adviice
adviice
  • 43
  • 33 375
Can This Couple Retire at 55 with $1.5 Million?
Want to watch the whole webinar? You can do that here:
ua-cam.com/video/lJYdM_EesS0/v-deo.html
Want to start your own retirement plan!
app.adviice.com/start-discovery
Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions.
---
Retiring in your 50s is a dream for many Canadians, but how much money do you need to make it possible. Well, that always depends on what kind of retirement you want and how much you want to be able to spend.
Spending is a huge factor in a retirement plan, especially when you're looking to have potentially a 40+ year retirement.
In our recent webinar, we went over a case study looking at how to test possible spending for an early retirement.
In our case study, Dave and Bonnie have 5 more years of work and are on track to have around 1.5 million in financial assets by the time they turn 55. They're aiming to spend 88,000 in early retirement and 67,000 in late retirement. They want to understand if they have enough or whether they'll have to work a few more years.
Disclaimer: This video is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. All information provided is for illustrative purposes only and you should not rely on such information as the primary basis of your investment, financial, or tax planning decisions. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. No representations, warranties or guarantees are made as to the accuracy of any estimates or calculations provided. Nothing in this material should be construed as investment or tax advice, or a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any financial product or securities. Before making any financial decision, you should review your situation with a financial planner.
Переглядів: 1 481

Відео

What Happens To Your CPP When You Die?
Переглядів 67212 годин тому
Start your own retirement plan! app.adviice.com/start-discovery Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. In this video we look at Canada Pension Plan death and survivor benefits. We discuss what your spouse can expect from CPP when you die and why those benefits might be...
How to Bounce Your Last Cheque (Retirement Planning)
Переглядів 58821 годину тому
Want to watch the whole webinar? You can do that here: ua-cam.com/video/lJYdM_EesS0/v-deo.html Want to start your own retirement plan! app.adviice.com/start-discovery Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. For many Canadians building wealth and leaving it to the next g...
4 TFSA Mistakes You Might Be Making In Retirement
Переглядів 2,5 тис.День тому
Start your own retirement plan! app.adviice.com/start-discovery Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. In this video we highlight the 4 common mistakes we see people making with their TFSA in retirement. These mistakes can be quite costly in retirement, adding up to $1...
Why the 4% Rule is a HUGE Oversimplification
Переглядів 72414 днів тому
Want to watch the whole webinar? You can do that here: ua-cam.com/video/lJYdM_EesS0/v-deo.html Want to start your own retirement plan! app.adviice.com/start-discovery Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. We love the 4% rule as a general rule of thumb, but when it com...
How To Pay $0 Income Tax On $75,000 Retirement Income
Переглядів 8 тис.14 днів тому
Start your own retirement plan! app.adviice.com/start-discovery Don't have a detailed retirement plan yet? Start your retirement plan for just $9. This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. In this video we highlight the 5 reasons why you might pay lower income tax in retirement than you might think. We also dive into a retirement planning case study wit...
How Much Can I Spend in Retirement? - October 16 Case Study:
Переглядів 81821 день тому
In this case study we talked about how to build a good retirement spending estimate, how to stress test those spending assumptions and what the percentage on the ‘Success Chart’ actually means. We then worked through Dave and Bonnie's plan: a 50 year old couple aiming to retire at 55. They currently have 1.2 million in assets saved, no pension and want to spend around $80,000 per year. We’ll te...
Should You Meltdown Your RRSP? - September 19th Case Study
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Місяць тому
In our monthly webinar we looked at the RRSP meltdown strategy. We looked at the fundamentals of the strategy and then explore three case studies: a 65 year-old couple with a DB pension, a 56/59 couple looking to retire early with 1.3 million mainly in registered assets and a 61 year-old single with $350,000 in financial assets. 2:20 - Fundamentals of the RRSP Meltdown Strategy 13:20 - Key Info...
August 15th Case Study: When Should You Take Government Benefits?
Переглядів 2012 місяці тому
When should you be taking CPP and OAS? It depends. In this workshop we’re going to look at two scenarios: a couple both 61 with a pension and $2,000,000 of financial assets and a 61 year old individual with $182,000 of financial assets and no pension. We’ll highlight how the Adviice platform can help each of these individuals see the pros and cons of taking CPP/OAS early or later. We’ll also lo...
Do I Have Enough Money to Retire at 65? - July 17th Case Study
Переглядів 4282 місяці тому
One of the most common questions when looking at retirement is: Do I have enough? In this workshop we’ll look at a couple that’s 4 or 5 years from retirement. They have no pension and have saved $1,000,000 towards their retirement split across RRSP, TFSA and non-registered accounts. Is that enough for them to retire? We’ll show you how to answer that question on the Adviice platform. Disclaimer...
Adding Three Phases Of Retirement Spending: Go-Go, Slow-Go, No-Go
Переглядів 5714 місяці тому
Start your retirement decumulation plan for just $9! app.adviice.com/start-discovery This includes a comprehensive 30-day email/video course with detailed instructions. In this video... - How to add three phases of retirement spending to your plan - Go-Go Years - Slow-Go Years - No-Go Years - Detailed example on the Adviice platform - Two WARNINGS to watch out for when planning retirement spend...
Adviice Onboarding: Customize Platform: Company and Branding
Переглядів 1158 місяців тому
Adviice Onboarding: Customize Platform: Company and Branding
Adviice Onboarding: Exploring Demo Clients
Переглядів 3908 місяців тому
Adviice Onboarding: Exploring Demo Clients
Adviice: Client Friendly Financial Planning Powered By AI
Переглядів 7368 місяців тому
Learn how a client-friendly financial planning powered by AI can help grow your business. Key Highlights: - What is "client-friendly" financial planning? 1:02 - 3 ways to grow your business using client-friendly financial planning 3:09 - Engage more clients with client-led onboarding 6:43 - Save time with gather data and documents with client-led discovery 9:51 - Use AI Strategies to generate f...
Adviice Onboarding: Client Portal: Lead Gen & Free Trial Feature
Переглядів 658 місяців тому
Adviice Onboarding: Client Portal: Lead Gen & Free Trial Feature
Adviice Onboarding: Embed Your Calendar
Переглядів 988 місяців тому
Adviice Onboarding: Embed Your Calendar
Adviice Onboarding: Customize Email Content
Переглядів 858 місяців тому
Adviice Onboarding: Customize Email Content
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.8: Discovery: Net Worth
Переглядів 4598 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.8: Discovery: Net Worth
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.6: Foundation: Future Cash Flow
Переглядів 5908 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.6: Foundation: Future Cash Flow
Retirement Planning Video Series: 0.1: Platform: Introduction
Переглядів 1,2 тис.8 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 0.1: Platform: Introduction
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.11: Discovery: Upload Documents
Переглядів 3988 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.11: Discovery: Upload Documents
Retirement Planning: Examples: Inheritance
Переглядів 2258 місяців тому
Retirement Planning: Examples: Inheritance
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.3: Foundation: Emergency Fund
Переглядів 3388 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.3: Foundation: Emergency Fund
Retirement Planning: Examples: Multiple Scenarios
Переглядів 5218 місяців тому
Retirement Planning: Examples: Multiple Scenarios
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.6: Discovery: Assets
Переглядів 5948 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.6: Discovery: Assets
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.7: Foundation: CPP and OAS Estimate
Переглядів 4768 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.7: Foundation: CPP and OAS Estimate
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.2: Foundation: Selling A House
Переглядів 3388 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.2: Foundation: Selling A House
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.4: Foundation: Debt Payoff Plan
Переглядів 3318 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.4: Foundation: Debt Payoff Plan
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.3: Discovery: Income
Переглядів 9398 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 1.3: Discovery: Income
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.1: Foundation: Buying A House
Переглядів 3518 місяців тому
Retirement Planning Video Series: 2.1: Foundation: Buying A House

