Відео

Good point, I will look into it.

Thanks a lot!

Yes, will do the upload this WE. Has been very busy lately, but should get around to record the last part. I'll provide the steam workshop link in that video and description. Thanks again!

@@Simoholics-uk1py Would be great to see the independent link with the file as well :) Situation portrayed in your videos will change dramatically in the comming years. Poland is aquiring right now additional 6 patriot batteries and 23 CAMM land based batteries, with plentifull of top-notch radars. Would be great to check this scenario in the future. Once more: great work man. Looking forward to see more of your stuff. All the best!

@@hitusiks7072 Hi, this is the dl-link: steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3405276915 will also add this to all parts. Reg. future of the area: I think Kaliningrad is already in a very vulnerable position; with most SAM sites and airfields easily in HIMARS range, the Poles would find a RU AD and airforce already highly depleted before they even get going. Poland is definitly still short on good SAMs of their own... I really like the swedish AEW though.. Would be interesting to replay with Polish F35s e.g., though would probably be too easy. cheers.

Thanks for your comment! Still learning about this stuff and having highest respect for the skill/knowledge of those who actually do/did this in RL. Will keep experimenting with the WH torps; they add an interesting aspect to the tactics, though they seem to hardly see any use any more in 21st century...

Much appreciated, thanks!

Thanks, much appreciated!

Thanks for being awesome! And much appreciated!

Thanks, much appreciated! The problem with showing the "making of" in detail is that it is usually a process that takes many hours and difficult to put into a video without it being way too long and boring. (e.g. the Kaliningrad scenario was about 1 year of on and off tinkering) Finding sites on google/esri is mostly just looking for them manually. Or find sources that give you hints (e.g. in this case the mint-blog was extremely helpful). If there are high-value targets that need to be protected, SAMs usually have to be close by and preferably a little bit behind the target from the expected angle of the strike (also they need space, road access, etc.). In many cases, the sites will just be lurking in places that are convenient like that and not even that difficult to find... Lmk if you have scenarios ready; would be interested to try them out.

@@Simoholics-uk1py Ahh thank you, I appreciate you sharing your scenarios as well, you can tell a lot of work has gone in. It would probably be even more work if you needed to record the creation process as well. I have an interest in making a couple of historical ones so had to go hunting around for the makeup of their armed forces in that year, I've noticed the current makeup of them is much more readily available on Wikipedia which is somewhat ironic. I have found a couple of sources I can base the state of play off though so I'm hoping that I can start putting some units on the map soon enough.

@@StaleNinja Yes, I have noticed that as well. One thing I have done in the past was e.g. just asking chatGPT for the setup of the Sovjet northern fleet in the mid-1980s. It will spit out platforms and numbers. These you can then look up on wikipedia or other sources and see if they were actually present at the point in time that you are interestet in. This might work better with ships though then with other things...

Yes, though I feel like that is true for basically all systems that engage ballistic or fast ballistic'ish targets. E.g. There is video evidence for S400s getting hit by ATACMS while still fireing missiles, which usually would not happen in CMO. In the end its a simulation, reality is more complicated.

@@Simoholics-uk1py I agree. There's a similar video of Patriots getting smacked by Iskanders as well. The unfortunate part of these drone videos is that we're getting only a partial picture of what's going on. What are the ISR assets in the region? Are there multiple different aerial threats incoming? What's the EW situation? Lots to consider for many people. Not the least, C:MO module creators 😅

Germnay will not exist in near future, its slav time , hold your pants !

Yes, would be interesting to revisit that one at some point.. Could be sort of a modern Pearl Harbor. The old guam scenario unfortunately does not have working AI, so contains only the assets..

The most recent satellite images that are free AFAIK are ArcGIS/ESRI. On those, all six sites are still present and look largely untouched. Baltisk was probably withdrawn in anticipation of the invasion in 2021/2022... It is very possible that the sites are getting cannibalized for parts, ammo and/or trained personnel though, which would not be immediately noticable on satellite images...

They've done dirty a lot, yes.

I own both. 🤨

True. In cmo you tend to need a couple of hits to sink the carrier, though I was surprised how little it did this time. Might have been an outlier. Also, no idea how easy it actually is IRL to break the keel of a 60k+ tons CVN...

Hi, yeah, would be pretty asymmetric, North Korean Navy is a lot of small boats and subs. Could be an interesting challenge playing north though..

Thanks, much appreciated!

Hi, yeah, would be a little bit like French AF vs. Sovjet AF. Both air forces are pretty small though... but I like the idea, will take look at it.

@@Simoholics-uk1pyhey would u also do something with serbia vs kosovo? with or without support? thank you

Thanks! Yes, CMO should have more UA-cam content..

Sure, any suggestions? What kind of scenario would interest you?

@Simoholics-uk1py im honestly unaware of the scope of this game...but an aerial battle with china would be interesting either in north in ladakh region or in the east in arunachal..while china has tech superiority they have geographical limitations and less bases so am curious what that could look like....otherwise you can try specific things like j20 vs s400 of india...maybe rafales vs chinese air defense..or india using su 30s to launch brahmos and trying to destroy chinese airbases in tibet...it could also be more naval battles..malacca strait could be a fun front..you could try out indias new ac...is land warfare a possibility in this game?if yes you could try something there with indian t72s and t90s vs chinese tanks...also the new zorawar light tank vs z15 in ladakh(north border) if its in the game...there are a lot of possibilities....even pakistan is there.. just do anything you find interesting Ill def watch it...

@@capteagle9 Land warfare is possible, but it is pretty basic. Kinda like the idea with the air war. I'll look into it.

