Відео

Mr romas debate ahmad x Muslim.....ito ung favoriteo qng pinapanuod sa utube

wala n yung chanel ni skeptical

Tanung ko lang poh sa mga muslim kapag ang babae namatay napunta sya sa paradise ano poh ba ang naghhintay saknya dun

To the atheists who wrote their comments, thank you for your statements. I am ready for responding these comments on a recorded video or live stream. Stay tuned.

By just reading the title I can say this: why someone would ask if atheism explains reality? It's like asking if breakfast is a proper way of locomotion: there's a category error there. Atheism isn't meant to explain reality, atheism is just this, look at it: A: "God exists" B: "I don't believe that" Atheism! It's the answer to a single question. Atheism isn't the right tool to investigate reality, we have science to do that and science isn't the same as atheism. If what you intended to say is "what best explains reality, SCIENCE or christianity", well, there isn't any challenge there: science all the way, since christianity isn't intended to be a tool to investigate reality. It would be like asking if my bike has all the nutritional values I need.

Well, I am an agnostic - but I do throw my hat in the ring, for... neither? You never know. Still, atheism has never pretended to explain absolutely everything. Still, modern cosmology and neuroscience has not yet debunked material views, either. Or of things being measurable in that paradigm. Myself, I find reality can only be explained so much... if it relies on YHWH having to make Himself massively... even violently... unhappy? Despite prescience - or awareness of just how dangerously suicidally proud angels can get. Or have theologians tie themselves in knots defining what 'rebelling against' means with a God who chose - fully of their own accord - to be invisible, and separated from humanity. In a way that, reasonably speaking, neither Adam or Eve demanded, compelled or made completely necessary. And all whilst Satan - who was supposedly one of YHWH's masterpieces, of design - was still able to retain some access back into heaven (if we count the Job story as fully literal, at least) as well as in retaining several powers. In a manner that may make 'spiritually dead', also, a somewhat dubious definition, for him? Post exile. Finally (for now) free will tends to be... inconsistently defined, at least in Pauline theology. As is Glass Darklies, Princes/Gods of this World who blind people... or in Romans 8:30.

Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._* And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 11 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality. 1. I have never been presented with a functional definition of a god. 2. I personally have never observed a god. 3. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god. 4. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity. 5. I have never been presented with any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality. 6. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true. 7. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon. 8. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._ 9. I have never knowingly experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event. 10. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed appears to have *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity. 11. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have been presented have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._ ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god. I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._* I welcome any cordial response. Peace.

No mother can miss that her Son died on the cross and got resurrected . I trust Jesus mother rather than Muhammad who existed 600 years after Jesus time. His mother is more realiable so as James and Jude, His brothers. I dont agree that Jesus didnt die because if He didnt die where is His body? And in Daniel 9:6 it says that the Anointed One will be cut off, (k!llled/perish) in hebrew.so it is necessary that He will be k!lled. The muslim misunderstood hebrew and ignorant in the bible

The old testament said that the One will come is God because isaiah 9:6 says that child is born u to us a Son is givenand His name shall becalled Wonderful Counsellor, THE MIGHTY GOD, the everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. In Isaiah 7:14 he said that a virgin shall conceive and His name shall be Immanuel, which means GOD is with us. In that case, the one will come is God. In the early christian era, Isa is not a known entity. It was a parody of the semitic name Yeshua invented by Muhammad. Theres no evidence that Jesus said He was just a spirit after resurrection and you cant limit God based on your imagination. jesus presented Himself with a bodily resurrection

Isa is not the messiah. Yeshua is the Messiah. Isa and Yeshua is not the same person. No early chrtistian knows who is Isa. If we are going to translate Yeshua an aramaic translation of hebrew name Yehoshua to arabic its supposed to be Yesua. The early christians know that Yeshua was Yahweh of the OT because of Jesus claimed that it was Him that Moses was speaking to and I AM is YH which is the tetragramtaon of the first 2 syllables of Jesus name in hebrew of YeHo of YeHoshua. The quran has no knowledge whatsoever about the OT history and tradition. You cant do that if you claim that the quran is an abrahamic religion. What happened in the quran is more of replacement theology.

Its s3trNge that the quranic accounts of Isa are the same as gnostic gospels like the gospels of barnabas, the senod treatise of the great seth, the gnostic apocapyse of Peter, the gospel of peter and John of Damascus

This is a wrong argument about matthew 27: 52-53 because yasir qadhi has never met Muhammad and never seen him riding a donkey going to al aqsa mosque which doesn't exist in Muhammad's time. No islamic scholar have also seen that he cut the moon in half. So by that logic were standing on the same ground. How do we know that dead people raise when Jesus was resurrected? The answer is because Jesus was resurrected and has the power to rise people from the dead. He did it with Lazarus, so its not surprising that the dead rose again with Him. In the OT something like this also happened when a dead man rose again after he was was thrown in Elijah's grave while being buried and a band of moabites came to maraud them. Muhammad was incapable of miracles due to the fact that he claimed that he was just a warner. So it is questionable that he claimed miracles if he's not capable of miracles. It means he contradicted himself. All of history works the same way as how matthew 27:52-53 was written. An example of this is we dont know if the gallic war really happened, by Julius Caesar, but because Tacitus was a reliable historian so we take it as it is.

