Відео

😮👍✅

Do you have conversion kit for ford transit ?

I hope after February things will be corrected.

LOL designed by xx😂

Volvo did that in B4 too...

Mercedes M274, 1.6 Liter, 156 bhp, 200.000 km, 7.5 l/100 km. No oil consumption, no chain sounds. Good engine.

This is just an Ad. This belt is just for the oil pump and it never brakes.

Something else modern engines have which I just don't understand is how tiny the oil pickup screen is, less surface area means it's much quicker to clog up. If you look at oil pumps from the 50s and 60s such as a Volvo B20 engine, they have huge pickups that would never clog.

Guess why is vw close to bankruptcy ?

I got an EV, so no more engine troubles and excellent performance for well beyond 100k km!

Wet belt what a stupid idea

My 3.8 v6 mustang is awesome. She's also super cheap to repair.

I don´t rcognize this problem at all. Maybe beacause i drive an elctric car 🙂

Selling you an car 👍 sell you an engine for your new car 👌👌👌

Who the hell had the brilliant idea of putting a belt embebed in oil?

What about the oil chain tensioner?

Thank you guys! been waiting for someone to make this conversion kit 😁

Motor manufacturers don't give a rat's ass about their customers. These days they only care about how much money they can wring out of every person able to afford a new car. They do things like offering a subscription service for heated seats. That is the way they think. Money, money and more money is what Volkswagen needs after their diesel emission scam. They broke the law but were caught out and now they want their customers to pay for that.

The 2.0 liter engine in the ford ranger has also a belt for driving the oilpump; it´s the same problem.

😂😂😂 The motor is junk at the first oil change.

Yeah.... I'll stick to my slow underpowered V8s. Sure, just shy of 400 horses crank isn't a lot for a 6l these days, but at least the engine isn't torpedoing itself.

The engine is not designed for a timing chain. Just don't buy the car or sell it.

Modern cars are not sustainable.

Would never by Peugeot or Citroen just because wet timing belt. Never

Chain rulezzz. You're genius!

3:04 - old sprockets look similar size, when new oil pump sprocket is noticably smaller, so now oil pum will rotate much faster? 3:28 chain looks bit loose?

Quick question. What exactly engines is he talking about? I had lots of old and modern VW diesel cars, with hundreds of thousands of miles on them, and never heard anything about something like that. Just replaced timing belt , when it has to be replaced. That's all.

I am wondering which EV cars are also using wet belt for their lubricating oil pump.

Deze aandrijfriemen blijven een probleem. In olie totaal krankzinnig, droog stom en milieu onvriendelijk. Gewoon tandwielen of een zware ketting. Het gewicht en wat minder toerental van de motor zijn beter voor levensduur. Dus beter voor milieu als dat bij fabrikanten een rol zou spelen. Jaren heb ik geprobeerd als motor ontwikkelende op een fabriek het tegen te houden. Maar er was niet tegen te praten, de fabrikanten van de riemen waren te machtig. En de ingenieurs op de fabriek te slap.

Everyone seems to be switching to this wet belt. Honda, Ford, GM, New 3.0 Duramax has a wet belt. VW.

long live om606

Ford 1.0 3cyl ecoboost same problem. Madness.

A very true title statement....

Iv had many 2.0tdi vw diesel engines and never had problem with oil pump belt. Iv just done a crank seal leak in 2017 2.0tdi skoda superb. Replaced belt and found it to be perfectly good with no bits in oil strainer. Sounds like your talking of fords. Your facts are wrong in this instance.

My 99 Sierra has 230k and gets 60psi cold idle oil pressure LMAO.

Loads are tge same now...PSA..Ford..Honda.. absolutely worse idea ever..belt in oil.

they could have added hybridation instead of downsizing. see the prius prime : good old 1.8L 4cyl on atkinson cycle , with an electric motor it becomes one of the most economical engines, with excelent durability. Also it's often not used at all on a PHEV, so less wear than usual.

We work on the EA288 day in day out and during cam belt changes we see the usual crank oil seal leak often, therefore we see the wet belt (also used on the previous EA189) and never see a problem. With the EA288 I would be more worried by the ticking time bomb stupid M6 cam sprocket setting screw falling out and twating the tensioner or falling into the front cover and punching into the sump. Anyway, where is the chain tensioner? Looks like a solution looking for a problem that doesn’t exist but I agree the 1% fuel saving is stupid, the modern car is sacrificed on the alter of Carbon Dioxide.