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @MacNeilR
    @MacNeilR День тому

    Is there a way to see of these amounts in "today's dollar" in the platform? I find it hard to judge the impact of something in the future such as a survivor benefit scenario when looking at inflation adjusted values. And thank you for making this so very much more clear!

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca День тому

      Hi! Good question. In the platform the charts all display Today’s Dollars by default (but they can display Future Dollars as well). That’s the best way to visually see the impact on the plan.

  • @billyrock8305
    @billyrock8305 2 дні тому

    Excellent presentation 👍

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 2 дні тому

      Thank you! You might enjoy some of the case study webinars we’ve done… ua-cam.com/play/PLLn-uwBCReL3FRxe0_nOGedcgt3lUHsc4.html&si=r-Smpo1KuKpgEtGs

  • @marcelmed4574
    @marcelmed4574 4 дні тому

    Thanks for the video, I think you may have made an incorrect comment regarding point #2, dividend tax credit. You mentioned that the dividend tax credit can help in allowing the individual to withdraw even more money out of an RRSP or RRIF, you mentioned this comment around the 3:19 mark. I do not believe this is the case, any withdrawals from an RRSP or RRIF will be taxed as income at your marginal tax rate not dividend tax rates. The dividend tax credit will only help if the dividend income was generated in a cash account. I've also seen many videos claiming how expenses lower later in life and others showing how it increases. If you end up moving into assisted living or retirement living housing your expenses will skyrocket. I live in Ottawa, assisted living on the low end starts around 5K per month with an incremental fee for the second spouse. Its hard to imagine how you can live on 65K per year in your example.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 4 дні тому

      The tax credit applies to all income and is non-refundable, so in many cases there are more tax credits than income, this can allow other income to be triggered and the tax credit applied.

