- 78
- 95 643
SR RS
United Kingdom
Приєднався 27 січ 2014
Dr. Rashid was born in Dhaka, the People's Republic of Bangladesh.
He moved to the UK in 1998 to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering. However, he was told to undergo primary schooling first, as he was only 7.
26 years later, going from year three to a Ph.D, and two jobs, he moved to the People's Republic of China for a lucrative career as a Chief Engineer, within a large., well-established engineering company.
His parents move to the West for a better life. But Dr. Rashid moved back to the East for a much better life.
Such is the pace of global developments
He moved to the UK in 1998 to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering. However, he was told to undergo primary schooling first, as he was only 7.
26 years later, going from year three to a Ph.D, and two jobs, he moved to the People's Republic of China for a lucrative career as a Chief Engineer, within a large., well-established engineering company.
His parents move to the West for a better life. But Dr. Rashid moved back to the East for a much better life.
Such is the pace of global developments
Відео
Cranfield University “engine room”
Переглядів 982 місяці тому
Cranfield University's little museum of aero engines (RB211, Olympus, and pegasus) in the Whittle Building. Maybe one day they could also include a trent series, but the roof probably isn't tall enough for it ;-) Taken in November 2023.
Somewhere in Huzhou
Переглядів 172 місяці тому
Mid may 2024 After my first week in China. The first chapter of my new life in the People's Republic!
A hotel, somewhere in huzhou (zhejiang province)
Переглядів 153 місяці тому
A hotel, somewhere in huzhou (zhejiang province)
Centre Deqing county (zhejiang province).
Переглядів 1313 місяці тому
My new home town ❤️❤️❤️ Clean, airy, safe, modern and stylish buildings, and surrounded by beautiful hills. And just 15 min train ride to the mega metropolis of Hangzhou! What more can you want?
CRH380A
Переглядів 4,3 тис.3 місяці тому
Deqing to Hangzhou (east) This is the train I take to travel to downtown Hangzhou.
Centrifugal Casting of a journal bearing for the energy sector (turbine bearing)
Переглядів 1228 місяців тому
Taken around August 2015, J.H. Richards & Co, Birmingham, United Kingdom. I was a 24-year-old student attached to the company for my Ph.D. project. So I spent some time learning the process. I was a Ph.D. student who got his hands dirty (and burnt)
Marina Bay watershow
Переглядів 78 місяців тому
My second day in Singapore. Right after recovering from my jet lag, I had decided to head downtown to explore this beautiful garden city metropolis. I stumbled upon the Marina bay light show. And fell in love with Asia and what it has to offer. It was like a baptism. I became a changed man. I yearned for Asia ever since
4300kw coreless medium frequency induction furnace
Переглядів 538 місяців тому
4300kw coreless medium frequency induction furnace
The Sound of Adhaan in busy and bustling Dhaka
Переглядів 528 місяців тому
The Sound of Adhaan in busy and bustling Dhaka
DCS Mi-24 Landing on Slava class cruiser
Переглядів 1083 роки тому
DCS Mi-24 Landing on Slava class cruiser
DCS world Mi-8MTV2 landing on moving ship
Переглядів 1353 роки тому
DCS world Mi-8MTV2 landing on moving ship
IJN Shokaku (1942 mod fleet aircraft carrier) 3D model
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
IJN Shokaku (1942 mod fleet aircraft carrier) 3D model
Mi-28 "Havoc" Russian All Weather Attack helicopter
Переглядів 1333 роки тому
Mi-28 "Havoc" Russian All Weather Attack helicopter
THEEND
what software did you use?
The Buran never took cosmonauts to space. They were all unmanned
What a shame. And there's two unfinished prototypes rotting away in a hangar sitting deep within Russia apparently.
Buran is fucking soviet communist american german hyper technology
Did Buran have jet engines in addition?
Space shuttle looks more efficient: you only expend the tank unlike the Buran whose orbiter doesn’t even have the engine.
Very Nice !
