Відео

Haven't seen this in years probably watch it again sometime. I remember liking it.

Sadly this movie is overrated and for me, didn’t hold up over time.

I personally enjoyed this film a lot more than you. Though, one criticism I do have about this film is that - without spoilers - I find the last few minutes of the movie to be quite a stretch. I'm surprised that you didn't comment about that. Nevertheless, I enjoyed watching your review.

I completely disagree with your opinion about the ending of this movie. I personally found it to be quite powerful. Nevertheless, I enjoyed watching you review this film.

Hello jonh is adriancito 2023--7-18 2:25pm present time and time space. Back to they future. Time machine

I just watched it and I thought I'd see what people thought of it and found your vid, I thought it was quite good for what was probably an incredibly low budget movie, I think the ending should have probably been used as an alternative ending on a dvd though (if they still sell them 🤷‍♂️), it was rather tense, I didn't like not getting the light at the end of the... "coffin" though.

Yea pretty good movie

Nize

Glad your feeling better.

It was a piece of s**t

If I knew how the movie would end I wouldn't have watched it

It should be a 10/10 it’s excellent why do you give masterpieces a low grade are you trying to mess with us

This is bay’s most through provoking and intelligentt film to date it should be a 9/10 not a two you have a bad taste in films.

Bsttleship is better have you seen that that one was fun.

I like one a little bit better than you . But part 2 is not worth it. Have a wonderful day

After watching this many times it has grown on me so I actually love it now

I'm a huge fan of horror films, and I did like this one, but didn't love it. Why? Bc it was trying to present too many horror film elements rather than focusing on one clear storyline. We had the opening scene in The Neighborhood. We had the teenage girls going to the carnival to find dates - and then that has an unexpected twist. We had the back-in-time storyline about a busload of kids, which is retold by a Mean Middle School Girl who wants her groupies to scare another classmate. Lots going on, and really, if they eliminated the girls/carnival storyline, it would have been much more cohesive and maybe we would have better connected to one of the characters so we would care what happened to them. Thanks for your review - I think we both had bigger expectations for this one.

You should check out fright night 1985 they also made a part 2 First one one of my favorite movies. Second is good as well.

It has a lot of energy and creativity.

Yeah this was not the same quality Star Trek movie in this series (next gen). If it were an episode on tv, I would have changed the channel, but I hung in there hoping it would pick up and have more engaging dialogue and/or action. Won’t watch this one again.

I saw this movie the night it premiered in 1996. The theatre was packed full o' nerds and it was amazing. After all these years, I still watch it just for the Battle of Sector 001 and the Enterprise-E, which in my opinion, was the sexiest, most bad-ass ship in Starfleet. To this day, the Sovereign-class is still one of my absolute favorites, right up there with the Defiant and Galaxy-classes.

I thoroughly enjoyed the movie despite some of the very "cliche" writing that was in it (especially when they were on Earth). It was nice to see the character Lily humanize Picard and remind him that he could do better despite his urge to want to take revenge on what the Borg did to him personally.