    • @marcelmed4574
      @marcelmed4574 4 дні тому

      @@adviice_casorry, this is not correct. The Canadian dividend tax credit is applied as dividend tax credits against tax liabilities on dividends received from Canadian corporations. It’s not against all income.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 4 дні тому

      If you take a look at the Federal T1 line 40425 you’ll see the dividend tax credit gets applied against all income, not just dividend income. From TaxTips.ca… … someone in the lowest tax bracket (after combining Federal + provincial tax brackets and rates) can reduce their other taxes payable by receiving dividends eligible for the enhanced dividend tax credit. www.taxtips.ca/dtc/eligible-dividends/negative-tax-rate-eligible-dividends.htm

  • @josephkeith6954
    @josephkeith6954 4 дні тому

    is it still true if the deceased partner qualifies but did not starter CPP there will be NO survival CPP ? i think i read this somewhere.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 4 дні тому

      No that’s not accurate. Even a 30, 40, 50 year old survivor will receive CPP survivor benefits from their spouse based on their spouse’s contributions, it doesn’t matter if they started CPP or not.

  • @Pmjay00
    @Pmjay00 4 дні тому

    This is such an important topic and is rarely, if ever, addressed by all the retirement planning channels I follow. I have commented on it many times. It's a huge oversite. This is one of the features that I really appreciate on the Adviice platform.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 4 дні тому

      You’re absolutely right!

  • @sholbech22
    @sholbech22 7 днів тому

    signed up as of the 1st/nov!!... already loving playing around! - the income / expense set up is critical to establishing the foundational BASE!... Already posted in Reddit.. but the non-reg investments section really need to be looked. GROUPING all non-reg investments together with the same return rate/risk/ metric doesn't seem likely. non-reg GIC may return 3% but a non-reg investment account may return 7%... something to consider.!

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 6 днів тому

      Glad to hear you’re enjoying the platform! Just to clarify, the non-reg account will have a different rate of return and risk variability depending on the asset allocation you set for the account. So a non-reg portfolio with $50,000 GIC and $150,000 investments would have a 75/25 asset allocation and have a different return/risk than a portfolio with $100,000 GIC and $100,000 investments which has a 50/50 asset allocation. To get very specific with rate of return, asset allocation, type of return you can go to Planning > Projections > Advanced Options.

  • @OnedayclosertoFI
    @OnedayclosertoFI 8 днів тому

    This is my plan…. I know so many people who want to and do save so much for retirement just to have a bunch left over…. Why? The dream is to retire as early as possible. Goal is to have almost nothing left. Sad thing is…. With how most people in today’s world don’t save…. This will be the end result for most people but not by choice. Very challenging retirement decades ahead for a lot of people.

  • @wcg66
    @wcg66 10 днів тому

    XEQT all the way! Seriously though, I am retired and we are drawing down my RRSP and using the extra to contribute to my TFSA. The plan is to use the TFSA for larger purchases down the road and, hopefully, not need to take it out for cost of living expenses. My regret is not getting serious enough with my TFSA when it started in 2009, I didn't really get going with it until 2014. I've made sure my kids don't make the same mistake!

  • @glitzy4895
    @glitzy4895 10 днів тому

    great content. thx. subscribing 👍 one question though: if my husband name me as successor in his TFSA, but should he die before me, what would happen to his TFSA?. We have no kids, but we give everything to my sister who is not a Canadian citizen in our wills thank u

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 10 днів тому

      Thanks! If your husband passes away, and you are the successor holder, then his TFSA rolls over to you.

    • @glitzy4895
      @glitzy4895 10 днів тому

      @ thx so much for yr very quick reply. sorry i meant to ask : if i die before my husband, what will happen to his TFSA ? . Will he have to name somebody else as successor? or just leave it like that and after he die, everything will go to whoever named in his will? Thank u so much. Appreciate it

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 10 днів тому

      Usually there will be additional designations but we recommend discussing your goals/intentions with an estate lawyer.

    • @glitzy4895
      @glitzy4895 10 днів тому

      @ thank you so much. 👍

  • @erick6579
    @erick6579 10 днів тому

    I am a member and I am loving it. However I personally find some items a steep learning curve but these videos and Reddit really help me out. This video especially was of great help. Keep up the great work!

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 10 днів тому

      Thanks for being a member! Retirement planning can be complex, but we’re always looking for ways to make it easier and more accessible.

  • @maxpayne7419
    @maxpayne7419 11 днів тому

    Assigning a “successor holder” on the TFSA is excellent advice. I did not realize the importance of this. Thank you for this important information!

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 11 днів тому

      So important but many don’t know or realize, thanks for the comment!

  • @rickcoburn5840
    @rickcoburn5840 12 днів тому

    I've been playing with your platform for 8 months now. I literally tell everyone that they need this. It gets more awesome with every upgrade and all the support. Thanks so much for access to this software. I was so stressed with a forced early retirement before the peace of mind it brought 😊

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 11 днів тому

      So glad to hear that! We want everyone in Canada to have their own retirement plan, but it’s a big problem to tackle, thanks for sharing!

    • @ybc8495
      @ybc8495 11 днів тому

      so total 72$ has gone?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 11 днів тому

      Not sure I understand?

    • @ybc8495
      @ybc8495 11 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca your software is 9 per month he used 8 months so total 8*9=72$.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 11 днів тому

      Ah yes, $9/month, that’s correct.