Sabi ng Panginoong Jesus Ama namin sumasalangit ka tanong Ama ba nig Panginoong Jesus c Allah nyo pkisagot lang

Read the Whole Gospel Handicapped worshippers

Probably a composite figure based on a number of first century Palestinian preachers that got embellished and mythologized. I don't accept any of the supernatural claims attached to this figure.

ISLAM THREE IN ONE RELIGION ALLAHA AND UNCLE MOHAMMED AND SHAITHAN ALL IN ONE WITH OUT LIES ISLAM DIES, MOHAMMED HATED WOMEN muslim CALLED THEM women have half a brain and second class in islam in the KORAN

Walng kwenta mkipag debate s mga yn mga sinungaling mga yn..islam dies with out lies...

Medyo mahina yung microphone mo lods, di rinig yung boses... Pero mostly yung matanda nasa video gumagawa lang sya ng fallacy by making bible verses out of context.. (Pag fallacy automatically invalid na yung argument nya )

Sa quran ,semilya pa lng ang muslim ,isinusulat na ang kanyang kapalaran at nakarakda na kung sa langit sya o sa apoy. Para ano ang paggawa ng mabuti sa islam

What does Isaiah 2:22 mean? Isaiah concludes chapter two with a warning for those wise enough to hear it. The lesson is to stop trusting in mere human beings to save you. They may be wealthy and seemingly secure for the moment, but it's foolish to follow their path of destruction through worshipping idols (Isaiah 2:8),visiting soothsayers, and making deals with foreign governments (Isaiah 2:6). At the end of the day, human beings are always just one breath away from death (James 4:14). The day of the Lord will come, and those who have not trusted in Him will be destroyed (Ezekiel 30:3; Obadiah 1:15; Acts 2:20; 2 Peter 3:10). Seemingly important peoples' power will be revealed as a fleeting moment of arrogance and not a plan for success.

Hibang na yan si Tatang ,kahit sa Quran silang mga Muslim naniniwala na si Jesus (Isa) na ipinanganak na walang Ama..

Mahina buses mo bro

According to the Old Testament genocide is morally good when YHWH commands it. According to christian apologists genocide is evil when Stalin, Hitler or Pol Pot orders it. So christian morals are subjective. If you take the Moral Argument seriously you should reconvert. I won't hold my breath.

You didn’t solve the problem. You basically said that everything god commands is good because he said so. Might makes right. That’s evil. The Nazis would have loved someone as obedient as you.

Wow, you have a strong accent.

Laws don't imply a law giver any more than pattern in nature imply a pattern maker. Human beings make laws, rules for people to follow. Humans learn behaviors from each other through observation, communication and interaction. Human beings many animals also have instincts, patterns of behaviors, from thumb sucking to empathy, that have an evolutionary advantage. None of it necessitates a god. There are no "objective morals" because there is no objective moral law giver. To identify an objective moral law, you first have to identify an objective moral law giver, just as you identify a designed object by identifying the designer. We know what is designed by humans because we know what a human is. Your argument is fallacious and circular. It assumes a Law Giver without proof. "Implies" is not evidence or proof. "Imply" is a subjective assessment. Your argument relies on vagueness and equivocation. From the start, it is wrong. Laws do not imply a Law Giver. Get a degree in the sciences. Find a community college and learn something, like how to identify and measure real physical attributes and processes, how to compare data to find correlations that implies a causal connection between two physically identifiable attributes and or processes.

When god tortures babies for fun in the Bible, is that wrong? Or does your right and wrong depend on who is doing the action, which is subjective moral relativism?

Here, let me solve the atheist problem of morality. “I assert that there is an objective moral law, established by nature. It happens to align with my personal moral values. I know this is all true because I get a strong positive emotional feeling when I think about it. Now I am justified in passing laws than ban your values if they disagree with mine.” There. Am I doing it right, theist?

muslims say i dont respect islame but when i refute their man made joke book the queer they say i dont understand it and its contexts,but i only ask mouse slimes to explain a surah,and they reply with a question, its true all muslims are dhimmies

UPDATE: Sige pa rin ang paghahamon ni Mr. @Rashid Indasan kay Bro. CJ pero patuloy na iniiwasang sagutin ang tatlong punto na nagpapatunay na ang Islam ay hindi tunay na relihiyon.

😂😂😂😂 Uthman doesn't know where Corinthians is yet he has read the Bible cover to cover..... If lying was a person😅

Don't confuse people Jesus said : Me and my father we are one . Not he is God . Meaning he knows some but not all of Jehovah's plans. But he has powers of 90 percent of his father . Just like in our family . Son can't know everything of his father mind. Same as jesus himself.

