Відео

@@charliemoore2551 well, the Earl was credited later... The Valet knew the thing obviously. He brought ease to the Earl.

maybe, but this still makes sense. Each view starts with question how do you know things. With absence of any other means to know you try to observe your mind and infer from that the rest. Technically speaking Husserl is not wrong, he tries to describe how your neural network constructs reality out of data, and correctly notes that it is abritrary and subjective process and in fact you cannot know anything outside of it. Makes perfect sense, if a robot would be concious he would have to posit as much as well. How a thinking concious system knows anything at all? well, it doesnt, it just experiences stuff. The fact that between mind and "outside reality" can be correlation is our hope and broader understanding, but you cannot really know. I dont get why people have problem grasping that in age of AI. This is literally what we observe in LLM's. How do they know anything? they dont, they just guess, respond and process. How does brain know anything? it sits in your skull, separated from the world around it, it receives some signals and infers from them stuff. THATS gobbledygook right there. Your brain is mumbo jumbo par excellance.

Thanks for the visit

It means to write down as a note , to put down. 😊