@Simoholics-uk1py cool...idk why but my 2nd comment isnt going through (its another cool idea): can try a large naval battle in the malacca strait...at the same time make use of bases (that have su 30s with brahmos)and missiles(agni prime) from the indian islands of andaman and nicobar which lie right at the mouth of malacca...it could possibly make it more even and interesting...

@@capteagle9 Sorry, that comment didn't show up anywhere... Yes, strait of Malacca is a really interesting topic. Besides India, there is also Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapoor, all having capable navies. Wasn't aware that brahmos is available as air launched. Will definitely take a look

Will try to get it on Steam Workshop this weekend...

@@Simoholics-uk1py Cheers

@@EnglishScripter It's on steam workshop, title: "JMSDF vs. PLAN". Thanks again!

@@Simoholics-uk1py Thank you!

Guess it depends what your goal is. Also irl Japan likely would not fight alone...

Mh, Zircon is probably still imature at this point, my feeling would be he'd use something simple, that they trust it will work. Also they would probably do it on territory they control so they can pick it back up if it ends up not working... (pretty sure last thing he wants is UA recovering a functional nuclear warhead.... xD) Very speculative though, right now there is little evidence that any side would profit from breaking the tabu..

Glad you liked it, thank you!

@@Simoholics-uk1py keep em going man. I learn quite a lot watching your content and makes me improve my gameplay as well 👍

Yes, working on getting that fixed in newer videos.

Fürchte auch. k.A. ob das Design einen tieferen Sinn hat, der sich nicht auf Anhieb erschließt... Aber es sind große Schiffe, da würden ne Menge Raketen reinpassen...

Glad you enjoyed it!

Glad you enjoyed it :) Yes, CMO is a little neglected when it comes to content to watch..

Pretty sure its holding Shift while hovering over the unit. Could also be ctrl...

You can check out P Gatcomb's videos, he has a couple of "tutorials" where he builds scenarios step by step.

Thanks, much appreciated!

ha ha! USA is 50+ ahead of ruzzia! USA just keeps its weapons in secret. Don't believe ruzzian propaganda, they don't have anything working- just look at their complete collapse in Ukraine. Using meat waves equipped with shovels agains NATO trained Ukrainian army? Ukrainians lost 31K wounded, while orcs lost 500K+ dead!!!

LRHW wants to talk

@@PennsylvaniaEAS - LRHW ?? 🤣🤣🤣 "The LRHW has failed several tests since 2021, some of which were attributed to problems with the missile itself. In 2023, two tests were canceled after problems were found in the launcher and launch sequence, the GAO said" Keep dreaming, murican engineers, all with 3 mums pushing happy "diversity" skills will need 10-20 years more to get even close... Hey, did I mention the crappy LRHV is not even maneuverable ??

@@PennsylvaniaEAS - LRHW is a failed PROTOTYPE "...Problems with the launcher and launch sequence of the new Long Range Hypersonic Weapon System will keep the U.S. Army from fielding its first LRHW battery until fiscal 2025, a government watchdog said Monday. The service aims to fix the problems and test the missile and launcher " Murican woke engineers, with 3 mums, are still decades away :p

HACM would also like a word

True! I even seen a trusted documentary where F-14 destroyed 3 su-57! USA is ahead 50+ years!

Yes, you are right, there is also that aspect. Kinda feel the maneuvering is a little overrated, making turns will canibalize your range for CM and speed for HCVs... With patriot you can theoretically sneak up from behind since it is not omnidirectional. Making turns during final descent to evade interceptors could be a little hard to pull off without also completely missing the target afterwards. Could totally be wrong there and might play around with this in the future...

@@Simoholics-uk1py to be honest hypersonic missiles in general are over hyped and probably waste of time and money. They were designed for speed and maneuverability but we don’t have the technology to make them work seeing as US has wasted hundreds of billions in design and still having issues with little result. Russians and Chinese highly doubt they have much and their designs (which are untested) are propaganda tools. But on my opinion if you’re going to use a missile for speed and a single trajectory you might as well just use a regular old ballistic missile and overwhelm enemy defense with drones right before ballistic missile strike making you waste the drones. But yes you would have to move the launch platform or ship much closer if you plan on using more fuel to maneuver.

The Kinzhal hypersonic missile is a ballistic missile and is not capable of maneuvering. The Zhirkon is a hypersonic that can maneuver.

He do not only miss that, as well he missed another "detail" - such missiles come with several decoys, making the interception almost impossible - you need AT LEAST 2 interceptors for a target, and Patriot service record is miserable, with an interception rate a bit above 56% against ballistic, not hypersonic targets, and on a fix trajectory, without decoys involved. To be fair, missile specialists with active experience (military) already debated this, peoples with real knowledge, not kids on YT, and concluded it is almost impossible for the Patriot system to intercept a Zircon.

@@voidwalker9223 "to be honest" one describe the grapes as soar, when one is incapable to get them ! You need to educate yourself dude, swallow the facts, and learn the meaning of "honest". Murican engineers, sons of 4 mums, are proving to be decades behind.

Indeed, the X-51 seems to be the inspiration for the few renders that exist claiming to be zircons... I was not aware of this. Wonder if the design that is currently produced as "zircon" may be closer to the X-51 design than previous iterations, since it is well documented and probably does a few things right, thus explaining the wreckage.. Anyway this is really pure speculation on my part. But big thanks for pointing this out though!

@@Simoholics-uk1py Google ‘Zircon missile SPF forums’ and you will find what it most likely looks like. Scramjet inlet is similar to the American HyFly and as previously mentioned, the solid-fuel stage tail section matches what was found in Ukraine. The missile is very axisymmetric.

Interesting, western propaganda then

Thanks, much appreciated!