Відео

Would you care to elaborate? There is only one scenario. The tides are caused by inertia forces as the Earth, Moon and Sun all orbit a common centre of mass. Gravity is an Inertial force.

@@oortcloud8078I’m not convinced by the centrifugal force as an explanation for the tides on the other side of earth. Since the centrifugal force is constant, during the new moon phase, the tides nearest the moon aligned with the sun would be higher than the tides on the other side of the earth. But this is not true.

Thanks for the reply. My only advice to you is to find Dr Becky's explanation of tides, or better still, look for "What school gets wrong about tides! Inertia and spacetime" and we'll be happy to discuss this apparent mystery regarding spring tides with you further.

You can watch my video on barycenter for more explanation on tides. Hope it helps. Thankyou!

​@@brightsidescience Hi Brightside, I apologise that my friends and I keep commenting on your channel, but we're all very passionate about explaining science correctly to people, and really admire the effort and attention to detail you put into making this place a success. This person was having difficulty grasping the concept of a centrifugal force and I was just trying to help point them in the right direction. Yes, your barycentre presentation would also be a good place to start. Have a nice day! Thank you.

NO IM AND UR NOT SIGMA

bro what 😭🙏

Like me pls

Different softwares .....trade secrets 😜

We need to pay one time activation fees for every platform I think.... it's not a scam .

@@brightsidescience tell me one more thing. Does Status app need another coin wallet to transfer the assets to binance?

Essentially, Yes. The Barycentre is the balance point of the system. The orbital angular momentum of the two objects around this point is balanced against the gravitational attraction between the two objects. There is a very simple equation, which allows us to calculate it's location, but you'll have to comment on my cartoon find out. You would be very welcome. Thank you.

😑what?

Barely visible you say. Well how do you account for the increase in sun spot activity, which occurs on the same 11 year cycle, when Saturn and Jupiter are on the same side away from the Sun?

@@cybermonkeysThat isn’t irrelavent in this. Sunspot activity is totally different topic. You’re out of topic

@@SyDatNguyen-r4j Thanks. I appreciate the reply. Although, you were the one who brought up the topic of a wobbling sun, so if anything, you're the one who was going off topic? How is something not, not relevant? That must make it relevant, not irrelevant. When Saturn and Jupiter are on the same side away from the Sun. The *Barycentre* of the Solar System is beyond the surface of the Sun. This means that the Sun will experience a greater *Tidal Force* across it's diameter, which could be a cause for the increased sunspot activity we observe from Earth. In the same way that we experience a *Spring* tide on Earth, when the Sun and Moon align. Therefore, it is visible and we do not ignore it's affects. I hope that helped. Have a nice day. 😁

The existence of the barycentre is not a theory. It is an established fact, in exactly the same way as gravity is perceived as the attraction between objects of mass. This is true. The Earth and Moon both *orbit* around a common centre of gravity, they do *not rotate* around the barycentre. The distance between the Earth and Moon is not fixed, because Johannes Kepler's first law of planetary motion states, that all *orbits are elliptical.* That is why there is a variation between a total and annular eclipse. Does that answer your question about how the distance between celestial bodies varies over time? The concept of the barycentre is logically established, through the generally accepted laws of orbital mechanics. As set out by Sir Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler and Galileo. All formidable scientists in their own right.

I am really grateful to you.

You're very welcome sir. I really like this young person's approach to science. They have a delightful way of expressing their wonder for the nature that surrounds us. Of course the Barycentre is the real reason behind the twice daily tides, we experience on our precious planet Earth, and you would be more than welcome to join the discussion on my cartoon, if you'd like to delve deeper into this phenomena. Have a wonderful day! Thank you.

Nice Voice too

Thank you

​@@bhanopersaud1984 Hello Bhano, I get the distinct impression that the wonderful teacher here, is behaving rather modestly towards your nice comment. Can I just politely suggest on their behalf, that you also view their video on the barycenter as well, because that will complete your ideal picture of our daily tides. Good luck.

Who on Earth told you, the moon has no gravity? 😂😆🤣 The acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the Earth is 9.8m/s^2. The acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the Moon is 1.6m/s^2. Therefore, the moon's gravity does pull on the earth's oceans, but that's not the end of the story for tides, and only the beginning. Good luck in your exams? 😂😅

Hi Nashiira, I'm guessing from your polite comment that you actually meant *revolution* not *evolution* ? Revolution - describes the motion of a planet in orbit around a barycentre, which is explained in a delightful little video released by Bright Side Science some days ago. Evolution - is a theory proposed by Charles Darwin in 1859 and was called, On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. Newton and Darwin were both extremely great scientists. Take care and thanks for commenting. 👍

@@wavydaveyparker

​@@nashiiranash You are very welcome, Nashiira. 👋

No!

If you really want to understand in depth about this topic, you should learn about a very much important topic called ' barycenters'. I apologize for missing that content in this video. But a video regarding the same will be released as soon as possible.

There is absolutely no need for you to apologize 'Bright Side,' although your diligent and thoughtful behaviour is very noteworthy, and as any respectable scientist or teacher will tell you, it's vitally important to show humility in the sight of small errors, and it's best to just make the corrections, and move on with your work. Your tides presentation is a perfectly valid explanation for the simple occurrence of two high tides a day. At no point did you say that the gravitational force of the Moon was higher than the Earth's. Instead you said that the centrifugal force counterbalances the gravitational force and causes a high tide on the side facing away from the moon. Perfectly correct. The Centrifugal Force was an idea introduced by Newton himself, to explain the 'apparent' outward movement of an object in circular motion, very similar to the action of a centrifuge, but he had to conclude that it wasn't a 'real' force, because there wasn't any agent to produce the desired effect, very similar to the action of gravity, which is the 'apparent' inward movement between objects of mass. However, when questioned on this apparent error in his calculations, he had no answer and said, _"I'll leave that for the consideration of a future scientist?"_ And, that bright side scientist was none other than Albert Einstein, who concluded that gravity and centrifugal were both _'apparent'_ forces, which only appear in an accelerated frame of reference, and that both have a contributing factor behind the tidal phenomena we observe in our oceans, lakes and seas. Can I politely suggest you have a look at Dr Becky's explanation of tides, as it's very similar to yours, and might provide you with some inspiration. Good luck.