Відео

stormgate is the worst game ever made

Give me 100 Million USD and I build you the best rts in the world.

Give me 100 Million USD and I build you the best rts in the world.

So let's see what battle aces has. You cannot choose where you build your expansion -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The locations for expansions and resource sources are very limited (good example: AOE wood and farms) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Maps are hand-crafted. Therefore they are well known from the beginning of each match. No map scouting needed -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You hardly need to scout the opponent because you can see which units he can and will build -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no map types; for example, you don’t start with construction units, a larger base, a more open or more closed map -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The structure of the maps is very similar and therefore the strategies are always the same -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot manipulate the map by cutting trees, building walls, destroying rocks to change the situation in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Base building is limited to 1 structure -- decreased diversity and freedom of choice --> bad You cannot invest resources in static base defense like turrets and walls -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot choose between more than 8 units in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Units that don't belong to a faction, don't tell a story, seem to be replaceable, and do not create a unique, cool feeling -- decreased diversity --> bad The differences between the units are often not big enough (SC2 level of differences: Lurker, DT, Viper, Sentry) -- decreased diversity and playstyles --> bad You cannot build water units -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no upgrades to make an investment in one strategy -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can hardly macro, because there are no production differences between the players (the only limiting factor are resources) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no player abilities like in AOM, C&C Generals, Stormgate -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no hero with different abilities -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can choose between different units, but not between different factions with unique identities that let you feel something -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no editor for modding -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice --> bad You don't need to care about which resources you gather and how you allocate your workers -- easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You don't have to make clicks for building workers, almost no clicks to building structures and upgrades --> easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You can make runbys -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can micro units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build your own collection of units -- it's not possible in most other rts --> good You can build units that enable positioning play like with Siege Tanks in SC -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build flying units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good So, what conclusion would you reach when you weigh the pros and cons? Is Battle Aces a good or a bad RTS? I think that is a good checklist for every rts developer to make sure to have a solution for all of this. There are of course even more things like atmospheric sound and graphic design, good network technic, replay features, chat features etc. And think about if you don't like one of these mentioned things you can make it as an on/off option. The best rts is the rts where everybody can play it like he/she wants.

So let's see what battle aces has. You cannot choose where you build your expansion -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The locations for expansions and resource sources are very limited (good example: AOE wood and farms) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Maps are hand-crafted. Therefore they are well known from the beginning of each match. No map scouting needed -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You hardly need to scout the opponent because you can see which units he can and will build -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no map types; for example, you don’t start with construction units, a larger base, a more open or more closed map -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The structure of the maps is very similar and therefore the strategies are always the same -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot manipulate the map by cutting trees, building walls, destroying rocks to change the situation in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Base building is limited to 1 structure -- decreased diversity and freedom of choice --> bad You cannot invest resources in static base defense like turrets and walls -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot choose between more than 8 units in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Units that don't belong to a faction, don't tell a story, seem to be replaceable, and do not create a unique, cool feeling -- decreased diversity --> bad The differences between the units are often not big enough (SC2 level of differences: Lurker, DT, Viper, Sentry) -- decreased diversity and playstyles --> bad You cannot build water units -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no upgrades to make an investment in one strategy -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can hardly macro, because there are no production differences between the players (the only limiting factor are resources) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no player abilities like in AOM, C&C Generals, Stormgate -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no hero with different abilities -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can choose between different units, but not between different factions with unique identities that let you feel something -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no editor for modding -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice --> bad You don't need to care about which resources you gather and how you allocate your workers -- easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You don't have to make clicks for building workers, almost no clicks to building structures and upgrades --> easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You can make runbys -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can micro units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build your own collection of units -- it's not possible in most other rts --> good You can build units that enable positioning play like with Siege Tanks in SC -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build flying units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good So, what conclusion would you reach when you weigh the pros and cons? Is Battle Aces a good or a bad RTS? I think that is a good checklist for every rts developer to make sure to have a solution for all of this. There are of course even more things like atmospheric sound and graphic design, good network technic, replay features, chat features etc. And think about if you don't like one of these mentioned things you can make it as an on/off option. The best rts is the rts where everybody can play it like he/she wants.

I predict that Battle Aces will have a small fan base but won’t achieve the massive success that people might have anticipated or hoped for. The reasons for this are simple. People who want a classic RTS like StarCraft, WarCraft, Age of Empires, or Command & Conquer mainly want it for the story, the single-player campaign, and the immersion through interesting factions set within a world rich with atmospheric sound, music, and graphics. The story provides further immersion and identification possibilities. This is not a factor to underestimate, as players enjoy identifying with a hero, a faction, and the gameplay style associated with it. Additionally, classic RTS games offer a great deal of variety and diversity. This includes a range of different missions, procedurally generated maps, multiplayer modes, multiple factions, a wide variety of units, many different soundtracks, modding options, and, last but not least, various ways to showcase one's skill. Skill can be demonstrated through intelligent scouting, consistently monitoring the minimap, pattern recognition to predict the flow and location of important points on unexplored parts of the map, micro-management, clever tactics, smart strategies, effective economy management, smart walling, intelligent expansion, aesthetically pleasing or intelligent base building, and much more. Battle Aces lacks almost all of this. However, RTS has always thrived on this variety to reach as many target audiences as possible. So, the small target audience can enjoy the game, but let me make it unmistakably clear that I’m smarter-smarter than the developers-and can easily predict that this game won’t be a big success. It will not reach the player numbers of Age of Empires II or StarCraft II. It will fade into obscurity relatively quickly, and most players will wonder why, or attribute it to other reasons-none of which are the real causes or the true issues. These are the reasons and problems of a very small niche, and nothing more. So remember my words, and try to pass this feedback to RTS developers worldwide if you ever truly want to see a great new RTS. I’ll be proven right, and you’ll see it someday too, even if it takes 20 more years and 100 more subpar RTS games before this realization comes. You can ignore me and my arguments, but it will not help any of you.