"Mom, can we have space shuttle?" "We have space shuttle at home" *Space shuttle at home*
It would be realy interesting if CCCP would not colapse when it did and we could see Buran fly in its "final" version. On paper, it was an improved and a more capable design over USS shuttle. I see few people understand that in USA, congress (who are not rocket scientist) decided in the end what the shuttle was to be, which was very decremental. Originaly, the external tank was to be reusable aswell, and no dangerous srbs. While in CCCP military supremacy and scientific endevors were praised. If you had the right idea, presented to the right people, you had a green light. Of course there were other county issues, but generaly in CCCP scientis/engeneers were more valued then in USA, where movie stars have way bigger social status. Thats why more "unreal" things came from that land, 1st full stage oxigen rich engines which americans thought to be unfeesable and later used them on atlas. People are smart, reguarless in which county they are born, the only thing that sets us apart is who, how and by what standards are we led.
Indeed. I would also like to see what the Soviet engineers and scientists could achieve with the same budget as their US counterparts. Of course, one of the reasons why the Soviets were quite creative in their engineering approach (multi-combustion chamber rockets, staged combustion cycle, etc), was because of limited resources. The USSR, despite all its flaws, was a very technocrat-led country in certain aspects. Many political members had engineering/STEM backgrounds. China (where I now live/work, as en engineer) takes this to a new level. They're far better at setting industrial policies than their western counterparts with liberal arts/soft degrees. The mayor of my City has a Ph.D. in metallurgy, and worked for a large steel making plant.
@@energiam880 respect for beeing an engeener 👌 im also in engeering indeed indeed, good poings Im sad to say but it seems usa pushes forward only when there is competition compromizing theyr values, not suprising, its a human instinct to be better. For this reason i hope china and india keep breaking the barriers, not only to advance techology, but to motivate competition again.. After all, space is for all mankind, its to big for single coutrys, let alone private individuals. (Individualism is a bit of a plague if in a to big "dose" if you ask me) I dont know china to well, im a simple balkan european who was born in war times and have to say, china at this moment seem to have an almost perfect balance between industrial focus and, as you put it, liberal/soft degrees.. meybe to much industrial focus, but thats good for general progress in a seemingly stagnating world. Not gonna lie, liberal degrees are necessary for people to prosper and industial focus for a coutry to prosper, a balance of both is ideal... went to much in politics on a technical video, my apologys
Music?????
🎼🥁🎧????
⚙️🔧👍
The Soviet shuttle pursued rationality. The American shuttle pursued coolness.
Nice
Нужно бы снова восстановить буран, мрию, «каспийского монстра» и других и создать корабли даже лучше.. Все были рады развалу СССР но только спустя время многие начинают понимать что мы потеряли на самом деле😊
I remember historical day in November 1988 when Space Shuttle Buran flew to space for first mission. After two orbits Buran (Snow storm) landed in fully automatic mode.
And then never flew again....
Man I can’t believe that the space shuttle didn’t have a fully automatic mode for landing, (it did) I also can’t believe that auto pilots didn’t exist before the buran… (they did)
Can I know the software? Is this model for bigger games or mobile ones?
I don't know why it's on my feed but eggh anyway nice CFD simulation.
Буран - гораздо более дорогая система без многоразовых двигателей.
Boosters were designed to be reusable, but it was never implented due time shortage. Buran was lucky (or unlucky) to even fly once 🙁
@@tehice23 и как же спасались водородные двигатели?
This is just sexual 💪
Brainless background music does not detract from the reality that the author of this piece essentially ripped off his ideas from the WEST (as did the Soviets with BURAN). The surest manner of detecting a Communist suck up is to observe his efforts to mimic the West, whether it be technology, or in this case, crappy music. I shall enjoy BLOCKING THIS CHANNEL. 👎
My feed is wild
When's the "in"?
nobody : youtube algorithm :
Why this in my feed anyway?😂
....both of them....
why 0120looks like ssme
because it is the Soviet eq. to RS-25 SSME
Way to gooo man! Superb? Can you maybe send me tabs if you have it? Thank you for the video anyway😁
AMAZING, will you ever realise the model? i would love to 3d print it
This is MIG?
