Відео

0:03 / 10:05 The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! US Railway 2.78K subscribers Subscribe 13 Share Download Clip Save 127 views 1 day ago #CONNECTNEC2037 #NortheastCorridorUpgrade #AmtrakRailExpansion The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! #CONNECTNEC2037, #NortheastCorridorUpgrade, #AmtrakRailExpansion, #BidenInfrastructurePlan, #USRailTransportation, #GreenhouseGasReduction … 4 Comments Boopty Doop Add a comment... @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes 100%😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago I always want California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak and I always love California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak.😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes and yeah of course California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak

0:03 / 10:05 The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! US Railway 2.78K subscribers Subscribe 13 Share Download Clip Save 127 views 1 day ago #CONNECTNEC2037 #NortheastCorridorUpgrade #AmtrakRailExpansion The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! #CONNECTNEC2037, #NortheastCorridorUpgrade, #AmtrakRailExpansion, #BidenInfrastructurePlan, #USRailTransportation, #GreenhouseGasReduction … 4 Comments Boopty Doop Add a comment... @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes 100%😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago I always want California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak and I always love California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak.😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes and yeah of course California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak

0:03 / 10:05 The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! US Railway 2.78K subscribers Subscribe 13 Share Download Clip Save 127 views 1 day ago #CONNECTNEC2037 #NortheastCorridorUpgrade #AmtrakRailExpansion The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! #CONNECTNEC2037, #NortheastCorridorUpgrade, #AmtrakRailExpansion, #BidenInfrastructurePlan, #USRailTransportation, #GreenhouseGasReduction … 4 Comments Boopty Doop Add a comment... @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes 100%😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago I always want California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak and I always love California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak.😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes and yeah of course California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak

0:03 / 10:05 The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! US Railway 2.78K subscribers Subscribe 13 Share Download Clip Save 127 views 1 day ago #CONNECTNEC2037 #NortheastCorridorUpgrade #AmtrakRailExpansion The POWERFUL State Facts of the NEC C37 RAILWAY Plan! #CONNECTNEC2037, #NortheastCorridorUpgrade, #AmtrakRailExpansion, #BidenInfrastructurePlan, #USRailTransportation, #GreenhouseGasReduction … 4 Comments Boopty Doop Add a comment... @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes 100%😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago I always want California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak and I always love California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak.😮 2 Reply @osmanhossain676 12 hours ago Yes and yeah of course California High-Speed Rail in California and futures Amtrak

Looooooooooooool - they can do it in Japan, they can do it in so many other countries and continents across the world, even here in Australia, we are looking to try and build some here on our east coast, with a population of 25 or 26 million people. I bet California has a population well above that.

not really. High speed trains will help save us from the full effects of climate change. And that is worth any price.

Slow to get it built yes, but huge benefits when it's finally open.

The people that currently drive or fly from one end of California to another for work or leisure.

All the people who drive and fly between the cities right now

As an Aussie, professionals who are sick of driving everywhere in congested traffic, and want that time back to themselves. The younger generations who are more likely to believe in man made climate change. They likely live in San Francisco or L.A. but want to commute to the other.

When this line opens, you’ll be surprised!

They do have oversight. They’re being audited every year and are being very transparent with their spending. All that info is available on their website. Any sort of ‘wrongdoing’ that you’re hearing may be on the contractors (I have heard things about the ones building CP 1 and 2-3, namely with all the change orders), not CHSRA itself.

The section from San Francisco to San Jose is completely done.

Bright Line makes it's money off real estate development rather than operational income. Rancho Cucuamonga is as decent point as a catch basin for Orange County and Inland Empire without having the huge expense of rail/electrification to Union Station. Plus they can develop the site or charge parking fees.

Are you ok?

Are you ok?

Why hasn't Amtrak added a DAILY train from Houston to San Antonio and Houston to Dallas? Texas is tired of being IGNORED and SCREWED by Amtrak. How large does Texas have to grow before Amtrak ADDS significant long distance services to Texas? Houston to Denver, Dallas to Atlanta, Houston to Orlando, and Dallas to Kansas City?

Currently an 8 hour road trip between KCY and MIN (Mineola TX) takes 25 hours and costs $123 one way. I’d love to have service between KCY and Galveston just for the convenience of taking a cruise without the complications of ground transportation.

@@ronclark9724because the Texas government doesn’t want to fund it

Oh wow, perpetual motion machine. Fun fact: the hardest part of making one is hiding the battery

Maby we just throw it back..

