Відео

@cmdmeat6579 no, thank you for the kind words and support. Seriously. Any support means a lot.

@daviddaniels9551 i can't thank you enough for the kind words, support and i love that you saw all the details I put into this. Thank you, David. You just made the beginning of my 2025.

@@stuarture4749 ok, literally the best compliment! You have no idea how much it would mean to me to one day work with sideshow. Sigh....one day. Lol.

Thank you!!

@@Kurtsculpts hey! No prob! Hope it helps, my friend.

@MerdaLegal hey! I hope it helps. Everyone has a different process and pipeline, this is the one that works for me.

@ChristianRivera-y3p first off, sorry for my delayed reply to your comment/question. Secondly, thank you for the kind words and support. I REALLY appreciate it. As far as something more detailed, no I don't but if you want to cover or go over some specifics in this area, don't hesitate to reach out via IG or ArtStation. I'd be more than happy to help or talk shop. 🙂

@Ismael.03 No, thank you for the support and kind words! I'm really happy to hear that this brief overview helped. The process isn't complicated, but it can take a while. However, the results never disappoint in my opinion. 😀

Hi, first off, thank you for the support and kind words. Second of all, yes you can both. The way I would do it but only wrap certain aspects of the model is mask it off. That way you're only wrapping parts that are not masked.

@@somuch3d Thank you for the info! I have udims on my mesh and it is polygrouped based on uv. I guess hiding polygroups might work like masking. Definitely will give it a try. Just finished the sculpting & UV unwrapping phase, currently looking into texturing step. Wrapping/projecting and procedural generation are two relatively easier methods I have run into.

@@somuch3d lol, I have tested out both masking/hiding methods, and ended up redoing the mapping 3 times on the scanned head. I'm writing feedback here so anyone else run into this situation might skip the headache. We're morphing the scanned head into the shape of our own sculpted character, and therefore, the scanned head cannot have hidden parts. To avoid wrapping unwanted parts such as mouth bag, we need to mask it off, but DO NOT hide it away by polygroup selection. If anything is hidden away, ZWrap can wrap successfully, but the scanned head will not change shape after exiting ZWrap menu. For our own sculpted character, it's safe to hide part of it by polygroup selection, since we're not changing the shape of it. For example, I have a full body character, and I can hide away the body and the mouth bag, only keep the head displayed.

Hello and sorry for the late reply to this comment. I must have missed it. I did merge of the two pieces and a quick retopo in zbrush. Creased the edges and subdivided.

Thank you!

nevermind found your Twitch channel..thanks brooooooooooo

@@DanielAlva360 thank you so incredibly much for the kind words and supporting my work.

Hi! Thank you for the kind words, I'm happy to hear you found it helpful!

Thank you for the kind words and support

Thank you so much for saying that! It's been a couple of years but I'm still really happy with how he came out. Definitely one of my fav projects.

@@somuch3d it just showed up since all the news with Sabretooth in deadpool 3 has been confirmed but man you sir out did yourself. He's my favorite marvel villain

Thank you! LOKI was awesome. Totally inspired me to makes this and capture the moment of Glorious Purpose! Thank you for watching and support.

@@somuch3d I am truly grateful to you. I found you while looking for a zwrap workflow. I think it was a tutorial using zwrap and projection, and it was really realistic. Thank you for sharing your core workflow with others. I still can't use the vface source properly, but I won't give up.

I'm honored to help and equally grateful for the support. If you have artstation or ig, send me a message and perhaps i can help out further or see what issue you're having. Again, thank you for the support. Always a pleasure to share and talk art.

@@somuch3d thank you sir, I just follow your instagram. have a great day

Hello! I'm glad you like her! Thank you for watching and thank you so much for the kind words and support. It really means a lot. 🙏🏼💙

@@somuch3d You are welcome! All the best for future projects

I'll say this, it takes time and a lot of patience to do or learn anything you're passionate about. But It's never too late to starr and there's an infinite amount of resources to learn from. 🙂

Thank you so much for the kind words and support. I'm glad you liked Madelyne Pryor!

Thank you for your comment and question. Yes, easy solution. Mask off the area like the mouth so it's not included in the wrapping process. I forget to do this sometimes as well. 😉

@@somuch3d yeah I've solved thanks, i'm new to zBrush, I moved from Blender recently, zBrush UI make me crazy. Thanks for your answer!

Absolutely. Yes, the zbrush ui can be a bit jarring at first but customization really helps make it your own. Happy zbrushing and thank you again for your support!

Thank you so much for the kind words and support!

What do you mean by "good use"? Games can't be this detailed for another 5+ years without crashing frame rates. Most the independent artists are showing off static 3D models. Put that level of detail and rig it up in a game while moving and FPS would take a serious hit. That being said there are a few games that show off what UE5 can do like ArcheAge II / State of Decay 3/ The Witcher 4 to name a few.

Nothing a little research can't clear up, friend. I'd recommend Looking up a list of games developed using unreal 5 and the list of games currently being developed. Not to mention the numerous companies currently using metahuman characters and shaders. Considering the list of games created using unreal 4, it's safe to say, the next 10 years could widely use 5. Plus the countless industries using unreal as a destination hub for media and display. I just wrapped work with 2 different game studios currently working with unreal 5. That said, this level of detail is not outside the new standards and spec level of next gen character creation. 250k tris 4 4k texure sets. Also, this character is rigged and posed. Plus, considering the character is the only mesh on screen, processing fine real time. Thank you for viewing and comments. Opening discussions and talking art is always fun for me. Cheers!

@@somuch3d Just curious, but could current "average" graphics cards like the Rtx 2080 or Rtx 3060 handle this level of detail fully rigged and animated in a game running 60+ fps? Seems like current games using UR 5 have a lot less detail in the people models/ environment which I thought was mostly due to hardware limitations.