Відео

Wonderful initiative

well done !

Very good

Interesting... thanks

Awesome.

braavo! bravo im crying! im tearing up im crying. bravo. She died so young.

Great sir

ij

It was a great talk indeed!!

On David Hilbert’s “On the Infinite” (Über das Unendliche) ♾️ Having previously heaped praise on Cantor’s set theory, Hilbert proceeds to point out all the contradictions that are inherent in that theory, seemingly totally oblivious to the incongruity of his stance: “In the joy of discovering new and important results, mathematicians paid too little attention to the validity of their deductive methods. For, simply as a result of employing definitions and deductive methods which had become customary, contradictions began gradually to appear. These contradictions, the so-called paradoxes of set theory, though at first scattered, became progressively more acute and more serious. In particular, a contradiction discovered by Zermelo and Russell had a downright catastrophic effect when it became known throughout the world of mathematics. … Too many different remedies for the paradoxes were offered, and the methods proposed to clarify them were too variegated. Admittedly, the present state of affairs where we run up against the paradoxes is intolerable. Just think, the definitions and deductive methods which everyone learns, teaches, and uses in mathematics, the paragon of truth and certitude, lead to absurdities! If mathematical thinking is defective, where are we to find truth and certitude?” And after pointing out that mathematics has immersed itself into a quagmire of self-inflicted contradictions, he offers his view of how the problem might be resolved: “There is, however, a completely satisfactory way of avoiding the paradoxes without betraying our science. The desires and attitudes which help us find this way and show us what direction to take are these: Wherever there is any hope of salvage, we will carefully investigate fruitful definitions and deductive methods. We will nurse them, strengthen them, and make them useful. No one shall drive us out of the paradise which Cantor has created for us. We must establish throughout mathematics the same certitude for our deductions as exists in ordinary elementary number theory, which no one doubts and where contradictions and paradoxes arise only through our own carelessness.” This emotive proclamation “No one shall drive us out of the paradise …” sits very uneasily alongside his concomitant claim that every cause of any contradiction in Cantor’s set theory will be rooted out without compunction. It indicates very clearly a strong desire to retain aspects of that theory that are emotionally appealing. It is not far-fetched to suggest that this emotional attachment led to the turning of a blind eye to the possibility that the notion of a number larger than any limitlessly large number might be indicative of a fundamental problem worth investigating in depth. It is worth noting Hilbert’s intense antagonism to any criticism of Cantor’s set theoretical ideas. One of the prominent critics in Hilbert’s time was Henri Poincaré. Although Hilbert did praise Poincaré’s mathematical creativity in general, he denounced Poincaré for criticizing the “fruitful scientific approach of Cantor” and lambasted Poincaré for not producing any new ideas in this Cantorian realm, objecting that Poincaré only “dictated prohibitions”. That’s remarkably ironic. The most glaring irony is that the contradictions of Cantorian set theory were the direct result of too much freedom, and every attempt to devise axioms to prevent the contradictions amounts to nothing other than prohibitions on what one can do with Cantorian sets. - www.jamesrmeyer.com/infinite/hilbert-uber-das-unendliche

Great work sir for math Lovers

Hollywood has made many blockbusters based on or about physicists and not nearly enough about mathematicians.

Good discussion by the way.

I thought he died in the hospital after the duel

Promo SM 🙈

Here’s the full interview: ua-cam.com/video/H5H9M5r7UlY/v-deo.htmlsi=Uo83PTRhTsWpaQSC

Algebra is the word derived from al jabr which is itself taken from a sanskrit word madhava pi calculation on value of pi is the great example of he knows algebra which dealing with unknowns

Representing knots with mathematical concepts on board is very impressive.

Good effort to make general public aware with these deep and interesting cocepts of mathematics.

ua-cam.com/video/l7qSIa6TpT0/v-deo.htmlsi=5osXaKCpsQ13bIVz

Where these classes happen? and Can anyone join?

The link of non-truncated talk is here: ua-cam.com/video/-AsnqKi39Jo/v-deo.htmlsi=fu5k_1X4dIYXI7jN

Ramanujan movie bhi dekhna chahiye sab ko indian

Amazing

Ramanajun was great

How the Sir Quadratic Equation Was Made and Its History

❤❤

You're starting the "Story of Algebra" several thousand years after it was invented. Credit is usually given to either "Diophantus of Alexandria" who lived between 200 to 280 CE, is often mistakenly known as the 'Father of Algebra', for his Arithmetica, a work on the solution of algebraic equations and on the theory of numbers. 500 years after Diophantus of Alexandria, came Muhammed al-Khwarizmi (c. 780-850, Baghdad - though born in the region of Khwarizm in what was northern Persia). Al-Khwarizmi gives us the word "algebra" from his book Al-kitab al-Mukhtar fi Hisab al-Jabr Wa-l-Muqabala. His pioneering work offered practical answers for land distribution, rules on inheritance, and distributing salaries. What is called 'Algebra' today was invented in Kemit (Egypt) well before the Pyramid Age.

Very unfortunate that Galois died so very young. Who knows what else he could have discovered with such an innovative mind

Lets bring back math duels

Kis jagah ho raha he Ye lecture??

This is gonna go viral

Weldon sir . Love you sir . Keep it up sir . And thanks 👍👍👍👍👍👍🎉 a lot

السلام علیکم سر آپ بہت اچھا کام کررہے ہیں۔ بہت معلوماتی اور دلچسپ ویڈیوز ہیں۔ بہت بہت شکریہ

The greatest "loss" perhaps?

interesting. thank you

There’s a reason why scientists tell stories, and it’s a reason that every science writer knows. And it’s because people only want stories. Every editor will tell every science writer, ‘If you’re going to tell us about the nature of reality, you have to package it in a story because it’s the only way people will pay attention.’ And that even goes for us scientists. The great thing about the best books in science is they manage to actually avoid stories and so really communicate the science. We know that, psychologically, stories are unavoidable, but it doesn’t make them cognitively significant, any more than our conviction that colours are out there in the world. When we compare those stories with what game theory, for example, tells us about the actual nature of human interactions, we should begin to recognise that, for all their emotional value and for all their artistic beauty, they are not to be relied upon ‒ in the way science can be relied upon ‒ to order and arrange human institutions and cope with the vicissitudes of the future. - Alex Rosenberg (vimeo.com/185704265) PS: It is always a pleasure to listen Alex Rosenberg on science. 🥰

Amazing. Thank you for this brand and informative video

I know how can made but this one is not perfect first horizontal right angle then vertical right angle lastone must be 45' 45' 90' opposite 45' after perrpenticular

നിഴലുള്ളപ്പോൾ വീഡിയോ എടുത്ത വിഡ്ഢി 😂

Ground shadow 👌😂😂

666 🖤

if you dont know how to make video then dont go to near

sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir

Assalam-O-Alaikum.. Sir where did u get this material please tell me name of the book.....plz sir

Great.

Keep it up Dr. Israr Karim from black hole Islamabad.

Our brain might be a quantum computer that hallucinates math. There's a code for arithmetic hidden inside our head. A recent research by a pair of teams from the University of Bonn and the University of Tübingen indicates that. For details see thenextweb.com/news/your-brain-might-be-quantum-computer-hallucinates-math?Social&Facebook&fbclid=IwAR3KOKbFgauNnIjGcP5sxcBhtKVlmdcsNXt_nAs9X9WyxLFnzH3rHZyWquk#Echobox=1644971346

Great very interesting kindly upload more vedio

The video is very ininformative but brother can you remove the music?