Відео

Definitely not a P-38 but not a B17 either. It has two engines on the port side and three on the starboard, heaven only knows what it is supposed to be.

😂😂 I see you found that funny! We try to keep things lighthearted around here, but we're always open to feedback and ideas. What do you think-should we embrace more humor in our content, or keep things a bit more serious? Also, what would be your take on improving or making content fun in a creative way? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! 😄

@@noomaann Haha the tone is perfect. My wife and I were laughing for like 3 hours. Bravo

The concept of a white hole, as the opposite of a black hole, is fascinating and opens up a lot of interesting ideas about the nature of the universe. While black holes pull in matter and energy, a white hole would theoretically do the opposite by ejecting it all, creating a sort of cosmic balance. Your suggestion that the universe itself could be a white hole is a compelling idea-one that leads us to question the origin of the matter and energy we observe. Some theories even speculate that the Big Bang might have characteristics similar to a white hole, where everything in the universe was "ejected" into existence.

Yes It is indeed.

Divorce laws and incentives are definitely a complex issue with many opinions on how they impact family dynamics and society. It’s a topic that sparks a lot of debate. What do you think would be a fair way to approach family support and divorce laws to ensure they work for everyone involved? Also, how do you feel about the role that economic policies and migration play in shaping societal changes? I'd love to hear more about your perspective, and I think others in the community might have valuable input as well!"

@@noomaann That's easy. Get government out of the business entirely. Remove all the cash and prizes from divorce and suddenly men and women are accountable for their life choices again. Don't want to end up a broke single mom? Be more discerning about the men you're with like in the past. Women are responsible for 80% of all divorces. It's not hard to see why when they're literally paid for it. What man with a brain is going to play that game and put their future kids through the trauma of losing their father and home because of a selfish and delusional mother who's just going to drop them in front of a tv/video games until adulthood because she has no interest/time/energy to raise them herself? Most of us millenials grew up this way, so is it really a surprise we're not having kids? As to the migrant issue, I think it speaks for itself through simple supply and demand. An ageing, childless society that's made starting a family prohibitively risky and expensive, combined with a feckless consortium of government and corporate interests wish to supress wages, raise rents, and install a permanent worker class with no autonomy or self determination. It's naked opportunism, undercutting american youth by flooding the job and real estate market with an overwhelming amount of 'competition' so that EVERYONE loses(but older generations that already got theirs).

History indeed offers invaluable lessons that can guide us in shaping a better future. Our perspective is that understanding past events helps us avoid repeating mistakes and provides a foundation for building innovative solutions. What are some historical lessons you find particularly impactful for today’s world? Do you have any examples of how these lessons could be applied in current situations?

You’ve brought up a thought-provoking and complex issue regarding population dynamics. It's certainly a topic that raises ethical, social, and political questions. How do you think global trends in population growth and decline affect different regions culturally and economically? Also, what do you see as the most important considerations when discussing population policies in a diverse and interconnected world? Your perspective would be interesting to hear, especially regarding the potential impact on future generations.

That’s an interesting perspective. How do you feel modern human genetics play a role in shaping the future of humanity? Also, do you think there's more we can learn from studying our shared ancestry with Neanderthals? I'd love to hear your thoughts!

@@noomaann 1. the latest coming from Harvard is that people outside Africa are more like evolved Neanderthals than pure Homo sapiens. This stemming from it what was only a few Africans who spread their genetic code and it’s those descendants who make up the majority of the outside white species. First you have to consider how and why those other previous races outside Africa “went extinct” or rather evolved into their modern form we see today with different skin tones and behavioral traits. For west European Neanderthals it was their aversion to mix with other groups and rather keep resources to themselves. We see the decline of the white European population as we speak, globally. (As well as Asian but this could be due to European influence and ideology increasing). What my guess is, for Europeans to survive they require more energy output due it only being a small peninsula, not very hospitable to life for much of the year (we have the Viking raider who are the majority modern Saxon, Frankish and Anglo people who we see today who dominated the last 500 years) but as other “races” have adapted their technology…. We see the natural geographic and thus the natural genetic adaptations to more hospitable environments becoming a huge advantage. Essentially in today’s world. The biggest advantage it to be able to live in as many places as possible while needing as little environmental continuity as possible. Therefore the most adaptive genetics will win out (it’s not the strongest or smartest who survive but those most adaptable to change) Now over time. Considering historically African homo sapien dna has remained the most dominant and persistent I would say that just because of genetics (darker skin usually wins out over lighter during mixing) and current trends (most races being below replacement level already but Africans being above replacement) we should see a blacker and browner world. Now genetically due to less recent genetic bottlenecking (most Europeans or many Asians can trace back to one or a few fairly recent common ancestors) There is more genetic diversity between African groups due to the greater level of divergence between areas leading to different behavioral characteristics and thus abilities. To get to the point. It’s these diverse characteristics that will now for the first time interact with dna from outside Africa that will gradually reduce the percentage of Neanderthal dna making the descendants of white and rapidly decreasing Asian populations more adaptive to different environments due to the re admixture of even more African genes. This combined with the advancements in technology and medicine (much of racism comes from negative ancient interactions with new groups bringing new diseases which is now less of a factor but the epigenetic behavioral traits of seeing the out groups as existential threats still remains) will create a more unified and connected global world in time (if population collapse doesn’t happen before economic integration is complete) With fair and equal distribution and the ability for most humans to survive almost any climate for long periods of time the future of humanity will become more physically resilient and hopefully more peaceful…. Or…. 2. The Neanderthal dna people might choose to never mix with African dna Leading to population collapse And we go back to the either the Middle Ages with maybe a bit more tech and start all this again