  • @JohnHobbs-o3z
    @JohnHobbs-o3z 12 днів тому

    Sorry,i wrote these comments 2 min. in, you touched on some of this.

  • @JohnHobbs-o3z
    @JohnHobbs-o3z 12 днів тому

    Having a large TFSA can be huge when u are older and in need of long term care,since a lot of things in Canada are income tested when we are older. I dont think people talk about this aspect of it to much.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 11 днів тому

      Great comment!

    • @jeffho1727
      @jeffho1727 11 днів тому

      Yep, thats the idea of my spouse and I. If we don't need it, kids get a nice nest egg about the time they'll be retiring.

  • @JohnHobbs-o3z
    @JohnHobbs-o3z 12 днів тому

    I agree,in 2009 i told my wife it should be called a TFIA not savings right after we maxed it out the first year.I told my banker the same thing,she actually said-some people may want it as a savings account.People this is why you do not have your investments at a bank.I also agree most people should leave it till the end for a variety of reasons.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 12 днів тому

      Agreed! TFIA would be much better!

  • @marcelmed4574
    @marcelmed4574 15 днів тому

    Where does this software show tax rates?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 14 днів тому

      Hi! If you’re registered you can go to Planning > Projections > Table and see the marginal tax rates. We’ll be adding avg tax rate soon but you can already see total tax / taxable income.

  • @MarcusB-v1u
    @MarcusB-v1u 15 днів тому

    Would be interesting to see how a 'reverse mortgage' may benefit retirees who choose to stay in their primary residence using the home's equity as a 'tax-free' living benefit?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 15 днів тому

      That’s definitely one option to tap into home equity.

  • @life101withKrys
    @life101withKrys 15 днів тому

    Great video! I’m still a dacade before I retire but you are on my contact list at this point 😊

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 15 днів тому

      Best time to plan for retirement is 5-10 years before you retire, that gives you room to make strategic decisions to help reduce taxes, qualify for benefits, decide on timing of CPP/OAS, ensure the portfolio has the right asset allocation/fees etc etc. If you wait until you retire to start planning you have less options.

    • @life101withKrys
      @life101withKrys 15 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca I’m planing now but I’m sure I can benefit at final stage to efficiently plan for taxation purposes. When it comes to assets allocation I’m pretty happy with where I’m now.

  • @ronmaunder8662
    @ronmaunder8662 15 днів тому

    I love this. I’m so annoyed at the amount of tax we have to pay each year. I wonder if this kind of strategy would work in Alberta ?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 15 днів тому

      Wouldn’t be exactly the same in Alberta because the dividend tax credit doesn’t result in negative tax rates, but you could get close!

    • @ronmaunder8662
      @ronmaunder8662 14 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Thanks

  • @jdavid1707
    @jdavid1707 16 днів тому

    since the 4% rule is before fees, I would argue that Canadians can dramatically increase their sustainable withdrawal rate by lowering the fee they pay for investments. For example, a lot of Canadians use bank balanced mutual funds. fees in these funds can be over 2%. switching to a lower cost alternative can save 1%, possibly more, per year. This means a whopping 50% increase in the sustainable withdrawal rate from 2% (after fees) to 3%! A lot of Canadians would count investment fees among their top 10, possibly top 5 annual family expenses. But, because of the hidden nature of investment fees in Canada, many are not even aware they are paying these fees. Brutal.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 16 днів тому

      Yes, bank/retail level fees are a huge drag in retirement, it’s not uncommon for it to be the top “expense” in a retirement plan. A 2% fee on a $1M portfolio is $20,000 per year. For most people fees are a hidden cost, but the fact is their retirement spending is $10,000+ lower than it could be due to fees.

  • @johnnyv5995
    @johnnyv5995 17 днів тому

    Great video! Does the Adviice platform work for Quebec?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 16 днів тому

      Yes it does, we have QC tax and benefits, but it’s missing some of the nuance around QPP like the new age 72 deferral option.

    • @johnnyv5995
      @johnnyv5995 16 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Great. I will give it a try and see if I can figure things out. Age 72 deferral...that's crazy, but hey it is Quebec :)

  • @paulinanelega
    @paulinanelega 18 днів тому

    Great video, very clear info (and no audio issues, unlike another commenter mentioned as having). Will check out the planner app - nice to see that option. I had a retirement plan done last year but I feel like it needs to be revisited and optimized. I also did my own very detailed drawdown plan. Haven't retired quite yet but it's very soon.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 18 днів тому

      Thanks for the comment, glad to hear there weren’t any audio issues for you.

    • @paulinanelega
      @paulinanelega 18 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Does the app have the ability to do a corp drawdown scenario, i.e., some retained earnings drawn each year (non-elig divs), plus a portion of income from corp investing account (elig divs)?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 18 днів тому

      Good question! We’re releasing a corporate module in a few weeks!

    • @paulinanelega
      @paulinanelega 18 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Thank you! It would be very helpful to show some corp meltdown scenarios, rather than the typical RRSP/RRIF. We have both been self-employed for majority of our careers, and opted to pay ourselves via divs than salary, thus we have nominal CPP in our 'foundational income.' (There's a bit, from earlier in career, but the situation becomes very diff't than someone who has CPP as one of their main income streams.) Thanks again, look forward to the corp module being released.

