Відео

Hocam, i owe you to thanks. I will make a presentation about public spaces in postmodern cities and one of my title is the space of consumption. Your videos help me to understand the lots of things and i want to say thank you.

It's funny how price influences perception. For you a Camry or a Corolla is a pragmatic non-nonsene car. Here in Brazil, since both are imports and the dollar is mad expensive, they are seen as high end cars. They are marketed to the middle aged man who wanna display prosperity.

This is really a wonderful explanation❤

Telling you what you alreay know the lecture

amazing professor! hope you will continue delivering valuable pieces like this

ur a great teacher, thank you

Thank you so much for your overview.

Great video.

💪 'Promosm'

thank you so much for this, the way you deliver the content is easy to understand!

Great work - thank you!!

Excellent, thank you for the generosity of sharing this!

Hi professor Threadgold, as I was watching this, I wonder how this idea of classed experiences of achievement and passion fit into your analysis of DIY career?

The current praxis you have with dealing with these ideas and theories is an automatic loss. Many of these people started with little to no social capital and got to where they are now despite being more or less unintelligible to the layman. What that clearly demonstrates is many of the intellectual class found their philosophy thought-provoking and insightful. So something about these theories teaches people how to understand reality in such a way that their predictions become more accurate. If you decide to advocate to deplatform these ideas, you might potentially prevent a very small minority of leftists from turning into neo reactionaries sure, but what you're doing is setting up an echo chamber around leftist thought to dogmatically reject outside ideas regardless of their sophistication. The end outcome of this strategy is a largely decaying and stagnant left that increasingly does not understand how to adapt to new sociological problems, and an intellectually thriving right that has sophisticated answers and theories to the most chaotic and captivating social problems. Note that this isn't because right wing philosophy is somehow inherently better at understanding this phenomenon. The world that Nick Land describes in his philosophy is obviously not an ideal world. Within his own ideas, there is a very strong motivation to reject capitalism. The only reason why you could reach a position by which right wing philosophers have become more accurate than left wing philosophers is because you forbid left wing thinkers from contemplating accelerationist theory. Rather than rejecting outside ideas entirely and dooming your theory to irrelevance, you should instead co-opt the ideas that made the theory successful in the first place, and then modify and critique the non leftist components such that the new theory aligns with your own moral axioms. Instead of labeling Nick Bostrom as a racist and dogmatically rejecting his ideas, what you should instead do is recognize what makes parts of his theory accurate, and then edit the philosophy such that it better fits your moral values.

www.youtube.com/@salahror8/featured

great thanks

Thank you for helping me study my Final Exam

🥰

Hi, BSU ))) this week we're looking at digital sociology which takes into account the the rising influence and kind of saturation of ICTs otherwise known as information communication technologies so where we once maybe thought of the media as being kind of separate and a way of representing the world today we increasingly think about the way that humans are pretty much immersed in media in the day to day lives one of the metaphors for this to think about this is the notion of the cyborg the way that we increasingly carry around this technology as a part of us in our phones in headphones even you know wearing something like glasses is a way of kind of the use of technology that changes what it means to be a human so here digital cultures become just the same as youth cultures or sporting cultures they're just part of who we are and what we do in our day to day lives a key theorist here is in terms of thinking about this is the work of manuel castells who argues that capitalism has moved from producing things to producing information information becomes the key commodity in our kind of global capitalist society today we can think about this in terms of where maybe the things that dominated the economy were things like Ford or General Electric these companies actually made everyday things today our economics is dominated by things like Microsoft and Facebook and companies that don't really make specific things but kind of trade on information so here data becomes a way a new structuring society and algorithms themselves are increasingly treated by sociologists as a kind of social structure as having a profound influence on the way that we live these changes and they're our kind of immersion in digital media have seen the divide between the public and private that's been a key to politics throughout many centuries being fundamentally changed so our we've kind of in many ways have voluntarily given up many notions of our privacy and our individual information now is kind of a key thing that's traded for a huge profit we can think about the internet going through a kind of certain almost generational changes the original internet was fairly wooden in many sense it was kind of one way people would produce things people could kind of engage with them it was largely anonymous when that happened more recently what we call Internet 2.0 where things became more about exchange there was things like Facebook and social media started to rise and there was much more social exchange much more way of being on those platforms as a kind of version of yourself that performance of everyday self as Goffman talks about and more recently we've moved to what many people are calling the internet 3.0 the Internet of Things again all these developments have been studied in depth by sociologists and sociology itself has been really affected by these changes where digital technology is now a key way of disseminating our research findings so digital communication technology of have had many kind of developments in the world both positive and negative and sociologists tend to treat the developments quite around the notion of ambivalence that there's both positives and negatives going on so there's lots of ways for instance that the Internet provides us with mechanisms to communicate with people like we never have before again 60s Marshall McLuhan argue that as media develop more and more we would live in a global village where we would understand each other more and more people would understand other cultures and get to know them and not be kind of as scared of him as maybe they were back then but we haven't really seen that been the case in fact it seems as we've had more and more of communication and between different cultures and being exposed to them there there's been maybe an increase in xenophobia in many ways so you can see here there's an ambivalence going on between the positives and negatives further could be the use of things like fitbit's that allow us to track our day-to-day lives so they owe us to increase our fitness but these are things also maybe things that provoke obsession for people that become get carried away with that kind of stuff and get locked down to you know obsessing about those things rather than just kind of living at day to day life so again sociologists are kind of interested in the way that social change has happened around these new technologies but also in many ways the way things stay the same again you can see the way that politics plays out online where there's more chance than ever for us to kind of communicate with people to get along too create groups of like-minded people but at the same time there seems to be more conflict online ever the than ever before particularly aryan notions of gender sexuality and race so sociologists are really interested in studying this and the field of digital sociology is one of the most burgeoning areas of research in our in our discipline [Music]

28

11 18

8 11

Can college majors be pseudoindividual? Identities or what?

