) He's very smart, but he cannot ever critically look at his own blind spots and biases (a skill that can be learned but is difficult)

This PF guy is such a classic blonde dumb guy trying to be smart while misinterpreting and misunderstanding basic philosophical concepts. No wonder he loves Peterson.

How did Destiny think that woman and female are synonyms? Woman is used to refer to adult human females, the definition he's criticising has way more vailidity than what he said.

Adult female is literally in the dictionary. You should have them change it if it's wrong

Lmfao

Also... Referring to females as women is a general category. You observe the physical reality that most females grow into women. A woman is a fully matured female, a girl is an adolescent female. This really isn't that complicated. Fully matured females (aka women) can choose to express their gender however they want. .. they can be more masculine , or more feminine, or anything in between. They are slaves to language though.... They think the description is more meaningful than the reality they are living, so they want reality to match the descriptions... If they can't match then the only option is to change the meaning of language.

Also particulars necessarily reduce things to universals.... You can't have a particular horse if you haven't conceptualized horse in general. You just have a thing in a field with 4 legs that can't stand upright, or communicate with language. .. there is no horse 1, 2, or 3, if there is no concept of horse... There is just a thing with observable characteristics.

Jordan Peterson is still based. The problem is that he isn't talking about the things that he got popular for... His college lectures.... Now he is trying to interview people and do all this other shit. Really his best work is still when he does a teaching series.

around the 24 minute mark destiny surprised me with an extremely stupid take on gender

"Adult human female" is perfectly fine as a meaning for "woman" because female isn't a synonym for "woman". "Female" would refer to large gamete producers or individuals whose physiology or morphology is sufficiently close to the large gamete producers of their own species. Thus women are a subset of females under this meaning, which is made clear by the "adult human" modifiers. Non-humans aren't women, and children humans aren't women either.

when desinty asks "what happened to his brain" in regard to religion, perhaps he found optimism in the face of meaning . and strayed from nihilism while living with a lack of.

19:30 this argument by Peterson is incorrect Christians don't believe this

Guy is mental, no point in any discussion.

I find the idea of things changing offensive

1:42 PF Jung has yet to beat these allegations

>Jregachad barges into the discussion >changes the topic from boring ass local politics to transhumanism >claims two arms are superior >refuses to elaborate further >stays

what about his active skills man...

right, I guess all the africans swam to america, thats also why they are still making up 97% of all american elite swimmers

Why only his passive lmao this is amazing. Make a guide on his whole kit.

Based

Lol on getting Ritche Torres wrong and confusing him with Hakeem Jeffries

lol never saw the last clip, thats hilarious

Jp is Clearly talking to people that have never tripped.. hes suggesting revelations writting was the result of a psychedelic trip, nit negating the validity of the revelation itself.

Legal immigrants didn't grow up with our same stories or traditions. To claim multiculturalism doesn't work fly's in the face of what America is. Our entire history has been a legacy of multiculturalism, and it's worked great! Integrating people into our society is so core to America, specifically because we are a nation of immigrants. No matter where you come from you can become American, but only people born to Japanese, or Indian, or German parents can be Japanese, Indian, or German by blood. Illegal immigrants can and do integrate into our society, they always have.

I don't see why it's surprising that black people supported the 1994 crime bill. Crack cocaine was literally destroying whole communities and black people don't love drugs and crime so it's pretty understandable that they wanted the government to crack down on it.

Don't call other's a cult when you are so unbelievably blind to the falsehoods you believe and how much of your consent has been manufactured.