  • @tanyaperrin8844
    @tanyaperrin8844 18 днів тому

    Yeah, let the rest of us pay taxes so you guys can enjoy all the services scot free!

    • @touayaaj84
      @touayaaj84 18 днів тому

      Why not? Everyone has the right

    • @OlegScherbina
      @OlegScherbina 18 днів тому

      Company that pays the dividend pays the tax on that dividend on the recipient's behalf. So taxes are paid.

  • @ScottEvil
    @ScottEvil 19 днів тому

    I could barely hear you. I'm not turning up the volume to be blasted out of the room by other youtube videos.

  • @ybc8495
    @ybc8495 19 днів тому

    9 $ per month? is this on going for how many months? I still have 5 years to retire so I think i'd buy later?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 19 днів тому

      Never too early to start planning for retirement. You can always build a plan for a few months and then cancel. Don’t wait until retirement or you may miss pre-retirement planning opportunities.

    • @josephkeith6954
      @josephkeith6954 19 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca John you are the best. Thank you for creating adviice. i wish your company the best going forward. Conquest is backwards thinking and short sighted decided to go in bed (so to speak) with the so called AUM base fees financial planners.

  • @josephkeith6954
    @josephkeith6954 19 днів тому

    super excited we got a diy retirement planning platform. the example above did it account for RRIF minimum withdrawal after age 71 especially? if you have large sum of RRIF you will get tax a lot and there’s no wiggle room there. obviously the investment assumption is qualified canadian dividend which i don’t know if this is a norm.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 19 днів тому

      Hi! Yes the platform will automatically calculate the RRIF minimum for you, but in this case we were above the RRIF minimum with the planned withdrawals so it wasn’t an issue. Yes, if the non-reg account has a different asset mix the tax would be different/higher, but this just further highlights the benefit of good planning.

    • @JohnHobbs-o3z
      @JohnHobbs-o3z 19 днів тому

      Salution,dont have a large RRIF.

  • @jaxwylde2139
    @jaxwylde2139 21 день тому

    I do have a question/comment, after my earlier post: I'm planning on using the 'Cash Wedge' strategy to help mitigate significant/longer than usual market corrections. I'll have 1 (ideally 2) years worth of cash/equivalents in my portfolio from which to use for my expenses (vs having to sell stocks/etfs in my accounts), and hopefully the market rebounds before I need to sell securities to fund expenses (and also allowing dividends to refill some of the cash portion if correction is stubborn). Can this be something you can cover in future video, on how someone could go about setting this up (if even possible)in your tool? I guess I could use the Non-Reg account for this, but just like you have TFSA savings provision (vs TFSA Investments) in your platform, is there a way to have a RRSP/RIF account that only has Cash/Equivalents, which can then be triggered first, in decumulation AI strategy? I realize this is very specific, and probably difficult to incorporate but you guys already do what to me seems like 'voodoo' with your platform :-), I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 21 день тому

      There isn’t a specific RRSP account for this purpose, but this previous Community comment highlights how to add a cash wedge… www.reddit.com/r/adviice/comments/1eqkx4e/wedge_strategy_in_decumulation_phase/ You could accomplish this by activating a Group-RRSP and using that as the RRSP cash wedge account.

  • @jaxwylde2139
    @jaxwylde2139 21 день тому

    I've just started using your platform recently, and feel I've got a good grasp of the fundamentals (after only a few hours of 'playing with it'), but this video was extremely informative and has helped answer I few questions I had. Thank you! I'm surprised you don't have many views yet....hopefully that'll come with time. I do have other questions, but will use your FAQ's to see if I can get those answered there, and will be on the lookout for more of these videos from you guys.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 21 день тому

      Welcome to the platform! You can also post questions to the Reddit Community, look for a link to the community in the left nav in the platform.

    • @jaxwylde2139
      @jaxwylde2139 21 день тому

      @@adviice_ca I wasn't aware of that (as evident from my second post). I'll check it out, thank you!

  • @maxpayne7419
    @maxpayne7419 22 дні тому

    I really appreciate how this platform has helped me plan my retirement. And as well, the excellent advice and ideas from these sessions and from the Q&A’s on Reddit. It gives me great peace of mind and confidence to know I have a solid plan. I used to use a spreadsheet to try to model my retirement - and Adviice just blows me away in comparison. It’s amazing. Thank you so much - and keep up the great work and updates!!

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 22 дні тому

      Oh wow! Thank you for the great feedback, that means a lot to us!

