Відео

@@kathyhorne556 Thank you so much! Your positive feedback really means a lot to me and encourages me to think of more ways to express to others, what we all in this community have been seeing for years now. Thank You Thank You!

@@Giftofwateralive Thank you! Yes mad libs exactly and then historical definition of the absurd new word gets updated so that it fits just fine into the new historical context. "Nothing to unusual to see here folks, it's just old archaic English" .. 🙄

@@kylegunnink Only in newer remakes. In the original series we grew up with decades ago.. he never says it.

I have all the same questions. It’s been 9 years since I woke up. One day it will all make sense.

@@lovelyday5153 Seriously, thank you for sharing that. This is actuality a very commonly reported experience and I have a list of my own Mandela effects that I don't share with most other people. I am ok with the idea that there is no one "right" way that things absolutely "must" be. Im thinking about doing a video on this subject too, just to get people thinking and discussing. Thanks again.

Not everyone can see every change, that what makes it strange.

@@RedStorm. Same here.. I've only gotten one person to see any of this.

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg I think this is the most bizarre part about truth, we can't seem to have it accepted..very strange. We thought everyone would want to know and be shocked..nope. lol

@@RedStorm. Exactly! I was about to share that same first impression. I felt 100 present certain these revelations would spread like wildfire and shock the masses... nope.... just me.. and this relatively small community on the internet..

I've succeeded with 2 people, my mom & my sister see this as well & we talk about it. As soon as I started talking about it, asking questions about verses they had memorized, like me, that weren't there anymore, they immediately agreed the changes were real. My mom is 80 & was a Sunday school teacher. She remembers. I've not been able to bring anyone else to the changes. No friends or other family. I wish I could have done more.

Was there dung & piss? Those are egregious changes to me.

@@Jen_seeks_truth Yes, especially because skeptics like to say that Mirror Mirror comes from the old fairy tale and that's why people are getting confused. As you can see that argument doesn't hold water with this evidence straight from Disney.

@@emaracin2011 I hear you. It is frustrating and seems to people like us to chase our own tails so to speak, but I can't help but keep digging into this. I can't stop and iv won't, even if it seems like I end up talking to a brick wall about all of this. Im not going to stop.

@@tannerworm Most do, yet more and more lower case h are showing up on older Bibles.

@@Jen_seeks_truthThank You! So, did your Dad see the word as unusual or unfamiliar being in the Bible? They didn't even have corn there back then.. My experience has been like trying to push the opposing ends of a magnet together, when I talk about this subject with others. Nothing connects, nothing sticks, it's like trying to mix oil and water and I'm the odd one out in the conversation.

@ unfortunately my dad did not see corn as unusual, even though he is 88 and raised on the KJV. Originally I reviewed 10 Bible verses with obvious changes, “nursing fathers”, “bottles of wine” and so on. The only one he wasn’t sure of was the word “stuff”. I dropped the topic because if he doesn’t see the verses as a problem, then I didn’t see how he would see them as changes. A few months ago he was surprised that “Jesus repented” in the KJV, but he just said about a translation issue of the word. But just last week he quoted John 3:16 and 17 KJV and I ended our conversation with asking him to look up the verses in his Bible at home to check. It was funny as he said he didn’t need to check because they were the first verses he memorized in grade school. But he never got back to me. I think the supernatural is just difficult to accept. So we just continue to love our family and pray for them.

@@digitalman9735 Hey thank you Thank you, yes. It really means a lot to hear a shout out from someone like you. I've been following the major ME channels out there and yours is for sure one of them. Yes I'm affected by ALL OF IT.. and I can only get a small fraction of people around me to see an even smaller fraction of the MEs I'm seeing. I am passionate about this subject and I believe that the people who see something.. need to say something... So I guess I'm a little late to the game, but better late than never... .

John 18:38, hee hee hee

@@lucycoombes6785 Yes! I'm seeing content on other people's videos change also. That is another reason I'm doing these videos is to see what my own content will look like years down the road as changes continue to occur. Im talking about more than just written comments though. The original videos are changing.

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg yes what ever is doing this can change audio too

@@lucycoombes6785 Thank you for sharing that and commenting here. Your perspective being from England is very helpful. I have a couple of questions for U.K. viewers. Do you remember baptise or baptize being correct spelling used in the KJV? Also the modern NIV Bible U.K. edition, uses the word corn instead of grain or wheat. This is done to make the language more relatable to U.K. readers. Is this true? Is the word corn used in the Bible or anywhere else, in place of grain, a familiar term for you? Thanks!

@ it was absolutely never ever corn. Always wheat or grain! Baptise without a Z. Shills have tried to justify the use of corn, but it was never there before in any version

@@lucycoombes6785 Thank you so much for sharing that. Corn for sure is a strange addition. However, the second example here baptise/baptize, highlights a strange difference in the experiences of US vs UK experiences of the Mandela Effect. The American experiences will say that baptize has always been correct and is still correct in the KJV, however the UK experiencer, most often will report that baptize with a z, is a new Mandela Effect for them. This is something very strange that I'm trying to wrap my head around here. I would say that both are correct, depending on the personal reality one has historically experienced.