Have anyone seen evil possess person cure in the name of allah....... Only Jesus my brother come to him before uts too late❤ He loves u

"ONLY BEGOTTEN" Translates the Word Monogenes. In English, it's "ONLY BEGOTTEN." In Greek, Monogenes means One of a Kind or Unique. Not Begotten in Literal sense or Created. 5. Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in CHRIST JESUS, 6. who, although HE EXISTED in the FORM OF GOD, did not consider EQUALITY with GOD something to be used to HIS advantage, 7. but EMPTIED HIMSELF, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8. Being found in appearance as a man, HE HUMBLED HIMSELF by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a Cross. 9. For this reason also, GOD HIGHLY EXALTED HIM, and Bestowed on HIM the NAME which is ABOVE EVERY NAME, 10. so that at the Name of JESUS EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW, of those who are in Heaven and on Earth and Under the Earth, 11. and that EVERY TONGUE SHALL CONFESS that JESUS CHRIST is LORD, to the Glory of GOD the FATHER. (The FATHER is Glorified when we Kneel before CHRIST) Romans 14:10-11 But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again, why do you regard your brother with contempt? For we will ALL stand before the Judgement Seat of GOD. 11. For it is written, "AS I LIVE, SAYS THE LORD, EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW TO ME, AND EVERY TONGUE SHALL CONFESS TO GOD." Here, in Romans 14:10, it says we will ALL Stand Before the Judgement Seat of GOD. However, John 5:22 says The FATHER Judges No One, ALL Judgement is the SON'S. Does that mean JESUS is GOD? YES. Verse 11 says EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW and EVERY TONGUE SHALL CONFESS TO GOD. Philippians 2:10-11 says We will ALL KNEEL and CONFESS with our TONGUE to JESUS. What does that mean? JESUS is GOD. Colossians 1:13-19 For HE rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the KINGDOM of HIS Beloved SON, 14. in whom we have Redemption, the forgiveness of sins. 15. HE is The Image of the Invisible GOD, the Firstborn of ALL Creation. 16. For BY HIM ALL THINGS WERE CREATED, Both in the Heavens and the Earth, visible and invisible, whether Thrones or Dominions or Rulers or Authorities - ALL Things have been Created through HIM and for HIM. 17. HE is BEFORE ALL THINGS, and in HIM ALL THINGS EXIST. 18. HE is also the Head of the Body, the Church, and HE is the Beginning, the Firstborn from the dead, so that HE HIMSELF will come to have FIRST PLACE in EVERYTHING. 19. For it was the FATHER'S good pleasure for ALL the Fullness of Deity to dwell in HIM. What does this mean? JESUS is GOD. How can the Creator, Create HIMSELF? Isaiah 44:6 "Thus says the LORD, the KING of Israel And his Redeemer, the LORD of HOSTS: 'I AM The FIRST and I AM The LAST, And there is no GOD besides ME.' Revelation 1:17-18 When I (John) saw HIM, I fell at HIS feet like a dead man. And HE placed HIS Right Hand on me, saying, "Do not be afraid; I AM The FIRST and The LAST, 18. and The LIVING ONE; and I WAS DEAD, and Behold, I AM Alive Forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades." JESUS is GOD.

Read your false Quran properly, he was man on Earth.

He clearly said he is doing God's Will. Why can't you sons of man understand what the son of man is telling you.

There’s no pretense with these Christian brothers and make it a competition to want to win an argument to prove they’re right… yet I don’t recall Paul having that tone when he spoke about Christ and the God news

Jesus is god in flesh. Amen ❤❤❤ Glory to god jesus christ amen amen

The muslim god are false god.all muslim must came into faith to Jesus a savior for all human being his Love for us endure for ever.

If your father are American and your mother are German you are 50% American and 50% German but 100% human. But since Jesus are from heaven and his father so Jesus also 100% God and 100% human.

I rather believe in Jesus rather to muslim who had a prophet Muhammad that also didnt know if he going to heaven a prophet of your allah who died by putting course on the christian.

Sarili mo lang yang Kuro Kuro palibhasa wala kang alam sa ISLAM PAGTUONA. MO NA LANG KUNG PAANO MO HUGASAN UNG DUMI AT IHI NG DIYOS MO❤😊

Kaya MARAMING BIBLE EXPERT AND NAGSISIALISAN NA DAHILAN SA WALANG KATOTOHAN ITO ISA NA DITO SI BART EHRTMAN NA PHD NG BIBLE ❤😊

CHRISTIANS GOD IS POOPING AND PEEING LIKE YOU AND ME❤😊😅

Based on the Holy Bible, Jesus is the son of God, and NOT God! Matthew 3:17 And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.” Acts 7:55 But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. Mark 16:19 After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God. Romans 8:34 Who then is the one who condemns? No one. Christ Jesus who died-more than that, who was raised to life-is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. Hebrews 12:2 fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith. For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. And if Jesus IS god, why did he pray to himself??? Luke 5:16 But Jesus often withdrew to lonely places and prayed. John 17:1 After Jesus said this, he looked toward heaven and prayed: “Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you. SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT... Deuteronomy 5:6-7 I am the LORD your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me. (See also Exodus 20:3.) Do you see an exception clause for God's Son? I don't....

amen

yes ofc jesus said i ll back in 2050 and then what? the generations who born before would say,, naaaah i dont care i ll do as i want this willnot happen in my time

Without lies islam DIES

Jesus christ is the way the truth and the life amen 🙏🏾

Korea bro