Відео

This is very good viedo 👌👌

Thanks so much 😊

Peter stole $100. An hour later John bought a $70 goods from the same shop. How much did the shop lose? $100. I couldn't care less if Peter and John knows each other, are accomplices, or even the same person.

Bvyukmhui😢😢😂😂😮😅😅😅😢🎉❤❤❤❤

This is ONLY correct if the groceries were given to the store FOR FREE. The total loss is $200.

It's not a great breakdown, but it is correct . Basically, the thief decided to steal the goods instead of the $70. In the end, the thief has $30+the goods. While the store has $70.

Can someone explain to me how the heck is 5x5x5 125 because I got 5x3=15 then 15x5=75 HOW THE HECK IS IT 125?!HOW DO THEY GET IT?

Explain in fortnite terms?

😊😊🎉💯💯💯💯💯💢💢

love it :0

Thank you minity maths you helped me in my homework I am in eighth standard

How do you do 10+3x-x^2? Another rearranged equation?

You say can you say some definitions😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

Good morning

So i read that this is riddle should be taken as a riddle only, and not a mathematics problem. That's why the answer is $100. Not like in real life where they loose more. I just want to know what individual came up with this...probably a bad cashier. Lol

This is so very hardworking 😢😢

Thank you 🎉🎉🎉😢❤❤❤❤

it's ok

Awesome 🎉

how did you get 74 ?

This would be accurate if the wholesale costs of the goods were 70 dollars which wouldn't be the case

Very helpful sir

Show this to Terrance Howard

I disagree. Ownership of money and goods always remains with the last legitimate owner. The store keep owns $100. It is stolen by the thief. There is no legitimate exchange. Therefore, ownership remains with the Shopkeeper who is down $100. The thief returns and uses the $100 he does not legitimately own to purchase 70 of goods. When the thief gives the shopkeeper the stolen $100 as payment, he gets another $70 of goods where ownership does not transfer because the payment is fraudulent... and he receives another $30 as change in another fraudulent transfer from shopkeeper to the thief. The balance is the Storekeeper has lost $200 because none of the transfers of ownership were legitimate. Whereas, the thief has seen $200 of goods and money pass that they have had no legal ownership of pass through their hands.

Nice 👍🏽

I love you so much😊

it so good

Wow this helped me a lot😊

Thanks, it's helped me a lot

Thank you so much😍 It's help me a lot❤️

The easiest way to explain it is what if the thief stole the $100 after buying the goods? the shop loses $100. whether he stole the $100 before the transaction or after the transaction makes no difference the shop still loses $100😢 Although they did make a profit on the transaction

I guess there's a brain teaser or a riddle I'd have to accept this if I were the stoner A store owner I would be out $200. The potential to gain a profit the retail sale of the products that were worth $70 retail plus the $30 that he got in charge that's $100 plus the register the till would be off by $100. To the store that's a $200 loss.

Me know a Ready

You are not showing the $100 stolen which will still show up missing when the register shows a shortage when closing.

I did this type of math equation and i went crazy like literally when i was putting the numbers in smallest to largest its so easy to skip one

thank you ive never understood mean but i do now thank you :)

Just before the exam perfect😂😂😂

I wishhhhhhhhhhh the voice was a human voice because it would help me concentrate While I watch this video just giving some advise for your channel .

Who is watching this on 2024

Idk why l still don’t understand. Thanks for the vid❤

thanks

11?

I dont get how you do the 2nd question

It’s not even in order..

It’s not even in order..

Nice video but the last one makes no sense. The example you gave each of them can be a superset of each other. A superset is a set that contains all elements of the other with at least one more element.

Tomorrow is my exams

Thanks

Thx

1771 solve