You raise some really interesting points about the economic system and the evolution of human reproduction. It's true that many people feel the current economic model may not be sustainable with the growing population. Do you think there are specific changes or alternatives that could prevent a collapse? What would be an ideal economic system for the future, in your opinion? The connection between birth control and evolution is fascinating. Do you believe birth control is reshaping not just individual lives but entire populations in terms of genetic and social evolution? How do you think society should navigate this balance between personal choice and population sustainability? Your last point about potential allergies and "penises that break condoms" is both humorous and thought-provoking! 😂 Do you think these kinds of extreme evolutionary outcomes are realistic possibilities, or are they more of a fun speculation about the future?

@noomaann I think the declining populations and some moderate reforms might be enough to stave off a collapse. Humans can fall back on geo-engineeeing to save the environment if push comes to shove. I think the ideal economic system would be one be few a notches to the Left of the Embedded Liberalism of post WW2. Denmark is a great starting point. The challenge is capturing the perks of capitalism (which are NOT what the capitalists claim they are), without empowering the capitalists so much that they start using the profits they earned from economic rent seeking to political rent seek. Some types of evolution can happen very quickly. If the genes needed to adapt are already there and the pressure strong enough and rewards on a spectrum, it can happen in handful of generations. The tree moths in Britain are a classic example. It took just a decade for them to turn black when the factory soot turned the trees black. In humans, I think cheap sugar was our last filter. Diabetes is much more common in countries were sugar was recently introduced. In the West, the people most sensitive to sugar died in 1800s. Humans are adapting to the excess sugar in our diet already and probably already a 1/4 of the way through adaption. I think the increase in allergies could happen quickly. The genes and epigenetics are already in place. 4 generations might be ambitious, but by 2124, I would not be surprised if it is common enough that we have signs for latex like we do for peanuts now. The condom breaking penises are an obscure reference to a SMBC comic. I don't know how you can evolve a penis that can break a condom without hurting a woman so much that she wants to stop having sex. So that one was more flippant.

It’s true that our world is facing significant challenges, and the idea that we need more than just material needs to thrive is an important one. I’d love to hear more about your thoughts on this. What do you believe are the most critical issues we need to address as a global community? And how do you think we can find meaningful solutions beyond just our immediate needs?

@@noomaann people are experiencing spiritual death look at mouse utopia. All the answers are in following Christ.

You’re absolutely right that humanity has endured significant challenges and changes over millennia, from surviving with a small population around 200,000 years ago to evolving without modern conveniences like the Internet, electricity, and schools. You raise an important point about the role of economic and political factors in addressing contemporary issues. Indeed, many of the problems we face today may be more about how we manage resources and make decisions than about inherent limitations of our technology or capabilities. We’d love to hear your thoughts on this! Do you believe that focusing on economic and political solutions could be the key to solving modern crises? Are there specific areas where you think improvements could be made? Or do you think there are other factors we should consider in this context?

@@noomaann the trend is that wealthier societies in general have fewer children, which is a starting factor, but they are also more fractured in the sense that work is away from home, internal migration for education/jobs spreads the family out, and a lot of time is spent either working or doing activities outside of the family. And this takes a toll on us humans as we are designed to live in smaller, more tight-knit groups.

The real reason is millenials grew up watching their dads, uncles, brothers, family friends, etc. all get finessed and crushed in family courts. Who wants to get married and start a family when the woman can just say "I'm bored/unhappy" and you get kicked out of your home, lose access to your kids(Whom she shall poison against you with generic female fabrications about how awful you are), and have to pay her to have sex with other men?

You’ve raised some thoughtful points about how time, community, and social dynamics impact family growth. We agree that a strong sense of community and balance in work-life plays a crucial role in enabling people to have children. However, do you think there are other societal factors, like economic policies or cultural shifts, that could also contribute? We believe that addressing these issues holistically might foster a better environment for families. What are your thoughts on how we can improve both work conditions and community ties to make having kids more feasible?

Yes Brother!

It'll be an issue real fast when you need a job, or for your country's economy to not totally collapse under the weight of all those entitlement programs boomers and X'rs voted in for themselves and expected your generation to pay for.

It's true that change is a constant in life, and everything evolves over time. In our latest video, we explored the idea that while things and people come and go, the lessons and experiences we gather are what truly stay with us. We’d love to hear your thoughts on this. Do you think the transient nature of things has a deeper impact on our lives? Or is there a particular way you think we can make the most out of this impermanence? Your insights could really add to the discussion!