Promo'SM

😬 "Promo SM"

IF YOU HAVE CHILDREN THAT ARE INTERESTED IN TRANSITIONING, DO NOT LET THEM DO THAT, NOR ENCORAGE THEM. INSTEAD, PROVIDE THEM WITH THIS BIBLE STUDY, CONSISTING OF THESE THREE VERSES. . THE REASON WHY THESE VERSES WILL HELP YOUR CHILDREN IS THIS: SATAN IS TEACHING PEOPLE THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GENDER AND THE SEX ( SEXUAL ANATOMY ). . HOWEVER, THE BIBLE TELLS US THAT JEWS CIRCUMSIZE SONS, AND THAT THEY ARE MALE: ( Exodus 4:25 ) "Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son ...". IN THE PRECEDING VERSE, THE WORD "FORESKIN" IS THE MALE SEXUAL ANATOMY, AND THE WORD SON REFERS TO THE GENDER. THEREFORE, WE HAVE ONE VERSE OF THE BIBLE THAT DECLARES THAT JEWS CIRCUMSIZE THEIR SONS. SECONDLY, THE BIBLE TELLS US THAT KING DAVID CIRCUMSIZED TWO HUNDRED MEN: ( 1 Samuel 18:27 ) "Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins ...". IN THIS SECOND VERSE, THE WORD "FORESKINS" APPEAR, AND THE WORD "MEN" APPEARS. SO NOW, IT'S ALMOST THE SAME SITUATION AS ABOVE, HOWEVER, INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT A SON, WE ARE REFERING TO MEN. FINALY, THE BIBLE TELLS US THAT GOD CREATED MEN AND WOMAN: ( Genesis 1:27 ) "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." NOW, THIS LAST BIBLE VERSE REQUIRES CARE. PUT THE EFFORT IN TO ENCOURAGE A CONVERSATION WITH YOUR CHILD. DON'T JUST THROW THAT VERSE AT THEM! IN FACT, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO FIRST PRAY TO GOD BEFORE ATTEMPTING ANYTHING WITH YOUR CHILD CONCERNING THE IDEA OF BEING TRANSGENDERED. REMEMBER, SATAN IS TEACHING THE IDEA IN THE MEDIA. PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE VIDEOS THAT CONFIRM THIS.

Thanks

Thank you! great explanation, luv the pace so i can actually take the information in a make notes. Huge help

thanks for a clearly explanation, it helps a lot

www.youtube.com/@wandsawangluo

Great video!

Each word precious! Thanks for such a wonderful explanation.

Excellent summary! So insightful.

The Gendering of sociology Jackson and Scott

Orstart

Amazing and wonderful ideas from prof. Beck. Are not we are in new allegience

ref 3:04 - "symbolic violence includes actions" - can this include language, such as the performative dangers of using particular language. An example I can think of is racial subjugation by referring to a 'riot' that black people are engaged in. Alternatively, 'uprisings' implies much less. So in this example, is it correct of me to see 'riot' in such a context being a form of symbolic violence?

Please read the Book of Revelation! People must finally realize that we are living in the END times, the rapture and the 7 tribulation with the world ruler (Antichrist, 666!) are right around the corner. If you know the biblical prophecies of the end times and the plans of the NWO, you can easily see what is happening in the world. There is hope: accept JESUS ​​CHRIST as your Lord and Savior today and you'll be fine (rapture!)!!! Remember: JESUS ​​is GOD, see John 1! Read the New Testament and the Book of Daniel, listen to Dr. Ron Rhodes and Roger Liebi on the end times, Rapture, Antichrist. Blessings from AB

ᑭᖇOᗰOᔕᗰ

Nice Presentation Sir. Thank you

Very good sum up of Beck's ideas. Thank you!!

Thanks

Best summary of risk society ever!

Hi, please read the Word of GOD: soon a loaf of bread will cost a days wages (see Revelation 6.6). We are living in the E N D times, the 7year Tribulation with the Antichrist is right around the corner, that's GOD'S judgement upon all unbelievers! But there is hope - get saved and be rapture ready: accept JESUS CHRIST as your Lord and Savior today!!! Please study biblical end times prophecy; listen to Dr. Ron Rhodes on end times chronology. Blessings from AB

very informative

It's good to have habitus defined and related to the other conceptual apparatus. Thanks very much 👍

7:57

Liliana's work is fantastic!

This was very helpful in understanding the concepts that my Professor was presenting us with. Very thorough job!

amazing explanations!