Відео

chatGPT anyone?

The more cells you have, the more valuable you are. So I guess we’re saving elephants over human beings. A zygote is not a potential human being. It’s a human being. It is an organism with unique human DNA that grows through cellular reproduction, and has bodily unity. 96% of biologists agree. Whereas a skin cell is not a human being, it is a part of human being This is beyond dishonest from a supposed modern day genius. Sam Harris we can now clone human genomes, does that mean that we aren’t human, or ensouled from a religious perspective? And unless you can prove that the splitting is random then this argument falls apart. And regardless, the pro life position does not have to be rooted in Religion, you are the one who’s making it about Religion.

This is getting harder to find and is being buried by YT. Most important defense of free speech in the 21st century. "Shame on you while you do this."

Only the deluded and enchanted believe that Stephen Fry is a good man.

Just released a video about a real crime documentary. I'm sure you'll find it interesting. Don't forget to share your thoughts with me!

A Roman God!! No! Mithra was an Iranian(Persian) mythology. But, do not dig deeper Christians! it will challenge your believes BIG TIME!

Homosexuals and Christian share something in common the promise of disagreement, however homosexuals are trying to make statement. Are being revolutionists, but Christians quietly live out Christian living. In context i am saying Homosexuals want to be accepted and have power over other sexuality, but Christians are living for Christ and spreading good to the world but they are hated for that.

i hate when ppl say atheists don't have morals. there are some terrible things in the bible that nobody talks about. rape, murder.. but it's ok because they believe in god. really, if christian's follow the bible for their ethics, wouldn't that give atheists the better morals?

Bunch of lies when he starts reading. Thought you might like to know. If you believe everything the clowns on TV tell you, you aren't very bright.

Oh. My. Word. Give me a historical source on the Mithras crap because there isn't one. All those Mithraic "facts" are simply BS. Making claims is not the same as stating facts.

Mind-Blowing!

I love Misthra cheese at the Old Spaghetti House.

"Mithras" and "Jesus" are two different names for the same figure...

Oh, Jesse, you've come so far. LMAO

Even today we haven’t cleaned the air produced by earlier cars that ran with lead up until the mid 90s

How to be saved and be right with God for eternal life! 1-Admit you’re a sinner and be willing to turn from your sins towards God. 2-Believe onto Jesus Christ,who being the Son of God, died on the cross, was buried and resurrected for the forgiveness of our sins as a free gift. 3-Confess onto God,asking to be saved accepting this free gift of salvation, to start a new life being born again after being saved from your sins. Scripture links below. The romans road to salvation. 1.Romans 3:10, “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" 2.Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” 3.Romans 5:8, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." 4.Romans 5:12 “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for all that have sinned:" 5.Romans 6:23, “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” 6.Romans 10:9, “That is thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.” 7.Romans 10:13, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. More scripture. John 3:16-17 16."For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” 17.”For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” Romans 5:8-9 8."But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. 9."Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him." Corinthians 15:1-4, 1."Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2."By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.” 3."For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;” 4."And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:”

Blissful ignorance 🤓

What a liar...

To say or even imply that atheism is morally and intellectually superior to Theism is ludicrous. Atheists are responsible for more oppression, murders, and barbarism than all religions put together. Just read the histories of just a few of the 20th and 21st century atheists who had power and influence. Based upon the Godless philosophies of people like Leon Trotsky and Karl Marx humanity endured Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Il-Sung, Idi Amin, Kim Jong-un, and Vladimir Putin. That is not to minimize the horrors of the inquisition or the crusades; rather, it is to demonstrate that atheism has absolutely no superiority. Humanity, whether religious or atheist, is depraved and capable of incredible acts because of a sinful nature. When given an opportunity sin and evil will rule if unchecked. The only answer is Christ, not religion and not atheism.

Mithra is Iranian sun God not roman .the Roman's copy paste this in 1 century AD but we had mithra in avesta and the artaxerxes the second inscription in 4 century BC and this cult is at least for 2000 BC

Wow, they just spreaded straight up lies, thats interesting

MCGI CHURCH GOD BLESS US ALL WHO BELIEVE IN GOD.

BS

All religions are based on older myths - ALL FALSE

almost everything they stated about Mithras is completely false,. First of all the religion had no written texts so we really know very little about it but one thing we do know for certain is that Mithras as born from a stone. So unless you believe that rocks can be sexually active he was not born from a virgin lmao

The United States WASN'T built on christianity, it was built on freedom and liberty

Mithras is a Persian Goddess.

Does anyone know what type of brain damage Jesse Lee Peterson has?

it wasn't roman, it was Persian, and its a woman not a man

This particular priest left the priesthood . He fell in love and is now married to a journalist who worked at Fox . He the ex priest also had a gig on Fox News. I am happy for him and he's wife or husband.

Here from 2021. Still relevant.

penis!

this has been mostly debunked since. I would be curious if it ever reached Ireland. Britain has some mithraic temples but Roman influence was obvious in the archaeological evidence. the religion travelled with the legion armies! Curious sunken churches with specific reference to 'temples' on the islands off the west coast of Ireland. Mithraic temples (if not in caves) were built a meter or two below ground level. look at me boring the bejesus outta everybody! 🧙🏻‍♂️🦌

Christ is real and his holy Roman Catholic Church is the one true church ordained by God from the foundations of the earth.

