Відео

Oh yeah! How did I miss that?

lmao. tldr bro; i was jaqqing it and the sauce hit my little sisters face after reading your cumment. DLC. lmao.

Saturn is a hybrid planet with characteristics of both Jupiter and the ice giants. Its atmosphere is not too hazy to obscure distinct features-such as the hexagonal storm, Great White Spots, and colorful bands-but it lacks the vivid and sharp appearance of Jupiter. This is because, like the ice giants, Saturn has a higher concentration of methane in its atmosphere. Methane interacts with UV light from the Sun to form hazy molecules. Saturn’s greater distance from the Sun means it receives weaker sunlight, which allows these hazy molecules to accumulate over time, unlike Jupiter, where such molecules are quickly destroyed due to its closer proximity to the Sun. Additionally, Jupiter has a more varied atmospheric composition compared to other gas giants, and its atmosphere is more turbulent because it emits much more heat compared to its planetary neighbours.

I was actually disappointed when I found another study that reprocessed the photo of Neptune after I uploaded the video. The colors in the new image look more saturated and closer to the colors I see in photos taken with backyard telescopes.

Despite being overlooked by scientists and the public, Uranus remains my favourite planet

My pleasure!

You're absolutely right. But when you force yourself to upload everyday, you don't give yourself enough time to find a great topic or come up with strong ideas for your script.

@@whatis.ium29 fair enough, im just a comenter who likes astromony

Ah, yes, the Cosmic Microwave Background paparazzi must have been on break that day! But seriously, it's all about the science-proof is in the data, not who was holding the camera

@@whatis.ium29 A calculation based on an assumption - which is not necessarily true - , gives results. Change the assumption, the results will change. The whole process is not related to the scientific method at all .

The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is a direct observation of the leftover radiation from the Big Bang, a critical piece of evidence for the theory. While the Big Bang is technically a theory, it's built on a mountain of data, including the observed expansion of the universe, element abundances, and, of course, the CMB. Scientific theories aren't random assumptions-they're built on rigorous evidence and observation. If better data came along, the theory would evolve, but for now, the evidence is so overwhelming that the Big Bang is considered the best explanation we have for how the universe began.

@what-is-ium 1- Just before the Big Bang, the singularity, what was it made of ? Was it neutral charged ?, was their gravity ? 2- What force made it expand ? 3- How did the first atom form ? 4- How did the protons and electrons get their charge ? Even with the CMB, there isn't any connection with the B.B.

Go to hell! i told you many times don't leave comments on my videos

Thank you for your support and kind words! 😄

And atoms were indivisible once. Now what?

So, you haven’t grown up yet? 😏

Thanks! I was actually a bit frustrated after seeing fewer views than I expected, but that's just how the algorithm works-nothing you can really do about it.

But the script of this video wasn't written by AI, i wrote it by myself, i used AI for correcting spelling and grammar errors and for voice over. Moreover, I took hours to gather images and footages and edit the video. so don't let the AI voice fool you

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

It actually did explain it, There is no difference in the apparent size of the Moon when it is near the horizon compared to high in the sky, It is just an optical illusion, The Moon can actually appear more distorted near the horizon due to the thicker layer of atmosphere you see it through, creating a reddish and flalttened look. The perceived improuvement in clarity is likely another part of the illusion, To see for yourself, try looking at the Moon through binocular when it is high in the sky and compare it to when it is near the horizon. You'll notice there's no real difference in clarity or detail.

@@whatis.ium29 that what I just said, there is a difference how it looks. Mind you, when one is looking trough binoculars there is no other objects visible, thus only giving you a view of the moon itself. So the theory of moon illusion because of other objects in our view while the moon is near the horizon is no longer true since you just see the moon trough the optics. Somehow the craters and details seem to be closer and clearer while the moon is on the horizon. Perhaps it’s a mind trick even then…

I am glad to know that the video was useful for you 😊👍

So are you saying that just because I use AI to paraphrase and voice over, my channel should be banned?

@@whatis.ium29 oh okay, I'm sorry... I thought it was another of em bot channel. There are many out there

Did you know? 63 Earths can fit inside Uranus!

Yeah, you’re right. I tried to make the video from scratch in a single day, so I didn’t have enough time to review and analyze what I wrote. While 'blanets' remain a theory, black holes are real-we even have images of some! You can watch the video I made about the first image of a black hole taken by the Event Horizon Telescope in 2019. ua-cam.com/video/MAFUOEbf5Ps/v-deo.html

Totally! Just hoping our spaceship doesn’t need a tune-up anytime soon!

Yeah, that was an old video, i didn't know how to adjust the gain of the background music those days

I appologize, Yeah you are right, i didn't take my time when writting the script, Callisto is special for many reasons, it is the most heavily cratered body in the solar system, and it has no differentiated core.

Thank you so much ))

Glad you think so!