Відео

Covid is not in the bible but epidemic was mentioned but it doesnt mean that God did not say about epidemics like covid. Wrong question to lask if you have the knowledge about God. If its not supported by verses in the bible then it is not the TRUTH. Jesus already said that there is only one God.

The audio or sound system has a problem.

False prophet Felix Manalo deceived many for claiming that the early Church founded by Christ turned away from the faith,so he founded his own religion on 1914.Some abandoned their faith ,but Peter and the Apostols and Paul spread the gospel and built Churches on the first century.

Tunay na si Felix Manalo ay bulaang propeta.May tumalikod peru hindi natalikod ang Iglesiang tinayo ni Cristo nong unang siglo.Sina Pedro at mga Apostol ang mga unang miembro ng tunay na Iglesia.

Pinatunayan ninyo na si Felix Manalo ay bulaang propeta.May tumalikod peru hindi natalikod sina Pedro at mga Apostol na miembro ng tunay na Iglesia noong unang siglo

Ang lakas ng loob makipag debate, samantalang yung pinuno niya hayahay lng,ipinapain yung kangyang menistro,tamad talaga si manalo

Kung nagkataon na si bro Eli Soriano,ang nakadebate nitong INC ni manalo Talo ito sure yan,,,,

I JOHN 5:20 (KJV) And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

Lahat kau mali.reaearch kau isa lng itinayo n relihiyon n kristo kundi ang catholic church. Kau tatag lng ng tao..born again aq dti ng ilng dekada bumalik aq s tunay n eglisia n tatag n kristo..reseach kau s goole at encyclopedia..at sk history.

Bias as f 😂 ilang beses ko na napanoof to si ventilacion nilampaso ng mga bible scholars example si James White tignan nyo muntanga sya kung san san tumatalon sa talata,, yang kalaban nya wala masyado alam

When felix manalo was young ang alive he was thingking about what is the best business to establish, he aswered himself a Religion, thats how Iglesia ni Manalo started, comouflage with the name iglesia ni cristo.

What is the personal name of the Father whom you are debating please be specific about the name of the Father because Satan the Devil is also called Father at John 8: 44.

Basahin n'yo ang 1 Corinto 15:27-28 d'yan n'yo malalaman kung sino ang tunay na Diyos, kaya tama ang ipinangangaral ng Iglesia Ni Cristo. ❤

Felix Manalo founder of INC raped Rosita Trillanes and many others.

Debate is just feeding your pride and ego.. that means.. you may win that debate but next what? If u don't win the soul.. useless at all!

The Holy Bible is hidden in mystery. It was written. So we cannot blame if the Church of God cannot understand what's in the Bible. It was written too that unless Lord Almighty will clear up the mind of a person and call him in the flock, that's the time the person can understand what's written in the Bible. May our Lord God open the mind of those people , the Minister of the Church of God and his followers😊😊😊

Wow😅😮😮😮

Saying Jesus Christ is a only human, they don't understand the scripture

Bias.. Cut ang presentation ng baptist😢😢😢😢😢

Double standard 😂😂😂😂😂

1. John 1:1-14 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us." - This passage identifies Jesus as the "Word" (Logos), affirming His divinity. 2. John 10:30 - "I and the Father are one." - This statement made by Jesus suggests a unity with God the Father. 3. Colossians 2:9 - "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form." - This emphasizes that Jesus embodies the fullness of God. 4. Hebrews 1:8 - "But about the Son he says, 'Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.'" - Here, God the Father addresses the Son as God. 5. Revelation 1:8 - "'I am the Alpha and the Omega,' says the Lord God, 'who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.'" - Many interpret "the Alpha and the Omega" as referencing Jesus, especially since He identifies with this title later in Revelation. 6. Matthew 28:19 - "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." - The co-equal nature of the Trinity is often inferred from this command.

