Відео

I agree with you, the mission is crap. Even with the little turrets, if they ever shoot. You can expect me to test missions until they are 100% accurate. As I understand it, missions are the basis for any further emergent gameplay. Happy New Year :-D

maybe wrong option setting for turret like it need relative mode or something but i am not sure yet

Das ist hart und kann ja nur ein Bug gewesen sein. Bin auch überrascht wie sich Save Stanton so spielt. Phase eins und zwei empfinde ich als sehr casual freundlich, da haben sie wohl die Hürde tief angesetzt damit viele Erfolgserlebnisse einfahren :-D

Energy management all available energy on weapons. It is possible that I took energy away from the thrusters so that I could then put it on weapons. Please keep in mind that the video is two weeks old (3.24.2) and CIG is changing the energy distribution and other ship component related values every patch; the energy provided by the capacitors for S5 weapons has probably been reduced, hence currently less charges. I hope this helps you :-D

@rubentaiartinger2640 the smole weapons 8 shoot also

You have a strong argument there. I can imagine that they will adapt and optimize the engine so that we will have fun with SC at release and keep my fingers crossed :-D

thank you for asking: cpu 5800x/gpu 2060 6GB/ 32 GB Ram 3600/ mainb b 550 aorus pro v2/ CPU z bench single thread 633.5 multi 6614.3; and you, what hardware are you running your games with?

Thank u for Ur comment i know my 2060 6 GB is my bottleneck tested my cpu/General performance(5800x) in w10 and w11, there was Zero to 1 % Differenzen in perf so i run w11 and its ok ;-D

@@rubentaiartinger2640 well if you look at all the benchmarks people have been doing lately it still shows W10 performing better than W11 even on older CPUs, i have a 5800X and i can tell you the difference is more than 1% and some times more than 5%

In the actual wave 1 3.24.2 patch cig could have reduced the amount of greenskybox-paint the sky full to a better value; it looks a little less green, maybe they improve more to a realistic black space when patches go on . . . i press thumbs ;-D

sometimes it even feels beautiful ;-D

ight now i would do all Omni and one dist cannon ;-D

ight now i would do all Omni and one dist cannon ;-D

ight now i would do all Omni and one dist cannon ;-D

​@@rubentaiartinger2640thats what i use too, but all omni

right now i would do all Omni and one dist cannon ;-D

Cig May have invisible obstacles reduced

@@rubentaiartinger2640 contacting ATC one, two or more, finally i can take off.... deploying/retracting landing gear helps too... new patch, new bug...

Yup I got nailed by a 2 Sec burst of ground fire.

Yeah, weak and slow

@@rubentaiartinger2640 Shame, it was a great ship beforehand.

I am very glad that you like it. Can you please tell me what you liked most? Thanks in advance :-D

Hi Jean Gerne: My Loadout at the Time of The Record was two S5 Deadbolt cause they did punch; with the 3.23 ammo increase comes a damage decrease; if shards run well i will test them for you this evening ;-D

Maybe 3.21 PU will bring a better functioning Vulture in our hands . . .

Ja ist eine Org, wenn Du mir in Discord ne pm schickst kann ich die Info an jemanden bei OMC weiterleiten, dass Du an denen interesse hast . . .

I just wait for 3.21 PU and hope it will be better then . . .

searched for it till now for like +40 hours, read somewhere it has a drop chance of 0.0355 % so i hope cig will adjust that chance if that value is correct; i wish everyone luck to find it

I will think about that resynch Windows time advice for a Day or two and then decide what i will do; thanks for the input

Did my second char repair and resynched time on windows: vlm/vma is finally working again, i am very thankful for your recommendation synfpv9097 :-D

I synchronized the windows time and all is good now :-D

did not test the vulture for a while, maybe it will be better when 3.21 goes live . . .

ptu has them for every tester ;-D

field of view set to 116 may help you if you have a 2k monitor . . .