  • @jaxwylde2139
    @jaxwylde2139 24 дні тому

    Good video, thank you. I wish that I had ability to modify the inflation rate in this tool. It looks to me like your model is assuming a 2.1% inflation rate for all future years. I understand that is based on historical data, and you update this 'built-in fixed value' at the start of each year, but it limits my ability to simulate different 'what-if' scenarios where a higher than normal inflation rate is the norm (as we've had over the past few years). Yes, I can adjust the return rates on my various investments to create a 'synthetic' change to inflation rate, but I find that very cumbersome and limiting. I should be able to change default value, and bonus feature (at some point in a future update) have an AI strategy that enables change to inflation rate by certain % for x number of years. Maybe that's wishful thinking, but you never know until you ask. :-)

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 23 дні тому

      Thanks for the comment! It’s important to highlight that the Success Rate analysis feature will do this stress testing for you, it will automatically evaluate the retirement plan over 100+ historical periods of stock returns, bond returns AND inflation rates. This includes sustained periods of higher inflation like the 1970’s. We find this to be a much more robust way to test the success rate of the plan as it reflects all of the inflation periods from the last 100+ years. That being said we have had this request come up a few times and it is on our roadmap. We’ll let you know when it’s available.

    • @sholbech22
      @sholbech22 18 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca agree with comment above.. 2.1% is too low of an assumption, the 100 year average is 3.1%, and the 1960 to 2023 average is 3.8%... One of the scenario's i would want to run is to simply change 2.1 to 3.1... will be subscribing shortly!

  • @jean-marcfiliatrault266
    @jean-marcfiliatrault266 26 днів тому

    Does your software utilize the concepts behind DCF/NPV to evaluate scenarios?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 25 днів тому

      You mean Net Present Value? The platform plans year by year, it doesn’t discount future cash flow into one present value, it plans income, expenses, contributions, withdrawals, taxes, tax credits, CPP, OAS etc on a year by year basis. This is important because things will shift and change over the course of retirement. Spending will change. Income sources will phase in/out. Tax credits will phase in (Pension Income Tax Credit, Age Amount Tax Credit). The results are displayed in Today’s Dollars and in Future Dollars. Let us know if you meant something different by your question.

    • @jean-marcfiliatrault266
      @jean-marcfiliatrault266 25 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Yes. DCF = Discounted cash flow and NPV = Net Present Value.

    • @jean-marcfiliatrault266
      @jean-marcfiliatrault266 25 днів тому

      @@adviice_ca Understood. But here’s the problem, if only in the case of an RRSP meltdown strategy… You either pay a lot of money 20-25 years from now or you increase your revenue on a yearly basis over that 20-25 year period and pay more taxes every year. How to determine which scenario is better? Any amount paid in tax at the end of one’s life, once discounted 20-25 years to today is not worth a whole lot… Doug Chandler, an actuary, alluded to that in his 2022 study entitled: “Retirement drawdown choices”. Soooo, any tool not using DCF/NPV concepts would come to a different conclusion than that of Chandler.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca 24 дні тому

      So the way the platform works it will be reflected in the final estate value, which is the metric that the AI Strategies will rank on by default. In the RRSP Meltdown strategy there may be extra tax triggered early, but it may result in less tax paid later, the model reflects this in the final estate value. Everyone's result will be different because one person might have extra TFSA contribution room to absorb the extra RRSP/RRIF income, while another person might need to invest the extra RRSP/RRIF income in a non-registered account with additional tax drag. The model performs calculations year-by-year to end at the final estate value. This year-by-year calculation takes into account all the different parameters specific to the individual's circumstances. The platform always shows the results in Today's Dollars by default (so it discounts the future value of the RRSP/RRIF by the inflation factor).

  • @cruiser33
    @cruiser33 Місяць тому

    Side question, but this software looks a bit like Conquest, but more accessible and affordable for the DIY'er. Can you please point me to the video that explains who is this software for, how it is different from say something like Conquest or Snap Projections?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Hello, the Adviice platform is available to advisors & planners (just like Conquest or Snap Projections) but we also make it available directly to individuals users. Unlike those other platforms we’re focused on making financial planning easy but still very powerful. Once you enter your information in the Discovery phase the platform will automatically explore 100’s of AI Strategies for you and how they impact your plan. Things like when to start CPP, when to start OAS, how to melt down your RRSP/RRIF, how much you can spend in retirement etc etc. Here’s an intro video with an overview… ua-cam.com/video/8NPBl5ub3GA/v-deo.html

  • @JohnHobbs-o3z
    @JohnHobbs-o3z Місяць тому

    Listen to this guy=common sense.

  • @JohnHobbs-o3z
    @JohnHobbs-o3z Місяць тому

    Canada is a country based on benefits,if u have money,its a no brainer to melt down rrsp/rrif to your taxable account or TFSA,huge benefits when u are older and everything is income tested.You are going to spend it one way or another anyway,stop leaving the government so much money.