Marson, dimo ma gets ang john 1:14 kaw sng sinungaling boi

Herculas,ikaw ang bulag at bingi betterconsult an eent

Kulto

This is dumb minister he don’t understand many many times explanations

Nakatala sa Biblia na hihiyain kayo mga tumutuligsa sa Tunay na lingkod kg DIYOS ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa huling araw

NASA gabay ng DIYOS si ka Joe Ventilacion hindi nagbabago ang kanyang katawan malakas pa rin,,Salamat ang INC ang may totoong DIYOS

Is Trinity True? ua-cam.com/video/YGCtsJvh0bQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/hKh0SPB5cjw/v-deo.html The True God ua-cam.com/video/RZuZYchq4Sw/v-deo.html

Huwag kayo masyado maging fanatic sa mga relihiyon na yan. Wala sila ginawa kundi magpagalingan na akala mo ay napakatalino nila at bobo ang Diyos. Napaka-talino at napaka-manunawain po ng Diyos at hindi nya hahatulan ang isang tao base lamang sa mga technicalities na pinagtatalunan ng mga "religious intellectuals" na yan. Magfocus lamang po tayo sa paggawa ng mabuti at naaayon sa 10 Utos ng Diyos at siguradong magiging maayos ang lahat.

IGLESIA NI CRISTO IS THE ONLY HOPE BECAUSE IT'S THE TRUE CHURCH WE ALL NEED..WETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT..

😂Tawa nlng.

Ka Joe Ventelacion❤❤

Dun sa mga NAGSASABING si CRISTO ay "DIOS" ay BAGO AKO MANIWALA sa INYO ay si CRISTO MISMO muna ang PANINIWALAAN ko tungkol sa SINABI na kung "SINO LAMANG ANG TUNAY NA IISANG DIOS LAMANG" kundi ang "AMA"at HINDI IPINAKILALA ni CRISTO na "SYAY DIOS "(Juan 17:3,1)SINO ngayon ang TOTOO sa inyo ni CRISTO?Yung SINASABI mong SYAY DIOS o si CRISTO na sinabi NYA na ang AMA LAMANG?ISIPIN MONG MABUTU yang SINASABI ni CRISTO .EWAN ko kung NAPAKAHIRAP INTINDIHIN YUN?(ang tanga mo nalang kung hindi mo MAINTINDIHAN) Maski ang mga APOSTOL SINABI NILA MISMO kung SINO ANG "TUNAY na IISANG DIOS LAMANG".(1 Corinto 8:5-6)Maski ang DIOS ay HINDI SYA PUMAPAYAG na meron pang IBANG DIOS LIBAN sa KANYA maski sa darating na PANAHON (Isaias 43:10)UNAWAIN MONG MABUTI ITO. EWAN ko kung NAKAKAINTINDI ka sa NAKASULAT LAMANG.

IKAW ANG SINUNGALING MARSON 81975, ETO SABI NG IISANG DIOS,AKO LAMANG,WALANG IBAAAAA,LIBAN SA KIN, AT ETO NAMAN ANG SABI NI CRISTO SA AMAAAAAAA, YOU ARE THE ONLY TRUE GOD,TANONG KO SA YO MARSON, MAY SABI BA MISMO SI CRISTO WORD FOR WORD NAAA AKOOOO AY IISANG NA TUNAAAAY??? KUNG.MERON,ONE VERSE LANG PO,OK NA ME, SIR MARSON, SAGOOOOT,ANTAY KA NG MADLANG PEOPLE,WHAT VERSE??? BASAAAAAAAAAA

Happy to see this and to proved once again that the Father is the ONLY TRUE GOD!

John 1:14 ibig bang sabihin na ang Ama ang naging tao? Sinungaling talaga tong mga Manalista na to kahit malinaw na sa John 1:1,14 iisang Dios na may dalawang persona ang Anak ang "WORD" na NAGING TAO (John 1:14)

Felix manalo is not a messenger of God, only JESUS, I have attended several times in I.N.C services they do not allow their members to bring their own Bible which is contrary to the teaching of Jesus.. JESUS IN HIS "NATURE" IS GOD.. That's why he said "Me & my father are "ONE"...I.N.C. can not accept that because of their OWN DOCTRINE..every "PERSON" MUST STUDY WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE..The "BEREANS" search the Bible if the teaching of Apostle Paul(Acts 17:10-11)is TRUE?.. That's the reason why many are mislead in what is the truth...Don't just listen..Search by your self.. WE MUST READ THE BIBLE & ASK GOD IN JESUS NAME TO GIVE US UNDERSTANDING. GOD BLESS US ALL.

Definitely Ka Joe Ventilacion clearly teaches the true doctrines...mabuhay Iglesia ni Cristo🇮🇹❤️👈

Ka joe ventellacion 💪

Watched from keene n h u s a

Greetings from Lokal ng Bagong Silangan Quezon City.