@ that’s very odd! I can’t figure that one out. The other night my husband and I were watching an old movie quiz on UA-cam. There were quite a number of old movies I’ve never seen or even heard of and it seemed kind of bizarre to me, like I had entered a different dimension!

@@SupernaturalBibleChanges Yes, I'm in the same boat as you looking at these old Bibles. I want to say that surely the spelling couldn't have been as atrocious in the old reality as it appears today. Words are spelled two different ways in the same verse! And the medial S is for sure multiplied. I was told that it is not to be used for the double ss sound, then a year later I'm seeing double medial s, like ff. Apparently now they have zero spelling rules to follow in that time period. Soon the whole 1611 will just turn into garbage symbols and nonsense. They already have the ampersand & and so many other weird symbols in there it is just a matter of time.

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg Oh wow, now that's a smoking gun that the medial S is being multiplied, some of the old Bibles now appear to have profanity in them, which might be intentional. I can't be 100% sure, but many words that would be traditionally spelled with a Y, like Deuteronomy in the Geneva are spelled with an "ie" at the end, I noticed the name of Mary spelled "Marie", I just can't be too sure if it's a change or not, but it just looked so odd and "new" to me. 🤷‍♀ Also in my Matthew's Bible there is a "spelling chart" at the beginning, and it shows the "old spellings" compared to the " modern spellings" however the chart doesn't match some of the spellings in this old Matthew's Bible, it shows "Zechariah" spelled like "Zacherie" but in the bible text it's also spelled Zachary...it's just a mess... but like you said, they just spell things how they feel or phonetically

Ridiculous! I think they’re messing with us.

@@RedStorm. Yes, and it really looks like words were added that just then push all the other script around, making it all look wrong in so many ways.

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg yep, pretty messed up. It's all so strange. Wonder if we will ever know what's going on with all of this.

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg that makes sense, words are definitely being added into verses, so it would shuffle and push other words forward.

Yes, and i believe there are many others like you who simply don't know the scale and detail of these changes. I would like to cover more of the wide diversity of Mandela Effects but it seems like other channels have many of those details pretty well covered. I think I'm pretty glued to the Bible changes here because they aren't talked about as much in detail and the changes are appearing more rapidly. It seems like every other day I'm finding more new words and altered verses.

@@annlyon144 Yes heavens has changed for sure. What is the second change that you see?

@ I remember there was much more in that verse. But I’m not close to my Bible right now so I can’t look. God explained it so much better in the beginning them it has now.

@annlyon144 Yes there are for sure are lot of changes now to the creation story. Mostly subtle changes so far. God creating "an help meet" for Adam is the most wild one I've seen so far. Craziness...

@ wow

Do you remember John the Baptist having two disciples? Verse 35. Not ME. Oh well!!

@@RedStorm. Yes you are absolutely correct! I find it to be such a long winded mouthful that might tend to overwhelm people, if I were to mention everything we are seeing, all in one take. It really is a tsunami of changes, but hardly anyone can see any of them. I figure I'll try to spoon feed people a bit and see what, if anything, a larger spectrum of people will bite down on. Thanks for your Feedback!

the emojis in the KJV should be raising a few eyebrows

@@SupernaturalBibleChanges For people who understand proper grammar and punctuation, for sure. It seems like most people just overlook this stuff or seem quick to write it all off as being a result of archaic English still having a foothold in the KJV to this day. My hope is that the limited percentage of people who are able to see this stuff, are at least exposed to this information so they can wake up and become more vocal themselves.

@@SupernaturalBibleChanges I have 80 of them highlighted in my KJV

@ Im happy to see you taking the iniative to do these vids. I tend to ad some tidbits when I'm in chat to support the issue in the vid at hand, for those who read comments, kind of supportive material. Hope you don't mind. You are doing a perfect presentation.🕶

@@SupernaturalBibleChanges Wow ya i almost want to make a video on that topic because corn is in the NIV UK edition. So contemporary U.K. readers would find the word corn a more relatable linguistic expression in the Bible?I somehow doubt that.. 🤨🙄

@@MandelaEffectsAndMore-wg4zg oh wow, I was not aware that corn was in the UK NIV version, that is wild.

@@SupernaturalBibleChangesThank You for that positive peer review! I'm no digital arts professional but I would like to use what resources and skills I do have to present a message that might be able to appeal to all audiences. It would be cool if a wide range of people find themselves able to grab hold and resonate with this kind of presentation.

@@barbaragodwin6710 Of which version? I say that because some people actuality do remember the current versions of things always being there and words like couch and corn always being in the Bible

@@FusionTrusion-tw7wg George Reeves?... never heard of him.. I have for sure heard of Christopher Reeves though.

Yes, it's only in Mark and Mark is being altered quite a bit. My Bible now has a note in it right before the resurrection, that the following portion is not included in the oldest biblical records for Mark. So basically the Resurrection portion of Mark is said to be an unverified addition to the Bible. What will they say next?