  • @KP-uj1wf
    @KP-uj1wf Місяць тому

    Great demonstration. I'm a DIY investor and retirement planner... would your software be available at a monthly fee or a one time cost? Thanks

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Yes it’s available to anyone for just $9/month. Go to adviice.ca for details. We also have a community of users and to provide support www.reddit.com/r/adviice/

  • @jimjackson4256
    @jimjackson4256 Місяць тому

    You shouldn’t have to feel it necessary to meltdown your rrsp before it is turned into a rif.You should be able to keep your rrsp as long as you live and withdraw from it what you want rather than mandated withdrawals when you are 71. That would be a real self directed retirement plan which would give you some discretion with your finances when or if you get very old.The withdrawal rates when you are in your 80s and up ensure your retirement savings will be basically gone in your early nineties. Do govt pensions disappear when they are in their nineties ?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Thanks for the comment! Doing away with minimum withdrawals would certainly make things more flexible. But most of the time melting down the RRSP is about managing tax over time rather than having a large tax bill in the estate.

    • @jimjackson4256
      @jimjackson4256 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_ca You can take out all you want from your rrsp but when it comes to a rif thé amont left is a pittance when the minimum withdrawals kick in and you get up in years. I’d rather have some flexibility if i get really old and what happens after i die who cares.At least the way i’m describing will potentially leave something behind as compared to the mandated withdrawal route which will leave you virtually broke if you reach 95. Imagine being broke at 95. What kind of a sociopath dreamed up the rif strategy?

  • @maxpayne7419
    @maxpayne7419 Місяць тому

    I’m in the early stages of an early retirement. I have found the Adviice platform extremely valuable in my financial planning. It allows robust planning and I have been able to test many ideas and options and been able to zero-in on an optimal plan for my situation. It’s been very helpful. And added this, I’m grateful for the advice and ideas I receive from these videos. Thanks gents! This is the best financial planning software and information on the market 👏👏👏👏👍

  • @MichelClavette
    @MichelClavette Місяць тому

    Great demo! Does the platform properly consider QPP instead of CPP (ie: max age for QPP is 72 years old with a bump-up of 58%) as well as combined Quebec and Federal tax brackets? Any localisation available for French language?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Hi! Good question! Although the platform does include Quebec and Federal tax brackets it does not include specific QPP functionality like the new age 72 deferral. It also does not include a French language version yet. We do hope to add these features soon.

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    I think I know why I am a bit confused. You mentioned in the video that there are three spots to make scenario-specific changes: (1) Future Cashflow (Foundation section), (2) Projections (Planning) and (3) CPP/OAS (Foundation). Given that you said changes to Discover AND Foundation sections flow through to ALL scenarios, those statements seem to contradict each other. For example, if I created a new scenario (Projections > "copy") and then went in to make an income change from the future cashflow section (in foundation), does that income change flow through to all scenarios or just the scenario specific part?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Ah! Good question! We’ll certainly clarify that statement in future videos. While there are three sections that can include scenario specific changes, our expectation is that most users will only make changes in Planning > Projections. This section allows both changes to Income and Expenses assumptions year by year (in the Planning > Projections > Table) and this section allows changes to CPP and OAS start age (in the AI Strategies table).

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      ​@@adviice_ca Okay, thanks. I empirically confirmed that changes in foundation > income for example does carry through to the other scenarios. I'll tell you why it is not intuitively obvious, at least for me. From a UX perspective, I instinctively assumed that I should use it same as with using Excel "save as," wherein the new scenario copies all the values from the "original" but that then you can make subsequent edits to the new scenario does not flow back and overwrite to the original "baseline." I think some more cautionary notes to end users might be warranted, imho. I can see how to just add/edit the gross income for the two years in the Planning > Projections > Table, as you suggest, but it is less obvious how/if I need to edit anything/anywhere else to capture the other data elements from the Foundation> Income page (like tax, cpp, ei and other deductions). Or does the software just estimate those other data elements to match the gross income changes?

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    Hey Team Adviice, for whatever it's worth, I think that a great future enhancement to the "advanced options" would be to enter account level information rather than just at the account type level. This way the user could more easily make some adjustments/overrides to reflect the actual asset mix/ composition in each account, and the corresponding expected returns. For example, if someone has multiple registered accounts (not uncommon, I'm sure) and they each have different asset mixes, it can be hard to make advanced option overrides given that it would require a fair bit of offline manipulations / aggregations of account information. Not only would that make it easier to enter asset information, it would also make me more confident in the outputs in that that the expected rates of return better reflect the actual composition of my portfolio rather than some average/ideal portfolio.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Thanks for the suggestion!

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    OK, so I watched the video and got the following basic message: You can create new "scenarios" to things like expenses and or income via future cash flow section, and that otherwise ALL values from Discovery and Foundation apply to all scenarios. But I'm a bit confused though. So assuming I want to try varying certain things in my plan from Foundation section to compare plan results, does that mean I CANNOT use copy functionality/scenarios to do so? For example, in my initial base case I set up a future home purchase in the "Buy a House" tab in Foundation. If I want to now change the home price from $X to $X+$400K (i.e., buy a $400K more expensive house) to see how that impacts the plan, is there a way to do that and retain both the original $X house purchase AND the $X+400K house cases for comparison? If so, that is not intuitively obvious to me how to do that. I looked in the projections table to find the original home purchase to see if I can override it, but the purchase amount does not seem accessible/visible in the table (just the closing costs are visible).