I share na lang po natin ang mismong video. Instead na kopyahin po at ireupload

We welcome everyone to attend our worship services nearest you!

no alklol going

I m very good health

You follow what the bible says? Then enlighten me where in the bible it is stated that Felix Manalo is the “sugo”???

why no comments🧐

With respect to the Lupercalia-Valentine’s connection, most scholars would argue that there is absolutely no connection between the two whatsoever. Lupercalia was celebrated from the 13th to the 15th of February. But here’s the thing - Lupercalia was a very local thing; it was held almost _exclusively_ in Rome. There are only scant references to it being held anywhere else. It was not at all a Roman Empire-wide celebration; thus, could not have possibly been the seeding of some sort of “proto-Valentine’s Day” across Europe. Further, there are no historical records of Lupercalia being celebrated more recent than the end of the 5th century. Further, Lupercalia had very little to do with romance. One *presumed* aspect of the festival that seems to prevail in many modern descriptions is the idea that there would have been a matchmaking lottery of sorts, which supposedly featured girls writing their names on paper that would be drawn from a box by boys, and the couples would be paired up. This supposition is often cited as further evidence of the connection between the ancient festival and Valentine’s Day. There is, however, absolutely zero historical records that suggest boys being paired randomly with girls for participation in the ritual. Indeed, most scholars agree that the concept that Lupercalia featured girls writing their names on paper that would be drawn from a box by boys is likely an 18th-century invention that developed from the English custom of doing the same which seems to have originated in the late 1400’s. In short, the custom of choosing one’s Valentine by lot originated in England around the 1400’s, *not* the Roman Lupercalia. The earliest attested historical record of the Lupercalia comes from the 3rd century BCE, while the last record was from the end of the 5th century CE - around the same time Pope Gelasius I made February 14 into a day that would honor the Christian martyr, Saint Valentine. At no point however does Gelasius speak of compromise, or of adapting any pagan customs. Even though they weren’t far apart chronologically, the supposed symbolic overlap between the two took centuries more to develop, as Valentine’s Day hadn’t yet acquired the romantic meaning it has today. That would only come about 1,000 years later. In the early church, the Feast of St. Valentine would have been a solemn celebration; not the holiday it is today. Indeed, it is quite possible that Gelasius was partly responsible for Lupercalia’s decline. Without this ritual of a supposed lottery at the Roman festival, there appears to be little correlation between the Lupercalia and Valentine’s Day. Further, though there is a calendar overlap, there is zero historical evidence to suggest that one was replaced by another. It is vitally important when writing about traditions to remember that there are only 365 days in the year ... calendar overlap, when it occurs, does not equate to any degree of significance; it’s going to happen. Most mainstream historians agree that Valentine’s Day and romance became associated with each other only in the late 14th century. That’s a pretty huge gap between the late 1300’s and the end of Lupercalia in the 400’s. A thousand year gap where nothing resembling Lupercalia or romance and Valentine’s Day is historically recorded. Almost 1,000 years of complete silence - it strains credulity to suggest the two are in any way related. The association between Valentine’s Day and romance It is thought to have arisen specifically because of the popularity of a few Geoffrey Chaucer’s poems, namely, "Parliament of Foules (Fowls)" and “The Complaint of Mars” which both associated Valentine’s Day and romance. At the time of Chaucer's writing, February 14 also happened to be considered the first day of spring in Britain, because it was the beginning of birds' mating season-perfectly appropriate for a celebration of affection. In addition, this was also the time of a concept known as “courtly love” in Europe. Given the above, it would seem, under closer examination, that a supposed connection between Valentine’s Day and the Roman Lupercalia lies solely within the realm of some very wishful thinking. Not celebrating Valentine’s Day because of its alleged association with Lupercalia (i.e., that it has a supposed pagan origin) holds absolutely no historical validity whatsoever, yet some religious denominations just can’t seem to let go of this false and completely erroneous connection.

Getting back to the book, "the 2 Babylons" there is one thing you need to know, Just one point here, Jesus did NOT die on a cross but rather an upright stake (Grk Stauros) or upright pole ! Remember what the Bible says that we MUST worship God "with spirit and with TRUTH" !

Xmas has been adopted by Christendom as a Christian celebration, but it NEVER was with the first century Christians, it was a PAGAN holiday adopted by the apostate church, SIMPLE !