It was an alright movie. The worst thing they ever did to the Borg was add a Queen, though. People are so limited in their thinking and creativity that they can't conceive of a "hive mind" as anything but what they see in Ant colonies and Beehives. And those aren't even hiveminds. They're just the same sort of social structure any other species has, but with particular components that allow more direct influence. Workers in those hives generally don't have much thought of their own, they're like robots. And the pheromones of the queen give them only simple instructions that they can't really disregard. The Borg were something entirely different. The idea was supposed to be that the drones are "drones" because their brain power is instead contributing to the collective mind. No individual controls it...there's just a meta-mind that emerges from the aggregation of all of its component minds, which then overrides all those component minds. What was a good idea...and something they should've stuck with...was the notion of cutting off chunks of the Collective and having those chunks end up differentiating themselves from the original Collective. Like...Hugh got separated, and his return started to reinfect the Collective with individuality. It would make sense that the Collective, if it couldn't STOP that wave of new individuality, would instead sever all the affected drones/ships and probably try to destroy them. But it's unlikely they'd get 'em all, so a new group of Borg would form, having to go through the growing pains of sorting out their individuality from the fact that they're all still in a collective with one another (but separated from the original). That would be really interesting. Or, the Collective gets SO big...that the overmind starts to develop dissociative identity disorder, and begins to split into several overminds. One fixates on the status quo, and severs itself from the rest, seeking an adaptation to prevent that problem from occurring again, and then looking to assimilate other civilizations again (and possibly reacquire the other collectives). Meanwhile, the rest eventually also separate from one another, each leading to a different "flavor" of Borg. One might become fixated on assimilating only the absolute BEST of the best, and either simply enslaving or destroying all who don't measure up. Another might be choosy about who and what it assimilates because it's obsessed with scientific discovery...and it doesn't care about consumption or expansion...only exploration and knowledge. Another still might wind up turning to diplomacy. Offering a mix of individuality and connection to the Collective, but only to the willing...without force or any coercion...like a technological hippie commune. Maybe a couple of splinters could've had something like the Queen, or Locutus...or Lore... Each with their own obsessions or other behaviors. But always there'd still be the main Collective...the originals. The living artificial disaster of galactic proportions.

The reason that you only have 91 views is that you're not good at this, at all. For the record, I didn't even watch your review, your sad girl face on the thumbnail was all I needed.

This could have been so much better if they had developed the 3rd act by integrating more "leading information" in the body of the film. Yes, I like the surprising details revealed, but that storyline could have been more engaging had we gotten a better sense of how and why the characters came to be together in the same place in the forest. And then, rather that expand on their discovery, it falls flat. I watched this movie twice, and even when I knew the outcome, I came away disappointed.

Sam Huntington was an inspired choice for Jimmy Olsen.

Keep up the good work, try your best!

I completely agree, the premise is stupid: We have a highly contagious virus, so in an emergency instead of having people do a lockdown in their apartments, that are relative secure against the infected (they don't have superstreng) and we can contain and segregate the infected, oh no, the protocol is to have everyone locked, unsupervised in a single giant room, that way a single infected can infect the most of people possible.

This movie is pure kino. You're autism is too strong.

Movie still fire 🔥

Hater

Bro liked the opening seen🍪🍆

This is one of my favorite Superman movies that didn’t star Christopher Reeves. And Kevin Spacey is excellent as Lex Luther and brings so much depth to his character. Good review.

I like it a little bit more then you I would give it a 5/10 I just thought it was a fun bad good movie.

The “villain” is the most laughable, unrealistic creation ever- too silly to take seriously.

Delete this lol don’t review anything 🤣

It's a fun silly movie for sure awesome review

This god awful review explains why you have 500 followers

Oh dear I loved these movies... Calling bullshit

Agree with you 100precent

I know what you mean but its building up the characters and finding out the history of the house its a good job we're all different when it comes to movies

This was an iconic film and he was actually a real person who died early in China , you sir are boring 🥱

I agree but I would give this movie 6/10 because there lots of references to the tv show that made me laugh. Enjoy 4 it's a blast.

This movie was phenomenal. Your parents are clearly related.

This one is my favorite. then the 4 and 6 are tied.

Awesome collection 😎👍

This Star Trek Movie was a pilot script for a relanch of Trek just streched out in 1979 Voyager was massive news.. Its long its not great BUT Trust me 2/4/6 are home runs as is 8 7 is Kirk meeting Picard.. Always remember this was a rush job as Star Wars was massive and every studio wanted there own Space War & Paramount had well Star Trek

Two is way better awesome review

This movie was so good, so many things to consider due to the fact-based accounting. Cultural differences, between how we solve problems (no more dueling to the death) to wives who were considered property rather than individuals, to hierarchy. And by telling the story through different perspectives of our main characters, it kept me on the edge of my seat at times, looking for any differences or subtleties that might be present and being value to the way we choose to believe what really happened. And I believe that the pandemic caused the low audience turnout/success of this and many other movies that were released in this timeframe.

Thank god we got the Tropic Thunder review 16 years after the release, John