It's GTAW/TIG
I think that's magificent
BURAN .. THE BEST !!!
So this is the kind of music the japanese were jamming into while on the deck of shokaku
Buran is very underrated
Буран -- наша гордость и боль. Ну могли же такое - великая страна была СССР!
Unless you disagreed with a dictatorship or were "lesser race" according to Stalin at which point you were tortured, gulaged and/or killed ... kinda sounds like another Nazi Germany with a Hitler in power when you think about it like that.
Такую страну прое#бали
Nice Job, and btw In1942 she did have that configuration until June of that year. So nice Pre refit Version captured her glory well. As most of all ww II ships go Incredible engineering
are these downloadable ?
To be Honest, Energia was way more complicated and Better than The space shuttle
Neat part is, it was less complicated, that´s the main reason why it was better
HIT PRINT!
Soviet technology is best
ngad vs su 75
Shokaku in 42 does not have the three triple 25mm on the bow! Check your references!
Do you make em urself?
And the buran shuttle can take off......
Buran is better but when the time of it's building process soviet union is.......let's say bankrupt 😅
The Buran its very similar to Space Shuttle, but the Energia its fantastic, a massive rocket.
Based on the Energia rocket, it was planned to create a Vulcan rocket with a payload capacity of up to 200 tons. Instead of 4 side blocks with RD-170 engines, it was supposed to install 8, and also add a third stage. Currently, Russia is developing the Yenisei rocket, which is a continuation of work on superheavy missiles
Существовал проект Шаттл-С, саrgo, тоже без "самолётика". Надо бы - сделали бы.
@@ФедотовДмитрий-щ3гel buran. es superior.
When the space shuttle failed why didn't the United States buy the Russian space shuttle the Buran?
Буран не российский, а советский космический челнок
I've heard that the NASA actually considered using the Buran after the Columbia disaster. But the only Buran that ever flew to space was destroyed by this time. All the other orbiter that never got completed got their components used for other projects, scrapped or abandoned.
a: if the space shuttle failed, then why did it complete 135 missions? b: its this thing called 'cold war' dont know if youve heard of it
Buran has a lower percentage of returned parts. The number of engines on boosters speaks for this. The Chinese, when they copy Starship, will do the same.
Wich was actually an improvement The shuttle was MORE expensive to repair, than just use an expendable rocket The soviets made engines more powerfull and as efficient as the shuttle's, but far less complex and cheaper to build The Shutle engines where also dead weigth in orbit
- One big engine is more expensive then 2 smaller ones. - The boosters and big tank were designed to be reusable - It flew just once as a test, autonomusly, becouse the coutry was collapsing - It was not a copy, it was an improved design by learning the shuttles drawbacks/issues, mainly srbs and orbiter. - It would have the capabitly to get to the moon in final iteration
おかしな長門!コレは長門と云うなら間違いだらけの長門である!長門の写真と見比べて欲しい。軍艦の事がよく解った日本人ならこんな長門は描かない!(笑笑)。
Buran was never used in a real mission so there is no comparison.
Он вообще то один раз летал на орбиту Земли в автоматическом режиме и вернулся оттуда на аэродром, сомневаюсь что ваш шаттл был способен на это, так что глупости не пишите, раз не в курсе всего...
Every space flight is a MISSION!
@@BadmaOchirov50 и толку, что он слетал? Мкс строили шатры, а не бураны.
@@yurakondratuk253 тут под этим видео некоторые писали что он вообще не летал, поэтому и написал что он всё таки разок слетал, а причём тут строительство МКС? Речь вообще не о нем.
@@BadmaOchirov50 у шатла был автопилот,на сколько я знаю. Так что приемущество автопилота очень спорное. Буран не стал рабочей лошадкой в космосе