I predict that Battle Aces will have a small fan base but won’t achieve the massive success that people might have anticipated or hoped for. The reasons for this are simple. People who want a classic RTS like StarCraft, WarCraft, Age of Empires, or Command & Conquer mainly want it for the story, the single-player campaign, and the immersion through interesting factions set within a world rich with atmospheric sound, music, and graphics. The story provides further immersion and identification possibilities. This is not a factor to underestimate, as players enjoy identifying with a hero, a faction, and the gameplay style associated with it. Additionally, classic RTS games offer a great deal of variety and diversity. This includes a range of different missions, procedurally generated maps, multiplayer modes, multiple factions, a wide variety of units, many different soundtracks, modding options, and, last but not least, various ways to showcase one's skill. Skill can be demonstrated through intelligent scouting, consistently monitoring the minimap, pattern recognition to predict the flow and location of important points on unexplored parts of the map, micro-management, clever tactics, smart strategies, effective economy management, smart walling, intelligent expansion, aesthetically pleasing or intelligent base building, and much more. Battle Aces lacks almost all of this. However, RTS has always thrived on this variety to reach as many target audiences as possible. So, the small target audience can enjoy the game, but let me make it unmistakably clear that I’m smarter-smarter than the developers-and can easily predict that this game won’t be a big success. It will not reach the player numbers of Age of Empires II or StarCraft II. It will fade into obscurity relatively quickly, and most players will wonder why, or attribute it to other reasons-none of which are the real causes or the true issues. These are the reasons and problems of a very small niche, and nothing more. So remember my words, and try to pass this feedback to RTS developers worldwide if you ever truly want to see a great new RTS. I’ll be proven right, and you’ll see it someday too, even if it takes 20 more years and 100 more subpar RTS games before this realization comes. You can ignore me and my arguments, but it will not help any of you.

Thank you finally

Legend! Thank you 🙏

Thanks this helped out. Simple and free. Just getting back into streaming after my pc shorted out 6 months ago. Probably going to lose another job due to my disabilities and waiting on SSI claim to get processed. So thanks a bunch.

thank you sir have been looking forever to block out the background.

Finally found a soultion!! Thanks Man!!

Tip: if you scout him going stalker, build something that's good against that like marine tank, throw in some ghost. Banshee can cloak but if he has one or two observers it's game over especially with your opponent having upgrades. He can also just come in, trigger cloak, move out and wait until cloak runs out. Build a couple of tanks, marine, throw in a ghost and a thor or two and walk right over him. If you do medivac you can grab the thor in a fight, go around into the main and just wreck anything. Marine is also good if he does an air transfer like in this game (litteraly happening while I watch). Banshee good for haras early game though, just make sure to transition out if it at like the 5 to 7 minute mark. Also, vs protoss it's considered standard to just expand with a bunker. You were greedy at the start there and got somewhat punished for it.

Hi am sorry it dont work on window's 10

I hate those storms - it should be not legal. Fuck the protots !

I think Banches are preaty good units and they with Vikings are very good team ... Nice to watch your games man..

sick stream ! been watching for a couple weeks now, game 1 though i feel like libs would’ve helped you tons

Have you tried adding a raven to the BC group? The AA missile should be pretty effective vs the corruptors because BCs shoot really quickly.

"Promo sm" 🎉

Great stuff man been looking for this info for a minute 👍🏻

thanks bro

Hi bro

you have 46 subs i have 42, we should grow together, I also stream on twitch too.

great great.

follow you on twitch and now just subbed to you here, great game too

epic battle at 17:15

love the intro

i started at bronze about a month ago, blew past silver, and now about to pass gold and be promoted to platinum, such a great game, i love every minute of it, the wins the losses, the friends and the nights spent paying this awesome game with my favorite snacks. life is good, follow me on my journey to Grandmasters #starcraft #StarCraft2 #starcraft2023 #StarCraftII #SC2023 #SC2 Hope this comment helps your channel grow, see you in the next video.

hellion drive through would have totally worked if the stalkers didnt block you, good job man

yes always scout

what league is this?

mech is so fun

fun game nice job

19:15 Sure Blinding Cloud helped but I believe Friendly Fire played a big role as well. Your tanks in the back killed a lot of your units in the front. And all the firebats had died (I believe to Lurkers?) before blinding cloud was even used.

Que asco los smurf que se meten a lucirse en ligas bajas. Ese zerg no es ni liga oro

Interesting game, interesting salt at the end 😂

Hay man I enjoy your content and hope you keep posting cheers 👍

toss op :(

Hi there it would be great if a reply can be shared thanks 👍

cool but has a water mark

1 view video in my yt algorithm wtf lol nice

That probes roast: delicious.

Audio bans are so annoying.

*builds bunker* *puts nothing in it* *salvages bunker* I like the cut of your jib.

Good stuff my dude

good vid. but I prefer fine cam it works better.

To anyone looking for the only way to play Terran mech check this out. Keep it up my dude.

I would like to try that strat

Good stuff my dude

Nice game dude. Could you maybe try thor-banshees against Protoss? For example you can open marine tank banshee into fast third, then go to five factories one starport and attack when 6/8 thors are out, with banshee cloak and speed :)