Well, frankly the FREIGHT is much more important to the economy than having passenger arrive to their destinations sooner... As in the novel and film Dune, THE SPICE MUST FLOW...

The freight trains pays for the upkeep of the rails on which Amtrak's rides on so maybe they should get priority over Amtrak

@@davidhill3724 I'm not saying they shouldn't but that's the problem that Amtrak has. In order for Amtrak to really prosper they have to build their own network of track. Free from freight cars. That's going cost over 50 billion+ and decades long work.

No, for Amtrak to prosper they have to stop screwing up! Their equipment choices suck!

Chicago to Vegas or Miami is irrelevant. Even in Japan or Europe such distances are not done by train. First the regional HS and regional commuter connections (Proper NEC hs connectionsTexas-OKC , California, Chicago/Midwest, Cascadia ) ..

@@lws7394 that's because the United States is much much larger than Europe and Japan

@@lws7394 Japan is small than the state of California

@@harjabenharris4510 The golden rule for HSR journeys is 3hr, with a max to 5 hr. For longer the train is just not competitive. One of the fastest corridors is Paris-Bordeaux with 600km in a whopping 2 hr. With such incredible speed one could do 1500km in 5hr. Whether that distance Paris-Madrid ever becomes competitive still has to be seen. Denver-Las Vegas (1200km with no serious cities in between) through the Rocky Mountains will not make sense to justify the massive investments of building HS rail through the Rockies. It is as ridiculous as the Chinese HS rail line through the western desert to Urumqi in the Uygur region. such incredible speed one could do 1500km in 5hr

@@harjabenharris4510 🙂 Americans .... The distance San Diego to Vancouver is 1900km. The distance from Nagasaki in the south via Tokyo to Sapporo in the north is 2500km ! One difference is that those Westcoast states and BC have a pop. of 55mln , whereas Japan has twice that population with major cities every 250km. The 1000km between San Fransisco and Portland have mostly mountains and forests, really not suitable for to build a fast rail.. But of course those regions mentioned before should have good hsr !

That seems to be the biggest issue with US rail infrastructure at the moment.

Well the current rolling stock needs to be replaced to maintain current levels of service. To expand further from that will require additional investment.

They have the money, but nothing they buy works.

That’s still cheaper then highways

@@tonyburzio4107 would help if they just bought rails/land for straightening the track, or removing grade crossings, etc.-. It’s a lot harder for those to go wrong.

Ok, Phase 1 AND 2. Phase 1 they already have $28 billion available, $13 billion of which has been spent across the entire project (construction, land acquisitions, environmental clearance, ‘bookend’ projects like Caltrain electrification, legal challenges, etc.). Their base cost estimate for SF-Anaheim is currently $106 billion (high end is $128 billion). They need up to $7 billion more to complete Merced-Bakersfield, $4.7 billion of which they’re now competing for in future IIJA grants.

The fact that all the blue states are doing worse than ever especially California and yet people like you still wish Kamala to win is beyond unbelievable. Lol

The fact that all the blue states are doing worse than ever especially California and yet people like you still wish Kamala to win is beyond unbelievable. Lol

The fact that all the blue states are doing worse than ever especially California and yet some people still wish Kamala to win is beyond unbelievable. Lol

The fact that all the blue states are doing worse than ever especially California and yet people like you still wish Kamala to win is beyond unbelievable. Lol

yes that’s a good thing

I don't think I-lint is capable of operating at high speeds and hydrogen power trains aren't very energy efficient.

@@aGame284 Doesn't matter All that matters is to achieve net zero carbon emissions and H is the only way to do that.

@@johndunbar7504 biggest priority is the speed, and electric is the only way to do that, also zero emissions

@@duncanholden2826 Wrong on all counts. Alstom tested the i-lint in my home country of Canada.for many months last winter. Results showed that it matched or exceeded diesel and electric trains in all performance characteristics (the i-lint is ultimately electric at the power wheels). These results satisfied German railways who ordered a dozen trains after that. p.s. electric trains are not `zero emissions'.They have all sorts of environmental proiblems in production.

@@johndunbar7504 <-- I don't know what you're smoking but there is no way hydrogen fueled is more efficient than overhead power lines. I'm guessing you are eating up the company propaganda. Someday there may be a use for hydrogen fuel, but it won't be trains. It is going to be something that cannot be plugged into the grid.