Відео

Fecteau is fantastic and I could listen to him talk for hours

❤❤❤❤🔥🔥🔥🔥

❤❤❤❤🔥🔥🔥🔥

Heut Ausstellung in Bregenz gesehen bze gehört. Wirklich grossartig...

Huge appreciation to Fridericianum, for uploading this beautiful video. This is what UA-cam is for!

The human makes itself practically according to concepts it has of itself, and in practically making itself, it changes the concepts of itself according to which it practically makes itself. Rinse and repeat. This talk was unnecessarily longwinded.

This is far too cerebral for me. I honestly have no clue what he is saying.

speak in simpler terms boss! and look at the audience when you present. horribly done.

what a boooooooooooooooooooooooring lecture!!!

This guys is really interesting but I think he would really benefit from an intro with some definitions of terms, which is always boring and not a great way to start a discussion, but it’s clear that he is a unique thinker and to understand his definitions would certainly aid us in understanding his theory.

Blue stripes doesn't use words that are sensible but uses the elbow around the arse technique showcasing his vocabulary.

This guy would be a joke in Iran.

Love this comment section

yes more pls for english fans

Amazing range, compelling and thoughtful. So much work in one place. Thank you.

REALLY?.... Where is the passion, the energy, the reason. Your work is utterly empty.

bet

Ignorance & Idiocy: how to discern when the Ghost is malfunctioning & the Machine does not understand.

Exceptional artist. No bullshit whatsoever just doing his thing really really well. ❤

the audience cam is frightening and uncanny

Love the sculptures

this artist is so humble and so gracious

Amazing artist, a real one.

00:13 quick nip

Is it possible to get the lecture notes for this? Alternatively, has Ian published on this topic?

A wonderful mind: G. M. Tamas <3

Brilliant 👏

Negarestani is not r/acc neither l/acc. He is compatible with both in part.

Very good cosmological insights, observations and questions, thank you.

Damn! ❤

Great talk. So bloody scary 😭

The more I listen to Braidotti, the more respect for her I gain. Fascinating speaker with a surreal topic on her tongue. Thank you for this upload

The comments on this page are really weird.

Wonderful work, wonderful speech.

Make notes of all the speech, and read slowly, it makes sense to me, he is explaining a transdisciplinary methodology, Deleuze and Guattari applies these synthetic operators and construct an skizo methodology. Reza and the speculative realists are their orphans. Come on, make your own living hypotesis, play with those abstract machines kiddo!

His is a very comfortable stance to take since he knows he could be wrong about anything and that’s what he is only right about. :))

The problem with Iain Grant is that his lines of inferences never go through anything like logical implication. He holds so many presuppositions enough to bring the world of philosophy down by the sheer weight of unaccounted assumptions. Lovable philosopher though even though he remains in the realm of pure speculation.

There are some plainly trollish comments and some genuine puzzled sentiments here. There is no point to respond to the trollish comments. For the puzzled ones: In the past decade or so, Reza has been trying to synthesize various elements of dynamic system analysis, naturalized phenomenology and conceptual engineering (late Carnap) to provide a picture of our technical and practical concepts which are at once informed by our novel inferences (like Peirce's method of abduction), our capacity to make concepts by intervening or manipulating things (philosophy of engineering from Archimedes to people like Hans Vaihinger and beyond) and the capacity to make evermore suitable concepts adequate for describing what is we are doing when we are doing something, successful or not, from a practical point of view. The point in this lecture which tends to get lost but is further developed in his other papers and talks is that concepts such as materiality, system, whole, part and scale should be understood in terms of triangulations between (1) our manipulative inferences (the reference to Peirce) where theoretical and practical commitments overlap and play with each other, (2) discovering a class of novel phenomena not by mere theoretical reasoning but by practical encounters / experience of the target phenomenon, (3) the enlightenment impulse to refine our concepts, moving in the Carnap sense of explication, from vague or otherwise clunky concepts to more exact concepts.

crazy

this is wtf i’m talking about, METAPHYSICS BABY

Long live Trianon 1920!

23:26 Donna Eroin?

YOLO, am Right? Was there an I in that question?

I like words. Do you? Well, hopefully your brain is okay, because I have a harder time with words, given the fact that doctors have been experimenting on my brain, through the word, and before I had reached puberty. Keep up the great work! No problem!

Hi language.

You guessed wrong.

Nope. Not me.

Sounds like you are promulgating an ethics, which seems contrary to what you claim to be aiming at. I don’t know. It’s as if you aren’t making any sense. But who knows.

People are chopping up children's brains with pharmaceutical drugs, and they are doing it in the open and under the protection of the law. But ethics don’t matter, right? 👻👻👻👻👻

He needs far more artwork to cover for his uncommitted crimes, mind you. Someone let this guy know he needs to be careful.