Відео

Great content and teaching to edify The Body of Christ. Thank you

Praise God! Good one Prithvi 👍

god bless u nana

God bless you abundantly Prithvi

What a morning! Thank you God . Thank you Prithvi it was wonderful

Awesome Boy...

Awesome message 👏 God bless you Prithvi

God bless you chinna babu ❤

Thanks for your message Mike. Just the encouragement I needs.

The video is great I like it very nice

LOL. Actually I stopped reading the Bible years ago because I discovered it was a contradicting and self-serving piece of nonsense that was written by uneducated and superstitious men. It truly has no place in modern society.

Praise god🙏🏻🙏🏻

Thank you Caleb for bring a simple, clear, and powerful truth to us. That in baptism our old lives were buried, that we are therefore (buried) to sin. That in our lives, our house can not be divided, part of it living as we used to in our old life of sin and death, and in the other, living like free and blessed believers who follow Jesus. Its strange to think we can prevent God from knowing about parts of our lives we haven't surrendered to him, instead come into the full truth that we are free completely, that we can join together in full worship of him and what has done for us. Mark chapter 3, verse 22-27. Romans 6:3, 6-8.

Excellent word , thankyou

Faith Rises to the level of your hope. Natural hope will not increase your faith as it is dependent on probability. Living hope is backed by the assurance in God (his word/promises/character, actions, spiritual gifts), and therefore increases our faith when we act upon it, centring our actions on the Kingdom of God and his righteousness. Living in hope is released by the revelation that 1. Christ was/is raised from the dead. 2. knowing/acting upon the knowledge that Christ is living in you. 3. knowing that the spirit has been given to you as a deposit guaranteeing our salvation as a down payment of eternity (where we will be like Christ). In conclusion, as a Christian you know that Christ was raised from the dead, lives in you via the holy spirit, who himself IS a deposit of eternity. These spiritual facts are the spiritual anchor which makes certain our hope in eternity, and the assurance of our faith. Imitate Jesus now, as we will reflect him in eternity.

Hello, I am moving to Swansea and I have been trying to find a way to contact the church since I can't call directly from my country, how can I get you?

ᎮᏒᎧᎷᎧᏕᎷ 😏

Blessings

So this one will definitely be preserved for the history books. Hilarious 🤣

What an insightful conversation... Amazing!

This series is so powerful. It’s practical and real.