Fry loves religion bashing. He never understood transcendentalism or archetypal mythology despite his book on Greek myths, which misses every deep psychological allegory. His researchers are to a large extent wrong, so please read this well researched item: "Is Jesus Simply a Retelling of the Mithras Mythology? | Cold Case Christianity" coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-jesus-simply-a-retelling-of-the-mithras-mythology/ Fry always stereotypes Christians from ludicrous extreme examples, like American fundamentalists, building straw men. Mithras has been known about for centuries, no-one is 'angry' about it, the average vicar knows this stuff, and a good, say, Jungian knowledge of archetypal myth unmakes his case. Read it! And I don't see him rushing to get to grips with the underlying transcendental truths. He can't look within.

Mirtha was born out of a rock..

You are so missed, and have been never more needed x

Hitchens was an idiot when it came to understanding free speech in the U.S.

Hello all

This is the funniest comedy show I've ever seen I had to watch this for RE homework kill me.

Haha the poor researching in the early episodes of QI is astonishing , it really improved with age!

Check out the Jesus's Birthday September 11th video on my channel. Subscribe to see more as well 👍

If you watched zeitgeist and were convinced Jesus was just a ceeated copycat. You are a good sheep who didn't look further into it. Zeitgeist is a scam and Jesus doesn't even compare closely to these other gods. Literally so much missing info and twisting of the truth to compare jesus to the other gods. Sheep sheep sheep. Wake up.

Mithras is actually the constellation of Orion, who is kiIIing the precessional constellation of Taurus. This would have happened in 1750BC, according to the precession of the equinox - when Taurus ceded to Aries in precession. It is the same story as Gilgamesh (Gilgamesh is also Orion). And we do have an ancient narrative. Arthurian Legend (23th century) says that Pompey the Great brought the cult of Mithras back from Anatolia, during the Pontic war. And the name for the cult was derived from the Pontic king Mithradates VI - and nothing to do with the Persian Mithra. According to Arthurian Legend the ‘Mount Olympus’ mentioned is actually Gibraltar - a Pillar of Hercules. There was a large cave in the Pillar (a Mithraeum), and Pompey defeated the Pontus Pirates there. Ralph.

anyone else feel like they're at a party but the only one there is a hundred clones of BlissfulKnowledge?

to be black and to have a seat on cnn that means your a simp

QI loves its 19th Century anti Christian sentiment. Check out ua-cam.com/video/xlF0gVedODE/v-deo.html for some scholarly not comedy show truth

As a pagan it was interesting to hear this

Sam arguments aren't well put here. Science didn't really answer anything here, at best science delivers set of data which upon decision can be made to reflect upon moral and values of an individual or principles within the established system. Why number of cells at specific moments does matter? Does science tells us what we ought to do and at which number of cells it's okay kill a being for specific reason or any reason at all? It doesn't, it just can help us to establish such number. Same could be said between different humans, especially at different stages of development that differ in number of cells such as an adult and an infant. Number of cells seems like a completely arbitrarily characteristic to draw conclusion upon value of life that may result in relevant set of characteristic such as useful and feeling human entity or even feeling animal. Discarding potential on basis hypothetical and artificial capability to clone or genetically engineer some sort of isn't as well solid argument. First we can't do that. Second for sake of an argument let's assume we can. In case of cloning you would be creating copy what would simply devalue value of individual as everyone would become easily replaceable and things such as murder would be minor inconvenience (depending of course on hypothetical time and resources required to clone) to everyone else, barring perhaps individual killed leaving death only big deal for specific unit that got killed as for everyone else clone would be just like previous unit (maybe perhaps outside some people with subjective sensitivities regarding cloning or religious folks that insist that clone doesn't have soul or has different one). Three even if you could engineer other life that would simply mean value of life in totality also would drop (unless perhaps engineered life form is qualitatively worse than ones produced by natural processes or to small degree artificially) for same reason as above. So it bring interesting issue of cloning and engineering could present if we would capable to produce humans of about equal or better utility, but not really much of a use in context of abortion. Four, even in such case process of developing such life wouldn't begin unlike in pregnancy, in which case human baby depending on stage pregnancy with various likelihood will be born, through most of that period with far greater chances of doing so than not and in case it doesn't abortion is pointless as result is about the same . Five, essentially by dismissing potential and future you would be either forced to rely on past status as justification for not being killed while in coma, unconscious, vegetative state (which you could depend on case recover from), drugged to the point of inability to feel pain and think (what also hammers Sam concern with causing suffering as you could kill someone painlessly), even if you insist on suffering of family member or friend that would still justify killing people that don't have friend or family that cares about them, hell it perhaps could even justify killing everyone (good known world destroyer issue brought in context of negative utilitarianism) as it's possible that our living causes more suffering (and certainty than it otherwise it would) than positive experience either to ourselves, others or both. Even if you hand-waved it by stating that life is still worth living despite of it, same argument could be applied to fetus. So really Sam's arguments are about as valuable as those some of eugenicists that promote genocide of groups with inferior IQ (after all lesser number that can have substantial result on final product ie human), promising better world and future based on differing numbers and have some factual basis in the goal but still unappealing to anyone who isn't possessing values that of social Darwinist or potentially utilitarian and creates nasty implications for treatment of life and humans, just like abortion does .

I lost confidence in QI's Biblical knowledge in the episode where Stephen Fry claimed that Luke was the Gospel that tried to fulfill the Old Testament prophecies when in fact it was Matthew. This is basic Bible knowledge. The alleged parallels between Mithras and Jesus are consistently misrepresentations of what Christians actually believe. Its a shame that, even though Fry hinted at some dissent by Christian apologists, he didn't actually tell what these counter arguments are, nor why he is so sure they are false. See link below for the briefest of introductions to the issue. ua-cam.com/video/qrCYVk6xrXg/v-deo.html