In VW group, this problem is exaggerated in this video. This tiny belt can snap, or lost some tooths which was stuck in oil pickup tube mostly results in low oil pressure warning, but can last far more than 300000km. But wet oil belt in Peugeot / Citroen is nigtmare which damaging engines in less than 60-80-100000km far sooner than belt inspection/replace interval.

Reliability is very important to me. Many of the large displacement engines produced in America are Overhead valve engines. Although these engines have been in use successfully for over 70 yrs the engines today now have timing issues. Either it is the timing chain system on smaller engines, or the lifters on the OHV engines. To gain a less than 1 km/l the industry has developed roller lifters to reduce friction. These lifters have needle bearing and if the oil is not kept absolutely clean (the manufacturers recommend 10,000 miles before changing oil) the bearings will fail. Once a bearing fails the cam shaft starts to be ground down by the lifter butting metal filings through out the engine. One small part destroys an engine. It can of course be rebuilt but that will cost upwards of $10,000.00 all because of a poorly designed part and long oil change intervals. Lifter failure is not uncommon on Hemi engines in less than 50k miles. The Hemi tick can start at a low mileage and as you drive keeps grinding the cam shaft down and filling the oil with metal shavings. This is insane. Buying a $100,000.00 pickup truck and it only lasts 100k miles before you need to install a new engine (the engine cost $10k and installation is another $5k. Why would you buy this and put yourself through this type of grief.

Whats up with this neo-liberal bulls*@# channel spitting propaganda that keeps popping up in my feed? Cars are unreliable and break down? Its the policies we are forced to create to avoid dieing out and not the unstopable greed of our economic system expressed through planned obsolescence, reliability and ease of service. And of course commends are filled with climate change deniars and neo-lib clowns. Holy Sh@# can't wait for our species to disappear. Edit: Litterally went on a 8 min explenation that the oil pump is insufficient and somehow this is caused by... clean regulations? And of course theres also the product placement at the end because we have to keep producing, consuming and throwing away.

It doesn't really matter which belt is in the oil. The belt driving the oil pump is even more important. How long will your engine last if that belt fails. The timing system is important as well, but the oil pump is the heart of the engine. No pressurized oil, no motor. Anyway you look at it that belt should be replaced with a chain. The manufacturer could have done that in the first place, but it would have cost another $1.00 so they opted for you buying a new car every 5 yrs instead of making this engine last longer. Not the politicians, but the bean counters. Saving $1.00 per car and selling a million cars will save a lo of money, but the reliability and reputation of the brand will be lost. Personally I would would research the car before buying and if there is a wet rubber belt driving anything in the engine, I won't buy the car. Period. Great job changing the belt for a chain. Unfortunately a kit to replace these belts wouldn't sell in America. It is hard enough to get people to check their oil or even change it on time, let alone spend money to fix a design failure in the engine. We have become a throw away society and this will come back to bite us sometime.

D4a did a great video on this topic, worked out that the wet belt would save you maybe 100 euros a year, however the belt change costs way more than a normal belt, needs doing more frequently and let's not even mention how much it'll cost if/when it goes horribly wrong. How the wet belt is still a thing boggles the mind

The new ford 1.6l is a good example

The 1990s 1hz will last forever

Where is tension for the oil pump chain?

Great news. Now you just need to make all the plastic parts metal, get rid of the GDI system and the turbo. And you finally have engine at least half as reliable as a old American pushrod V8. lol

Let me tell you my example. I changed this driving belt of the pump in my t5 at the age of 11 years and after 430k kms and the drive belt did not show any I repeat ANY visible wear in my 2011 model year 2.0 tdi ea 189.

Thanks for this! I own the mentioned 1.6 TDI, and it's nearing 400,000 km. I was planning to replace the oil pump belt during the next timing belt change, but with this, my little car will last longer.

Honestly I dont mind this belt. Replaced many of them while doing timing belt. Cars had 120 000- 400 000km. Oil pump belts were always in good shape except one which had over 500 000 km. And even that one did not fail cmpletelly, it was just cracked. If it works good and is easily serviceable I dont care how its cinstructed. Your chain might even last shorter than original belt. Look how small the diameter of sprockets is. Thats going to be pretty hard on the chain. Also no tensioner at all.