There is absolutely nothing mysterious about Biblical "tongues" - and there is only one type - when referring to something spoken, they are nothing more than real, rational language(s); usually unknown to those listening to them, but always known by the speaker(s) - it’s their native language (in some cases, it is a language the speaker has learned). In contrast, the “tongues” Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians are producing today is an entirely self-created phenomenon. It is non-cognitive non-language utterance; random free vocalization based upon a subset of the existing underlying sounds (called phonemes) of the speaker’s native language, and any other language(s) the speaker may be familiar with or have had contact with. It is, in part, typically characterized by repetitive syllables, plays on sound patterns, alliteration, assonance, and over-simplification of syllable structure. It is also interesting to note that any disallowed sound combinations, i.e. consonant clusters, in the speaker’s native language are also disallowed in his/her tongues-speech. Further, this subset of phonemes typically contains only those sounds which are easiest to produce physiologically. There is absolutely _nothing_ that “tongues-speakers” are producing that cannot be explained in relatively simple linguistic terms. Conversely, when it comes to something spoken, there are absolutely _no_ Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s), though it may not be the explanation you want to hear, and it may be one which is radically different from what you believe, or were taught. _Nowhere in the Bible is modern tongues-speech advocated or evidenced._ “Praying in the Spirit” does _not_ refer to the words one is saying. Rather, it refers to how one is praying. In the three places it is used (Corinthians, Ephesians, and Jude), there is absolutely zero reference to 'languages' in connection with this phrase. “Praying in the Spirit” should be understood as praying in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. In Pentecostal/Charismatic parlance however, the phase has come to be equated with modern “tongues”, i.e. when one “prays in the Spirit”, it signifies that one is typically engaged in some form of tongues-speech. The word “tongue(s)” itself is simply a more archaic word for (real) “language(s)”, nothing more. Replace “tongue(s)” with “language(s)” in these various passages and the whole modern Pentecostal/Charismatic concept of “tongues” begins to become difficult to posit - “language(s)” sounds a lot less mysterious, and in many cases, adds more clarity to the text. Again, in Pentecostal/Charismatic parlance however, the word has come to be equated with the modern concept of “tongues-speech”. Most people who use ‘tongues’ are very keen on describing the ‘experience’. Indeed, for those that use it, it is very psychologically, physically, and spiritually fulfilling. It’s almost like primal screaming. When people practice ‘tongues’, they feel a sense of sweet release and inner peace, in that virtually all stress can be gone after the experience. People describe the experience, but in examining the “mechanics” behind it…well, not so much. When a person has experienced tongues, s/he is absolutely convinced as to the ‘scripturalness’ of his/her experience, and the correctness of his/her doctrinal beliefs - this, despite the overwhelming scriptural absence of anything remotely akin to what they’re doing. I'm not doubting or questioning the 'experience'; as mentioned, glossolalia as the spiritual tool that it is, can be very powerful and, for many people, the experience is profound. As one commenter put it, “Speaking in tongues distracts the ego/analytical/conscious mind while leaving the subconscious (the heart) wide open to import the divine." Both the spiritual and physical benefits of using this tool are also well documented. Again though, it is important to note that this same statement can be made for virtually _any_ other culture that practices glossolalia. Religious and cultural differences aside, the glossolalia an Evenki Shaman in Siberia, a vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian tongues-speaker in Alabama are producing are in no way different from each other. They’re all producing their glossolalia in the exact same way; they just have different explanations and beliefs as to why they’re doing it, and where it comes from. “Tongues” is to some Christian believers a very real and spiritually meaningful experience but consisting of emotional release via non-linguistic ‘free vocalizations’ at best; non-cognitive non language utterance - the subconscious playing with sounds to create what is perceived and interpreted as actual, meaningful speech. “In _some_ cases, I would argue that it is clearly a self/mass delusion prompted by such a strong desire to “experience God” that one creates that experience via “tongues”. Indeed, as one writer puts it: “You want this to be real. You’ve convinced yourself it’s real. You’re improvising the sounds, but there is nothing about what you’re doing that cannot be explained in natural terms. The only reason it sounds like a language is that you want it to sound like a language. But it’s not.” Known by many different names, “tongues”, “glossolalia”, or more accurately “non-cognitive non-language utterance” (NC-NLU), is practiced by many cultures and religious beliefs from literally all over the world; it is relatively new to Christianity and certainly not unique to it. As a point of note, I’m a Linguist, and let me also add here that I am neither a so-called ‘cessationist’ nor a ‘continuationist’ - I do not identify with either term; in fact, I had never heard the two terms until just late in 2016. As far as I’m concerned, quite frankly, since the Biblical reference of “tongues” is to real, rational languages, obviously “tongues” haven’t “ceased”; as far as I’ve been able to ascertain, people still speak. Another aspect of the modern tongues phenomenon is, of course, the concept of ‘interpretation’. “Interpretation of tongues”, which goes hand-in-hand with ‘speaking in tongues’, may also be said to be a self-created phenomenon. Interpretation is a ‘spiritual improv’ of sorts, inspired by one’s deep faith and beliefs. What do I mean by this? Well…. Interpretations are typically characterized by being inordinately longer than the actual glossic utterance, rather generic and non-specific in nature, and perhaps not surprisingly, open to multiple non-related ‘interpretations’. In other words, have ten interpreters listen to a glossic string and you’ll get ten different (typically unrelated) “interpretations”. In ‘tongues’, ‘The big brown dog is slow’, can also be ‘The small white cat is quick’. These latter two characteristics (‘generic-ness’ and multiple interpretations) do not suggest anything that is divinely inspired. It fails even the most basic tests and criteria that define ‘communication’ itself. A common come-back to the multiple interpretation issue is that God/the Holy Spirit gives different interpretations to different people. As one writer put it rather succinctly, “Pentecostal Darwinism does not exist - there’s no mutation or transformation of one message into several for the sake of justifying what is an obvious discrepancy. If this were the case, it would completely eradicate the need for ‘tongues’ in the first place”.

Often at work in my job, I’d become stuck for a solution to something. I’d walk away from my desk, ask God for wisdom and bang-the answers would come, crystal clear. Sometimes it was with a huge complicated spreadsheet or a way to deal with Government departments. Praise God

Really enjoyed your Sermon about our unlimited, incredible God, Ollie!

Mr Burden is that you?

8:10 best part

Love the gherkin and paste sandwich

Yes Cedric my guy

Brilliant