Відео

??

Thats not what happened.. at all here. I tries to track the second AI plane.. for no reason really whatsoever. It had plenty of energy.

THAT would be nice..

I hate as a player who used the draken before they removed tracers removing them was fine even though I had to learn the gun with out tracers. the issue I have now is the nerf to stealth belts on top of the guns being inconsistent with damage stealth belts now are he/ap/he/ap which is dumb. they nerfed stealth belts because players suck then gave the better belt to the one with tracers

Thanks! I do as well. SO glad they brought back tracers.. !! I randomly found a LOT of good, free music on a royalty free site, "Pixabay"! Song was "Take my Love". Link: pixabay.com/music/upbeat-take-my-love-phonk-background-music-158467/

Could've kept scrolling... so all I see is personality trait and socialization issue. o7

@@KrowDD214 but not, your fault not mine

In English please?

Yeah, they’re useful.

skill issue@@the_darkgameryt

And theyre OP so cry about it

Yes... ? Visuals do tend to make things easier.

​@@the_darkgameryt i use stealth belts in every gun because guiding myself by how tracers look like is pointless, since tracers usually have like around 100m/s more of muzzle velocity than the rest of shells because they're armor piercer tracing rounds. Unless the tracer belt specifically deals more damage than the rest of options I always pick stealth because it has the same type of round in most frequency.

@@6uis1948 still have

mine is better, it doesn't face 11.7

@@roisca1257 yea, faceing 11.3 without flare

I have that one too.. it also has been given tracers.

@@KrowDD214yes, the shared 30 mil from the Saab to the ground attack viggens have them but not the integrated ones on the jaktviggens

I prefer tracers..

just use stealth

I mean if we wanna speak on realism instead of fun and balance, the reason it doesn’t have them irl is bc it has a radar lead indicator

Well irl drakens did have a radar gunsight and the ingame ones dont so i guess this is compensation or something :3

Gaijin compensating for something

:3​@@OscarEXA

​@@viper2255:3

and? who cares, gameplay is better because of the change, I couldn't care less if it's realistic

atleast they dont have fragmentation shells

Yeaaa.. but they dont do anything at all if I can't hit anything with them either :D

@@KrowDD214 real it took me for ever to get used to them but when i did it was fun. tbh i dont really like the change since they nerfed stealth belts so its ap and he. which is dumb

use air target rounds, still get tracers but not as much

It doesnt work anyway. Missile explodes too early, forms no fragmentation by some reason, leaving enemy scratched or not touched at all.

At what point did I not know how to aim? I killed one and I DID hit him (Treycool) early into the fight.. I missed him by a cunt hair after the reversal because the nose couldn't quite get around fast enough and then he killed himself.. c'mon now. 🤣 Not to mention 2 of them had me dead to rights at one point...

Man, I wish I could get my radar to work for the Sparrows like that. I get hit by them all the time, but I can never get a good radar lock like that.

the russian radar cant even track people from behind and rear, it does the job very good in headons tho

​@@fpsxkyo what

Level 74 Aced crew.. every stat on this plane is maxed 5+5. xD

Level 74 Aced crew.. every stat on this plane is maxed 5+5. xD I "buzzed off" because I only get 50 rounds and there was no point in shooting what looked like a dead plane.. i was expecting to be shot at by the tail gunner. When he didn't then also "disappeared" as active, I figured he J'd out or was some type of bug happening.

So there is something called a pilot being knocked out, the plane will still fly for a bit

​@@SneppydeppyPilot pronom being "it" , I Guess they identify themself as a chair

Level 74 Aced crew.. every stat on this plane is maxed 5+5. xD

Negative... Level 74 Aced crew.. every stat on this plane is maxed 5+5. xD I've seen similar things with clouds, but usually while they're IN the cloud.. not completely clear of it.

fr

Realistic battles easily

realistic battles, but i did get to jets using arcade though it took forever

i used arcade until i reached jets because jets are so much quicker and can get to the battle easier

Play realistic battles instead, at first they’re harder but you get used to it after a few days

ok thanks @@MG101

The AIM-9 SHOULD have locked on to the 3000 degree F, 500ft heat plume coming from the back of the jet as it was climbing vertical when I first tried the lock. I was 100% NOT head-on. The R60, was from behind, HOWEVER has a MINIMUM safe distance it can be fired.. IF it fired, it would've should've done damage to BOTH our jets. Missiles in WT aren't realistic at all. I particularly like when Migs somehow "out run" a missile from less than a mile behind or a single flare defeats a missile from 50ft away. Excellent coding.. Sincerely, 20yr USAF Munitions Troop (AMMO)

@@KrowDD214 they are called "rear aspect" for a reason + it is only 800 degrees do you research

your research*

@@mondiwe8936 They're also called an IR missile for a reason.. and at 800 degrees vs say 75 degree ambient environmental temp.. that heat plume sticks out like a sore thumb. I'm not even saying it should've hit from that angle, BUT I should have easily been able to get a lock and fire.

Didn't need to be all aspect. When I attempted the lock, he was climbing vertical. ANY variant of an AIM-9 would have locked on to the 3000 degree F heat plume that jet "should" be emitting from that angle... I DID get shot from the back... from WELL within minimum safe distance for ANY missile. That missile "should" have done damage or killed BOTH of us is my gripe with WT. Sincerely, 20yr USAF Munitions Troop (AMMO)

@@KrowDD214 Dude, it's a video game, it's not a super accurate simulation of real life or claims to be one.

@@harryshuman9637 The game has a Wiki full of information based on IRL info along with stat cards for every vehicle and armament in the game. It 100% claims to be a "realistic" sim... 🤣🤣

@@KrowDD214 My dude, wiki is modified by hundreds of people. Also information on basic weapons stats listed there has nothing to do with how physics and game mechanics are modeled.

Yeaa.. but thats not how a radar "lock" works. From distance it may get somewhat confused, but as it gets closer the target gets more clear to the seeker. Gaijin just doesnt model missiles very well in general and shit like this happens..

@@KrowDD214 if you mean irl, definetly. i just know in game if there are 2 targets close together the radar will go in between them. The same as when locking on with a helicopter or targeting pod. Its just hard coded so that 2 targets close by makes the actual point where the munition goes in the middle of them. Also seeing this again i think it might just be an overreaction from the missile trying to steer :/

@@goliath3413 Well the systems are "supposed" to run like irl... if theyre not, thats shit coding and implementation by Gaijin,, which is why the video is literally titled as a question to Gaijin. Its the literal point of the video. :D

@@KrowDD214 thats bcs all missles in game work like ir locks lmao, thats why it confuses and goes for targets that are close even tho they have solid lock and already too close to target, hell its even funnier when u have datalink missle send at a target change cource without any reason and miss bcs of that

Wtf indeed... on the server replay, it shows him completely normal. Nothing wrong in the slightest from his end. No packet loss or anything shown.. no idea.

@@KrowDD214 Did he launch a radar guided from the ground. It makes no sense, never seen anything like it.

Appreciate it man!

Np!

I havent ran into that issue.. try checking twitchalerts and make sure your sound file, volume etc are good to go and saved?