Відео

Haha, totally get that! Sometimes the best tricks are the hardest to remember. Maybe jot it down in your 'future-you will thank you' list? 😉

It certainly doesn't fit every scenario.

@karbonaterol4966 bro don't hold such opinions. Learn what the market demands. Java has a lot of demands, atleast JVM does.

Ngl, this is what I was expecting.

Hello. Glad you're here.

It’s true that Python’s else in a loop can feel a bit unusual if you’re not used to it!

It's slower but hard to beat the library ecosystem. I have another performance enhancement video coming later this week.

Bad take. Sometimes you have stuff in python, and sometimes you want it to be faster. It’s like telling someone who lives in Chicago and wants to be warm to just move somewhere else instead of letting them buy a coat.

I have something coming up this weekend that's a really simple and very cool way to increase performance and reduce memory usage.

@@beginsecure I’m ready for it brother

This method is only really feasible if you only use it on pure functions

How rewriting on c++ speed-up waiting for 2 seconds?)

Eeeerm ackshually, it's a better idea to remove "time.sleep(2)"

@@jadencorr6897 c++ is like a significantly faster language... though my comment is a joke

Yes, definitely not a good idea to sleep in your code. In the example it's just a stand in for a long running bit of code.

If it’s looking messy, sticking to a standard if-else can definitely be clearer!

It's slower, but hard to beat when it comes to the library ecosystem.

Great point.

also the intentional delay/ waiting is removed now

"they" it's just a curiosity hook

The walrus operator (:=) is typically used when you want to assign a value and use it in an expression immediately, which is why it’s not really aimed at assigning None. Assigning None usually doesn’t need the walrus operator, as it’s not meant to be used in conditional expressions like other values are.

Haha, fair point! The else in loops is definitely a love-it-or-hate-it feature.

Thanks for your comment! I appreciate the real-world perspective!

@@beginsecure Still, good video!

The walrus operator offers a bit more flexibility for cases where you want to assign and use the result in expressions, especially within conditions. But for simple logic like yours, your method is clean and effective!

​@@beginsecure Yes you are right also walrus is good with generators! Now instead of looping as if generator is an array, you can yield till null. Which is better for memory and more functional overall.

Wow, thanks for the kind words. It's tough to make stuff that doesn't get a lot of views. I'll see if I can make something a bit more engaging and continue on. Take care!

@@beginsecure- It would be much appreciated. Thanks in Advance!!

it’s definitely a controversial feature!

Ben? Not sure I understand.

​@@beginsecureWait, this supposed to be on another video, I don't know how it end up here, sr.

I’m glad you found it helpful! Thanks for watching.

Yep, you’ve got it! The else in a while loop only runs if the loop ends naturally-meaning it didn’t break out early.

Yeah, the walrus operator is new to a lot of developers, so it just takes a bit of getting used to. Once you get the hang of it, it’s actually pretty intuitive!

Sort of, although Python has a ternary operator too. Here's a simple example: age = 18 status = "Adult" if age >= 18 else "Minor" print(status)

Thanks for the comment. The else just runs if the while loop completes normally.

Hello, if I understand, the version I installed in the video is older than the version you found when you went to search for it, is that right? If so, that's fine, new releases are coming out all the time, so use the latest that works for your platform. If the question is something else, let me know. Thanks for watching!

Hello, thanks and yes you are right. I need a quality control check to make sure I do that. I didn't realize it until after I'd published. Thanks for watching!

Python is full of a lot of gems like this. Thanks for watching!!