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Yes you can do that using Planning > Projections > Advanced Options. In Planning > Projections you can make multiple scenarios and adjust year-by-year assumptions for Income, Expenses, Contributions and Withdrawals, Debt Payments etc. You can also adjust additional assumptions coming from Discovery and Foundation using the Advanced Options button at the top right of the Projection Table. In Advanced Options you could adjust the home purchase assumptions like amount, timing, mortgage size etc etc.

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    Great platform. Great video. Looking forward to getting more proficient with it and keeping up with the enhancements ongoing.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Thank you! Lots more on the roadmap!

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    Can you provide a bit more insight into what the individual lines represent and what historical data range(s) is(are) used in the Success Rate graphs? It's clear that there is a range of possible outcomes based on historical returns but... For example, What does 10th percentile actually mean? Is it using the 10th percentile of ANNUAL (?) returns for each asset class for a certain range of years? Does it apply the SAME (e.g., average) annual return figure every year, or if not, how does it vary from year to year AT the chosen percentile?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Each line in the Success Rate chart is one period of historical returns (both equity returns, fixed income returns, cash returns, and inflation rates). It’s like you went back in time and started retirement in 1920, or 1929, or 1945, or 1972 etc etc etc. The 10% and 90% are meant to help avoid focusing on the very extreme results, the 10th percentile is the result closest to the 10th percentile for that given year. So if there were 100 lines in the chart then the 10th percentile would be the 10th line from the bottom.

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_ca Got it, thanks. Out of curiosity, how far back do the historical data ranges that you use go back (e.g., is 1920 the first year of the first historical "band" of years")?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      @@markchuchra8399 Its over 100-years of historical data at the moment.

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    Re: Spousal RRSPs. Do we attribute the account to the spouse who does the funding OR the recipient spouse of the funds?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      The platform attributes the Spousal-RRSP to the annuitant (the owner of the account and the person who will eventually withdraw from the Spousal-RRSP). So the balance entered should be for the person withdrawing.

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_cagreat. That makes sense, thank you

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_ca Great, that's what I guessed but good to confirm

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    This video does not discuss the Diversification section on the right... Do those numbers actually drive anything in the calculations / projections? The other thing that is not clear is that the investment return and allocation section includes equities, bonds and cash. But this third column ("Diversification") does not reflect cash. So for example, if someone had a 70/20/10 (stock/bond/cash) asset allocation plan, how does that map to the diversification plan in "column 3"? Do you then "redraw the pie" for just stocks and bonds, ignoring the cash portion? (stock becomes 77.8% and bonds 22.2%)?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Diversification is only use for the Success Rate chart to determine the weighted average variability of investment returns from year to year. Yes the diversification will adjust for Cash if it’s part of your portfolio allocation.

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_ca Thanks. Ahh, okay. I see that the portfolio's geographic (and bond) split is driven by in risk profile questionnaire results. What if my actual geographic target preference split strategy is different (e.g., 40% US, 10% Canada, 25% Global) from the generic diversification splits (i.e., 25% US, 25% Canada, 25% Global) from the risk profile section. Is there a way to adjust to my geo plan targets?

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    I plan to buy a house in the future AND then subsequently sell it, so I filled this section out as described. I see the purchase in the Cash flow expense section. But the strange thing is that I don't see a big corresponding cash flow at the sale date. I do see the selling costs in the cash flow expense chart, but NOT the actual proceeds of the sale. Is that right?? Where do the sale proceeds go?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      That’s a unique situation (most people who are planning to purchase a home aren’t also thinking about selling the same home). If you haven’t already, post these questions to the community forum for more specific guidance… www.reddit.com/r/adviice/

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    I can see how this makes sense if you are working and still drawing a salary. But if you are in early retirement and living off of savings/investment income, this seems to show a massive shortfall in gross income. Should the user be making some sort of adjustments on the income side to make this diagram useful?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Actually that shortfall in cash flow is important because it’s that amount that must be made up through investment withdrawals.

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    Question: How do you fill in the Defined Contribution plan correctly if you are no longer working? In other words, you are no longer making contributions (no more salary going forward) BUT you will be receiving benefits from that plan in the future.

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Typically the DCPP will transition into a LIRA account in that situation, but you can simply enter 0% for the employer and employee contributions.

    • @markchuchra8399
      @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

      @@adviice_ca I have a "Registered Pension Plan (RPP)" and assumed this is the same thing as DCPP, but not sure that is right. Is an RPP the same thing as DCPP, in your parlance? If not, should I add my "RPP" to my other LIRA account total and leave DCPP empty instead?

  • @markchuchra8399
    @markchuchra8399 Місяць тому

    What's the difference between TFSA Savings Contributions and TFSA Contributions? What about TFFHSA?

    • @adviice_ca
      @adviice_ca Місяць тому

      Good question! We do have the FHSA (First Home Savings Account) as an option for first time home buyers. This previous post might help with the difference between TFSA and TFSA Savings… www.reddit.com/r/adviice/comments/1fdyafi/expenses_monthly_savingsdebt_payments/