Відео

@@renaukint8264 thank you. The list was definitely full demon version. Benefits the LoC. Next one will go into the warflock side of things.

@@rmulshine thanks, which part about the pinks do you mean?

@@TheRealmWarsNetwork nvm, I was having trouble distinguishing units.

Awesome, thank you!

AI is not perfect yet but handy to use. will get better over time.

@@TheRealmWarsNetwork I suppose it's more TTS but it stands out horrendously, for the effort it takes to type in a script and get it read, I honestly feel like it would be worth the extra few hours just to have someone human read it for a less disconnecting experience. Doesn't have to be professional audiobook level of reading, but some sort of actual emotion behind the words would go a long way.

@@DanMarston117 I'll think about that

Honestly, I thought the Ai voice was much better than a lot of others I've heard on yt channels. It's very passable.

@@jediguru34 They are making progress I think.

i did not mention it much as all the Sylvaneth heal every turn. so it actually didn't do much (or didn't trigger). when it did damage i put it into the shooting damage comments.

gotta bring out the big ones!

@@banlungx001 done in the next video already

true! we missed the banner.

@@tizianomerello6530thank you! yes, you can store prayer points. You roll for it and then decide if you want to spend (you have to use all) points on a prayer or keep it.

Belthanos "Nature Aetheric" ability is at the start of any turn, same as "Active Place of Power" so it seems it should be possible. Belthanos uses his ability and Alarielle activates it as they both happen at the start of turn.

@@TheRealmWarsNetwork Ah, you're right. The ability is yellow so I thought it was in the hero phase. I wonder which one is correct.

indeed, need to use him while it lasts. who knows what the battle tome will bring. i am tempted o give his paint job an upgrade on mine, feel the wings are a bit bland currently.

yes they do! wizards as well. you pick a spell and a prayer lore for your army that every caster then knows all the spells/prayers of.

happy you like the brep!

Awesome, thank you!

we did realise this after the game as well that she actually is not able to strike and fade indeed due to her pie plate base. made for a good moment here though in hindisght as she escaped on the slimmest of margins.

Yeah, I had the same thought when I saw that. She's too thicc, and it has hurt me in games with her before.

U can place alarielle on the root from a tree. So u can use Strike and fate with good positioning.

Put her on the base of the tree then she is wholly 6 ?

Thank you very much!

welcome back :) the Raptors wanted to be on the board to be able to do covering fire turn 1, as seize the center was the most obvious choice for the Sylvaneth in turn 1, but they did expose themselves to the bow hunters this way. For the Praetors, the soul-bonded ability says it can be used during the deployment phase. Is there a core rule that would say it can be used only when on the board? As they do count as deployed when in the sky. Really wanted to utilise power through with the Palladors, but they were fighting Kurnoth and Alarielle who both have an at least equal health characteristic, so the Palladors can't use power through against them. Belthanos was surely too defensive. He did get a lot more vulnerable without his ward save so he was very weary to stay outside the range of the Raptors and Palladors, who both outrange him. The ability to give the Kurnoth run and charge is still very useful though.

​@TheRealmWarsNetwork 28.0 in the rulebook says "unless states otherwise, units using or being picked as part of an ability must be on the battlefield". Deployment is split into 3 parts the last being using the deployment abilities. Since the praetors would not be on the battlefield they cannot declare the "soul-bonded" ability. Unless this was FAQ'd I believe this is still the ruling.

@@codfreak213789 good find. They can't use it then like this.

Thanks! Will do!

some fantasy terms are not clear in pronunciation to us non-native speakers and the AI at times does not convey these very well unfortunately.

Why so toxic?

@@user-be2nt8bi9j “Toxic”? Having standards and being unwilling to accept AI Slop is not Toxic. You should try it sometime.

@@rocomet hmm, I see what you mean. I'll try to get it a bit more adjusted in the next video.

@@ocean7119 thank you. Glad you like the voice!

yep, learned that this game.

@@alvarosalvador5392 it actually doesn't have to be wholly inside enemy territory. Partially is also allowed for this tactic.

But is must be wholly outside friendly territory

thanks for the detailed notes, glad you enjoyed the format! some details are indeed not mentioned or are not well reflected during editing, this style of battle report is a bit more upfront effort to record individual actions when reviewing the game footage and then turning each one into comment and/or graphic indication even (in the 3rd ed battle reports i was averaging about 150 actions per game) which all adds to the editing time. i cut down on some that i would have liked (like a CP usage indicator). Might try to add more back in again next time. Hope i can answer some of the questions on this game: T1 the LoC summoned the shackles, but as he was deployed a bit back the manifestation couldn´t actually affect anything due to the range. the score was hold 1, hold 2, hold more = 3 points + 4p for the battle tactic = 7 victory points. T2, the horrors spiked their explosions. was lucky for sure, but can happen. One of the main reason to take pinks over blues here, it makes especially heroes think before charging them. T3, here was an editing error in the scores. I realized after editing that i didn´t comment much on the underdog mechanic (or at all actually), in this game it was not that impactful as the FEC usually had the choice and turned the central objective into a home or flank one. As they were dominant on the objective control they didn´t need it much. Blues did indeed kill a knight by attacks. Doesn´t happen often but can. the score was off due to the editing error and i did not add the points for objectives of FEC T5 as the battle tactic was enough at that point.

@@AdeptusEsquire planning to make more for sure

@@Jenkstudio97 thank you, that's exactly the idea too have it more compact.

Thank you!

thank you, will keep it in this style.

thanks that makes the spell indeed much better than i thought it was.

thanks for the heads up on the detonation. not sure which occasion you refer to with the 0-move manifestation. in this case the shackles were on the field but had their main use to try to slow down FEC in T1 and then later to put one round of damage on Ushoran.

@@TheRealmWarsNetwork I was talking about the redeployment of the fec turn 1, but I guess he wanted to stay 3" from the manifestation

@@gilgamesh000 correct! Good spot.

The FEC player could have counter charged the shackles on turn 1 and pile-in in melee of your unit, denying you a battle tactic… You can’t use it this way to block your opponent, quite the opposite

@@robinapparailly3261 that's indeed a good idea. Need to be careful with how to place manifestations to not give the opponent more opportunities than you do for yourself.

thank you! will get more flyovers / close ups again for the next report.

@@TheRealmWarsNetworkhonestly this makes it 1000x more easy to process what’s going on lol, I also think close ups for armys would be cool! Good job!

that's good to know. was under the impression that the "if it has 6 points" means it has to explode that turn.

i did not recognise that but you are right! now i need some more imps to slap DK2 style ;)

the turn to spawn spell is great when it goes off but quite conditional, ideally you want to cast it in the opponents turn to bind an enemy unit. the 12" range makes that tricky already and most importantly in this case you need to kill a model with D3 damage to turn it into a spawn. In this game only the crypt horrors and morbheg knights were in range of the spell and those got 4 wounds each. Hard to kill one of those with D3 damage, so usually "arcane suggestion" was cast instead.

@@Strade8 good question. The Maelstrom warscroll is lacking the "you can" as part of the ability. Might be somewhere in the core rules that you don't have to use it?

​@@TheRealmWarsNetworklast BT on warpfire minis he explains the rule like that. I think you can activate (or not) each rule that doesn't say "Must".

@@TheRealmWarsNetworkso this is correct the wording is very different compared to 3rd, you can declare when you blow it up. However, if it is killed or banished you would not be able to explode it like in 3rd is would simply poof.

no fluff, no memes, just gameplay at a reasonable speed. Great content